Economic Opportunity Survey of Small Dairy Farms in the Southwest Part of Iran
الموضوعات :
M. Vatankhah
1
(
Department of Animal Science, Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center, Shahrekord, Iran
)
M. Faraji
2
(
Jahad Agriculture Organization of Chaharmohal and Bakhtiari Province, Shahrekord, Iran
)
A.A. Gharadaghi
3
(
Animal Science Research Institute, Karaj, Iran
)
A.R. Aghashahi
4
(
Animal Science Research Institute, Karaj, Iran
)
الکلمات المفتاحية: Iran, dairy cattle smallholder, economic opportunities,
ملخص المقالة :
In this study 495 smallholder dairy farms in 52 villages of different township in southwestern province of Iran (Chaharmohal and Bakhtiari province) included 1321 lactating cows and 2811 total mature cows (lactating and dry) during winter 2009 to summer 2010 were used to estimate economic opportunities insmallholder dairy farms. Questionnaire survey was used to collect data from last year information, recorded information, direct recording during visit the farm and interview with the small holder farmers. The economic opportunity is the amount of additional revenue that could be obtained if farmers could improve various productivity indexes to meet reasonable targets. The total of economic opportunities per farm per year estimated as 2009.68 US $ included 1354.85 US $ (57.94% total) for average daily milk produce per cow, 475.52 US $ (26.07% total) for average lactation length, 75.04 US $ (4.00% total) for average age at first calving, 37.52 US $ (8.98% total) for average calf production interval and 66.75 US $ (3.00% total) for average calf mortality, respectively. The considerable variation observed for economic opportunities, percent of total and total of economic opportunities in different townships, seasons, breeds and size of herds. Thus, increasing the average daily milk production per cow and averagelactation length, as well as decreasing average age at first calving and average calf production interval could affect profit and productivity.
Anciuti M.A., Rutz F., Silva L.A., Cosenza R.C. and Silva R.G. (2004). Effectof replacement of dietary inorganic by organic selenium (Sel-Plex®) on the performance of broilers. Proc. An. Symp. Biotech. Feed. Ind. 20,14-19.
Arthur J.R., Mckenzie R.C. and Beckett. G.J. (2003). Selenium in the immune system. J. Nutr. 133, 1457-1459.
Barua A. and Yoshimura Y. (2004). Ovarian cell-mediated immune response to Salmonella Enteritidis infection in laying hens (Gallus domesticus). Poult. Sci. 83, 997-1002.
Cunnigham C.H. (1971). Virologia practica. 6th Ed. Zaragoza Acribia.
Daza A., Salado S., Gálvez J.F. and Gutiérrez Barquín M. (2000). Efecto de la suplementación con vitamina E y Selenio sobre el sistema inmune, parámetros hematológicos y parámetros productivos de lechones recién destetados. Departamento del Producción Animal. E.T.S. de Ingenieros Agrónomos. 15,1-2.
Johnson J. and Reid W.M. (1970). Anticoccidial drugs: lesion scoring techniques in battery and floor-pen experiments with chickens. Experim. Parasitol. 28, 30-36.
Karadas F. and Surai P.F. (2004). Interações entre selênio e vitamina E: será que 1+1 é igual a mais 2 Pp. 57-69 in Anais do Simpósio Brasileiro Alltech: Re-imaginando a indústria de alimentação animal. Biotecnologia Nutricional na Indústria de Alimentação Animal.
Kindlein G., Ribeiro A.M.L., Canal C.W. and Vieira M.M. (2007). Feeding different levels of vitamin E and selenium has no effect on serum immunoglobulin Y (IgY) production by layers vaccinated against Escherichia coli and avian encephalomyelitis virus.Ciência. Rural. 37, 1374-1379.
Koutsos E.A. and Klasing K.C. (2001). Interactions between the immune system, nutrition and productivity of animals. Rec. Advan. Anim. Nutr. 21, 173-190.
Leng L., Bobzek R., Kuriková S., Boldizárová K., Grešáková L., Ševcíková Z., Révajová V., Levkutová M. and Levkut M. (2003). Comparative metabolic and immune responses of chickens fed diets containing inorganic selenium and Sel-PlexTM organic selenium. Pp. 131-145 in Proc. Nutritional Biotechnology in the Feed and Food Industry, Alltech’s 19th Ann. Symp. Nottingham University Press, UK.
MaiorkaA., Silva A.V.F., Santin E., Borges S.A., Boleli I.C. and Macari M. (2000). Influência da suplementação de glutamina sobre o desempenho e o desenvolvimento de vilos e criptas do intestino delgado de frangos. Arq. Bras. Méd. Vet. Zoot. 52, 487-490.
Maiorka A., Boleli I.C. and Macari M. (2002). Desenvolvimento e reparo da mucosa intestinal. Pp.172 in Fisiologia aviária aplicada a frangos de corte, M. Macari, Jaboticabal: Funep.
Maiorka A., Santin E. and Dahlke F. (2003). Posthatching water and feed deprivation affect the gastrointestinal tract and intestinal mucosa development of broiler chicks. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 12, 483-492.
Rayman M.G. (2000). The importance of selenium to human health. Lancet. 356, 233-241.
Rutz F., Pan E.A., Xavier G.B. and Anciuti M.A. (2003). Effect of replacement of dietary inorganic by organicselenium (Sel-Plex®) on the performance of broilers. In: Nutritional Biotechnology in the Feed and Food Industries. Pp. 147-161 i Proc. of Alltech’s 19th Ann. Symp. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.
Rutz F., Anciuti M.A., Rech J.L. and Rossi P. (2004). Impacto dos minerais orgânicos sobre o desempenho animal. Pp. 74-82 in Proc. Anais do Simpósio Brasileiro Alltech: Re-imaginando a indústria de Alimentação Animal. Biotecnologia Nutricional na Indústria de Alimentação Animal. Ed., Andrea Malaguido e Fernando Rutz.
Santin E., Maiorka A., Macari M., Grecco M., Sanchez J.C., Okada T.M. and Myasaka A.M. (2001). Performance and intestinal mucosa development in broiler chickens fed diets containing saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 10, 236-244.
Surai P.F. (2000). Organic selenium: benefits to animals and humans, a biochemist’s view. In Pp. 205-260 in Proc. Alltech’s 16th Ann Sym. Nottingham University Press, Biotechnology in the Feed Industry. Nottingham, UK.
Surai P.F. (2002) Natural antioxidants in Avian Nutrition and Reproduction. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.
