Plant Responses to Individual and Combined Effects of Abiotic Stresses: Lycium depressum L. Vegetative Parameters under Salinity and Drought
الموضوعات :Abolfazl Sharifian Bahraman 1 , Adel Sepehry 2 , Hossein Barani 3
1 - Rangeland and Watershed Management Faculty, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
2 - Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
3 - Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
الکلمات المفتاحية: Salinity, abiotic stress, drought, Lycium depressum L, RSM Analysis,
ملخص المقالة :
Lycium depressum L. is the only native tree-like life-form species inhabited in saline and alkaline regions of Turkmen Sahra located at Golestan province in Northern Iran. During past years, efforts have been made to increase vegetation cover of the area by cultivation of L. depressum L. to reduce water and wind erosions and dust storm challenges; however, the cultivation of this species has not been quite successful. Regarding the importance role of L. depressum in the ecosystem, a greenhouse experiment was conducted in January 2018 with different levels of salinity and drought stresses. Salinity stress (control (4 dS/m), 14, 24, 34 and 44 dS/m) applying NaCl solution and drought stress (control (0), 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1 MP) applying PEG 8000 as well as their combinations were conducted on plant cuttings (clones) using factorial experiment and Response Surface Method (RSM). Data were collected for leaf number (LN), root length (RL) and plant height (PH). Through the findings, it was concluded that drought stress had higher negative effect on plant function than salinity stress which dramatically reduced LN, RL and PH parameters (P<0.05). It was also inferred that combined treatments had higher negative effects on plant function than the individual treatments. Additionally, the result showed a significant difference between aerial organs and underground organs with regard to the severity of being affected by salinity and drought stresses so that LN and PH were highly affected comparing with RL. Generally, we observed that higher levels of salinity (higher than 30 dS/m) and drought (higher than 0.25 MP) will adversely affect the growth of plant organs leading to reduction of plant yield; even in some cases, it causes the plant total death. Finally, it was concluded that L. depressum is highly affected by drought rather than salinity.
Ahmad, P. and Prasad, M.N.V., 2011. Abiotic stress responses in plants: metabolism, productivity and sustainability. Springer Science & Business Media, 474pp.
Ahmed, I.M., Dai, H., Zheng, W., Cao, F., Zhang, G., Sun, D., and Wu, F., 2013. Genotypic differences in physiological characteristics in the tolerance to drought and salinity combined stress between Tibetan wild and cultivated barley. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 63: 49-60.
Albacete, A., Ghanem, M.E., Martínez-Andújar, C., Acosta, M., Sánchez-Bravo, J., Martínez, V., Lutts, S., Dodd, I.C. and Pérez-Alfocea, F., 2008. Hormonal changes in relation to biomass partitioning and shoot growth impairment in salinized tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants. J. Exp. Bot, 59: 4119–4131.
Álvarez, S. and Sánchez-Blanco, M.J., 2014. Long-term effect of salinity on plant quality, water relations, photosynthetic parameters and ion distribution in Callistemon citrinus. Plant Biol, 16: 757–764.
Álvarez, S. and Sánchez-Blanco, M.J., 2015. Comparison of individual and combined effects of salinity and deficit irrigation on physiological, nutritional and ornamental aspects of tolerance in Callistemon laevis plants. J. Plant Physiol, 185: 65–74.
Awasthi, R., Kaushal, N., Vadez, V., Turner, N.C., Berger, J., Siddique, K.H. and Nayyar, H., 2014. Individual and combined effects of transient drought and heat stress on carbon assimilation and seed filling in chickpea. Functional Plant Biology, 41(11): 1148-1167.
Barlow, M., Zaitchik, B., Paz, S., Black, E., Evans, J. and Hoell, A., 2016. A review of drought in the Middle East and southwest Asia. Journal of Climate, 29(23): 8547-8574.
Bartels, D. and Sunkar, R., 2005. Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci, 24: 23–28.
Bhatnagar-Mathur, P., Devi, M.J., Reddy, D.S., Lavanya, M., Vadez, V., Serraj, R., Yamaguchi Shinozaki, K. and Sharma, K.K., 2007. Stress inducible expression of At DREB1A in transgenic peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) increases transpiration efficiency under water limiting conditions. Plant Cell Rep, 26: 2071–2082.
Carmo-Silva, A.E., Gore, M.A., Andrade-Sanchez, P., French, A.N., Hunsaker, D.J. and Salvucci, M.E., 2012. Decreased CO2 availability and inactivation of Rubisco limit photosynthesis in cotton plants under heat and drought stress in the field. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 83: 1-11.
Cassaniti, C., Leonardi, C. and Flowers, T.J., 2009. The effects of sodium chloride ornamental shrubs. Sci. Hortic 122: 586–593.
