مدل سازی ساختاری نقش حکمرانی آب در توسعه پایدار استان قم
محورهای موضوعی : برگرفته از پایان نامه
علیرضا اقبالیان
1
,
سید مهدی میردادیان
2
*
,
شهاب الدین شکری
3
1 - دانشجوی دکترای ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، گروه اقتصاد،ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی،واحد علوم وتحقیقات ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ،تهران ،ایران
2 - دانشیار،گروه اقتصاد،ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی،واحد علوم وتحقیقات ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ،تهران ،ایران
3 - دانشکده کشاورزی و علوم پایه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد رودهن
کلید واژه: حکمرانی آب, عوامل فنی, حمایت نهادی و اقتصادی , عوامل قانونی و حقوقی, استان قم,
چکیده مقاله :
مقدمه: بامطالعه در مورد مدیریت منابع آب می توان اذعان داشت که مفهوم حکمرانی آب ، موضوع قابل بحثی است که بسیاری از زوایای آن هنوز به درستی تبیین نشده است. مطالعه حاضر با هدف طراحی مدل حکمرانی آب در جوامع روستایی استان قم به منظور دستیابی به توسعه پایدار روستایی در استان قم انجام شده است. روش¬: جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر شامل کارشناسان آب سازمان نظام مهندسی کشاورزی استان قم که تعداد آن ها 163 نفر (آماررسمی سازمان، 1401) وکارشناسان سازمان آب استان قم که تعداد آنها 130 نفر(آمار رسمی سازمان، 1401) بوده است که بر اساس رابطه ی کوکران و با توجه به حجم جامعه آماری، حجم نمونه در این پژوهش تعداد170 نفر محاسبه و به روش تصادفی ساده انتخاب گردید. برای جمع آوری اطلاعات از پرسشنامه مشتمل بر 3 بخش: ویژگی های شخصی پاسخگویان، گویه های حکمرانی آب و گویه های عوامل تأثیرگذار بر حکمرانی آب به عنوان ابزار اصلی تحقیق استفاده شد. یافته¬ها: عامل فنی بزرگترین عامل موثر مدل پژوهش(522/0=β , 664/2=t)شمرده شده و بعد از آن به ترتیب عامل حمایت نهادی و اداری(374/0=β , 739/2=t)، اجتماعی(348/0=β , 435/3=t) و عامل اقتصادی(297/0=β , 960/2=t) مهمترین عوامل موثر محسوب می شوند. همچنین عوامل قانونی و حقوقی نیز از نظر آماری معنادار شناخته نشده است(040/0=β , 318/0=t). نتیجه¬گیری: این مطالعه با تمرکز بر یکی از مهمترین موضوعات حیطه آب تلاش کرده است به رابطه دو مقوله بسیار مهم ملی یعنی توسعه روستایی و حکمرانی آب بپردازد که در مطالعات پیشین داخلی کمتر به آن پرداخته شده است.
Introduction: After reviewing the literature and studying water resources management, it can be acknowledged that the concept of water governance is a debatable topic that many of its aspects have not yet been properly clarified. The present study was conducted with the aim of designing a water governance model in rural communities of Qom province in order to achieve sustainable rural development in Qom province. Methods: The statistical population of the present research included water experts of the Agricultural Engineering Organization of Qom province, which were 163 people (official statistics of the organization, 1401) and water experts of the Qom Water Organization, which were 130 people (official statistics of the organization, 1401). Based on the Cochran's formula and considering the size of the statistical population, the sample size in this research was calculated as 170 people and selected using the simple random sampling method. To collect data, a questionnaire consisting of three sections was used as the main research tool: personal characteristics of the respondents, water governance items, and factors affecting water governance. Findings: It was found that the technical factor was the most effective factor in the research model (β = 0.522, t = 6.642). After that, the institutional and administrative support factor (β = 0.374, t = 7.392), the social factor (β = 0.348, t = 4.353), and the economic factor (β = 0.297, t = 2.960) were the most important factors. Also, legal and regulatory factors were not statistically significant (β = 0.040, t = 0.318). Conclusion: This study, focusing on one of the most important issues in the water sector, has attempted to address the relationship between two very important national issues, namely rural development and water governance, which has been less addressed in previous domestic studies.
