Exogenous application of medicinal plant extracts improved productivity and qualitative traits of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under drought stress
الموضوعات :
Majid Bagnazari
1
,
Hadis Hasanbeigi
2
1 - Department of Horticultural Sciences, College of Agriculture, Ilam University , Ilam, Iran.
2 - Department of Horticultural Sciences, College of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran.
الکلمات المفتاحية: Antioxidants, Biostimulant, Cotton fiber quality, Drought stress, Fiber length,
ملخص المقالة :
Drought is a major factor that limits agricultural productivity worldwide. Several approaches have been used to help plants improve their performance under drought stress. However, the external application of medicinal plant extracts as biostimulants is a promising strategy that is still in its early stages. To mitigate the adverse effects of drought on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), a field experiment was conducted using a split-plot design based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The first factor was the application of 0%, 10%, and 15% Camellia sinensis (Cs) and Rosmarinus officinalis (Ro) methanolic extracts. The second factor was the frequency of the irrigation cycle, which was conducted every 10, 15, and 20 days (W10, W15, and W20). The best outcomes were observed with the 10% Ro extract under the W10 irrigation cycle, which resulted in the highest plant height (99.99 cm), fresh (3.32 g) and dry weight (0.46 g) of leaves, fiber strength (7.86%), elasticity (26.06 g·tex⁻¹), and color brightness (80.76 Rd). The best results for the total number of bolls (26.77), wool (5.24 g), boll weight (14.10 g), fiber length (32.10 mm), length uniformity (87.33%), and the minimum electrolyte leakage (30.33%), leaf particles in fibers (0.52), and short fiber index (10.14%) were found with 15% Ro extract under the W10 irrigation cycle. Both methanolic extracts, particularly 15% Ro, have shown promising results in most measured traits and could be a superior strategy for sustainable cotton production under drought stress.
Abdelraheem, A., N. Esmaeili, M. O’connell and J. Zhang. 2019. Progress and perspective on drought and salt stress tolerance in cotton. Industrial Crops and Products, 130, 118-129.
Ahmadi, M. and M. Aghaalikhani. 2012. Analysis of Energy Consumption of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L) in the province to provide a solution for increasing productivity of resources. Journal of Agricultural Ecology, 4, (2) 151-158.
Al-Sereiti, M., K. Abu-Amer and P. Sena. 1999. Pharmacology of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis Linn.) and its therapeutic potentials.
Allen, R. D. and L. Aleman. 2011. Abiotic stress and cotton fiber development. Stress physiology in cotton, 149.
Awan, S. A., I. Khan, M. Rizwan, X. Zhang, M. Brestic, A. Khan, M. A. El‐Sheikh, M. N. Alyemeni, S. Ali and L. Huang. 2021. Exogenous abscisic acid and jasmonic acid restrain polyethylene glycol‐induced drought by improving the growth and antioxidative enzyme activities in pearl millet. Physiologia Plantarum, 172, (2) 809-819.
Bakhsh, A. and T. Hussain. 2015. Engineering crop plants against abiotic stress: Current achievements and prospects. Emirates Journal of Food & Agriculture (EJFA), 27, (1).
Balkcom, K. S., D. W. Reeves, J. N. Shaw, C. H. Burmester and L. M. Curtis. 2006. Cotton yield and fiber quality from irrigated tillage systems in the Tennessee Valley. Agronomy Journal, 98, (3) 596-602.
Chastain, D. R., J. L. Snider, G. D. Collins, C. D. Perry, J. Whitaker and S. A. Byrd. 2014. Water deficit in field-grown Gossypium hirsutum primarily limits net photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal conductance, increasing photorespiration, and increasing the ratio of dark respiration to gross photosynthesis. Journal of plant physiology, 171, (17) 1576-1585.
Chaudhry, M. R. 2010. Cotton production and processing. Industrial Applications of Natural Fibres: Structure, Properties and Technical Applications: John Wiley and Sons Ltd Chichester, 219-220.
Chen, Y.-L., Y.-T. Shi, J.-J. Luo, D. Wang, Y. Hou, Z. Li and B. Zhang. 2012. Screening of drought tolerant agronomic trait indices of colored cotton varieties (lines) in gansu province. Acta Agron Sin, 38, 1680-1687.
Cruz De Carvalho, M. H. 2008. Drought stress and reactive oxygen species: production, scavenging and signaling. Plant signaling & behavior, 3, (3) 156-165.
El-Tayeb, M. 2005. Response of barley grains to the interactive e. ect of salinity and salicylic acid. Plant growth regulation, 45, 215-224.
El Sabagh, A., A. Hossain, M. S. Islam, C. Barutcular, D. Ratnasekera, O. Gormus, K. Amanet, M. Mubeen, W. Nasim and S. Fahad. 2020. Drought and heat stress in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.): Consequences and their possible mitigation strategies. Agronomic Crops: Volume 3: Stress Responses and Tolerance, 613-634.
Fang, Y., K. Liao, H. Du, Y. Xu, H. Song, X. Li and L. Xiong. 2015. A stress-responsive NAC transcription factor SNAC3 confers heat and drought tolerance through modulation of reactive oxygen species in rice. Journal of experimental botany, 66, (21) 6803-6817.
Fang, Y. and L. Xiong. 2015. General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cellular and molecular life sciences, 72, 673-689.
