Teacher Licensure and the Implementation of (Im)Politeness Strategies in Iranian EFL Classrooms

Hossein Aghaalikhani ¹ ( College of Foreign Languages and Literature, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran )
Fatemeh  Yousefi ² ( college of foreign languages, srb, tehran,iran )

Submited date : 2025-02-12 Accepted date : 2025-04-23

Keywords: Impoliteness strategies, politeness theory, pragmatic competence, EFL teachers, classroom interaction,

Abstract :

This study investigated the impoliteness strategies employed by 20 female Iranian EFL teachers working in private language institutes in Tehran,  selected based on convenience sampling method. Participants, with varying levels of education (BA, MA, Ph.D.) and teaching experience (5-25 years), were categorized into upper-intermediate and advanced English proficiency groups based on their performance on the Cambridge English: Proficiency (C2 Proficiency) test. A written Discourse Completion Test (DCT) comprising 15 scenarios was used to elicit teacher responses in various social interaction situations. Culpeper's Impoliteness Taxonomy (1996) provided the framework for analyzing the elicited data. Data analysis revealed that Iranian EFL teachers predominantly employed positive politeness strategies across various speech acts, particularly in requests, apologies, and offers, highlighting their commitment to fostering a positive and harmonious classroom environment. Negative politeness was more common in refusals, indicating a desire to mitigate potential face-threats. Statistical analysis using a Chi-Square test for independence revealed a significant association between proficiency levels and the use of politeness strategies with advanced teachers employing a wider range of strategies, particularly positive politeness. These findings suggested that higher levels of education may contribute to greater pragmatic competence, allowing teachers to utilize a more nuanced and flexible approach to communication. The study underscored the importance of incorporating pragmatic competence training, particularly focusing on politeness strategies, into EFL teacher education programs. This will equip teachers with the necessary skills to navigate complex classroom interactions effectively, fostering a positive and supportive learning environment conducive to student success.

References:


References
Allami, H. (2012). A sociopragmatic study of offer speech act in Persian. RALS, 3(1), 110-129. https://doi.org/10.18355/rals.2012.3.08

Allami, H., & Boustani, S. (2017). A cross-linguistic study of refusals: An analysis of pragmatic competence development in Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 385-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.10.013

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49(4), 677-713. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00094

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Chaqmaqchee, O. M., & Jasim, Z. F. (2022). EFL undergraduate learners' politeness strategies in the speech act of disagreement. World Journal of English Language, 12(8), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n8p1

Chejnová, P. (2014). Expressing politeness in the institutional e-mail communications of university students in the Czech Republic. Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.009

Eshghinejad, S., & Moini, M. R. (2016). Politeness strategies used in text messaging: Pragmatic competence in an asymmetrical power relation of teacher–student. SAGE Open, 6(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016632288

Eshghinejad, S., & Moini, M. R. (2016). Politeness strategies used in text messaging: Pragmatic competence in an asymmetrical power relation of teacher–student. SAGE Open, 6(1), 2158244016632288. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016632288

Farashaiyan, A., & Muthusamy, P. (2017). An investigation of Iranian learners’ utilization of politeness strategies and power relations in refusal speech act across different communicative situations. Asian Social Science, 13(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n1p36

Fitriyani, S., & Andriyanti, E. (2020). Teacher and students’ politeness strategies in EFL classroom interactions. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v4i2.558

Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18(3), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). Academic Press.

Jaafar, F. A., & Ageli, N. R. (2022). The use of politeness strategies in the realization of the speech act of disagreement by EFL learners. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 5(11), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2022.5.11.3

Jalilifar, A. (2009). Request strategies: Cross-sectional study of Iranian EFL learners and Australian native speakers. English Language Teaching, 2(1), 46-61.

Kasper, G. (1990). Linguistic politeness: Current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 193-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90086-Y

Kasper, G. (1992). Pragmatic transfer. Second Language Research, 8(3), 203-231. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839200800302

Kasper, G. (2000). Data collection in pragmatics research. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking (pp. 316-341). Continuum.

Khakzad Esfahlan, Z., & Boroumand, F. (2020). Politeness strategies in the realization of the speech act of disagreement by EFL learners. World Journal of English Language, 12(8), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n8p1

Mirzaei Jegarlooei, S. H., & Allami, H. (2018). (Im)politeness strategies and use of discourse markers. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 5(1), 1461048. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2018.1461048

Mulyono, H., Amalia, D. R., & Suryoputro, G. (2019). Politeness strategies in teacher-student WhatsApp communication. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 58, 295-318. https://doi.org/10.14456/pasaalj.2019.15

Muntigl, P., & Turnbull, W. (1998). Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(3), 225-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00048-9

Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2001). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Blackwell.

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.

Senowarsito, S. (2013). Politeness strategies in teacher-student interaction in an EFL classroom context. TEFLIN Journal, 24(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v24i1/82-96

Surono, S. (2021). Directive speech acts in parenting and politeness implications based on the schools’ missions: A study on kindergarten teachers in teaching learning process in Yogyakarta. Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English, 7, 66. https://doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v7i1.2560

Taguchi, N. (2019). Teaching and learning pragmatic competence: Where are we now? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 147-166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190519000094

Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2007). Students writing emails to faculty: An examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.125/44326

Wijayanto, A., Prasetyarini, A., & Hikmat, M. H. (2017). Impoliteness in EFL: Foreign language learners' complaining behaviors across social distance and status levels. SAGE Open, 7(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017732816

Wlodarczyk, W. (2017). Speech acts in education: A critical review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 341-355.