Enhancing Big Data Governance Framework Implementation Using Novel Fuzzy Frank Operators: An Application to MADM Process
الموضوعات : Transactions on Fuzzy Sets and Systems
Hamza Iftikhar
1
,
Faisal Mehmood
2
1 - Department of Mathematics and Statistics, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.
2 - School of Mathematics and Physics, Center for Applied Mathematics of Guangxi, Guangxi Minzu University, Nanning 530006, China.
الکلمات المفتاحية: Picture fuzzy set, Complex picture fuzzy set, Frank operations, Averaging operators, Geometric operators.,
ملخص المقالة :
In today's data-driven landscape, to ensure continuous survival and betterment, the implementation of a robust Big Data Governance Framework (BDGF) is imperative for organizations to effectively manage and harness the potential of their vast data resources. The BDGF serves no purpose when implemented in a random manner. This article delves into the complex decision-making challenges that emerge in the context of implementation of the BDGF under uncertain conditions. Specifically, we aim to analyze and evaluate the BDGF performance using the Multi-Attribute Decision-Making (MADM) techniques aiming to address the intricacies of big data governance uncertainties. To achieve our objectives, we explore the application of Frank operators within the framework of complex picture fuzzy (CPF) sets (CPFs). We introduce complex picture fuzzy Frank weighted averaging (CPFFWA) and complex picture fuzzy Frank ordered weighted averaging (CPFFOWA) operators to enable more accurate implementation of the BDGF. Additionally, we rigorously examine the reliability of these newly proposed fuzzy Frank (FF) operators (FFAOs), taking into consideration essential properties such as idempotency, monotonicity, and boundedness. To illustrate the practical applicability of our approach, we present a case study that highlights the decision-making challenges encountered in the implementation of the BDGF. Subsequently, we conduct a comprehensive numerical example to assess various BDGF implementation options using the MADM technique based on complex picture fuzzy Frank aggregation (CPFFA) operators. Furthermore, we perform a comprehensive comparative assessment of our proposed methodology, emphasizing the significance of the novel insights and results derived. In conclusion, this research article offers a unique and innovative perspective on decision-making within the realm of the BDGF. By employing the CPFFWA and the CPFFOWA operators, organizations can make well-informed decisions to optimize their BDGF implementations, mitigate uncertainties, and harness the full potential of their data assets in an ever-evolving data landscape. This work contributes to the advancement of decision support systems for big data governance (BDG), providing valuable insights for practitioners and scholars alike.
[1] Morton A, Keisler J M, Salo A. Multicriteria portfolio decision analysis for project selection. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. 2016; 1269-1298. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1- 4939-3094-4 28
[2] Pasi G, Yager RR. Modelling the concept of majority opinion in group decision making. Information Sciences. 2006; 176(4): 390-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2005.07.006
[3] Chen SM, Tan JM. Handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 1994; 167(2): 163-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(94)90084-1
[4] Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 1965; 8(3): 338-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
[5] Garg H, Kaur G. Cubic intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its fundamental properties. Journal of MultipleValued Logic & Soft Computing. 2019; 33(6): 507-537.
[6] Garg H, Kumar K. Linguistic interval-valued atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to group decision-making problems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2019; 27(12): 2302-2311. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2897961
[7] Akram M, Garg H, Zahid K. Extensions of ELECTRE-I and TOPSIS methods for group decision-making under complex Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems. 2020; 17(5): 147-164. DOI: http://doi.org/10.22111/IJFS.2020.5522
[8] Akram M, Dudek WA, Dar JM. Pythagorean dombi fuzzy aggregation operators with application in multi-criteria decision-making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. 2019; 34(11): 3000-3019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22183
[9] Kaur G, Garg H. Generalized cubic intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators using t-norm operations and their applications to group decision-making process. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2019; 44: 2775-2794. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3532-4
[10] Shahzadi G, Akram M, Al-Kenani AN. Decision-making approach under Pythagorean fuzzy Yager weighted operators. Mathematics. 2020; 8(1): 70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math8010070
[11] Shumaiza, Akram M, Al-Kenani AN, Alcantud JCR. Group decision-making based on the VIKOR method with trapezoidal bipolar fuzzy information. Symmetry. 2019; 11(10): 1313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11101313
[12] Waseem N, Akram M, Alcantud JCR. Multi-attribute decision-making based on m-polar fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators. Symmetry. 2019; 11(12): 1498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11121498
[13] Yager RR. Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on fuzzy systems. 2013; 22(4): 958-965. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989
[14] Fan CL, Song Y, Fu Q, Lei L, Wang X. New operators for aggregating intuitionistic fuzzy information with their application in decision making. IEEE Access. 2018; 6: 27214-27238. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2832206
[15] Garg H, Rani D. Some generalized complex intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multicriteria decision-making process. ARABIAN JOURNAL for SCIENCE and ENGINEERING. 2019; 44: 2679-2698. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3413-x
[16] Wu SJ, Wei GW. Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. International Journal of Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Engineering Systems. 2017; 21(3): 189-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/KES-170363
[17] Casasnovas J, Torrens J. An axiomatic approach to fuzzy cardinalities of finite fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 2003; 133(2): 193-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00345-7
[18] Chiclana, F, Herrera, F, Herrera-Viedma, E. The ordered weighted geometric operator: Properties and application in MCDM problems. Technologies for Constructing Intelligent Systems 2: Tools. 2002; 173- 183. DOI:
http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1796-6 14
[19] Yager RR. On ordered-weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 1988; 18(1): 183-190. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/21.87068
[20] Xu Z. Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Transactions on fuzzy systems. 2007; 15(6): 1179- 1187. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.890678
[21] Xu Z, Yager RR. Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. International journal of general systems. 2006; 35(4): 417-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03081070600574353
[22] Navara M. Triangular norms and conorms. Scholarpedia. 2007; 2(3): 2398. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.2398
[23] Cuong, B. C, Kreinovich, V. (2013, December). Picture fuzzy sets-a new concept for computational intelligence problems. In 2013 third world congress on information and communication technologies (WICT 2013). 2013; p.1-6. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/WICT.2013.7113099.
