Uncovering the Sustainability of Agricultural Cooperatives in East Kutai, Indonesia
الموضوعات :
Erwin Kurniawan A
1
,
Nurjanana Nurjanana
2
,
Ndan Imang
3
,
Arfiah Busari
4
,
Purwanti Purwanti
5
,
Dio Caisar Darma
6
1 - Department of Economics, Faculty Economics and Business, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda City, Indonesia
2 - Department of Economics, Faculty Economics and Business, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda City, Indonesia
3 - Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda City, Indonesia
4 - Department of Economics, Faculty Economics and Business, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda City, Indonesia
5 - Department of Economics, Faculty Economics and Business, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda City, Indonesia
6 - Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda City, Indonesia
الکلمات المفتاحية: Uncovering the Sustainability of Agricultural Cooperatives ,
ملخص المقالة :
This research aims to investigate the causality between access to computers (AC), internet networks (IN), digital administration skills (DAS), and financial literacy (FL) on profits (PFT). This study’s objectivity compares agricultural cooperatives that adopt technology with adopt non-technology. Secondary data was explored to analyze the performance of active agricultural cooperatives which are partners of the East Kutai Regency government.Using panel data regression from eighteen sub-districts in East Kutai, it is proven that technology adopting agricultural cooperatives were more prominent than non-technology adopting agricultural cooperatives during 2017–2022. However, there is a harmony in the statistical findings from both observations (agricultural cooperatives that adopt technology and non-adopters of technology), where access to computers and financial literacy both have a significant effect on profits. Other analysis results show that internet networks and digital administration skills have an insignificant impact on profits. The study's implications provide valuable output for the future sustainability of agricultural cooperatives. The success of agricultural cooperatives depends greatly on the effectiveness of the application of technology. Through this research, it is hoped that it can provide open space for academic, managerial and policy-making development to restructure the agricultural cooperative system, especially optimizing internet networks and administrative skills.
1. Abebaw, D., & Haile, M. G. (2013). The impact of cooperatives on agricultural technology adoption: Empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Food Policy, 38, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.10.003
2. Ahmad, S. F., Han, H., Alam, M. M., Rehmat, M. K., Irshad, M., Arraño-Muñoz, M., & Ariza-Montes, A. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence on human loss in decision making, laziness and safety in education. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 311. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01787-8
3. Alizadehnia, M., Ommani, M. R., Noorivandi, A. N., & Maghsoodi, T. (2022). Identify and analysis of indicators and sub-indicators of innovation management in agricultural cooperatives of Iran. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research and Technology in Extension and Education Systems, 12(2), 89–98. Retrieved from https://sanad.iau.ir/en/Article/1033769
4. Alshubiri, F., Jamil, S. A., & Elheddad, M. (2019). The impact of ICT on financial development: Empirical evidence from the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 11(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979019870670
5. Aminulloh, A., Harun'in, S. Z., Suyatna, N., & Komarudin, U. (2021). Muzâraah, SDGs, and the welfare of Indonesian farmers. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 7(3), 1372–1383. http://dx.doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v7i3.2583
6. Anh, T. T. (2022). Factors affecting members’ satisfaction with high-tech agriculture cooperatives in Vietnam’s Northern key economic region. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7(5), e0735. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i5.735
7. Arts, I., Fischer, A., Duckett, D., & van der Wal, R. (2021). Information technology and the optimisation of experience – The role of mobile devices and social media in human-nature interactions. Geoforum, 122, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.03.009
8. Bharti, N. (2021). Role of cooperatives in economic empowerment of women: A review of Indian experiences. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 17(4), 617–631. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-07-2020-0095
9. BPS of East Kalimantan. (2023). Kalimantan Timur Province in figures 2023. Retrieved from https://kaltim.bps.go.id/publication/2023/02/28/7a58231d5aa2f5a7b4d5c36a/provinsi-kalimantan-timur-dalam-angka-2023.html
10. BPS of East Kutai. (2023). Kutai Timur Regency in figures 2023. Retrieved from https://kutimkab.bps.go.id/publication/2023/02/28/64636a843fc8f02c2a69dcad/kabupaten-kutai-timur-dalam-angka-2023.html
11. BPS of Indonesia. (2023). Statistical yearbook of Indonesia 2023. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2023/02/28/18018f9896f09f03580a614b/statistik-indonesia-2023.html