Cassaniti, C., Romano, D. and Flowers, T.J., 2012. The response of ornamental plants to saline irrigation water. In Irrigation Water Management, Pollution and Alternative Strategies; Garcia-Garizabal, I., Ed.; InTech Europe: Rijeka, Croatia, 132–158.
Chaves, M.M., 1991. Effects of water deficits on carbon assimilation. Journal of experimental Botany, 42(1): 1-16.
Chaves, M.M. and Oliveira, M.M., 2004. Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. Journal of experimental botany, 55(407): 2365-2384.
Chrominski, A., Bhat, R.B., Weber, D.J. and Smith, B.N., 1988. Osmotic stress-dependent conversion of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) to ethylene in the halophyte, Allenrolfea occidentalis. Environ. Exp. Bot, 28: 171–174.
Cirillo, C., Rouphael, Y., Caputo, R., Raimondi, G., Sifola, M.I. and De Pascale, S., 2016. Effects of high salinity and the exogenous of an osmolyte on growth, phosynthesis and mineral composition in two ornamental shrubs. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol, 91: 14–22.
Colmer, T.D., Muñiz, R. and Flowers, T.J., 2005. Improving salt tolerance of wheat and barley: Future prospects. Aust. J. Exp. Agric, 45: 1425–1443.
Cvikrová, M., Gemperlová, L., Martincová, O. and Vanková, R., 2013. Effect of drought and combined drought and heat stress on polyamine metabolism in proline-over-producing tobacco plants. Plant physiology and biochemistry, 73: 7-15.
Danquah, A., de Zelicourt, A., Colcombet, J. and Hirt, H., 2014. The role of ABA and MAPK signaling pathways in plant abiotic stress responses. Biotechnology advances, 32(1): 40-52.
Dodd, I.C., 2005. Root-to-shoot signalling: Assessing the roles of ‘up’ in the up and down world of long-distance signalling in planta. Plant Soil, 74: 257–275.
Fedoroff, N.V., Battisti, D.S., Beachy, R.N., Cooper, P.J., Fischhoff, D.A., Hodges, C.N., Knauf, V.C., Lobell, D., Mazur, B.J., Molden, D. and Reynolds, M.P., 2010. Radically rethinking agriculture for the 21st century. Science, 327(5967): 833-834.
Flexas, J., Bota, J., Loreto, F., Cornic, G. and Sharkey, T.D., 2004. Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3 plants. Plant biology, 6(03): 269-279.
Flexas, J., Diaz‐espejo, A., Galmés, J., Kaldenhoff, R., Medrano, H. and Ribas‐carbo, M., 2007. Rapid variations of mesophyll conductance in response to changes in CO2 concentration around leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment, 30(10): 1284-1298.
Forests, Range and Watershed Management Organization of Iran, 2017. Desert Research Office, Golestan Province Natural Land Audit Plan.
Franco, J.A., Fernández, A., Bañón, S. and González, A., 1997. Relationship between the effects of salinity on seedling leaf area and fruit yield of six muskmelons cultivars. J. Hortic. Sci, 32: 642–647.
Gepstein, S. and Glick, B.R., 2013. Strategies to ameliorate abiotic stress induced plant senescence. Plant Molec. Biol, 82: 623–633.
Ghanem, M.E., Albacete, A., Martínez-Andújar, C., Acosta, M., Romero-Aranda, R., Dodd, I.C., Lutts, S. and Pérez-Alfocea, F., 2008. Hormonal changes during salinity-induced leaf senescence in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J. Exp. Bot, 59: 3039–3050.
Gilroy, S., Suzuki, N., Miller, G., Choi, W.G., Toyota, M., Devireddy, A.R. and Mittler, R., 2014. A tidal wave of signals: calcium and ROS at the forefront of rapid systemic signaling. Trends in Plant Science, 19(10): 623-630.
Hsiao, T.C. and Xu, L.K., 2000. Sensitivity of growth of roots versus leaves to water stress: Biophysical analysis and relation to water transport. J. Exp. Bot, 51: 1595–1616.
Iyer, N.J., Tang, Y. and Mahalingam, R., 2013. Physiological, biochemical and molecular responses to a combination of drought and ozone in Medicago truncatula. Plant, Cell & Environment, 36(3): 706-720.
Kefu, Z., Hai, F., San, Z. and Jie, S., 2003. Study on the salt and drought tolerance of Suaeda salsa and Kalanchoe claigremontiana under iso-osmotic salt and water stress. Plant Sci, 165: 837–844.
Khan, A., Anwar, Y., Hasan, M.M., Iqbal, A., Ali, M., Alharby, H.F., Hakeem, K.R. and Hasanuzzaman, M., 2017. Attenuation of drought stress in brassica seedlings with exogenous application of Ca2+ and H2O2. Plants, 6(2): 20.
