Welfare Assessment in Tunisian Dairy Herds by Animal-Linked Parameters and Performance Efficiency
الموضوعات :M. Mhamdi 1 , C. Darej 2 , M. Bouallegue 3 , S. Kaur Brar 4 , M. Ben Hamouda 5
1 - Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie, 43, Rue Charles Nicole Cite, Mahrajene, Tuns, Tunisie
2 - Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie, 43, Rue Charles Nicole Cite, Mahrajene, Tuns, Tunisie
3 - Faculté des Science Mathématiques Physiques et Naturelle de Tunis, Campus Universitaire 2092 Tunis, Tunisie
4 - Institut National de La Recherche Scientifique, Québec, Canada
5 - Institution de La Recherche et de l’Enseignement Supérieur Agricole, Ministère de l’Agriculture et des Ressources Hydrauliques, Tunisie
الکلمات المفتاحية: behavior, welfare, avoidancedistance, human-animal relationship, lameness,
ملخص المقالة :
Animal welfare considerations are becoming increasingly important for farming of animals, both in Tunisia and internationally. Practices which may have once been deemed acceptable are now being reassessed in the light of new knowledge and changing attitudes. And a clearly defined concept of welfare is needed for use in precise scientific measurements. If animal welfare is to be compared in different situations or evaluated in a specific situation, it must be assessed in an objective way. Likewise, welfare is a multidimensional concept and its assessment systems have been developed by researchers of the European project Welfare Quality®. These systems should include animal-based measures directly related to animal body condition, health aspects, injuries and behavior. In this context, a Tunisian study was carried out in 35 dairy farms to evaluate welfare quality of Tunisian Holstein population cows through some welfare indicatorsvalidated by the European project Welfare Quality®. The studied sample included 350 females (Holstein; 161 heifers and 189 cows). Avoidance distance (at the feeding rack and inside the stable), body condition, lameness, fertility, somatic cell count, and milk yield were assessed. The study showed that animals differ in their relationship with the stockholder, performance, and health state, early experience and temperament.
Ajkondawar P.G., Neerchal N., Varner A.M., Erez B., Lefcourt M.A., Dyer M.R. and Tasch U. (2001). Development of a bovine lameness index that correlates visual lameness scores to measurable limb movement variables: a pilot study. J. Anim. Sci. 79, 16-23.
Albright J.L. (1987). Dairy animal welfare: current and needed research. J. Dairy Sci. 70, 2711-2731.
Almeida P.E., Weber P.S.D., Burton J.L. and Zanella A.J. (2008). Depressed DHEA and increased sickness response behaviours in lame dairy cows with inflammatory foot lesions. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 34, 89-99.
Bergsten C. (2001). Effects of conformation and management system on hoof and leg diseases and lameness in dairy cows. Food Anim. Practice. 17, 1-23.
Breuer K., Hemsworth P.H. and Coleman G.J. (2003). The effect of positive or negative handling on the behavioural responses of nonlactating heifers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 84, 3-22.
Breuer K., Hemsworth P.H., Barnett J.L., Matthews L.R. and Coleman G.J. (2000). Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 66, 273-288.
Broster W.H. and Broster V.J. (1998). Body score of dairy cows. J. Dairy Res. 65,155-173.
Broom D.M. (1986). Indicators of poor welfare. British Vet. J. 142, 524-526.
Cook N.B. (2003). Prevalence of lameness among dairy cattle in Wisconsin as a function of housing type and stall surface. J. American Vet. Med. Assoc. 223, 1324-1328.
Dechow C.D., Rogers G.W. and Clay J.S. (2001). Heritabilities and correlations among body condition scores, production traits, and reproductive performance. J. Dairy Sci. 84, 266-275.
DEFRA(Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). (2003). Code of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock: Cattle. HMSO, London.
Duncan I.J.H. and Petherick J.C. (1991). The implications of cognitive processes for animal welfare. J. Anim. Sci. 69, 5017-5022.