Galmés, J., J. Flexas, R. Savé and H. Medrano. 2007. Water relations and stomatal characteristics of Mediterranean plants with different growth forms and leaf habits: responses to water stress and recovery. Plant and Soil, 290, 139-155.
Horváth, E., G. Szalai and T. Janda. 2007. Induction of abiotic stress tolerance by salicylic acid signaling. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 26, 290-300.
Iqbal, N., S. Hussain, M. A. Raza, C.-Q. Yang, M. E. Safdar, M. Brestic, A. Aziz, M. S. Hayyat, M. A. Asghar and X. C. Wang. 2019. Drought tolerance of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) by improved photosynthetic characteristics and an efficient antioxidant enzyme activities under a split-root system. Frontiers in physiology, 10, 786.
Ksouri, R., W. Megdiche, A. Debez, H. Falleh, C. Grignon and C. Abdelly. 2007. Salinity effects on polyphenol content and antioxidant activities in leaves of the halophyte Cakile maritima. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 45, (3-4) 244-249.
Kumar, B., D. Pandey, C. Goswami and S. Jain. 2001. Effect of growth regulators on photosynthesis, transpiration and related parameters in water stressed cotton. Biologia Plantarum, 44, 475-478.
Kumaran, A. 2006. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of an aqueous extract of Coleus aromaticus. Food chemistry, 97, (1) 109-114.
Kuromori, T., T. Miyaji, H. Yabuuchi, H. Shimizu, E. Sugimoto, A. Kamiya, Y. Moriyama and K. Shinozaki. 2010. ABC transporter AtABCG25 is involved in abscisic acid transport and responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, (5) 2361-2366.
Li, Z., J. Liu, M. Kuang, C. Zhang, Q. Ma, L. Huang, H. Wang, S. Fan and J. Peng. 2022. Improvement of plant tolerance to drought stress by cotton tubby-like protein 30 through stomatal movement regulation. Journal of Advanced Research, 42, 55-67.
Loka, D. A., D. M. Oosterhuis and G. L. Ritchie. 2011. Water-deficit stress in cotton. Stress physiology in cotton, 7, 37-72.
Lv, S., A. Yang, K. Zhang, L. Wang and J. Zhang. 2007. Increase of glycinebetaine synthesis improves drought tolerance in cotton. Molecular Breeding, 20, 233-248.
Mahmood, T., S. Khalid, M. Abdullah, Z. Ahmed, M. K. N. Shah, A. Ghafoor and X. Du. 2019. Insights into drought stress signaling in plants and the molecular genetic basis of cotton drought tolerance. Cells, 9, (1) 105.
Manavalan, L. P., S. K. Guttikonda, L.-S. Phan Tran and H. T. Nguyen. 2009. Physiological and molecular approaches to improve drought resistance in soybean. Plant and cell physiology, 50, (7) 1260-1276.
Moragne, W., T. Orr and T. B. Orr. 2009. New Jersey. Marshall Cavendish.Muhammad Aslam, M., M. Waseem, B. H. Jakada, E. J. Okal, Z. Lei, H. S. A. Saqib, W. Yuan, W. Xu and Q. Zhang. 2022. Mechanisms of abscisic acid-mediated drought stress responses in plants. International journal of molecular sciences, 23, (3) 1084.
Nag, A. and S. Das. 2013. Improving ambient temperature stability of probiotics with stress adaptation and fluidized bed drying. Journal of functional foods, 5, (1) 170-177.
Nakashima, K., K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and K. Shinozaki. 2014. The transcriptional regulatory network in the drought response and its crosstalk in abiotic stress responses including drought, cold, and heat. Frontiers in plant science, 5, 170.
Noreen, S., H. U. R. Athar and M. Ashraf. 2013. Interactive effects of watering regimes and exogenously applied osmoprotectants on earliness indices and leaf area index in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) crop. Pak J Bot, 45, (6) 1873-1881.
Popova, L., T. Pancheva and A. Uzunova. 1997. Salicylic acid: properties, biosynthesis and physiological role. Bulg J Plant Physiol, 23, (1-2) 85-93.
Rai, E. 2011. Mechanism of drought tolerance in cotton-Response of cotton cultivars to irrigation in the Texas high plains. Master of Science, Texas Tech University USA pp, 97,
Ratnayaka, H. H., W. T. Molin and T. M. Sterling. 2003. Physiological and antioxidant responses of cotton and spurred anoda under interference and mild drought. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54, (391) 2293-2305.
Sairam, R., P. Deshmukh and D. Shukla. 1997. Tolerance of drought and temperature stress in relation to increased antioxidant enzyme activity in wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 178, (3) 171-178.
Shaar-Moshe, L., E. Blumwald and Z. Peleg. 2017. Unique physiological and transcriptional shifts under combinations of salinity, drought, and heat. Plant physiology, 174, (1) 421-434.
Shi, X., C. Wang, J. Zhao, K. Wang, F. Chen and Q. Chu. 2021. Increasing inconsistency between climate suitability and production of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in China. Industrial Crops and Products, 171, 113959.
Stoilova, I., A. Krastanov, A. Stoyanova, P. Denev and S. Gargova. 2007. Antioxidant activity of a ginger extract (Zingiber officinale). Food chemistry, 102, (3) 764-770.
Tripathy, B. C. and R. Oelmüller. 2012. Reactive oxygen species generation and signaling in plants. Plant signaling & behavior, 7, (12) 1621-1633.
