بررسی مقایسه‌ای رابطه بین سبک‌های تفکر و راهبردهای یادگیری با عملکرد تحصیلی در میان دانشجویان دختر دانشگاههای دولتی و آزاد یزد
الموضوعات : فصلنامه زن و جامعه
1 - استادیار گروه روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه یزد
الکلمات المفتاحية: عملکرد تحصیلی, راهبردهای یادگیری, سبک‌های تفکر, دانشگاه دولتی, دانشگاه آزاد,
ملخص المقالة :
این پژوهش با هدف مقایسه رابطه سبک‌های تفکر و راهبردهای یادگیری با عملکرد تحصیلی دانشجویان دختر دانشگاههای دولتی و آزاد یزد انجام گرفت. این پژوهش از نوع توصیفی – همبستگی بود. با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری طبقه‌ای تعداد 195 دانشجوی دختر از دانشگاه دولتی یزد و 130 دانشجوی دختر از دانشگاه آزاد یزد انتخاب و مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند. برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از نمونه مورد مطالعه از سه پرسشنامه سبک‌های تفکر استرنبرگ- واگنر، راهبردهای یادگیری ASSIST و عملکرد تحصیلی درتاج استفاده گردید. داده‌ها با استفاده ازنرم افزار SPSS و با روش ضریب همبستگی پیرسون، رگرسیون چندگانه مدل ورود (اینتر) و آزمون t تجزیه و تحلیل شد. نتایج نشان دادند که: بین تمام سبک‌های تفکر و رویکرد یادگیری عمیق و راهبردی با عملکرد تحصیلی رابطه مثبت و معنا داری وجود دارد و تنها بین راهبرد یادگیری سطحی با عملکرد تحصیلی رابطه معناداری بدست نیامد. هم‌چنین، از متغیر سبک‌های تفکر، سبک تفکر سلسله‌مراتبی، محافظه کار و کلی و از متغیر راهبردهای یادگیری، تنها رویکرد یادگیری راهبردی در پیش‌بینی عملکرد دانشجویان سهیم بودند و در نهایت، یافته‌ها نشان داد دانشجویان دو دانشگاه در متغیر سبک تفکر آزاداندیش و راهبردهای یادگیری عمقی و راهبردی تفاوت معنا دار دارند. با توجه به یافته‌های بدست آمده می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که سبک‌های تفکر و راهبردهای یادگیری نقش مؤثری را در عملکرد تحصیلی ایفا می‌کند.
المصادر:
1-Adams, G. R. (1998). Objective measure of identity of status, a manual on
theory and test construction. Unpublished manuscript, University of Guelph.
2-AK, S. (2011). The effects of computer supported problem based learning on
students approaches to learning. Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 1-19.
3-Albaili, M. A. (2007). Differences in thinking styles among low average and
high-achieving college students. Proceedings of the 13th International
Conference on Thinking, Norrkoeping, Sweden, 5-10.
4-Ali Bawaneh, A. K., Kanesan Abdullah, A. G., Saleh, S., & Yin Yin, K.
(2011). Jordanian students thinking styles based on herrmann whole brain
model. International Journal of Humanities and social science, 1(9), 89-97.
5-Atkinson, S. (1998). Cognitive style in context of design and technology
project work: Education Psychology. An International Journal of Experimental
Educational Psychology, 18(2), 183-194.
6-Bernardo, A. B., Zhang, L. F., & Caluueng, C. M. (2002). Thinking styles and
academic achievement among Filipino student. The Journal of Genetic
Psychology, 163, 149-163.
7-Borromeo Ferri, R. (2012). Mathematical thinking styles and their influence
on teaching and learning mathematics. 12th International Congress on
Mathematical Education, pp. abcde-fghij.
8-Byrne, M., Flood, B., Willis, p. (2009). An inter institutional exploration of
the learning approaches of students studying accounting. International Journal
of Teaching and Learning in High Education, 20(2), 55-167.
9-Cano, F. & Berben, A. B. G. (2009). University students achievement goals
and approaches to learning in mathematics. British Journal of Educational
Psychology, 79, 131- 153.