12. Brous, P., Janssen, M., & Herder, P. (2020). The dual effects of the Internet of Things (IoT): A systematic review of the benefits and risks of IoT adoption by organizations. International Journal of Information Management, 51, 101952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.008
13. Bullinger-Hoffmann, A., Koch, M., Möslein, K., & Richter, A. (2021). Computer-supported cooperative work – Revisited. i-com, 20(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2021-0028
14. Candemir, A., Duvaleix, S., & Latruffe, L. (2021). Agricultural cooperatives and farm sustainability – A literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(2), 1118–1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12417
15. Cheng, E. W. L. (2019). Choosing between the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the technology acceptance model (TAM). Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(2), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9598-6
16. Ciruela-Lorenzo, A. M., Del-Aguila-Obra, A. R., Padilla-Meléndez, A., & Plaza-Angulo, J. J. (2020). Digitalization of agri-cooperatives in the smart agriculture context. Proposal of a digital diagnosis tool. Sustainability, 12(4), 1325. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041325
17. Cook, M. (2018). A life cycle explanation of cooperative longevity. Sustainability, 10(5), 1586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051586
18. Darma, S., Maria, S., Lestari, D., & Darma, D. C. (2020). An agroforestry consortium: A multiderminant in instituting an agrisilviculture system to improve welfare. Virtual Economics, 3(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2020.03.01(5)
19. Darma, S., Wijaya, A., & Darma, D. C. (2020). Different tests for the existence of agricultural cooperatives in Indonesia: Before and after COVID-19. Asia Life Sciences, 10(3), 615–628. Retrieved from https://www.academicspub.com/article/different-tests-for-the-existence-of-agricultural-cooperatives-in-indonesia-before-and-after-covid-19
20. Darwis, V., Rachmawati, R. R., Muslim, C., Chanifah, C., Sembiring, A., Ilham, N., Mufidah, L., Suhartini, S. H., Basuki, R. S., Rina, Y., Suharyon, Nurdin, M., Dahya, Damanik, M., & Dewi, D. O. (2023). Transformation of financial institutions grants from the government to inclusive financial institutions in Indonesia. PloS ONE, 18(6), e0286482. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286482
21. Deller, S., Hoyt, A., Hueth, B., & Sundaram-Stukel, R. (2009). Research on the economic impact of cooperatives. Project Principal Investigators. University of Wisconsin Center for Cooperatives, Madison. Retrieved from https://resources.uwcc.wisc.edu/Research/REIC_FINAL.pdf
22. Diraco, G., Rescio, G., Siciliano, P., & Leone, A. (2023). Review on human action recognition in smart living: Sensing technology, multimodality, real-time processing, interoperability, and resource-constrained processing. Sensors, 23(11), 5281. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23115281
23. Ermawati, L., Pratomo, D., & Hasimi, D. M. (2019). The effect of financial literation on financial performance in cooperatives of state employees in Bandar Lampung. FINANSIA: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Perbankan, 2(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.32332/finansia.v2i01.1441
24. Ferreira da Silva, F., Baggio, D. K., & Santos, D. F. L. (2022). Governance and performance model for agricultural cooperatives. Estudios Gerenciales, 38(165), 464–478. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2022.165.5238
25. Feyen, E., Frost, J., Gambacorta, L., Natarajan, H., & Saa, M. (2021). Fintech and the digital transformation of financial services: Implications for market structure and public policy. BIS Papers No 117. Monetary and Economic Department, World Bank Group. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap117.pdf
26. Haff, P. (2014). Humans and technology in the anthropocene: Six rules. The Anthropocene Review, 1(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614530575
27. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
28. Halilintar, M. (2018). Cooperatives and economic growth in Indonesia. European Research Studies Journal, XXI(2), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1027
29. Hardana, A. E., & Pratiwi, D. E. (2023). The impact of trust and relationship quality on agricultural cooperative competitiveness. HABITAT, 34(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.habitat.2023.034.3.28
30. Hasbullah, H., & Bareduan, S. A. (2021). The framework model of digital cooperative to explore economic potential in higher education. Sinergi, 25(2), 195–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.22441/sinergi.2021.2.011
31. HC, R. H. K., & Gusaptono, R. H. (2020). The impact of financial literacy on investment decisions between saving and Credit: Studies on sharia bank customers in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. Journal of Economics and Business, 3(4), 1456–1463. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1992.03.04.291
32. Hoehe, M. R., & Thibaut, F. (2020). Going digital: How technology use may influence human brains and behavior. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 22(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/mhoehe
33. Jia, F., Zhang, R., & Li, J. (2023). The impact of continuous use intention of cooperative members on new agricultural technologies. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1089362. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1089362