Ullah, A., H. Sun, X. Yang and X. Zhang. 2017. Drought coping strategies in cotton: increased crop per drop. Plant biotechnology journal, 15, (3) 271-284.
Valentovic, P., M. Luxova, L. Kolarovic and O. Gasparikova. 2006. Effect of osmotic stress on compatible solutes content, membrane stability and water relations in two maize cultivars. Plant Soil and Environment, 52, (4) 184.
Zhang, D., J. Tong, X. He, Z. Xu, L. Xu, P. Wei, Y. Huang, M. Brestic, H. Ma and H. Shao. 2016. A novel soybean intrinsic protein gene, GmTIP2; 3, involved in responding to osmotic stress. Frontiers in plant science, 6, 1237.
Zhang, L., J. Peng, T. Chen, X. Zhao, S. Zhang, S. Liu, H. Dong, L. Feng and S. Yu. 2014. Effect of drought stress on lipid peroxidation and proline content in cotton roots. JAPS: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 24, (6)
1405
Exogenous application of medicinal plant extracts improved productivity and qualitative traits of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under drought stress
Majid Bagnazari* and Hadis Hasanbeigi
Department of Horticultural Sciences, College of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran..
________________________________________________________________________________
Abstract
Drought is a major factor that limits agricultural productivity worldwide. Several approaches have been used to help plants improve their performance under drought stress. However, the external application of medicinal plant extracts as biostimulants is a promising strategy that is still in its early stages. To mitigate the adverse effects of drought on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), a field experiment was conducted using a split-plot design based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The first factor was the application of 0%, 10%, and 15% Camellia sinensis (Cs) and Rosmarinus officinalis (Ro) methanolic extracts. The second factor was the frequency of the irrigation cycle, which was conducted every 10, 15, and 20 days (W10, W15, and W20). The best outcomes were observed with the 10% Ro extract under the W10 irrigation cycle, which resulted in the highest plant height (99.99 cm), fresh (3.32 g) and dry weight (0.46 g) of leaves, fiber strength (7.86%), elasticity (26.06 g·tex⁻¹), and color brightness (80.76 Rd). The best results for the total number of bolls (26.77), wool (5.24 g), boll weight (14.10 g), fiber length (32.10 mm), length uniformity (87.33%), and the minimum electrolyte leakage (30.33%), leaf particles in fibers (0.52), and short fiber index (10.14%) were found with 15% Ro extract under the W10 irrigation cycle. Both methanolic extracts, particularly 15% Ro, have shown promising results in most measured traits and could be a superior strategy for sustainable cotton production under drought stress.
Keywords: Antioxidants; Biostimulant; Cotton fiber quality; Drought stress; Fiber length
Bagnazari, M. and H. Hasanbeigi. 2024. Exogenous application of medicinal plant extracts improved productivity and qualitative traits of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under drought stress. Iranian Journal of Plant Physiology 14 (3), 5075- 5086.
|
____________________________________ * Corresponding Author E-mail Address: m.bagnazari@ilam.ac.ir Received: January, 2024 Accepted: April, 2024
|
According to the United Nations in 2017, the world population is increasing rapidly and is expected to reach 9.8 billion by 2050. However, this population growth will cause climate changes that will lead to more severe abiotic and biotic stress conditions, creating major challenges in crop production ((Nakashima et al., 2014; Shaar-Moshe et al., 2017). Abiotic stresses are a significant threat to agricultural production, resulting in a 73% reduction in cotton production worldwide (Mahmood et al., 2019). Drought and heat are the most critical abiotic stresses affecting the phenology, growth, fiber yield, and quality of cotton. This problem will become more severe in the future due to the frequent occurrence of high temperatures and water shortages (EL Sabagh et al., 2020). Although cotton is commonly cultivated in arid and semi-arid regions, it is not considered a drought-resistant crop (Penna et al., 1998). The cotton industry faces the challenge of drought and heat stress, which can reduce fiber yield by up to 34% (Ullah et al., 2017).
Drought and other abiotic stresses cause excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that damage plant cells and inhibit physiological processes. In cotton and other plants, ROS such as hydroxyl radical (OH) and singlet oxygen (¹O₂) can oxidize various biochemical compounds, including lipids, proteins, DNA, and RNA (Ratnayaka et al., 2003; Tripathy and Oelmüller, 2012). However, plants have developed antioxidant mechanisms to cope with ROS production and accumulation. These mechanisms include enzymatic antioxidants like catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione reductase (GR), guaiacol peroxidase (GPX), and dehydroascorbate reductase (DHA), as well as non-enzymatic antioxidants like reduced glutathione, ascorbic acid, α-tocopherol, phenols, flavonoids, and carotenoids.
Plants use antioxidant mechanisms to counteract the production of ROS. However, according to Zhang et al. (Zhang et al., 2014), the balance between ROS production and antioxidant activity in cotton under drought stress determines whether damage will occur or the plant will be able to cope with the stress. Due to the toxic effects of synthetic antioxidants, there has been a growing trend toward using natural antioxidants, which are polyphenol compounds found in various parts of plants, such as their bark, leaves, stems, fruits, roots, and seeds (Stoilova et al., 2007).
Various studies have shown that green tea (Camellia sinensis) extract is a viable alternative to synthetic antioxidants because of its high phenolic content, including catechins, flavanols, flavonols, phenolic acids, and caffeine (Nag and Das, 2013). Additionally, rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) extract is widely used in various industries as a food preservative due to its potent antioxidant properties (Al-Sereiti et al., 1999).