Lawlor, D.W. and Cornic, G., 2002. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant, cell & environment, 25(2): 275-294.
Mahajan, S. and Tuteja, N., 2005. Cold, salinity and drought stresses: an overview. Arch Biochem Biophys, 444: 139–158.
McNutt, M., 2014. The drought you can’t see. Science, 345: 15-43.
Mittler, R., 2006. Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends in plant science, 11(1): 15-19.
Mittler, R. and Blumwald, E., 2010. Genetic engineering for modern agriculture: challenges and perspectives. Annual review of plant biology, 61: 443-462.
Munns, R., 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ, 25: 239–250.
Munns, R., 2005. Genes and salt tolerance: Bringing them together. Plant Physiol, 167: 645–663.
Munns, R., James, R.A. and Läuchli, A., 2006. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. Journal of experimental botany, 57(5): 1025-1043.
Munns, R. and Tester, M., 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59: 651–681.
Niknahad Gharmakher, H. and Sharifiyan Bahraman, A., 2017. The impacts of Atriplex plantation from the viewpoint of stockholders. Environmental Resources Research, 5(1): 89-99.
Ort DR, 2001. When there is too much light. Plant physiology, 125(1): 29-32.
Rizhsky, L., Liang, H., Shuman, J., Shulaev, V., Davletova, S. and Mittler, R., 2004. When defense pathways collide. The response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant physiology, 134(4): 1683-1696.
Rodríguez, P., Torrecillas, A., Morales, M.A., Ortuño, M.F. and Sánchez-Blanco, M.J., 2005. Effects of NaCl salinity and water stress on growth and leaf water relations of Asteriscus maritimus plants. Environ. Exp. Bot, 53: 113–123.
Ruiz-Sánchez, M.C., Domingo, R., Torrecillas, A. and Pérez-Pastor, A., 2000. Water stress preconditioning to improve drought resistance in young apricot plants. Plant Sci, 156: 245–251.
Saadi, S., Todorovic, M., Tanasijevic, L., Pereira, L.S., Pizzigalli, C. and Lionello, P., 2015. Climate change and Mediterranean agriculture: impacts on winter wheat and tomato crop evapotranspiration, irrigation requirements and yield. Agricultural Water Management, 147: 103-115.
Sahin, U., Ekinci, M., Ors, S., Turan, M., Yildiz, S. and Yildirim, E., 2018. Effects of individual and combined effects of salinity and drought on physiological, nutritional and biochemical properties of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata). Scientia Horticulturae, 240: 196-204.
Salachna, P. and Piechocki, R., 2016. Effects of sodium chloride on growth and mineralnutrition of purpletop vervain. J. Ecol. Eng, 17: 148–152.
Savé, R., Olivella, C., Biel, C., Adillón, J. and Rabella, R., 1994. Seasonal patterns of water relationships, photosynthetic pigments and morphology of Actinidia deliciosa plants of the Haywards and Tomouri
Sharifiyan Bahraman, A., Barani, H., Abedi Sarvestani, A. and Haji Mollahoseini, A., 2014a. Analyzing Effective Factors on Rangeland Exploitation by Using A'WOT (Case Study: Aq Qala Rangelands, Golestan, Iran). Journal of Rangeland Science, 4(2): 159-170.
Sharifiyan Bahraman, A., Barani, H., Abedi Sarvestani, A. and Haji Mollahoseini, A., 2014b. Identification and Comparison of Components Influencing Rangeland Exploitation from Pastorals and Experts' Viewpoints Using SWOT and AHP. Journal of Rangeland Science, 4(4): 257-269.
Sharp, R.E., Hsiao, T.C. and Silk, W.K., 1988. Growth of the maize primary root at low water potentials. I spatial distribution of expansive growth. Plant Physiol, 87: 50–57.
Suzuki, N., Rivero, R.M., Shulaev, V., Blumwald, E. and Mittler, R., 2014. Abiotic and biotic stress combinations. New Phytologist, 203(1): 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12797.
Tardieu, F., 2005. Plant tolerance to water deficit: physical limits and possibilities for progress. C R Geosci, 337: 57–67.
Tudela, D. and Primo-Millo, E., 1992. l-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid transported from roots to shoots promotes leaf abscission in Cleopatra mandarin (Citrus reshni Hort. ex Tan.) seedlings rehydrated after water stress. Plant Physiol, 100: 131–137.
Zandalinas, S.I., Mittler, R., Balfagón, D., Arbona, V. and Gómez‐Cadenas, A., 2018. Plant adaptations to the combination of drought and high temperatures. Physiologia plantarum, 162(1): 2-12.