مقایسه ویژگی های شخصیتی، کیفیت زندگی و نگرش به زندگی در مراجعین دارا و فاقد حیوان خانگی به کلینیک های دامپزشکی شهرستان گرگان
محورهای موضوعی : روانشناسي اجتماعياحسان زیادلو 1 , جوانشیر اسدی 2 , سونیا جاهدی دلیوند 3
1 - کارشناسی ارشد گروه روانشناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد گرگان. گرگان، ایران.
2 - استادیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،گرگان، ایران
3 - دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی، گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد بین الملل کیش، کیش، ایران.
کلید واژه: ویژگی های شخصیتی# کیفیت زندگی#نگرش به زندگی# حیوان خانگی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف: شخصیت یکی از عوامل موثر در ایجاد تفاوت‌های فردی و مجموعه‌ای از صفات و ویژگی‌های شخصی است که می تواند برای مقایسه اشخاص با یکدیگر مورد استفاده قرار گیرد. صفات شخصیتی می توانند بر چگونگی تشخیص و تفسیر محیط اطراف به وسیله فرد اثر بگذارند و بر کیفیت زندگی او نقش بسزایی داشته باشند. به طور کلی اعتقاد بر این است که ویژگی‌های شخصیتی متفاوت افراد در میزان رضایت یا نارضایتی افراد از زندگی و کیفیت آن مؤثر است. هدف از پژوهش حاضر مقایسه ویژگی‌های شخصیتی، کیفیت زندگی و نگرش به زندگی در مراجعین دارا و فاقد حیوان خانگی به کلینیک‌های دامپزشکی شهرستان گرگان بود.روش بررسی: روش پژوهش حاضر از نوع توصیفی- علی مقایسه‌ای بود. جامعه آماری مورد نظر مراجعین دارا و فاقد حیوان خانگی به کلینیک‌های دامپزشکی شهرستان گرگان در سال 1395 می باشند، روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس و تعداد 60 نفر به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند، جهت گردآوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامه 6 عاملی هگزاکو(HEXACO-PI-R) برای ویزگی های شخصیتی، پرسشنامه ویر و شربون برای کیفیت زندگی و پرسشنامه باتیستا برای نگرش به زندگی استفاده شده است.یافته‌ها: نتایج تحلیل واریانس چندمتغیره نشان داد که از میان مولفه‌های ویژگی‌های شخصیتی با سطح معنی داری(383/0)، مولفه صداقت و تواضع، هیجانی بودن،برون گرایی، توافق جویی، وجدانی بودن، گشودگی به تجربیات جدید( که خرده مقیاس برون گرایی از بقیه بیشتر بود) و از میان مولفه‌های کیفیت زندگی با سطح معنی داری(656/0) نقش جسمانی، درد بدنی،عملکرد اجتماعی، نقش هیجانی، سلامت عمومی(که خرده مقیاس عملکرد اجتماعی از بقیه بیشتر بود) و از میان مولفه های نگرش زندگی با سطح معنی داری(514/0) مولفه ی چارچوب و تکمیل در میان دو گروه تفاوت معنی داری وجود دارد.نتیجه گیری: براساس یافته های این پژوهش، بین ویژگی های شخصیتی، کیفیت زندگی و نگرش به زندگی در مراجعین دارا و فاقد حیوان خانگی تفاوت معناداری وجود دارد.
Objective: Personality is one of the effective factors in creating individual differences and a set of personal traits and characteristics that can be used to compare people with each other. Personality traits can affect how a person recognizes and interprets the environment and play an important role in their quality of life. It is generally believed that different personality traits of individuals affect the degree of satisfaction or dissatisfaction of people with life and its quality. The aim of this study was to compare personality traits, quality of life and attitude toward life in patients with and without a pet to veterinary clinics in Gorgan.Methods: The method of this research was descriptive-causal comparative. The statistical population is patients with and without pets to veterinary clinics in Gorgan in 2016, the sampling method is available and 60 people were selected as the sample, to collect data from the 6-factor Hexaco questionnaire. (HEXACO-PI-R) was used for personality traits, Weir and Sherbon questionnaire for quality of life and Batista questionnaire for attitude towards life.Results: The results of multivariate analysis of variance showed that among the components of personality traits with a significant level (0.383), the component of honesty and humility, emotionality, extraversion, agreement, conscientiousness, openness to experiences New (which was higher than the rest subscale of extroversion) and among the components of quality of life with a significant level (0.656) physical role, physical pain, social function, emotional role, general health (which is the subscale of social performance from The rest was more) and among the components of life attitude with a significant level (0.514) of the framework component and completion, there is a significant difference between the two groups.Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, there is a significant difference between personality traits, quality of life and attitude towards life in clients with and without a pet.Method: The method of the present study was descriptive-causal comparative. The statistical population is clients with and without pets in veterinary clinics of Gorgan city. Sampling method is available and 60 people were selected as a sample. A standard questionnaire was used to collect data.Result: The results of multivariate analysis of variance showed that among the components of personality traits, honesty and humility, emotionality, agreement, conscientiousness, openness to new experiences and among the components of quality of life, physical role, physical pain, emotional role, general health And among the components of life attitude, the component of framework and complementarity there is a significant difference between the two groups.Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference between personality traits, quality of life and attitude towards life in clients with and without a pet.
