بررسی تاثیر قرق بر میزان ترسیب کربن و صفات فیزیکی و شیمیایی خاک در مراتع نیمه‌استپ استان چهارمحال و بختیاری
محورهای موضوعی : جنگلداریمهدی مرادی شاهقریه 1 , پژمان طهماسبی 2
1 - دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد مرتعداری دانشکده منابع طبیعی و علوم زمین دانشگاه شهرکرد
2 - دانشیار گروه مرتع و آبخیزداری دانشکده منابع طبیعی و علوم زمین دانشگاه شهرکرد
کلید واژه: EC, pH, ترسیب کربن, قرق, نیمه استپ بوته‌زار, نیمه استپ گندمی,
چکیده مقاله :
چکیده: اکوسیستم های گیاهی کره خاکی سرویس ها و خدمات متفاوتی را ارائه می دهند، با توجه به شرایط حال حاضر کره زمین و آلودگی بیش از حد اتمسفر یکی از مهم ترین خدمات جوامع گیاهی ترسیب کربن در طولانی مدت در درون خاک می باشد. در مطالعه حاضر هدف بررسی تاثیر قرق بر میزان ترسیب کربن و خصوصیات فیزیکی و شیمیایی خاک در مراتع نیمه استپی استان چهارمحال و بختیاری می باشد. در هر منطقه(قرق و غیر قرق) هفت سایت همگن از لحاظ شرایط محیطی انتخاب و نمونه برداری از پوشش گیاهی و خاک درون آن انجام گردید. نمونه بردای پوشش گیاهی با استقرار ترانسکت و نصب پلاتهای چهار مترمربعی صورت گرفت و برداشت نمونه خاک تا عمق 30 سانتی متری در هر پلات در هر سایت نمونه برداری انجام شد. زیتوده هوایی و لاشبرگ در هر پلات جمع آوری و توزین گردید. نتایج حاصل از تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها نشان داد که میزان زیتوده هوایی، کربن خاک و کل کربن ترسیب شده در اکوسیستم در مراتع نیمه استپ گندمی به ترتیب با 99/1 t/ha، 75/51 t/ha و02/53 t/ha بصورت معنی داری بیشتر از مراتع نیمه استپ بوته زار برآورد گردید. میزان زیتوده هوایی، کربن زیتوده هوایی، درصد پوشش و کربن خاک منطقه نیمه استپ گندمی به ترتیب با 99/1 t/ha، 95/0 t/ha، 91/67% و 8/540 t/ha بیشتر از منطقه نیمه استپ بوته زار می باشد. همچنین نتایج نشان داد میانگین ترسیب کربن کل و خاک در هر دو منطقه مورد مطالعه در تیمار قرق تفاوت آماری معنی داری با تیمار غیرقرق دارد.
Abstract Earth Plant ecosystem offers different services, given the current conditions Earth and excessive pollution atmosphere, carbon sequestration to soil by plant communities is one of the most important services in long time. The present study was aimed to assess the effect of exclosure on carbon sequestration and soil physical and chemical properties in rangelands Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province. In each region, seven homogenous sites (grazed and non-grazed) were selected in terms of environmental conditions and vegetation and soil sampling were achieved in the each site. The vegetation sampling was done in rangeland with the establishment of transects and install a four-square-meter plots. The soil samples were done to a depth of 30 cm in each plot at the each site. Aerial biomass and litter in each plot were collected and weighed. The results of analysis data showed that the amount aerial biomass, soil carbon, and total carbon sequestration in semi-steppe rangelands with dominated grasses respectively, with 1.9 t/ha, 51.75 t/ha, and 53.02 t/ha were significantly estimated more than semi steppe shrubland rangeland. The results also showed that the average total carbon sequestration and soil in both study areas in treatment exclosure had a significant difference in grazingland treatment
References
1.Abdi, N., H. MaddahArefi. & G. ZahediAmiri, 2007. Estimation of carbon sequestration in Astragalus rangeland of Markazi province (case study: Malmire rangeland in Shazand region). Iranian J. of Range and Desert Research, 15(2): 269-282. (In Persian)
2.Alizadeh, M., 2010. Investigation of enclosure period on rangeland carbon sequestration (Case study: steppe rangeland of roodshur in Saveh). M.Sc. thesis of rangeland. Islamic Azad University of tehranNoor.