We hypothesized that the extracts of these two medicinal plants can serve as promising candidates to enhance the growth, physiology, and fiber quality of cotton while reducing the adverse effects of drought stress due to their proven high antioxidant properties.
Materials and Methods
Experimental Design
The research was conducted at the research field of the Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, located at 46°22' E longitude and 33°39' N latitude. The field is situated at an altitude of 1446 meters above sea level. The experiment was designed as split plots using a randomized complete block design with three replications, where each replication contained 10 plants. The experiment had two factors. The first factor involved the treatment with Camellia sinensis methanolic extracts (0%, 10%, and 15%), denoted as control, Cs 10%, and Cs 15%, respectively, and Rosmarinus officinalis (0%, 10%, and 15%), denoted as control, Ro 10%, and Ro 15%, respectively. The second factor involved different levels of the irrigation cycle (every 10, 15, and 20 days), denoted as W10, W15, and W20, respectively.
Preparation of Methanolic Extracts
To prepare the methanolic extracts, 160 g of each dried medicinal plant was completely powdered and soaked in 1 liter of 50% methanol. After 48 hours of shaking, the solutions were filtered using Whatman No. 1 paper. To separate the methanol, the extracts were left to rest in the open air for 24 hours. These extracts were then used as stock solutions. Different treatments and irrigation cycles were applied to the cotton plants during the vegetative growth phase, starting from the stage of four true leaves. The plants were sprayed four times to ensure optimal results.
Soil Preparation and Planting the Seeds
The process of planting cotton seeds involved several steps. First, the research field was plowed, and a drip irrigation system was installed. Next, the field was disinfected with Mancozeb fungicide. Then, delinted cotton seeds of the Khorshid variety were sown in each hole at a depth of 3 cm. The plants were spaced 80 cm apart in rows that were 1 meter apart. Once the seeds had germinated, the seedlings were thinned out, leaving only one plant every 80 cm.
Morphological Traits
Plant Height, Fresh and Dry Weight of Leaves, Leaf Area, Total Number of Bolls, Number of Un bloomed Bolls, Wool Weight, and Boll Weight After the plants had finished flowering and the cotton bolls had fully opened, various morphological traits were measured, and samples were taken to perform quality tests on cotton fibers. For measurement purposes, 5 plants were randomly selected from each experimental unit, and their characteristics were studied. The height of the plants at the time of maximum growth and when the bolls started to open was measured in centimeters. To determine the weight of the leaves, an equal number of leaves were taken from the middle part of the labeled plants. After measuring the fresh weight of the leaves, the samples were kept in an oven at 70 °C for 48 hours, and their dry weight was measured using a scale with an accuracy of 0.01 g. The surface area of the leaves was measured with checkered paper. Wool and boll weight were also measured using a scale with an accuracy of 0.01 g during the peak of cotton production.
Physiological Traits
To measure the relative water content (RWC), healthy, fully developed leaves were cut and weighed using a digital scale with an accuracy of 0.01 g. The cut leaf discs were then placed in Petri dishes with lids containing dH2O and stored in the dark at 4°C for 24 hours. The leaf samples were then removed from dH2O, dried between two layers of paper towels, and weighed again. The leaf discs were then transferred to an oven at 70 °C for 24 hours, and the dry weight was determined. Finally, the relative leaf water content was calculated as a percentage using the following formula (Galmés et al., 2007):
RWC = [(FW - DW) / (TW - DW)] × 100
where FW represents the leaf fresh weight, DW is the leaf dry weight, and TW is the leaf turgor weight.
To determine the electrolyte leakage (EL), an equal number and size of leaf discs were taken from each treatment and immediately placed into dH2O in equal volume. After 24 hours, the initial electrical conductivity (EC1) was measured with an EC meter (Conductometer, GLP 31). The samples were then placed in a Bain-marie (70 °C), and the final EC2 was measured. The EL of the samples was calculated using the following formula (Valentovic et al., 2006):
EL = (EC1 / EC2) × 100
In this equation, EL represents membrane electrolyte leakage, EC1 is the electrical conductivity of the samples after 24 hours, and EC2 is the electrical conductivity of the samples after the Bain-marie.
Fiber Qualitative Traits
Fiber Length, Average Length, Uniformity, Elasticity, Strength, Fineness, Moisture, Color Lightness, Yellowness, Number of Trashes in the Sample, Surface Covered with Debris, Leaf Particles in Fibers, Maturity of Fibers, and Index of Short Fibers
Fig. I. Interaction effect of methanolic extracts and different levels of irrigation cycle on the total number of bolls, boll weight, and wool weight of cotton (Gossypium hirsotum). In this figure, Cs is Camellia sinensis, Ro is Rosmarinus officinalis, and W is the irrigation cycle (day). |
Table 1 Effect of methanolic extracts (Camellia sinensis and Rosmarinus officinalis) and different irrigation cycle levels on cotton's morphological traits (Gossypium hirsotum).
*Common letters in each column indicate non-significance at the 5% probability level based on Tukey's test. In this table, Cs is Camellia sinensis, Ro is Rosmarinus officinalis and W is the irrigation cycle (day).
|
Data Analysis
The data were analyzed using SAS statistical software (version 9.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). To compare the means, Tukey's test with a significance level of 0.05 was used. Additionally, Microsoft Office Professional Plus Excel (2013) was utilized to create the diagrams.
