The Sustainability Practices among Dairy Farmers: The Case of Johor

الموضوعات :

Zainab Mohd Karim ¹ , Nalini Arumugam ² , Boniface Bonaventure ³

1 - School of Agriculture & Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioresource and Food Industry, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA)
2 - School of Agriculture & Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioresource and Food Industry, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA)
3 - Centre for the Promotion of knowledge and language, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Agricultural Campus

تاريخ الإرسال : 19 الأحد , ربيع الثاني, 1436 تاريخ التأكيد : 19 السبت , شعبان, 1436 تاريخ الإصدار : 21 الثلاثاء , جمادى الأولى, 1437

الکلمات المفتاحية: Sustainability, farmers, Dairy farming, practices,

ملخص المقالة :

Sustainability concept in agriculture is becoming widespread throughout industries in many fields even in crop production, livestock production and etc. Sustainable in agriculture is believed can give present and future good benefit to the farmers and society. However, in dairy sector in Malaysia, the sustainability concepts and practices seems not fully aware by the farmers which result in low self- sufficiency level in milk production. The self-sufficiency level in Malaysia is merely 6% and this lead to the urgency of importing more milk from other countries such as Australia, Holland and others. This study attempts to describe the descriptive thoughts on sustainability among Malaysian dairy farmers as well as describing the socio economic characteristics of the dairy farmers which will be the indicator of adoption of sustainability practices among dairy farmers. The preliminary data was collected using questionnaires through conducting face to face interviews with 50 dairy farmers from Johor. The Likert-type scale was employed to determine the practices that adopted by the dairy farmers. The gathered data was analysed using SPSS. The findings indicated that the dairy farmers had a higher understanding about the farm sustainability aspect which gives the highest mean score of 4.41. The second highest mean score is the ecological aspect which is about 4.13. The mean score for economic aspect shows the mean score about 4.00. The social aspect of sustainability revealed the lowest mean score which was about 3.46. The results indicated that the farmers favour sustainable practice is farm sustainability system. Sustainability in dairy farming sector in Malaysia can be achieved if the three element of sustainability which is environmental, economic and social aspect were implemented and adopted in this sector.

المصادر:

1. Abolhasan, S.S.,  Hosain, S.F., Ali Asadi & Abolghasem, S.S. (2010). Farmer’s attitude on sustainable agriculture and its determinants: A case study in Behbahan Country of Iran. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology. 2 (5), 422-427.

2. Altieri, M.A. (1995). Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.


3. American Society of Agronomy- (1989). “Decision reached on sustainable agriculture” Agronomy News, January, p. 15, Madison, Wisconsin.

4. Azman, A., D'Silva, J. L., Samah, B. A., Man, N., & Shaffril, H. A. M. (2013). Relationship between   Attitude, Knowledge, and support towards the acceptance of sustainable agriculture among contract farmers in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 9(2), 99.-105.

5. Bagheri, A. (2010). Potato farmers’ perceptions of sustainable agriculture: the case of Ardabil province of Iran. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1977-1981.

6. Bahaman, A.S., Jeffrey, L.S., Hayrol Azril, M.S. & Jegak, U. (2010). Acceptance, attitude and knowledge towards agriculture economic activity between Rural and Urban Youth: The Case of contract farming. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(19), 2310-2315.

7. Boniface, B., Gyau, A., Stringer, R. &Umberger, W. (2010). Building producer loyalty in Malaysia's fresh milk supply chain. Australasian Agribusiness Review, 18(5), 66-84.

8. D’Silva, J.L., Man,N., Shaffril,H.A.M., & Samah , B.A. (2011). Acceptance of sustainable agricultural practices: the case of crop farmers. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 6: 227-230.

9. DVS. 2014. Livestock/livestock products statistics, Department of Veterinary Services, Malaysia.


10. Higgins, G.E. (2009). Quantitative versus qualitative methods: Understanding why quantitative methods are predominant in criminology and criminal justice. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, 1(1), 23-37

11. Tatlıdil, F. F., Boz, I., & Tatlidil, H. (2009). Farmers’ perception of sustainable agriculture and its determinants: a case study in Kahramanmaras province of Turkey. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 11(6), 1091-1106.


12. Van Calker, K. J., Berentsen, P. B., Giesen, G. W., & Huirne, R. B. (2005). Identifying and ranking attributes that determine sustainability in Dutch dairy farming. Agriculture and Human Values, 22(1), 53-63.