34. Jorge-Vázquez, J., Chivite-Cebolla, M. P., & Salinas-Ramos, F. (2021). The digitalization of the european agri-food cooperative sector. Determining factors to embrace information and communication technologies. Agriculture, 11(6), 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11060514
35. Khan, N., Ray, R. L., Kassem, H. S., Ihtisham, M., Siddiqui, B. N., & Zhang, S. (2022). Can cooperative supports and adoption of improved technologies help increase agricultural income? Evidence from a recent study. Land, 11(3), 361. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11030361
36. Khasanah, N., Sriyana, J., Prasetyo, A., Nurdinawati, V., Hartopo A., Wahyudianto, H., Gartika, D., & Fahlevi, M. (2022). The role of knowledge management and sharing in cooperatives practices toward National Economic Recovery in the COVID-19 pandemic era. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 963755. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.963755
37. Kurniawan, E., Wahyuningsih, D., & Darma, D. C. (2023). Showcasing luxury on social media: What are the effects? An anomaly among lecturers. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 22(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.5614/sostek.itbj.2023.22.1.2
38. Kurt, İ., & Gök, H. (2015). Impact of technology on the perceptions of culture shock. Mevlana International Journal of Moral and Values Education, 2(2), 21–28. Retrieved from http://mijmve.mevlana.edu.tr
39. Kusmiati, E., Masyita, D., Febrian, E., & Cahyandito, M. F. (2023). A study on the determinants of successful performance of Indonesian cooperatives. International Journal of Social Economics, 50(9), 1285–1301. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-02-2022-0078
40. Langley, D. J., van Doorn, J., Ng, I. C. L., Stieglitz, S., Lazovik, A., & Boonstra, A. (2021). The Internet of Everything: Smart things and their impact on business models. Journal of Business Research, 122, 853–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.035
41. Leite, A. R., Padilha, A. C. M., & Binotto, E. (2021). Cooperation challenges in agricultural cooperatives. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 14(4), 809–826. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465964160
42. Li, M., Yan, X., Guo, Y., & Ji, H. (2021). Impact of risk awareness and agriculture cooperatives' service on farmers' safe production behaviour: Evidences from Shaanxi Province. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, 127724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127724
43. Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). Extending technology acceptance model to higher-education students’ use of digital academic reading tools on computers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00403-8
44. Lind, J., Pelger, S. & Jakobsson, A. (2019). Students’ ideas about technological systems interacting with human needs. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(2), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9449-0
45. Liu, Y. (2022). Application of digital technology in intangible cultural heritage protection. Mobile Information Systems, 2022, 7471121. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7471121
46. Liu, Y., Shi, R., Peng, Y., Wang, W., & Fu, X. (2022). Impacts of technology training provided by agricultural cooperatives on farmers’ adoption of biopesticides in China. Agriculture, 12(3), 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12030316
47. Liu, X., & Zhang, X. (2023). The impact of the digital economy on high-quality development of specialized farmers’ cooperatives: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 15(10), 7958. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107958
48. Luo, J., Guo, H., & Jia, F. (2017). Technological innovation in agricultural co-operatives in China: Implications for agro-food innovation policies. Food Policy, 73, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.09.001
49. Lv, S., Du, Y., & Liu, Y. (2022). How do fintechs impact banks’ profitability?—An empirical study based on banks in China. FinTech, 1(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.3390/fintech1020012
50. Majee, W., & Hoyt, A. (2011). Cooperatives and community development: A perspective on the use of cooperatives in development. Journal of Community Practice, 19(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2011.550260
51. Martínez-López, I., Fernández-Barcala, M., & González-Díaz, M. (2023). Unraveling agricultural cooperatives’ performance measurement: A literature review. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 27(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.22434/ifamr2023.0054
52. Maskur, A. (2016). Local government action for developing primary cooperatives in Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.026
53. Mhembwe, S., & Dube, E. (2017). The role of cooperatives in sustaining the livelihoods of rural communities: The case of rural cooperatives in Shurugwi District, Zimbabwe. Jamba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 9(1), 341. https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v9i1.341
54. Miranda, M. Q., Farias, J. S., de Araújo Schwartz, C., & de Almeida, J. P. L. (2016). Technology adoption in diffusion of innovations perspective: Introduction of an ERP system in a non-profit organization. RAI: Revista de Administração e Inovação, 13(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2016.02.002