Results
Morphological Traits
Plant Height, Fresh and Dry Weight of Leaves, Leaf Area, Total Number of Bolls, Number of Unbloomed Bolls, Wool Weight, and Boll Weight
Fig. II. Comparison of the different treatment effects at the irrigation cycle once every 10 days (W10) (A), once every 15 days (W15) (B), and once every 20 days (W20) (C) on boll (above) and wool (below) of cotton fibers (Gossypium hirsotum). In the figure from left to right, control treatment, 10% and 15% Rosmarinus officinalis extracts, and 10%, and 15% Camellia sinensis extracts are shown respectively.
|
Relative Water Content (RWC) and Electrolyte Leakage (EL)
The highest RWC (87.53%) was observed in the 15% Camellia sinensis (Cs) extract treatment with an irrigation cycle of W10. The lowest RWC (65.57%) was found in the control at the W20 irrigation cycle (Fig. III). In terms of EL, the maximum (49.01%) was recorded in the control at the W20 irrigation cycle, while the minimum (30.33%) was found in the 15% Rosmarinus officinalis (Ro) extract treatment with the W10 irrigation cycle (Fig. III).
Fiber Qualitative Traits
Table 2 Effect of methanolic extracts (Camellia sinensis and Rosmarinus officinalis) and different levels of irrigation cycle on quality attributes of cotton fibers (Gossypium hirsotum).
*Common letters in each column indicate non-significance at the 5% probability level based on Tukey’s test. In this table, Cs is Camellia sinensis, Ro is Rosmarinus officinalis and W is the irrigation cycle (day).
|
Fig. III. Effect of methanolic extracts and different levels of irrigation cycle on RWC and EL of cotton. In this figure, Cs is Camellia sinensis, Ro is Rosmarinus officinalis, and W is the irrigation cycle (day).
|
Color Lightness, Yellowness, Number of Trashes, Surface Covered with Debris, Leaf Particles in Fibers, Maturity of Fibers, and Index of Short Fibers
The 10% Camellia sinensis (Cs) extract treatment with a 10-day irrigation cycle (W10) exhibited the lowest fiber yellowness (7.10 +b). Conversely, the control with a 20-day irrigation cycle (W20) displayed the highest fiber yellowness (8.45 +b). The 15% Rosmarinus officinalis (Ro) extract treatment with a W10 irrigation cycle showed the lowest surface covered with debris (0.07%), leaf particles in the fiber (0.52), and short fiber index (10.14%). The highest values for these traits were observed in the control with the W20 irrigation cycle. Additionally, the lowest fiber maturity (0.61 micronaire) was observed in the 15% Cs extract at the W15 irrigation cycle, while the highest fiber maturity (0.83 micronaire) was recorded in the control at the W20 irrigation cycle. The maximum color brightness (80.76 Rd) was obtained in the 10% Ro treatment with the W10 irrigation cycle, and the minimum (70.33 Rd) was observed in the control with the W20 irrigation cycle. The lowest number of trashes in the sample (11.66) was noted in the 15% Cs extract at the W10 irrigation cycle, while the highest (23.00) was found in the control at the W20 irrigation cycle (Table 3). Lastly, the highest number of unbloomed buds (10.77) was observed in the 15% Ro treatment with the W10 irrigation cycle, whereas the lowest number (2.36) was recorded in the control at the W20 irrigation cycle (Fig. IV).
Table 3 Effect of methanolic extracts (Camellia sinensis and Rosmarinus officinalis) and different levels of irrigation cycle on quality attributes of cotton fibers (Gossypium hirsotum).
|
(Iqbal et al., 2019)Plants possess the ability to resist damage caused by abiotic stresses through various physiological and biochemical mechanisms, such as changes in morphology and metabolism (Bakhsh and Hussain, 2015). When a plant senses a stress signal through the plasma membrane, it initiates the production of abscisic acid (ABA), which predominantly occurs in plastids (Bakhsh and Hussain, 2015). ABA synthesis begins in the roots and is transported through vascular tissues, leading to stomatal closure in various cells, including guard cells (Kuromori et al., 2010). However, stomatal closure results in a decrease in CO₂ intake and net photosynthesis (Iqbal et al., 2019; Kuromori et al., 2010) , ultimately causing a significant reduction in crop productivity and dry matter production (Awan et al., 2021; Li et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2016).
To fully exploit limited water resources, maximizing high-yielding agriculture is essential. Various metabolites, such as glutathione, ascorbic acid, tocopherol, carotenoids, flavonoids, and anthocyanin’s, protect plants against oxidative stress by scavenging free radicals (Sairam et al., 1997). In particular, the role of phenolic compounds in reducing or inhibiting lipid peroxidation, scavenging free radicals, quenching singlet oxygen, or dissociating peroxides makes these extracts crucial antioxidants for protection against oxidative stress damage and defense against reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Ksouri et al., 2007).
Drought can have varying destructive effects depending on the timing and intensity of stress, growth stage, and species. Although drought stress negatively impacts all stages of cotton growth, the seedling, flowering, and boll development stages are particularly sensitive to water deficit (Shi et al., 2021). Recent research suggests that the number of bolls, boll weight, and leaf number can serve as indicators of cotton drought resistance (Chen et al., 2012). Studies on cotton have found that drought stress leads to a decrease in fiber, boll, and wool yield due to reduced net photosynthesis under water deficit conditions, which in turn affects growth and yield (Chastain et al., 2014).
