ارزیابی مؤلفه‌های مؤثر بر ایجاد فضاهای چندعملکردی اجتماع‌پذیر در حوزه‌های شهری با رویکرد محلی- جهانی (مورد پژوهی: منطقه 22 شهرداری تهران)
الموضوعات :سید محسن شمس الدین تکیه 1 , ناصر اقبالی 2 , اسماعیل شیعه 3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری شهرسازی، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، واحد امارات،
دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، دبی، امارات
2 - دانشیار جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
3 - استاد شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران
الکلمات المفتاحية: AHP, واژگان کلیدی: فضای چندعملکردی, اجتماع پذیر, محلی- جهانی, منطقه 22,
ملخص المقالة :
چکیده امروزه ارتقای کیفیت فضای شهری، یکی از نیازهای اساسی جامعه شهری است. پدیده‌ی جهانی سازی، اتفاقی است که بر فضاهای شهری- محلی تأثیر خود را گذاشته و ضمن چند عملکردی بودن باید قابلیت جذب جمعیت و اجتماع پذیر شدن این حوزه را داشته باشند. هدف ارزیابی و تحلیل تاثیرات و نقش مؤلفه‌های فضاهای اجتماع پذیر و فضاهای چند عملکردی و ارتباط آن‌ها با رویکرد جهانی- محلی، منطقه 22 شهرداری تهران است. این پژوهش کاربردی و روش تحقیق توصیفی- تحلیلی است. همچنین برای ارزیابی منطقه 22 از تکنیک تصمیم‌گیری مدل AHP، با استفاده از نرم افزار Expert choice استفاده گردید. که حجم نمونه 225 نفر برآورد گردید. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد؛ که مؤلفه تحرکات استفاده کنندگان دارای بیشترین و شاخص‌های اخطلاط کاربری، دسترسی سواره از پیاده، دارای بیشترین اهمیت از نظر مفاهیم پژوهش را دارا بوده است. این روند نشان دهند هم راستا بودن نتایج در روند مؤلفه‌های هر دو مفهوم می‌باشد. Evaluation of the Effective Components on the Creation of Multi-Functional Communities in Urban Areas wites in District 22, the AHP model decision making technique was used by Expert selection software. Conclusion: To estimate the sample size, Cochran formula and cluster sampling method were used to determine the appropriate components and indicators for creation of community spaces. The sample size was estimated to be 225 people. The analysis of the results of the research shows that according to the dimensions studied, the user's motivation component has the highest and user-defined indicators, pedestrian access is the most important for the concepts of research. This trend shows that the results are consistent in the process of the components of both concepts.
References
Abdi Daneshpour, Zohreh,. Mahmoudpour, ASerein. (2014). A Framework for Basic Knowledge Framework for Mental Intelligence Factors Affecting the Exercise on the Extent of People Using the General Garden in the City of Tehran, Journal of Sufeh, Volume 24, N 3. [In Persian]
Alawi Belmaani, Maryam,. Pour Jafar, Mohammad Reza. (2009). Effective Factors on the Utility of Urban. Abadi Magazine. No. 63. p. 8. [In Persian]
Alexander, C. (1969). Major Changes In Environmental Form Required by Social and Psychological Demands.pp. 78-85.
Ali Mardani, Masoud,.Mehdi Nejad, Jamaleddin,. Afkhami, Talieh. (2014). Qualitative Development of Urban Space to Promote Social Interactions (Case Study: Ahmad Abad St., Mashhad, Iran) 1, 2 Quarterly Journal of Applied Arts, Vol. 5, No. 7. p.5. [In Persian]
Bantayan, Nathaniel,. Bishop, Ian, (1998). Linking objective and subjective modelling for landuse decision-making, Landscape and Urban Planning, No. 43.pp.15-43
Barker, Roger. G. (1968). Ecological Psychology: Concepts and Methods for Studying the Environment of Human Behavior, Stanford, University Press. P:82.
Barter, M. (2009). Local and Global,Place and Space:. CABE. Community Green: Using Localspaces to Tackle Inequality and Improve Health: www.cabe.org.uk
Beatriz, G. (2004). Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration in Western European Cities: Lessons from Experience, Prospects for the Future. Routledge, 19, 4, PP.312-326.
Car, S. et al. (1992). Public Space. Massachusetts: Cambridge university press.p.114.
Carmona, M. (2011). Public places, urban spaces, different aspects of urban design. Translated to Persian by: Ahari, Zahra.
Carmona, Matthew,. Heath, Team,. Tetrak Tysdale, Steven. (2009).General Public Spaces, Translators: Gharei,Fariba,. Shokouhi, Mahshid,. Ahi,Zahra,. Salehi,Esmaeil. Tehran: Tehran University.
Carmona, M. (2004). Public places – urban spaces. The dimention of urban design. Oxford: Architectural press.p.3.
Cave, S. (1999). Applying psychology to the Environment,London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Douglas, M. (2003). Urban Space in Globalization era. International Development Planning Review, Nov., includes 6 articles.pp. 24-4.
