Enhancing Software Quality Assessment: Classifier-Based Reduction of Mutation Test Generation
الموضوعات : journal of Artificial Intelligence in Electrical Engineeringbahman arasteh 1 , Zeinab Asghari 2 , abbas koochari 3
1 - Department of Computer Engineering, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2 - گروه کامپیوتر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد ارس، هادیشهر، آذربایجان شرقی
3 - Department of Computer Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
الکلمات المفتاحية: software mutation testing, instruction classification, error propagation, machine learning,
ملخص المقالة :
Mutation testing could be a capable procedure to assess the quality of test suites. The method of creating mutation testing includes creating a huge number of test cases, which can be computationally costly and time-consuming. This consider proposes a classifier-based approach to diminish the number of created mutation tests that includes preparing a classifier on a set of instruction highlights to decide which ones are error-prone. The classifier is prepared on a dataset of instruction characteristics for identifying the foremost compelling informational for infusing mutants Mutation score is calculated to decide the foremost viable enlightening. The ponder assesses the adequacy of the approach through tests on a few open-source ventures. The comes about appear that the approach is able to decrease the number of produced mutants whereas keeping up high mutation score. This approach has the potential to essentially diminish the computational burden of change testing and make strides the effectiveness of program testing.
[1] Nasrin Shomali and Bahman Arasteh “Mutation reduction in software mutation testing using firefly optimization algorithm”; Data Technologies and Applications Emerald Publishing Limited 2514-9288 DOI 10.1108/DTA-08-2019-0140 11 April 2020
[2] Asghari, Zeinab, Bahman Arasteh, and Abbas Koochari. "Effective Software Mutation-Test Using Program Instructions Classification." Journal of Electronic Testing (2024): 1-27,DOI:10.1007/s10836-023-06089-0.
[3] Beller, Moritz, et al. "What it would take to use mutation testing in industry—a study at facebook." 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP). IEEE, 2021,DOI: 10.1109/ICSE-SEIP52600.2021.00036.
[4] P. G. Frankl, S. N. Weiss, and C. Hu, “All-uses vs mutation testing: an experimental comparison of effectiveness” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 235–253, 1997,DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(96)00154-9.
[5] Offutt, A.J. , Untch, R.H. , 2000. “Mutation 2000: uniting the orthogonal”.In: Proceed- ings of the Mutation 20 0 0 Symposium. Kluwer Academic Publishers, San Jose, CA , USA , pp. 34–44,DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5939-6_7.
[6] Alessandro Viola Pizzoleto et al.2019.”A systematic literature review of techniques and metrics to reduce the cost of mutation testing”, The Journal of Systems and Software 157 (2019) 110388, DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.100.
[7] Mateo, Pedro Reales, and Macario Polo Usaola. "Reducing mutation costs through uncovered mutants." Software Testing, Verification and Reliability 25.5-7 (2015): 464-489, DOI: 10.1002/stvr.1534.
[8] T.A. Budd, D. Angluin, “Two notions of correctness and their relation to testing”, Acta Inform. 18(1) (1982) 31–45, DOI:10.1007/BF00625279.
[9] D. Schuler, A. Zeller,” Covering and uncovering equivalent mutants”, Softw. Test. Verif. Reliab. (2012), DOI: 10.1002/stvr.1473.
[10] W. E. Wong and A. P. Mathur, “Reducing the cost of mutation testing: An empirical study,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 31, no. 3,pp. 185–196, 1995, DOI: 10.1016/0164-1212(94)00098-0.
[11] Ellen Francine Barbosa, Jose Carlos Maldonado, and Auri Marcelo Rizzo Vincenzi. “Toward the determination of sufficient mutant operators for C.” In: Software:Testing Verification and Reliability 11 (2001), DOI: 10.1002/stvr.226.
[12] A.J. Offutt, G. Rothermel, and C. Zapf. “An experimental evaluation of selective mutation”. In 15th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 100-107,May 1993, DOI: 10.1109/ICSE.1993.346062.
[13] Yu-Seung Ma, Jeff Offutt, and Yong-Rae Kwon. “MuJava : An automated class mutation system”. Wiley's Software Testing, Veriffcation, and Reliability, 15(2):97-133,June 2005, DOI: 10.1002/stvr.308.
[14] Gary Kaminski, Paul Ammann, and Jeff Offutt. “Improving logic-based testing”. Journal of Systems and Software, 86(8):2002-2012, August, DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.08.024.
[15] Y. Jia and M. Harman. “Constructing Subtle Faults Using Higher Order Mutation Testing”. In: Source Code Analysis and Manipulation, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Working Conference on. 2008, pp. 249–258, DOI: 10.1109/SCAM.2008.36.
[16] Jia, Yue, and Mark Harman. "Higher order mutation testing." Information and Software Technology 51.10 (2009): 1379-1393.
[17] Richard A. DeMillo, Richard J. Lipton, and Frederick G. Sayward. “Hints on test data selection: Help for the practicing programmer”. Computer, 11(4):34-41, April 1978, DOI: 10.1109/C-M.1978.218136.
[18] M. R. Woodward and K. Halewood, “From Weak to Strong, Dead or Alive “ an Analysis of Some Mutation testing Issues,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Software Testing, Verification, and Analysis (TVA’88). Banff Albert, Canada: IEEE Computer Society, July 1988,pp. 152–158, DOI: 10.1109/WST.1988.5370.
[19] S. Hussain, “Mutation Clustering,” Masters Thesis, King’s College London, Strand, London, 2008.
[20] Sebastien Combefis and Arnaud Schils.” Automatic programming error class identification with code plagiarism-based clustering”. In Proc. 2ndInt. Code Hunt Work. Educ. Softw. Eng. - CHESE 2016, pages 1-6,New York, New York, USA, 2016. ACM Press, DOI: 10.1145/2993270.2993271.