10-Cano-Garcia, F., & Hughes, E. H. (2000). Learning and thinking styles: An
analysis of their inter relationship and influence on academic achievement.
Educational Psychology, 20(4), 413-430.
11-Castells, M. (2004). The power of identity: the information age: economy,
society, and culture, chavshyan (2001). Tehran: Tarh-e-No Publication.
(Persian)
12-Coffield F, Modeley F, Hall E, et al. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy
in post 16 learning: A systematic and critical review. London: Learning and
Skills Research Centre.
13-Demir, A. (2009). Effects of thinking styles and gender on psychological
well-being. Journal of Educational Sciences, 24, 101-111.
14-Diseth, A. (2003). Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of
academic achievement. European Journal of Personality, 17(2), 143-155.
15-Diseth, A., & Martinsen, Y. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style,
and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology,
23(2), 195-207.
16-Dortaj, F. (2004). Study the effect of process and product mental simulation
on students,
improvement of academic performance academic test structure and
validity check. Educational psychology Ph.D. Thesis, Psychology and
Education Department, Allameh Tabatabaei University. (Persian)
17-Dortaj, F., & Moosapour, N. (2005). Evaluation of Educational Performance
of Quota and Nou-quota Student in Humanities. Quarterly Journal of Research
and Planning in Higher Education, 37&38, 79-104. (Persian)
18-Duff, A. (1997). A study on the reliability and validity of a 30-item version
of Entwistle and Tait’s Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory. British
Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 529-539.
19-Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K., & Ferguson, J. (2004). The relationship
between personality, approach to learning and academic performance.
Personality and Individual Differences, 36(8), 1907-1920.
20-Elias, R. Z. (2005). Students approaches to study in introductory accounting
courses. Journal of Education for Business, 12, 194-200.
21-Entwistle, J., & Tait, H. (2000). Approaches to learning, evaluations of
teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher
Education, 19, 169-194.
22-Fathabadi, J., & Seyf, A. (2007). Study the effect of different examination
methods (descriptive or multiple choice exam) on studying approaches and
preparing for exam strategies among university students with high or low
educational achievement. The Journal of Psychology and Education of Shahid
Chamran University of Ahvaz, 14(4), 21-46. (Persian)
23-Gunter, B. (2000). The effects of video games on children, Translated by:
Poor Abedini, H. (2004). Tehran: Javane Roshd Publication. (Persian)
24-Hosseini, H. (2004). Study the effectiveness of teaching the healthy life style
on conditional and unconditional students,
academic performance in Kashan
university, M.A. Thesis, Department of Psychology and Education, Esfahan
University. (Persian)
25-Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self- regulated learning in web- based
environments: instructional tools designed to facilitated cognitive strategy use,
Meta cognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational
Computing Research. 30(1,2), 139-161
26-Kizilgunes, B., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2009). Modeling the relations
among students epistemological beliefs, motivation, learning approach, and
achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 4, 243-256.
27-Lindemann, R., Duek, J.L. (2001). A comparison of changes in dental
students and medical students approaches learning during professional training.
Eur J Dent Educ, 5(4), 162-167.
Maanavipour, D., & Khorasani, B. (2005). Reliability, validity and
standardization of thinking styles questionnaire among university students.
Journal of Modern Thoughts in Education, 1(1), 87-104. (Persian)
28-Marton, F., Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning, outcome
and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
29-Naderi, F., & Safavi, S. A. (2010). The relationship between thinking styles
and functional flexibility with mental health injured women in Ahvaz. New
Findings in Psychology, 5(16), 111-126. (Persian)
30-Narimani, M., Mohammad Amini, Z., Berahmand, U., & Abolghasemi, A.
(2007). A Study of the Relationship Between Psychological Hardiness,
Thinking Styles, Social Skills and Academic Achievement in School Children.
Journal of New Researches in Psychology, 2(5), 93-107. (Persian)
31-Nazarifar, F., Abolghasemi najafabadi, M., Kamali, H., & Hosseini
Hafshjani, T. (2010). On The Relationship Between Thinking Styles and The
Educational Achievenent Among The Students of Engineering, Psychology, and
Education. Curriculum Planning, 25, 1-20. (Persian)
32-Nielsen, S., Plos, K., Furaker, C., & Jakobsson, A. (2012). Authentic
situations motivate medical students for dealing with medical insurance issues.