55. Mirón-Sanguino, Á. S., & Díaz-Caro, C. (2022). The agricultural cooperative as an instrument for economic development: An approach from Spanish investors’ preferences through a choice experiment. Agronomy, 12(3), 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030560
56. Moral, A. M., & Uclés, D. F. (2022). The agricultural cooperative in the face of the challenges of globalization, sustainability and digitalization. Agriculture, 12(3), 424. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12030424
57. Nabela, H. R., & Rianto, P. (2020). The use of new media technology in families and its impact on intimacy. Asian Journal of Media and Communication, 4(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.20885/asjmc.vol4.iss2.art3
58. Nguyen, T. T., Do, M. H., Rahut, D. B., Nguyen, V. H., & Chhay, P. (2023). The impact of internet use on the performance of agricultural cooperatives in Vietnam. MPRA Paper No. 117274. University Library of Munich, Germany. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/117274/1/Working_Paper_2023.pdf
59. Nirmal, A., & Bikram, P. S. (2015). Financial literacy and co-operatives sustainability: A study among the executive members of the co-operatives. International Journal of Community and Cooperative Studies, 3(3), 17–29. Retrieved from http://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Financial-Literacy-and-Co-Operatives-Sustainability-A-Study-among-the-Executive-Members-of-the-Co-Operatives.pdf
60. Nuansri, A., Datta, A., Tsusaka, T. W., & Zulfiqar, F. (2024). Factors influencing the profit and choice of agribusiness for agricultural cooperatives in Thailand. Journal of International Development, 36(1), 751–772. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3836
61. Obilor, E. I., & Amadi, E. C. (2018). Test for significance of Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). International Journal of Innovative Mathematics, Statistics & Energy Policies, 6(1), 11–23. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323522779_Test_for_Significance_of_Pearson's_Correlation_Coefficient
62. Ogah, O. M., Ikyereve, F. T., & Ogebe, F. O. (2020). Analysis of risks in financing agriculture a case of agricultural cooperatives in Benue State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research and Technology in Extension and Education Systems, 10(2), 81–86. Retrieved from https://sanad.iau.ir/en/Article/1033679
63. Paula de Oliveira, O., & Wander, A. E. (2022). Agricultural cooperative system: Management challenges and feasible solutions. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 15(3), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465968884
64. Pratikno, R. V., & Pattinussa, J. M. Y. (2022). Food and agricultural product industry as the economic defence for Indonesia's COVID-19 economic crisis. Verity: Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional, 14(27), 69–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/verity.v14i27.5906
65. Pulungan M. S., & Sardjono A. (2021). Familyhood principle and the cooperatives ideas in economic provisions in the Indonesian constitution. REVESCO. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, 137, e73860. https://doi.org/10.5209/reve.73860
66. Purnomo, M. (2011). Adopsi teknologi oleh usaha mikro, kecil dan menengah. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 2(2), 109–117. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jdm/article/view/2475
67. Rachinger, M., Rauter, R., Müller, C., Vorraber, W., & Schirgi, E. (2019). Digitalization and its influence on business model innovation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(8), 1143–1160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-01-2018-0020
68. Ramadania, R., Rosnani, T., Fauzan, R., & Darma, D. C. (2021). The study of perceived risk and e-service convenience towards satisfaction and trust of online academic users in Indonesia. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 6(2), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.13187/ijmil.2021.2.387
69. Ratner, B. (2009). The correlation coefficient: Its values range between +1/−1, or do they?. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 17(2), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2009.5
70. Roztocki, N., Sojac, P., & Weistroffer, H. R. (2019). The role of information and communication technologies in socioeconomic development: Towards a multi-dimensional framework*. Information Technology for Development, 25(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2019.1596654
71. Salehi, A., & Rasoulaizar, S. (2019). Determining the factors effective the effectiveness of agricultural mechanization cooperatives by confirmatory factor analysis. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research and Technology in Extension and Education Systems, 9(4), 189–197. Retrieved from https://journals.iau.ir/article_671827.html
72. Sari, N. N. (2022). The use of technology acceptance model to explain brand attitude and loyalty intention in e-commerce: The gamification case. ASEAN Marketing Journal, 14(1), 72– 96. https://doi.org/10.21002/amj.v14i1.1151
73. Ševarlić, M. M., & Nikolić, M. M. (2013). Agricultural cooperatives – Examples of good practise in the World and Serbia. The 50th Anniversary Seminar, Agriculture and Rural Development - Challenges of Transition and Integration Processes. September 27, 2013 161799, University of Belgrade, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.161799
