A 360 Degree Performance Appraisal Model for Documents Digitizing Firms

Subject Areas : Business Strategy

Amir Hossein Koofigar ¹ , Mahshid Ghaziasgar ² , Mahdi Karbasian ³

1 - Isfahan Payame Noor University, Isfahan, Iran
2 - Isfahan Payame Noor University, Isfahan, Iran
3 - Malek Ashtar University, Tehran, Iran

Received: 2015-01-31 Accepted : 2015-03-01 Published : 2016-01-01

Keywords: Performance Appraisal, 360 degree feedback, proposed model, performance evaluation criteria,

Abstract :

Performance appraisal is a process that people can comparetheir perceptions of working with major manufacturers’ perceptions.However, when assessment is done from different sources thatare related with self-assessment, called performance appraisal 360 degree.Given the importance of Performance appraisal by 360 degreefeedback in organizations, a model has been provided for 360 degreeperformance appraisal of firms that digitize documents. The model wasconfirmed 40 experts by questionnaire method, Also reliability of thequestionnaire was confirmed by Cronbach’s Alpha. The model was implementedin a similar firm. By determining of expectations and criteriaof performance evaluation of each sector the other sectors, The final 17different performance evaluation forms were developed that will be completedby its members and customers to performance evaluation of theother employees. The results of data and review it and recommendationswere provided, improve the productivity of the organization.

References:

[1] Abaspour, A. (1384), Manager Technical Manager Supervisors Employees.

[2] Ahanchian, M. R. (1382), Opposing effects of gender on student evaluations

of faculty members. Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences,

183-199.

[3] Andres, R., Garcia-Lapresta, J. L., and Martinez, L. (2010), A multigranular

linguistic model for management decision-making in performance

appraisal. Soft Computing, 14 (1), 21-34.

[4] Andres, R., Espinilla, M., and Martinez, L. (2010), An extended hierarchical

linguistic model for managing integral evaluation. International

Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 3 (4), 486-500.

[5] Antonioni, D. and Park, H. (2001), The relationship between rater affect

and three sources of 360-degree feedback ratings. Journal of Management,

27, 479-495.

[6] Banks, C. G. and Roberson, L. (1985), Performance appraisers as test

developers. Academy of Management Review, 10, 128-142.

[7] Chang, G. (1381), 360-Degree Method to evaluate the performance of

service firms. (Translator ashkzari, J).

[8] Dessler, G. (2000), Human Resource Management. 8th ed., New Jersey:

Prentice.

[9] Espinilla, M., Andres, R., Martinez, F. G., and Martinez, L. (2013), “A

360-degree performance appraisal model dealing with heterogeneous information

and dependent criteria”. Information Sciences, 222, 459-471.

[10] Fisher, C., Schoenfeldt, L. F., and Shaw, J. B. (2006), Human resources

management. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

[11] Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. (2009),

Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th Edition, Prentice Hall.

[12] Hinkin, T. and schriesheim, C. (2004), “If you don’t hear from me you

know you are doing fine”. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration

Quarterly, Vol. 45.

 [13] Javaherizadeh, N., Mehrabi, J., and Bazvand, F. (1390), Compare the

traditional method of performance evaluation and its relationship with

360 degree feedback and employee satisfaction, Lorestan University of

Medical Sciences. Journal of Development, 57-67.

[14] McCarty, M. and Caravan, T. N. (2001), “360 Feedback and processes:

Performance improvement and employee career development”. Journal of

European Industrial Training.

[15] Maund, L. (2001), Introduction to Human Resource Management.

[16] Millmore, M. and Biggs, D. (2007), “Gender differences within 360-

degree managerial performance appraisals”. The current issue and full

text archive of this journal is available at: www.emeraldinsight.com/0964-

9425.htm.

[17] Mum Ford, A. and Gold, J. (2009), “Management Development Strategies

for Action”. Chartered Institute of Personal and Development Cipd

house”. Camp Road, London, Sw 194 ux.

[18] Nelson, B. (2000), “Performance management. The use of informal

rewards in recognizing”. Performance; U.S.A. Available at:

http://www.pmanagement.com.articles/9902b.htm

[19] Sepehrirad, R., Azar, A., and Sadeghi, A. (2012), “Developing a hybrid

mathematical model for 360-degree”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,

62, 844-848.

[20] Ward, P. (2003), “360 Degree feedback”. The Cromwell press.

[21] Weiss, G. (2004), “How to give and receive employee feedback: Tell staffers

early and often how they performing, and listen to their job-related concerns”.

Medical Economical, Vol. 81.