[24] Cuong, B. Picture fuzzy sets-first results. Part 1, in: seminar. Neuro-Fuzzy Systems with Applications. 2013.
[25] Garg H. Some picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multicriteria decision making. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2017; 42(12): 5275-5290. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2625-9
[26] Khan S, Abdullah S, Ashraf S. Picture fuzzy aggregation information based on Einstein operations and their application in decision making. Mathematical Sciences. 2019; 13(3): 213-229. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s40096-019-0291-7
[27] Wei G. Picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. ournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2017; 33(2): 713-724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-161798
[28] Frank MJ. On the simultaneous associativity of F(x, y) and x + y − F(x, y). Aequationes Mathematicae. 1978; 18: 266-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01844082
[29] Cuong BC. Picture fuzzy sets first results, part 1, Seminar Neuro-Fuzzy Systems with Applications, [Preprint] 04/2013, Institute of Mathematics, Hanoi 2013. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/WICT.2013.7113099
[30] Cuong BC. Picture fuzzy sets first results, part 2, Seminar Neuro-Fuzzy Systems with Applications, [Preprint] 04/2013, Institute of Mathematics, Hanoi, 2013.
[31] Cuong BC. Picture fuzzy sets. Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics. 2014; 30(4): 409-420.
[32] Dinh NV, Thao NX. Some measures of picture fuzzy sets and their application in multi-attribute decision making. Int. J. Math. Sci. Comput. 2018; 4(3): 23-41. DOI: http://doi.org/10.31130/jst.2017.49
[33] Ullah K, Naeem M, Hussain A, Waqas M, Haleemzai I. Evaluation of electric motor cars based Frank power aggregation operators under picture fuzzy information and a multi-attribute group decision-making process. IEEE Access. 2023; 11: 67201-67219. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3285307
[34] Milosevic P, Dragovic I, Zukanovi M, Poledica A, Petrovic B. IFS-IBA Logical Aggregation with Frank t-norms. In: In Conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology. 2023. p.99-111. DOI:
http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39965-7 9
[35] Seikh MR, Mandal U. Some picture fuzzy aggregation operators based on Frank t-norm and t-conorm: Application to MADM process. Informatica. 2021; 45(3): 447-461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31449/inf.v45i3.3025
[36] Seikh MR, Mandal U. Q-rung orthopair fuzzy Frank aggregation operators and its application in multiple attribute decision-making with unknown attribute weights. Granular Computing. 2022; 7: 709-730. DOI:
http://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-021-00290-2
[37] Calvo T, Baets BD, Fodor J. The functional equations of Frank and Alsina for uni-norm and null-norms. Fuzzy Sets and System. 2001; 120(3): 385-394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00125-6
[38] Yager RR. On some new classes of implication operators and their role in approximate reasoning. Information Sciences. 2004; 167(1-4): 193-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2003.04.001
[39] Sarkoci P. Domination in the families of Frank and Hamacher t-norms. Kybernetika. 2005; 41(3): 349-360. DOI: http://doi.org/10338.dmlcz/135660
[40] Xing Y, Zhang R, Wang J, Zhu X. Some new Pythagorean fuzzy Choquet-Frank aggregation operators for multi-attribute decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. 2018; 33(11): 2189-2215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22025
[41] Zhou LP, Dong JY, Wan SP. Two new approaches for multi-attribute group decision making with interval-valued neutron-sophic Frank aggregation operators and incomplete weights. IEEE Access. 2019; 7: 102727-102750. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2927133
[42] Qin J, Liu X. Frank aggregation operators for triangular interval type-2 fuzzy set and its application in multiple attribute group decision making. Journal of Applied Mathematics. 2014; 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/923213
[43] Qin J, Liu X, Pedrycz W. Frank aggregation operators and their application to hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Applied Soft Computing. 2016; 41: 428-452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.030
[44] Ramot D, Friedman M, Langholz G, Kandel A. Complex fuzzy logic. IEEE transactions on fuzzy systems. 2003; 11(4): 450-461. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2003.814832
[45] Ramot D, Milo R, Friedman M, Kandel A. Complex fuzzy sets. IEEE transactions on fuzzy systems. 2002; 10(2): 171-186. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/91.995119
[46] Zhang G, Dillon TS, Cai KY, Ma J, Lu J. Operation properties and δ-equalities of complex fuzzy sets. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 2009; 50(8): 1227-1249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2009.05.010
[47] Akram M, Bashir A. Complex fuzzy ordered weighted quadratic averaging operators. Granul Comput. 2021; 6: 523-538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-020-00213-7
[48] Luqman A, Akram M, Al-Kenani AN, Alcantud JCR. A study on hypergraph representations of complex fuzzy information. Symmetry. 2019; 11(11): 1381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11111381