Dyer R.M., Neerchal N.K., Tasch U., Wu Y., Dyer P. and Rajkondawar P.G. (2007). Objective determination of claw pain and its relationship to limb locomotion score in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 90, 4592-4602.
EFSA (2009). Scientific opinion of the panel on animal health and welfare on a request from the European Commission on welfare aspect of the main systems of stunning and killing of farmed Atlantic salmon. EFSA. J. 10(12), 1-3.
Esslemont R.J. and Kossaibati M.A. (1996). Incidence of production diseases and other health problems in a group of dairy herds in England. Vet. Rec. 139,486-490.
Ewbank R. (1988). Management and Welfare of Farm Animals.3rd Ed. Bailliere Tindall, London.
Fox M.W. (1984). Farm Animals Husbandry, Behavior and Veterinary Practice: Viewpoints of a Critic. University Park Press, Baltimore, MD.
Garcia E.F. (2009). Oestrous intensity-a relevant indicator for animal well-being in high-producing dairy cows? Ph D. Thesis. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of the Technical University of Lisbon.
Gonzales L.A., Tolkamp B.J. and Kyriazakis I. (2008). Changes in feeding behaviour as possible indicators for the automatic monitoring of health disorders in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 91, 1017-1028.
Harmon R.J. (1994). Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. J. Dairy Sci. 77, 2103-2112.
Hemsworth P.H. (2004). Human-livestock interaction. Pp. 21-38 in The Well Being of Farm Animals, Challenges and Solutions. G.J. Benson and B.E. Rollin Eds. Blackwell Publishing, Iowa, USA.
Hemsworth P.H., Coleman G.J., Barnett J.L. and Borg S. (2000). Relationships between human-animal interactions and productivity of commercial dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 78, 2821-2831.
Hemsworth P.H., Coleman G., Barnett J.L., Borg S. and Dowling S. (2002). The effects of cognitive behavioural intervention on the attitude and the behaviour of stockpersons and the behaviour and productivity of commercial dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 80, 68-78.
Heringstad B., Chang Y.M., Gianola D. and Klemetsdal G. (2005). Genetic association between susceptibility to clinical mastitis and protein yield in Norwegian dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 88, 1509-1514.
Hristov S., Stanković B., Zlatanović Z., Joksimović-Todorović M.V. and Davidović V. (2008). Rearing conditions, health and welfare of dairy cows. Biotechnol. Anim. Husband. 24(1-2), 25-35.
Hristov S., Stanković B., Joksimović T.M., Bojkovski J. and Davidović V. (2007). Uticaj toplotnog stresa na proizvodnju mlečnih krava. Zbornik Naučnih Radova. 13(3-4), 47-54.
Hughes B.D. (1976). Behavior as an index of welfare. Pp. 1005-1012 in Proc. 5th European Poult. Conf. Malta.
Johnsen P.F., Johannesson T. and Sandøe P. (2001). Assessment of farm animal welfare at herd level: many goals, many methods. Acta. Agric. Scandinavica. 30, 26-33.
Kaltas G.A. and Chrousos G.P. (2007). The neuroendorinology of stress. Pp. 303-318 in Handbook of Psychophysiology. J.T. Cacioppo, L.G. Tassinary and G.G. Berntson Eds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Leach K.A., Huber J., Whay H.R., Winckler C., March S. and Dippel S. (2008). Assessing lameness in tied cows. Pp. 126-128 in Proc. 15th Int. Conf. Lameness in Ruminants, Kuopio, Finland. Savonia Univ. Appl. Sci, Kuopio, Finland.
Moberg G.P. (2000). Biological response to stress: implications for animal welfare. Pp. 1-21 in Biology of Animal Stress. Mench and G. Moberg Eds. CAB International, J.A. Oxon.
Munksgaard L., DePassille A.M., Rushen J., Herskin M.S. and Kristensen A.M. (2001). Dairy cows’ fear of people; social learning, milk yield and behaviour at milking. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 73,15-26.
