مطالعه ارتباط حکمرانی خوب با تولید و بهره وری کل عوامل در گروهی از کشورهای در حال توسعه و OECD

الموضوعات : فصلنامه علمی -پژوهشی تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی

آیدا آریابد ¹ , رضا مقدسی ² , سید یعقوب زراعت کیش ³

1 - گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی+دانشگاه علوم و تحقیقات تهران
2 - دانشیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات.
3 - استادیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات

تاريخ الإرسال : 05 الثلاثاء , شوال, 1439 تاريخ التأكيد : 09 الثلاثاء , ذو القعدة, 1441 تاريخ الإصدار : 05 الخميس , ربيع الأول, 1442

الکلمات المفتاحية: الگوی پانل, شاخص‌های حکمرانی, کنترل فساد, حاکمیت قانون,

ملخص المقالة :

با توجه به نقش سیاست‌های دولت بر تولید و بهره‌وری کل عوامل تولید در بخش کشاورزی، در این پژوهش به بررسی مقایسه‌ای تأثیر شاخص‌های حکمرانی خوب یعنی حاکمیت قانون، کنترل فساد، کارایی و اثربخشی دولت، کیفیت قوانین، مسئولیت‌پذیری و ثبات سیاسی بر تولید و بهره‌وری کل عوامل تولید در بخش کشاورزی کشورهای منتخب در حال توسعه و OECD در دوره زمانی 2013-2000 با استفاده از الگوهای پانل و 3SLS پرداخته شد. نتایج نشان داد که شاخص‌های حکمرانی بر ارزش تولیدات بخش کشاورزی و بهره‌وری کل عوامل تولید کشورهای در حال توسعه تأثیر منفی و این اثر در گروه کشورهای OECD مثبت است. از بین شاخص‌های شش‌گانه حکمرانی خوب، کنترل فساد با مقدار کشش 079/0- در گروه کشورهای در حال توسعه و حاکمیت قانون با مقدار کشش 075/0 در گروه کشورهای OECD دارای بالاترین تأثیر بر ارزش تولیدات بخش کشاورزی بوده‌اند. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که عدم بکارگیری سیاست‌های مناسب و برنامه‌ریزی از سوی دولت منجر به کاهش ارزش تولید می‌شود.

المصادر:

- Abolhassani, L., Eghbali, F., & Shahnoushi, N. (2015). The empacts of goverance on agricultural efficiency. International Conference of Agricultural Economics, 29th Milan Italy.

- Ahmad, K., & Chin Theng Heng, A. (2012). Determinants of agriculture productivity growth in Pakistan. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 95: 163-172.

- Ajaz, T., & Ahmad, E. (2010). The effect of corruption and governance on tax revenues.  The Pakistan Development Review, 49(4): 405-417.

- Amir Teymouri, S., & Khalilian, S. (2010). The growth of total factor productivity in key sectors of the Iranian economy during the first, second and third development plans. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 18(71): 141-162. (In Persian)

- Azmat, F., & Coghill, K. (2005). Good governance and market-based reforms: a study of Bangladesh. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71: 625- 638.

- Bayyurt, N., Vildan, Z., & Arkan, F. E. (2015). Good goverance and agricultural efficiency. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 6(1): 14-23.

- Bird, A., & Stephan, A. (2015). Governance and taxes: Evidence from regression discontinuity. Journal of Economic Issues, 5(3): 12- 17.

- Boussaidi, A., & Hamed, M. S. (2015). The impact of governance mechanisms on tax aggressiveness: empirical evidence from Tunisian context. Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 5(1): 1-12.

- Brownson, S., Vincent, I., Emmanuel, G., & Etim, D. (2012). Agricultural productivity and macro-economic variable flauctation in Nigeria. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(8): 114-125. Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education.

- Duncan, R., & Pollard, S. (2002). A conceptual framework for designing a country poverty reduction strategy. In: Defining an Agenda for Poverty Reduction: Proceedings of the First Asia and Pacific Forum on Poverty. 1: 91–107.

- Esmaeili, A., & Mehrabi Boshrabadi, H. (2010). The effect of government size on labor productivity and capital productivity in agricultural and industrial sectors in Iran. Agricultural Economics Research, 2(1): 35-52. (In Persian)

- Fan, S., Jitsuchon, S., & Methakunnavut, N. (2004). The importance of public investment for reducing rural poverty in middle-income countries: the case of Thailand. DSGD Discussion Paper No. 7.