Fig. IV. Effect of methanolic extracts and different levels of irrigation cycle on the number of unbloomed bolls of cotton (Gossypium hirsotum). In this figure, Cs is Camellia sinensis, Ro is Rosmarinus officinalis, and W is the irrigation cycle (day).
|
Flavonoids are a type of phenolic compound that help prevent oxidative stress in plants. They achieve this by either participating directly in regeneration reactions or indirectly by chelating iron, due to their antioxidant role (Popova et al., 1997). Another important phenolic compound, salicylic acid, regulates the flavonoid content and the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as catalase and peroxidase, which helps mitigate oxidative stress caused by drought. Salicylic acid acts as an internal growth regulator, assisting in various plant processes including resistance to environmental stress, stomatal closure, ion absorption and transport, membrane stability, growth rate, and photosynthesis (El-Tayeb, 2005; Horváth et al., 2007).
Plants rich in antioxidant compounds can protect cells from oxidative damage (Kumaran, 2006). In this study, methanolic extracts of Camellia sinensis and Rosmarinus officinalis, which contain phenolic antioxidant compounds, helped create a balance between reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidant activity under drought stress conditions. This balance contributed to the improved morphological traits of cotton across different irrigation cycles, consistent with previous scientific findings.
Plants employ osmotic regulation as an effective mechanism to manage abiotic stress responses. This process enables them to tolerate dehydration by accumulating various organic and mineral substances, such as sugars, proline, mannitol, amino acids, alkaloids, and mineral ions. This accumulation increases the concentration of these substances inside the cells and reduces the osmotic potential. Osmotic regulation allows plants to adjust stomatal and photosynthetic functions naturally, improve root system growth for water absorption, delay leaf senescence, and enhance dry matter accumulation and overall performance (Abdelraheem et al., 2019).
Despite these mechanisms, drought conditions can lead to significant reductions in net photosynthesis, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, carboxylation efficiency, RWC, and leaf water potential in cotton (Kumar et al., 2001; Lv et al., 2007; Noreen et al., 2013). In this study, drought stress led to a significant reduction in leaf RWC due to increased cell sap concentration. However, the methanolic extracts improved leaf RWC by modulating the stress conditions.
Under drought stress, the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) increases, which impacts cellular functions. The reduction in CO2 fixation during the Calvin cycle leads to decreased NADP+ regeneration, thereby affecting the photosynthetic electron transport chain (Cruz de Carvalho, 2008). ROS in cells include hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), hydroxyl radical (•OH), superoxide anion radical (O₂⁻), and singlet oxygen (¹O₂), with •OH and ¹O₂ being particularly reactive. These ROS can damage various cellular components, such as lipids, proteins, DNA, and RNA. RNA, causing membrane damage, ion leakage, and, in severe cases, cell death (Fang et al., 2015). Our study demonstrated that drought stress increased ion leakage in cotton plants. However, the antioxidant properties of methanolic extracts helped mitigate the destructive effects of ROS on cell membranes and reduced ion leakage.
Abiotic stresses, such as drought, can lead to significant morphophysiological changes in plants, adversely affecting their yield and quality, including fiber length, elasticity, fineness, and strength (Loka et al., 2011). Drought stress has been shown to significantly decrease micronaire and fiber length (Rai, 2011). Cotton fiber development is highly dependent on water availability; under stress conditions, cotton leaves lose turgor pressure, and photosynthesis is constrained. This limitation leads to a reduced supply of carbohydrates to developing bolls, negatively impacting fiber growth (Allen and Aleman, 2011).
Previous research has demonstrated that varying moisture levels can impact cotton fiber quality. Inadequate irrigation practices can negatively affect both the quantity and quality of cotton fibers. Our study aligns with these findings, showing that proper irrigation practices are crucial for maintaining fiber quality (Balkcom et al., 2006). Moreover, different irrigation practices can influence the quality of spun yarn. For example, fibers from cotton grown under drought stress may exhibit desirable spun yarn characteristics but often with reduced strength (Moragne et al., 2009). Drought stress has been reported to cause up to a 34% loss in fiber yield in the cotton industry (Ullah et al., 2017). In this study, we successfully improved cotton fiber quality and performance under drought stress conditions through the use of natural antioxidant extracts.
Plants employ four primary strategies to cope with drought: avoidance, escape, tolerance, and recovery (Fang and Xiong, 2015). Drought avoidance includes physiological adaptations such as stomatal adjustments and enhanced root development under moderate drought conditions. Drought tolerance involves the ability to endure severe dehydration through mechanisms like osmotic regulation and osmotic protectors (Luo, 2010). Plants may also escape drought stress by shortening their life cycle (Manavalan et al., 2009).
Abscisic acid (ABA) plays a crucial role in regulating various physiological processes related to stress responses, growth, and reproduction. During drought stress, ABA can induce premature flowering as a survival strategy (Muhammad Aslam et al., 2022). In this study, cotton plants exhibited a defense mechanism to escape from drought stress when methanolic extracts were not applied. This resulted in increased fiber yellowness, a higher number of trashes, more surface covered with debris, and increased leaf particles and short fiber index due to the adverse effects of drought stress.