Akbari Zardkhaneh, S., Rostami, R., & Mamaghanieh, M. (2011). The relationship between type of pet ownning and pet owner personality and mental health care. Journal of Veterinary Research, 66(3), 271-275.
Ambrosi, C., Zaiontz, C., Peragine, G., Sarchi, S., & Bona, F. (2019). Randomized controlled study on the effectiveness of animal‐assisted therapy on depression, anxiety, and illness perception in institutionalized elderly. Psychogeriatrics, 19(1), 55-64.
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and social psychology review, 11(2), 150-166.
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Marcus, B., & De Vries, R. E. (2007). German lexical personality factors: Relations with the HEXACO model. European Journal of Personality: Published for the European Association of Personality Psychology, 21(1), 23-43.
Battista, J., & Almond, R. (1973). The development of meaning in life. Psychiatry, 36(4), 409-427.
Berget, B., Ekeberg, Ø., & Braastad, B. O. (2008). Animal-assisted therapy with farm animals for persons with psychiatric disorders: effects on self-efficacy, coping ability and quality of life, a randomized controlled trial. Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health, 4(1), 1-7.
Cadena, J., Vinaccia, S., Pérez, A., Rico, M. I., Hinojosa, R., & Anaya, J.-M. (2003). the impact of disease activity on the quality of life, mental health status, and family dysfunction in colombian patients with rheumatoid arthritis. JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology, 9(3), 142-150.
Choubineh, H., Rostami, R., Mohammadi, A., Bahonar, A. R., Shirani, D., Safdari, R., . . . Nosratabadi, M. (2007). A Study on Mental Health Status and Personality Traits of Pet Owners. Journal of armaghan danesh, 12(2).
Christiansen, N., Sliter, M., & Frost, C. T. (2014). What employees dislike about their jobs: Relationship between personality-based fit and work satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 25-29.
Crossman, M. K., & Kazdin, A. E. (2015). Animal visitation programs in colleges and universities: An efficient model for reducing student stress. In Handbook on animal-assisted therapy (pp. 333-337): Elsevier.
Debats, D. L. (1990). The life regard index: reliability and validity. Psychological Reports, 67(1), 27-34.
Holttum, S. (2018). Pets, animal-assisted therapy and social inclusion. Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 18(3), 128-133.
Kajbaf, M., Keshavarz, A., Nouri, A., Lali, M., & Soltanizadeh, M. (2011). A comparison of family performance and mental health status in pet keeping and non-pet keeping individuals in Isfahan in 2009. Arak medical university Journal, 13(4), 83-94.
Khanjani, Z., & Aghanejadboozari, A. (2017). The role of personality traits, attachment styles and social skills in keeping different types of pets. Paper presented at the 11th Iranian Veterinary Students Congress, Babol, Islamic Azad University.
Korotkov, D., & Hannah, T. E. (2004). The five-factor model of personality: Strengths and limitations in predicting health status, sick-role and illness behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(1), 187-199.
Lounsbury, J. W., Loveland, J. M., Gibson, L. W., & Levy, J. J. (2014). Distinctive personality traits of quality management personnel. The TQM Journal, 26(5), 510-521.
Marashi, S. A., Mehrabiyan, T., & Mosalman, M. (2016). The relationship of personality traits and spiritual intelligence with life satisfaction in an industrial company in Ilam, Iran. Military Caring Sciences Journal, 3(1), 48-55.
Mirghaed Ali, T., Masoud, Y., Hossein, D., Alireza, B., Alireza, B., Amir, L., & Hamid, C. (2013). The Relationship Between Contact With Pets And Domestic Animals And Their Owners’ Mental Health And Personality Trait. Journal of Peyavard Salamat, 7(1).
Montazeri, A., GOSHTASBI, A., & Vahdaninia, M. (2006). The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Payesh, 5(1), 49-56.
Moradzadeh, S., Siadat, A., Abedi, A., & Mousavi, S. (2014). The multiple relationship citizenship behavior with life satisfaction of personnel in Esfahan University. Journal of Applied Sociology, 24(3), 103-118.
Nazarian, Z., Rezaei, O., Armoon, B., Seyedshahab, B., & Hamideh, M. (2018). The effect of pet therapy concurrent with common medication on positive, negative, cognitive and motor symptoms of schizophrenia: a randomized control trial. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 49(2).
Nordgren, L., & Engström, G. (2014). Animal-assisted intervention in dementia: Effects on quality of life. Clinical nursing research, 23(1), 7-19.
Parslow, R. A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Rodgers, B., & Jacomb, P. (2005). Pet ownership and health in older adults: Findings from a survey of 2,551 community-based Australians aged 60–64. Gerontology, 51(1), 40-47.
Sahebalzamani, M., Rezaei, O., & Moghadam, L. F. (2020). Animal-assisted therapy on happiness and life quality of chronic psychiatric patients living in psychiatric residential care homes: A randomized controlled study. BMC psychiatry, 20(1), 1-9.
Ware Jr, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical care, 30(6), 473-483.
_||_