Napolitano F., Grasso F., Bordi A., Tripaldi C., Saltalamacchia F., Pacelli C. and De Rosa G. (2005). On-farm welfare assessment in dairy cattle and buffaloes: evaluation of some animal-based parameters. Italian J. Anim. Sci. 4, 223-231.
Oltenacu P.A., Bendixen P.H., Vilson B. and Ekesbo I. (1990). Tramped teats-clinical mastitis disease complex in tied cows. Environmental risk factors and interrelationships with other diseases. Acta. Vet. Scandinavica. 31(4), 471-478.
Oltenacu P.A. and Ekesbo I. (1994). Epidemiological study of clinical mastitis in dairy cattle. Vet. Res. 25(2-3), 208-212.
Pawelek R. and Croney C. (2003). Animal welfare. Understanding and addressing issues related to the well being of livestock. Oregon State University Extension Service.
Popescu S., Borda C., Hegedus I.C., Sandru C.D., Spinu M. and Lazar E. (2009). Dairy cow welfare assessment in extensive breeding systems. Lucrări Ştiinłifice Medicină Veterinară. 13(2), 23-29.
Rousing T. (2003). Welfare assessment in dairy cattle herds with loose-housing cubicle systems. Development and evaluation of welfare indicators. Ph D. Thesis. Danish Institute of Agricultural Science. Denmark.
Royal M., Mann G.E. and Flint A.P. (2000). Strategies for reversing the trend towards subfertility in dairy cattle. Vet. J. 160(1), 53-60.
SAS Institute. (1996). SAS®/STAT Software, Release 6.11. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
Silva L.W., Smith R.F., Routly J.E., Jones D.N., Morris M.J. and Dobson H. (2008). Lameness, activity time-budgets, and estrus expression in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 91,4552-4559.
Sorensen J.T., Bonde M.K., Møller S.H. and Rousing T. (2003). A concept for assessing animal welfare at farm level as a farm management tool. Pp. 728-730 in Proc. 10th Int. Symp. Epidemiol. Econ.Vina del Mar, Chile.
Sprecher D.J., Hostetler D.E. and Kaneene J.B. (1997). A lameness scoring system that uses posture and gait to predict dairy cattle reproductive performance. Theriogenology. 47, 1179-1187.
Studer E. (1998). A veterinary perspective of on farm evaluation of nutrition and reproduction. J. Dairy Sci. 81, 872-876.
Vucinic M. (2006). Ponašanje, dobrobit i zaštita životinja. Fakultet Veterinarske Medicine, Beograd.
Waiblinger S., Boivin X., Pedersen V., Tosi M.V., Janczak A.M., Visser E.K. and Jones R.B. (2006). Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 101, 185-242.
Waiblinger S., Menke C. and Coleman G. (2002). The relationship between attitudes, personal characteristics and behaviour of stockpeople and subsequent behaviour and production of dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 79, 195-219.
Waiblinger S., Menke C. and Fölsch D.W. (2003). Influences on the avoidance and approach behaviour of dairy cows towards humans on 35 farms. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 84, 23-39.
Ward W.R. (2001). Lameness in dairy cattle. Irish Vet. J. 54, 129-139.
Webster J. (2005). Animal Welfare: Limping Towards Eden. Blackwell Publishing.
Whay H.R. (2007). The journey to animal welfare improvement. Anim. Welfare. 16(2), 117-122.
Whay H.R., Main D.C.J., Green L.E. and Webster A.J.F. (2003). Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: direct observations and investigation of farm records. Vet. Rec. 153, 197-202.
Windschnurer I., Schmied C., Boivin X. and Waiblinger S. (2008). Reliability and inter-test relationship of tests for on-farm assessment of dairy cows’ relationship to humans. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 114, 37-53.
Zimbelman R.G. (1991). Animal well being: one scientist's point of view. Prof. Anim. Sci. 7, 9-12.