By utilizing methanolic extracts, the cotton plants demonstrated enhanced resilience to drought, improving fiber quality and reducing undesirable traits such as yellowness and surface debris. This indicates that the application of these extracts can mitigate some of the negative impacts of drought stress on fiber characteristics.
Conclusion
The results indicate that longer intervals between irrigation cycles lead to a reduction in both the yield and quality of cotton fibers. However, the application of methanolic extracts, particularly the 15% Rosmarinus officinalis (Ro) extract, yielded significant improvements in most of the measured traits. This suggests that these extracts can enhance cotton fiber quality under drought conditions. Given the ongoing water crisis and the increasing need for sustainable agricultural practices, medicinal plant extracts present a promising alternative to synthetic antioxidants. These natural treatments effectively mitigate the adverse impacts of abiotic stresses, such as drought, on cotton plants, offering a valuable option for enhancing agricultural resilience and environmental sustainability.
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
References
Abdelraheem, A., N. Esmaeili, M. O’connell and J. Zhang. 2019. Progress and perspective on drought and salt stress tolerance in cotton. Industrial Crops and Products, 130, 118-129.
Ahmadi, M. and M. Aghaalikhani. 2012. Analysis of Energy Consumption of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L) in the province to provide a solution for increasing productivity of resources. Journal of Agricultural Ecology, 4, (2) 151-158.
Al-Sereiti, M., K. Abu-Amer and P. Sena. 1999. Pharmacology of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis Linn.) and its therapeutic potentials.
Allen, R. D. and L. Aleman. 2011. Abiotic stress and cotton fiber development. Stress physiology in cotton, 149.
Awan, S. A., I. Khan, M. Rizwan, X. Zhang, M. Brestic, A. Khan, M. A. El‐Sheikh, M. N. Alyemeni, S. Ali and L. Huang. 2021. Exogenous abscisic acid and jasmonic acid restrain polyethylene glycol‐induced drought by improving the growth and antioxidative enzyme activities in pearl millet. Physiologia Plantarum, 172, (2) 809-819.
Bakhsh, A. and T. Hussain. 2015. Engineering crop plants against abiotic stress: Current achievements and prospects. Emirates Journal of Food & Agriculture (EJFA), 27, (1).
Balkcom, K. S., D. W. Reeves, J. N. Shaw, C. H. Burmester and L. M. Curtis. 2006. Cotton yield and fiber quality from irrigated tillage systems in the Tennessee Valley. Agronomy Journal, 98, (3) 596-602.
Chastain, D. R., J. L. Snider, G. D. Collins, C. D. Perry, J. Whitaker and S. A. Byrd. 2014. Water deficit in field-grown Gossypium hirsutum primarily limits net photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal conductance, increasing photorespiration, and increasing the ratio of dark respiration to gross photosynthesis. Journal of plant physiology, 171, (17) 1576-1585.
Chaudhry, M. R. 2010. Cotton production and processing. Industrial Applications of Natural Fibres: Structure, Properties and Technical Applications: John Wiley and Sons Ltd Chichester, 219-220.
Chen, Y.-L., Y.-T. Shi, J.-J. Luo, D. Wang, Y. Hou, Z. Li and B. Zhang. 2012. Screening of drought tolerant agronomic trait indices of colored cotton varieties (lines) in gansu province. Acta Agron Sin, 38, 1680-1687.
Cruz De Carvalho, M. H. 2008. Drought stress and reactive oxygen species: production, scavenging and signaling. Plant signaling & behavior, 3, (3) 156-165.
El-Tayeb, M. 2005. Response of barley grains to the interactive e. ect of salinity and salicylic acid. Plant growth regulation, 45, 215-224.
El Sabagh, A., A. Hossain, M. S. Islam, C. Barutcular, D. Ratnasekera, O. Gormus, K. Amanet, M. Mubeen, W. Nasim and S. Fahad. 2020. Drought and heat stress in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.): Consequences and their possible mitigation strategies. Agronomic Crops: Volume 3: Stress Responses and Tolerance, 613-634.
Fang, Y., K. Liao, H. Du, Y. Xu, H. Song, X. Li and L. Xiong. 2015. A stress-responsive NAC transcription factor SNAC3 confers heat and drought tolerance through modulation of reactive oxygen species in rice. Journal of experimental botany, 66, (21) 6803-6817.
Fang, Y. and L. Xiong. 2015. General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cellular and molecular life sciences, 72, 673-689.
Galmés, J., J. Flexas, R. Savé and H. Medrano. 2007. Water relations and stomatal characteristics of Mediterranean plants with different growth forms and leaf habits: responses to water stress and recovery. Plant and Soil, 290, 139-155.
Horváth, E., G. Szalai and T. Janda. 2007. Induction of abiotic stress tolerance by salicylic acid signaling. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 26, 290-300.
Iqbal, N., S. Hussain, M. A. Raza, C.-Q. Yang, M. E. Safdar, M. Brestic, A. Aziz, M. S. Hayyat, M. A. Asghar and X. C. Wang. 2019. Drought tolerance of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) by improved photosynthetic characteristics and an efficient antioxidant enzyme activities under a split-root system. Frontiers in physiology, 10, 786.
Ksouri, R., W. Megdiche, A. Debez, H. Falleh, C. Grignon and C. Abdelly. 2007. Salinity effects on polyphenol content and antioxidant activities in leaves of the halophyte Cakile maritima. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 45, (3-4) 244-249.