El-Adly, M.I. (2007). Shopping Mall Attractiveness:a segmentation approach, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 35(11). P.147.
Esmail Pour, Najma,. Karamooz,Elham,. Fakharzadeh, Zahra. (2015). Collection of evaluation of user mixing in urban space of the street and ways to improve it. Case study: Kashani avenue in the middle texture of Yazd city. Geographic Quarterly Journal, Year 30, Issue 3, Successive No. 118. P. 24-1. [In Persian]
Fathi, Soroush. (2016). Sociological analysis of observance of citizenship ethics in urban space (Case study: Citizens of Tehran city). Year 6, No.18, P.144-115. Quarterly Journal of Urban Sociological Studies, No. 18. [In Persian]
Fathi, Soroush. (2012). An Analysis of Social Relations in Sustainable Urban Space, Journal of Social Development Studies, (4), 13, p.15.. [In Persian]
Gospodini, A., Beriatos, E. (2004). Glocalising urban landscapes: Athens and the 2004 olympics. University of Thessaly. [In Persian]. Habibi, Seyed Mohsen. (2018). Civil Society and Urban Life. Fine Arts, No. 31, pp. 10-7.
Hall, E. T. (1982),The Hidden Dimension, New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday P.55.
Heydari Sarshjani, Mohsen, (2014). Theoretical controversy about the global and local urban space, the emergence of a new world-wide approach to localization of urban spaces. The first national conference on geography, tourism and sustainable urban development. Tehran. [In Persian]
Lang, John. (2009). Urban design, typology of designs and procedures. (Translated by Seyyed Hossein Bahreini,) Tehran: Tehran University Press, Publishing & Printing Institute. p. 15.
Lang, John. (2002). The Architectural Theory, The Role of Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. Translator: Einifar, Alireza. Tehran University Press. Tehran.
Lang, J. (1994). Urban Design: American experience. New York: Van strand Reinhold.p. 181.
Langdon, F. (1966). The Social and Physical Environment: a Social Scientist View. Journal of The Royal Institute of British Architects 73, pp. 460-464.
Larco, N. (2010). Merging Global and LocalIdentity through Design. A Case Study of Puerto Madero, Buenos Aires. University of Oregon.
Lee, Yeunsook,. Kim, Kyoungyeon,. Lee, Soojin. (2010). Study on building plan for enhancing the social health of public apartments, Building and Enviroment, Vol 45, PP.1564-1551.
Lee, Y. Jonk. (2008). Subjective quality of life measurement in Taipei. Building and Environment, 43 (7). Pp. 1205-1215.
Liu, M. (2001). the Development of Civic Values: Case Study of Taiwan. International Journal of Educational research. Vol.35.p.5.
Mann, normal. (1977).the effect of simules queues on queue- joining behavior.journal of personality and social psychology, No.3.p.11.
Pakzad, Jahanshah. (2007). Theoretical Basis and Urban Design Process. [In Persian]Tehran: Shahid Beheshti Publishing, Second Edition.
Pakzad, Jahanshah. (2007). The course of ideas in urban planning - from quantity to quality, Tehran, New Township Development Company (Ministry of Housing and Urbanization) First Edition, Volume II. [In Persian]
Pasalar, Celen. (2003).tu on layout spatial of effects The.,,analysis case Multiple: schools middle in interactions’ dents Fac philosophy of doctor of degree for thesis unpublished.University State Carolina North of ulty.p.19.
Poll, Enric. (2002). The theoretical background of the city identity-sustainability network, Environment and Behavior, Vol.34, pp:8-25.
Rezvani, Alireza. (2016). Soul of the city, redefining the city, space, urban space and determining the spiritual indices.Chapter II Architectural Green 2nd, No. 4, p. 55. [In Persian]
Sadr, Seyed Hossein, (2009). Review of Darwinian Evolutionary Theory, Part I, Translated by: Marzieh Soleimani, Quarterly Journal of Islamic Education Education Development, p. 72. pp. 11-4. [In Persian]
Schmidt,, S., & Nemeth,, J. (2010). Space, place and the city: emerging research on public space design and planning. Cornell university.
Sharghi, Ali,. Alimardanii, Masoud,. Jahan zamin, Yosef,. Jahan zamin Shahrzad. (2017). Analysis and Evaluation of the Factors Affecting the Integrity of the Urban Autonomy in Historical Public Sites (Case Study: Ordibeh Shahid Beheshti Center). Urban Management Quarterly, No. 47. pp. 301- 316. [In Persian]
Shojaee, Delaram,. Partoei, Parvin. (2015). Factors Affecting the Creation and Promotion of Social Justice in Public Spaces with Different Levels of Tehran (Case Study: Public spaces of two neighborhoods and one district in the 7th Taharan area), No. 34, Year 12, Bagh-e-Nazar Magazine, 108. p. 99. [In Persian]
Wallace, A. (1952). Housing and social structure. Philadelphia Housing Authority.
Zandieh, Mehdi,. Eliasy,Ebrahim. (2016). Identification of Landscape Design Strategies for Urban Spaces to Improve Environmental Quality (Case Study: Central core of Mahabad City) Two Journal
_||_