- FAO. (2017). FAO Statistical Yearbook. http://www.fao.org/statistics/ yearbook/vol_1_1/index.asp.

- Farajian, L., Maghadasi, R., & Moradi, M. (2012). Study of the effect of infrastructure investments and research and development on the growth of total factor productivity in Iran's agricultural sector. Second National Conference on Economic Development Strategies, Focusing on the Regional Planning Program, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, 9 and 10 Khordad.

- Faye, M.L., McArthur, J.W., Sachs, J.D., & Snow, T. (2004). The challenges facing landlocked developing countries. Journal of Human Development, 5: 31–68.

- Hatef, H., & Karbasi, A. (2013). The role of government in agricultural production and productivity (Case study of Asian Productivity Organization member countries). Agricultural Economics, 7(3): 1-25. (In Persian)

- Herrendorf, B., & Schoellman, T. (2015). Why is measured productivity so low in agriculture? Review of Economic Dynamics, 18(4): 1003-1022.

- Hosseini. S., Pakravan, M., Gilanpour, A., & Eteghaei, M. (2011). The effect of supportive policies on the productivity changes of agricultural sector in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development (Agricultural Science and Technology), 25(4): 507-516. (In Persian)

- Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Lobaton, Z. P. (2003). Governance matters. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

- Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2005). Governance matters IV: governance indicators for 1996–2004. Working Paper, World Bank.

- Law, S.H. & Saini, N.W. (2012). Institutional quality, governance, and financial development  Economics of Governance, 13(3): 217-236.

- Lio, M., & Liu, M. C. (2008). Governance and agricultural productivity: A cross-national analysis. Food Policy, 33: 504- 512.

- Meon, P. G., & Weill, L. (2005). Does better governance foster efficiency? An aggregate frontier analysis. Economics of Governance, 6: 75–90.

- Moazen Jamshidi, S. Moghimi, M., & Akbari, N. (2011). Analysis of the impact of government size on human development in OIC countries (Geographical Weighting Regression Approach). Urban and Regional Studies and Research, 3(8): 95-116. (In Persian)

- Mobarak, A., & Azarpeivand, Z. (2009). A look at good governance indicators from the point of view of Islam and its impact on economic growth. Islamic Economy, 9 (36): 180-208. (In Persian)

- Najafi, B. (2003). The role of agriculture in Iranian economic growth. Proceedings of the Conference on Agriculture and National Development. (In Persian)

- Naruei, M., & Mehrabi Boshrabadi, H. (2015). The Effect of Government Support Policies on Agricultural Productivity in Iran (Panel Data Approach). Quarterly of Parliament and Strategy, 22(83): 101-122. (In Persian)

- Nayebi, H., Ebrahimi, R., & Azadegan, A. (2010). Evaluation and analysis of the factors influencing the growth of total factor productivity in the Iranian economy using Solow residual method. Iranian Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (IEJM), 10(1): 121-140. (In Persian)

- Roe, M., & Siegel, J. (2011). Political instability: Effects on financial development, roots in the severity of economic inequality. Journal of Comparative Economics, 39(3): 279-309.

- Rudra, P. P., & Sanyal, G.S.  (2011). Good governance and human development: evidence form Indian states. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 1(1): 1-8.

- Shahabadi, A., & Ganji, M. (2015). The impact of good governance on economic freedom of the selected MENA countries. Journal of Economics and Regional Development, 22(9): 264-288. (In Persian)

- Shahbazi, K., Sangin abadi, B., & Abdollah nezhad, C. (2013). The impact of governmental credit on total productivity of the factors of Iranian agricultural production. Agricultural Economics and Development, 21(84): 139-160. (In Persian)

- Shujat, A. (2012). The role of agricultural research in Indian productivity. Journal of Indian Economics, 21 (4): pp. 78-89.

- Weibe, K. (2003). Land quality and agricultural productivity. In Linking Land Quality, Agricultural Productivity, and Food Security. Agricultural Economic Report, 823: 19-27.

- World Bank. (2017). World development indicators on CD-ROM. World Bank, Washington, DC.