. WEF, The Global Risks Report 2016. 2016, World Economic Forum: Cologny.
2. IPCC, ntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014, Working Group II: New York.
3.https://ayhoekstra.nl/pubs/Vorosmarty-et-al-2015.pdf
4. Serageldin, I., Water Wars? A Talk with Ismail Serageldin. World Policy Journal, 2009. 26(4): p. 25-31.
5. WWAP, The United Nations World Water Development Report 2016: Water and Jobs. 2016, United Nations World Water Assessment Programme: Paris:UNESCO.
6.https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2601260
7. غفوری خرانق, س., م. بنی حبیب, and س. جوادی, چالش ها و راهکارهای اصلاحی حکمرانی آب زیرزمینی در دشت یزد-اردکان با استفاده از مدل DPSIR. اکوهیدرولوژی, 2019. 6(4): p. 1029-1043.
8. Jiménez, A., et al., Unpacking Water Governance: A Framework for Practitioners. Water, 2020. 12(3): p. 827.
9. Akhmouch, A. and D. Clavreul, Stakeholder Engagement for Inclusive Water Governance: “Practicing What We Preach” with the OECD Water Governance Initiative. Water, 2016. 8(5): p. 204.
10. Fliervoet, J.M., et al., Analyzing Collaborative Governance Through Social Network Analysis: A Case Study of River Management Along the Waal River in The Netherlands. Environmental Management, 2016. 57(2): p. 355-367.
11. Brouwer, S., Policy entrepreneurs in water governance. London: Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2015. 10: p. 978-3.
12. UNEP.http://www.unep.org/documents.multilingual/default.asp?documentid=97&articleid=1503, T.S.S., United Nations Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment:. 1972.
13. Brundtland, G.H.a.W.C.o.E.a.D.W.O.U.P.O., UK., Our Common Future: report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987.
14. Biermann, F., et al., with contributions from Ken Conca, Leila da Costa Ferreira, Bharat Desai, Simon Tay, and Ruben Zondervan. 2009. Earth System Governance: People, places and the planet. Science and implementation plan of the Earth System Governance Project.
15. عرب پور, ا., ارائه الگوی حکمرانی آب مبتنیبر بازاریابی اجتماعی در راستای تغییر رفتار مصرفی آب. مجلس و راهبرد, 2021. 28(106): p. 99-128.
16. پاک, ز. and س. محسنی موحد, بررسی بحران آب استان قم, in نخستین همایش کشوری بحران ها و چالش های آب در حوزه دریاچه نمک. 1393.
17. افسری, ع., et al., مدلِ دادهبنیاد بررسی جامعهشناختی حکمرانی آب در بحرانِ دریاچهی ارومیه. مطالعات راهبردی سیاستگذاری عمومی, 2018. 7(25): p. 53-72.
18. عسگری بزایه, ف., حکمرانی آب: مروری بر مفاهیم، چالشها، ابزارها و تدابیر نهادی. مدیریت آب در کشاورزی, 2016. 3(1): p. 25-34.
19. Cosgrove, W.J. and D.P. Loucks, Water management: Current and future challenges and research directions. Water Resources Research, 2015. 51(6): p. 4823-4839.
20. Manny, L., Socio-technical challenges towards data-driven and integrated urban water management: A socio-technical network approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2023. 90: p. 104360.
21. Brown, C.M., et al., The future of water resources systems analysis: Toward a scientific framework for sustainable water management. Water Resources Research, 2015. 51(8): p. 6110-6124.
22. Qu, J. and M. Fan, The current state of water quality and technology development for water pollution control in China. Critical reviews in environmental science and technology, 2010. 40(6): p. 519-560.