74. Siregar, A. P., Jamhari, J., & Waluyati, L. R. (2020). Data updates in the efficiency measurement of cooperatives in Indonesia. Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 4(2), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v4i2.7465
75. Soetriono, S., Soejono, D., Zahrosa, D. B., Maharani, A. D., & Hanafie, R. (2019). Strategy and policy for strengthening the agricultural cooperative business in East Java, Indonesia. Journal of Socioeconomics and Development, 2(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.31328/jsed.v2i1.886
76. Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325896
77. Sundberg, L. (2019). The relation between digital technology and values: Thinking through multiple technologies. Doctoral Thesis No. 308. Department of Information Systems and Technology, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1371237/FULLTEXT01.pdf
78. Suprehatin, S. (2021). Determinants of agricultural technology adoption by smallholder farmers in developing Countries: Perspective and prospect for Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, 40(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.21082/jp3.v40n1.2021.p21-30
79. Susilowati, E., Oktaviani, R., Arifin, B., & Arkeman, Y. (2014). The evaluation of cooperative’s role in soybean supply chain: A Case study on tofu and tempeh cooperatives in Indonesia. BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi, 21(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v21i2.4325
80. Tortia, E. C., Valentinov, V., & Iliopoulos, C. (2013). Agricultural cooperatives. Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, 2(1), 23–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.5947/jeod.2013.002
81. Tripathi, A. K. (2017). Hermeneutics of technological culture. AI and Society, 32(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0717-4
82. Trisniarti, N., Sofyana, N. N., & Azhari, A. (2022). The contribution of cooperatives to the Indonesian economy. Almana: Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 6(3), 452–459. https://doi.org/10.36555/almana.v6i3.1927
83. Utomo, R. P., Kuleh, Y., & Darma, D. C. (2023). Conventional vs modern: Which approach is better for the success of agricultural cooperatives?. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 9(4), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2023.09.04.02
84. Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
85. Wijaya, A., & Kurniawan, E. (2022). Ekonomi koperasi: Ekspedisi, dinamika dan tinjauan di Indonesia. Malang: Madza Media.
86. Wijaya, A., Jiuhardi, J., ZA, S. Z., Nurjanana, N., & Kurniawan, E. (2023). Determinants on small scale business: An empirical evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(1), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180132
87. Wulandhari, N. B. I., Gölgeci, I., Mishra, N., Sivarajah, U., & Gupta, S. (2022). Exploring the role of social capital mechanisms in cooperative resilience. Journal of Business Research, 143, 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.026
88. Xie, K., Wu, Y., Xiao, J., & Hu, Q. (2016). Value co-creation between firms and customers: The role of big data-based cooperative assets. Information & Management, 53(8), 1034–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.06.003
89. Yakob, S., Rusli, R. Z. A., Yakob, R., & Hafizuddin-Syah, B. A. M. (2021). Financial literacy and financial performance of small and medium-sized enterprises. The South East Asian Journal of Management, 15(1), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.21002/seam.v15i1.13117
90. Yang, D., Zhang, H-W., Liu, Z-M., & Zeng, Q. (2021). Do cooperatives participation and technology adoption improve farmers' welfare in China? A joint analysis accounting for selection bias. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(6), 1716–1726. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63325-1
91. Yang, W., Chu, C.-C., Yang, J., & Ye, X. (2023). The impact of internet finance on the profit efficiency of commercial banks: Theory and evidence from China. SAGE Open, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231158050
92. Yuhertiana, I., Zakaria, M., Suhartini, D., & Sukiswo, H. W. (2022). Cooperative resilience during the pandemic: Indonesia and Malaysia evidence. Sustainability, 14(10), 5839. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105839
93. Zhang, F., Sarkar, A., & Wang, H. (2021). Does internet and information technology help farmers to maximize profit: A cross-sectional study of apple farmers in Shandong, China. Land, 10(4), 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10040390
94. Zhang, J., Luo, J., & Li, J. (2021). Agricultural co-operatives participating in supply chain integration in China: A qualitative comparative analysis. PloS ONE, 16(4), e0250018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250018
95. Zhang, S., Sun, Z., Ma, W., & Valentinov, V. (2020). The effect of cooperative membership on agricultural technology adoption in Sichuan, China. China Economic Review, 62, 101334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101334
96. Zhang, Y., & Geng, H. (2012). An analysis on distribution of cooperative profit in supply chain based on multi-agent. Physics Procedia, 33, 698–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.05.123
97. Zhu, X., & Wang, G. (2024). Impact of agricultural cooperatives on farmers’ collective action: A study based on the socio-ecological system framework. Agriculture, 14(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14010096