[49] Luqman A, Akram M, Smarandache F. Complex neutron sophic hypergraphs: new social network models. Algorithms. 2019; 12(11): 234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/a12110234
[50] Sharma MK, Dhiman N, Mishra LN, Mishra VN, Sahani SK. Mediative fuzzy extension technique and its consistent measurement in the decision making of medical application. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2021; 2021: 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5530681
[51] Sharma MK, Dhiman N, Kumar S, Rathour L, Mishra VN. Neutrosophic monte carlo simulation approach for decision making in medical diagnostic process under uncertain environment. Int J Neutrosophic Sci. 2023; 22(1): 08-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.220101
[52] Sharma MK, Chaudhary S, Rathour L, Mishra VN. Modified genetic algorithm with novel crossover and mutation operator in travelling salesman problem. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences. 2024; 42(6): XX-XX. DOI: http://doi.org/10.14744/sigma.2023.00105
[53] Sharma MK, Sadhna A, Bhargava AK, Kumar S, Rathour L, Mishra LN, Pandey S. A fermatean fuzzy ranking function in optimization of intuitionistic fuzzy transportation problems. Advanced Mathematical Models & Applications. 2022; 7(2): 191-204.
[54] Mishra VN, Kumar T, Sharma MK, Rathour L. Pythagorean and fermatean fuzzy sub-group redefined in context of T˜-norm and S˜-conorm. Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications. 2023; 4(2): 125-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22105/jfea.2023.396751.1262
[55] Iqbal W, Rehman AU, Farid G, Rathour L, Sharma MK, Mishra VN. Further on Petrovic’s types inequalities. Journal of applied mathematics & informatics. 2022; 40(5-6): 1021-1034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14317/jami.2022.1021
[56] Garg H, Rani D. Complex interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their aggregation operators. Fundamenta Informaticae. 2019; 164(1): 61-101. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2019-1755
[57] Rani D, Garg H. Distance measures between the complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its applications to the decision-making process. International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification. 2017; 7(5): 423-439. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2017020356
[58] Yang X, Mahmood T, Ali Z, Hayat K. Identification and classification of multi-attribute decision-making based on complex intuitionistic fuzzy Frank aggregation operators. Mathematics. 2023; 11(15): 3292. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3390/math11153292
[59] Akram M, Khan A. Complex Pythagorean Dombi fuzzy graphs for decision making. Granul Comput. 2021; 6: 645-669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-020-00223-5
[60] Liao X, Li Y, Lu B. A model for selecting an ERP system based on linguistic information processing. Information Systems. 2007; 32(7): 1005-1017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2006.10.005
[61] Liu P, Akram M, Sattar A. Extensions of prioritized weighted aggregation operators for decision-making under complex q-rung ortho-pair fuzzy information. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2020; 39(5): 7469-7493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-200789
[62] Wei G. Picture fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Fundamental Informaticae. 2018; 157(3): 271-320. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2018-1628
[63] Wang WS, He HC. Research on flexible probability logic operator based on Frank T/S norms. Acta Electronica Sinica. 2009; 37(5): 1141-1145.
[64] Akram M, Bashir A, Garg H. Decision-making model under complex picture fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators. Computational and Applied Mathematics. 2020; 39: 1-38. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-020-01251-2
[65] Ullah K, Mahmood T, Ali Z, Jan N. On some distance measures of complex Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications in pattern recognition. Complex & Intelligent Systems. 2020; 6: 15-27. DOI:
http://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-019-0103-6
[66] Pitchipoo P, Vincent DS, Rajini N, Rajakarunakaran S. COPRAS decision model to optimize blind spot in heavy vehicles: A comparative perspective. Procedia Engineering. 2014; 97: 1049-1059. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.383
[67] Sayadi MK, Heydari M, Shahanaghi K. Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 2009; 33(5): 2257-2262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2008.06.002
[68] Mandal U, Seikh MR. Interval-valued spherical fuzzy MABAC method based on Dombi aggregation operators with unknown attribute weights to select plastic waste management process. Applied Soft Computing. 2023; 145: 110516. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110516
[69] Seikh MR, Mandal U. Multiple attribute group decision making based on quasirung orthopair fuzzy sets: Application to electric vehicle charging station site selection problem. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2022; 115: 105299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105299
[70] Seikh MR, Mandal U. Interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and SWARA based PROMETHEE II method to bio-medical waste management. Expert Systems with Applications. 2023; 226: 120082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120082