23. Bretschger, L., Economics of technological change and the natural environment: How effective are innovations as a remedy for resource scarcity? Ecological Economics, 2005. 54(2-3): p. 148-163.
24. Vang, Mia Lia. Short-term Changes in Sediment and Water Chemistry After a Partial Aluminum Sulfate Treatment to Long Lake, Wisconsin. Diss. University of Wisconsin--Stout, 2020.
25. Song, M., R. Wang, and X. Zeng, Water resources utilization efficiency and influence factors under environmental restrictions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018. 184: p. 611-621.
26. Li, Z., et al., Government mandatory energy-biased technological progress and enterprises' environmental performance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of cleaner production standards in China. Energy Policy, 2022. 162: p. 112779.
27. Zou, D. and H. Cong, Evaluation and influencing factors of China’s industrial water resource utilization efficiency from the perspective of spatial effect. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2021. 60(1): p. 173-182.
28. Judd, S.J. and I. Carra, Low-pressure membrane technology for potable water filtration: true costs. Water Res, 2021. 191: p. 116826.
29. Hasanbeigi, A. and L. Price, A review of energy use and energy efficiency technologies for the textile industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012. 16(6): p. 3648-3665.
30. Chan, N.W., Issues and challenges in water governance in Malaysia. 2009.
31. van Leeuwen, K., et al. The Challenges of Water Management and Governance in Cities. Water, 2019. 11, DOI: 10.3390/w11061180.
32. Larson, K., An Integrated Theoretical Approach to Understanding the Sociocultural Basis of Multidimensional Environmental Attitudes. Society and Natural Resources, 2010. 23: p. 898-907.
33. Grigg, N.S., Water Resources Management: Principles, Regulations, and Cases. 1996: McGraw-Hill.
34. Pahl-Wostl, C., An Evolutionary Perspective on Water Governance: From Understanding to Transformation. Water Resources Management, 2017. 31(10): p. 2917-2932.
35. Pahl-Wostl, C., et al., Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and society, 2007. 12(2).
36. Goldin, J., From vagueness to precision: raising the volume on social issues for the water sector. Water Policy, 2013. 15(2): p. 309-324.
37. Shunglu, R., et al., Barriers in Participative Water Governance: A Critical Analysis of Community Development Approaches. Water, 2022. 14(5): p. 762.
38. Abeywardana, N., W. Bebermeier, and B. Schütt, Ancient Water Management and Governance in the Dry Zone of Sri Lanka Until Abandonment, and the Influence of Colonial Politics during Reclamation. Water, 2018. 10(12): p. 1746.
39. Withanachchi, S.S., et al., Water resource management in dry zonal paddy cultivation in Mahaweli River Basin, Sri Lanka: An analysis of spatial and temporal climate change impacts and traditional knowledge. Climate, 2014. 2(4): p. 329-354.
40. Kessy, A., Decentralization and citizens' participation: Some theoretical and conceptual perspectives. The African Review: A Journal of African Politics, Development and International Affairs, 2013: p. 215-239.
41. Agarwal, A., et al., Integrated water resources management. 2000: Global water partnership Stockholm.
42. Tomaszewska, B. and L. Pająk, Geothermal water resources management–economic aspects of their treatment. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi-Mineral Resources Management, 2012: p. 59-70-59-70.
43. Varis, O. and K. Abu-Zeid, Socio-economic and environmental aspects of water management in the 21st century: Trends, challenges and prospects for the MENA region. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 2009. 25(3): p. 507-522.
44. Gomez, M., J. Perdiguero, and A. Sanz, Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Water Access in Rural Areas of Low and Middle Income Countries. Water, 2019. 11: p. 202.
45. Ménard, C., Redesigning public utilities: the key role of micro-institutions, in Corruption, development and institutional design. 2009, Springer. p. 189-202.
46. Grigg, N.S., Water governance: from ideals to effective strategies. Water International, 2011. 36(7): p. 799-811.
47. Tropp, H., Water governance: trends and needs for new capacity development. Water Policy, 2007. 9(S2): p. 19-30.