Kumar, B., D. Pandey, C. Goswami and S. Jain. 2001. Effect of growth regulators on photosynthesis, transpiration and related parameters in water stressed cotton. Biologia Plantarum, 44, 475-478.
Kumaran, A. 2006. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of an aqueous extract of Coleus aromaticus. Food chemistry, 97, (1) 109-114.
Kuromori, T., T. Miyaji, H. Yabuuchi, H. Shimizu, E. Sugimoto, A. Kamiya, Y. Moriyama and K. Shinozaki. 2010. ABC transporter AtABCG25 is involved in abscisic acid transport and responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, (5) 2361-2366.
Li, Z., J. Liu, M. Kuang, C. Zhang, Q. Ma, L. Huang, H. Wang, S. Fan and J. Peng. 2022. Improvement of plant tolerance to drought stress by cotton tubby-like protein 30 through stomatal movement regulation. Journal of Advanced Research, 42, 55-67.
Loka, D. A., D. M. Oosterhuis and G. L. Ritchie. 2011. Water-deficit stress in cotton. Stress physiology in cotton, 7, 37-72.
Lv, S., A. Yang, K. Zhang, L. Wang and J. Zhang. 2007. Increase of glycinebetaine synthesis improves drought tolerance in cotton. Molecular Breeding, 20, 233-248.
Mahmood, T., S. Khalid, M. Abdullah, Z. Ahmed, M. K. N. Shah, A. Ghafoor and X. Du. 2019. Insights into drought stress signaling in plants and the molecular genetic basis of cotton drought tolerance. Cells, 9, (1) 105.
Manavalan, L. P., S. K. Guttikonda, L.-S. Phan Tran and H. T. Nguyen. 2009. Physiological and molecular approaches to improve drought resistance in soybean. Plant and cell physiology, 50, (7) 1260-1276.
Moragne, W., T. Orr and T. B. Orr. 2009. New Jersey. Marshall Cavendish.Muhammad Aslam, M., M. Waseem, B. H. Jakada, E. J. Okal, Z. Lei, H. S. A. Saqib, W. Yuan, W. Xu and Q. Zhang. 2022. Mechanisms of abscisic acid-mediated drought stress responses in plants. International journal of molecular sciences, 23, (3) 1084.
Nag, A. and S. Das. 2013. Improving ambient temperature stability of probiotics with stress adaptation and fluidized bed drying. Journal of functional foods, 5, (1) 170-177.
Nakashima, K., K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and K. Shinozaki. 2014. The transcriptional regulatory network in the drought response and its crosstalk in abiotic stress responses including drought, cold, and heat. Frontiers in plant science, 5, 170.
Noreen, S., H. U. R. Athar and M. Ashraf. 2013. Interactive effects of watering regimes and exogenously applied osmoprotectants on earliness indices and leaf area index in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) crop. Pak J Bot, 45, (6) 1873-1881.
Popova, L., T. Pancheva and A. Uzunova. 1997. Salicylic acid: properties, biosynthesis and physiological role. Bulg J Plant Physiol, 23, (1-2) 85-93.
Rai, E. 2011. Mechanism of drought tolerance in cotton-Response of cotton cultivars to irrigation in the Texas high plains. Master of Science, Texas Tech University USA pp, 97,
Ratnayaka, H. H., W. T. Molin and T. M. Sterling. 2003. Physiological and antioxidant responses of cotton and spurred anoda under interference and mild drought. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54, (391) 2293-2305.
Sairam, R., P. Deshmukh and D. Shukla. 1997. Tolerance of drought and temperature stress in relation to increased antioxidant enzyme activity in wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 178, (3) 171-178.
Shaar-Moshe, L., E. Blumwald and Z. Peleg. 2017. Unique physiological and transcriptional shifts under combinations of salinity, drought, and heat. Plant physiology, 174, (1) 421-434.
Shi, X., C. Wang, J. Zhao, K. Wang, F. Chen and Q. Chu. 2021. Increasing inconsistency between climate suitability and production of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in China. Industrial Crops and Products, 171, 113959.
Stoilova, I., A. Krastanov, A. Stoyanova, P. Denev and S. Gargova. 2007. Antioxidant activity of a ginger extract (Zingiber officinale). Food chemistry, 102, (3) 764-770.
Tripathy, B. C. and R. Oelmüller. 2012. Reactive oxygen species generation and signaling in plants. Plant signaling & behavior, 7, (12) 1621-1633.
Ullah, A., H. Sun, X. Yang and X. Zhang. 2017. Drought coping strategies in cotton: increased crop per drop. Plant biotechnology journal, 15, (3) 271-284.
Valentovic, P., M. Luxova, L. Kolarovic and O. Gasparikova. 2006. Effect of osmotic stress on compatible solutes content, membrane stability and water relations in two maize cultivars. Plant Soil and Environment, 52, (4) 184.
Zhang, D., J. Tong, X. He, Z. Xu, L. Xu, P. Wei, Y. Huang, M. Brestic, H. Ma and H. Shao. 2016. A novel soybean intrinsic protein gene, GmTIP2; 3, involved in responding to osmotic stress. Frontiers in plant science, 6, 1237.
Zhang, L., J. Peng, T. Chen, X. Zhao, S. Zhang, S. Liu, H. Dong, L. Feng and S. Yu. 2014. Effect of drought stress on lipid peroxidation and proline content in cotton roots. JAPS: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 24, (6)