Creative Education, 3(1), 120-125.
33-Parsa, A., Saketi, P. (2007). Learning approaches, learning results and
students,
perceptions from the implemented curriculum in session and course.
The Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities of Shiraz University, 26(3), 1-
24. (Persian)
34-Pashayi, Z., Taghipour, E., Khoshkonesh, A. (2009). The effect skills
training of emotions confronting on test anxiety and academic performance of
female students. Journal of Applied Psychology, 3(4), 7-20. (Persian)
35-Rastjo, s. (2011). The relationship between learning approaches, tendency to
thinking and academic performance among Yazd University’s M.A. Students in
Humanities, Language and Literature and Engineering. M.A. Thesis, Faculty of
Humanities, Yazd University.
36-Rastjou, S (2011). Study the relation between learning approaches, thinking
orientation and academic performance among M.A. students in human science,
Language and literature and engineering departments of Yazd University. MA
Thesis, Department of Psychology and Education, Faculty of Humanities, Yazd
University. (Persian)
37-Razavi, A., & Shiri, M. (2005). Comparative consideration of relationship
between high-school girls and boys' thinking styles and their academic
achievement. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations, 12, 86-108.
(Persian)
38-Santrock, J. W (2009). Educational psychology (4th Ed.). USA, New York:
McGraw Hill.
39-Sarvghad, S., Rezai, A., & Maasoumi, F. (2011). Relation between thinking
styles with Shiraz pre university boy and girl teenagers,
self-efficacy. Quarterly
Journal of Sociology of Women, 1(4), 133-154. (Persian)
40-Seyf, A. (2008). Modern educational psychology (education and learning
psychology). Tehran: Agah Publication. (Persian)
41-Seyf, A. & Fathabadi, J. (2009). Different approaches to lesson study and the
relationship of study skills with academic achievement, gender and educational
experience of university students. Journal of Daneshvar (Raftar), 33, 29-40.
(Persian)
42-Shams, B., & Farshidfar, M. (1995). A Comparative study of demographic
and personality traits between conditional and unconditional students of Isfahan
medical university. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 2(4), 222-226.
(Persian)
43-Shokri, O., Kadivar, P., Farzad, V., & Daneshvarpour, Z. (2006). The
relationship between thinking styles and learning approaches with educational
achievement of university students. Advances in Cognitive Science, 8(2), 44-52.
(Persian)
44-Shokri, O., Kadivar, P., Farzad, V., sangari, A., & Ghenayi, Z. (2006).
Character strains and thinking styles role on university students, educational
progress: causal models presentation. Journal of Iranian Psychologists, 2(2),
44-52. (Persian)
45-Sterenberg, R. J. (1997). Mental self government: A theory of intellectual
styles and their development. Human Development, 31, 197-224.
46-Sterenberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
47-Wickramasinghe, D. P., & Samarasekera, D. N., (2011). Factors influencing
the approaches to studying of preclinical and clinical students and postgraduate
trainees. BMC Medical Education, 11, 22, 1-7.
48-Yamini, M. (2009). Study the thinking style and perception from clad
learning environment relation with emphasis on social constructivist learning
environment) with learning approaches and consequences among university
students. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Psychology and Education, Tarbiat
Moalem University,. (Persian)
49-Zhang, L. F. (2001). Do thinking styles contribute to academic achievement
beyond self-rated abilities? Journal of Psychology, 135(6), 621-637.
50-Zhang, L. F. (2002). Thinking styles and academic achievement among
Filipino students. Journal of Psychology, 163(2), 69-149.
51-Zhang, L. F. (2003). Does the big five predict learning approaches?
Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1431-1446.
52-Zhang, L. F. (2006). Thinking styles and big five personality traits revisited.
Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1177-1187.
53-Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Are learning approaches and
thinking styles related? A study in two Chinese populations. Journal of
Psychology, 134, 469-489.