3.Andrew, Y., 2010. Carbon estimating of forest biomass for the Clatsop State Forest, Resources Planning Program, 31 pp
4.Azarnivand H. 1992. Investigation of soil and plant cover in relationship withngeomorphologic units in Damghan city . Proceeding Seminar of Investigation of Desert and Arid Zones of Iran, 556 p. (In Persian).
5.Azarnivand, H., H. JoneydiJafari., M.A. ZareChahooki., M. Jafari& S. Nikoo, 2010. Estimation of grazing livestock effect on carbon sequestration and nitrogen stabilization in Artemisia sieberirangeland of Semnan province. Iranian J. Range Management, 3(4): 590-610. (In Persian).
6.Blake, G.R. & K.H. Hartge, 1986. Bulk density. In: Klute, A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Soil Sci. Soc.Am. Pub. No 9. Part 1. pp. 363-376.
7.Derner, J.D., D.D. Beriske& T.W. Boutton, 1997. Does Grazing Mediate Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Accumulation Beneath C4, Perennial Grasses Along an Environmentalgradient? Plant and Soil 191, 147–156.
8.Derner, J.D., Schuman, G.E., 2007. Carbon sequestration and rangelands: a synthesis of land management and precipitation effects. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 62, 77-85.
9.Dianatitilaki, Gh.,Naghi poor borj, A.A., Tavakkoli, H., Heidarian agha khani, M., Saeedafkhamoshoara, M.R., 2009. Effect of enclosure on soil and plant carbon sequestration in semi-arid rangeland of northern Khorasan. Journal of Iranian Range Management society, 3, 668-679.
10.Frank, D., 2005. The interactive effects of grazing ungulates and aboveground production on grassland diversity. Oecologia, 143: 629–634.
11.Frank, A.B., D.L. Tanaka., L. Hofmann & R.F. Follett, 1995. Soil Carbon and Nitrogen of Northern Great Plains Grasslands as Influenced by Long-term Grazing, Journal of Range Mangement, 48 (5): 470–474.
12.Fan, S., Gloor, M., Mahlman, J., Pacala, S., Sarmiento, J., Takahashi, T. & Tan, P. 1998 A large terrestrial carbon sink in North America implied by atmospheric and oceanic carbon dioxide data and models. Science282, 442–446.
13.Hahn . B.D , F.d. Richardson , M.T.Hoffman , R. Roberts , S.W. Todd , p.j. Carrick, 2005, A simulation – Model o.flonge- Term climate , Livestock and vegetation interactions one communal rangelands in the semi-arid succulent karoo , Nam aqualand , south Africa , Ecological Modelling 183 (2005) 211-230.
14.He N, Wu L, Wang Y and Han X, 2009. Changes in carbon and nitrogen in soil particle-size fractions along a grassland restoration chronosequence in northern China. Geoderma 150: 302-308.
15.INDUFOR. 2002. Assessing forest based carbon sinks in the Kyoto protocol. Forest Management and Carbon Sequestration, Discussion Paper, 115 p.
16.IPCC. 2007. Climate Change. The scientific basis. IPCC fourth assessment report.
17.Jafari Haghighi, M., 2003. Soil analysis methods - sampling and analysis physical and chemical with emphasis on Theory and Applied principles. NedayZahi Publication, 236p. (In Persian)
18.Jimenez, J. J., R. Lal, H. A. Leblanc & R. O. Russo. 2007. Soil organic carbon pool under native tree plantations in the Caribbean lowl&s of Costa Rica, Forest Ecology & Management241: 134–144.
19.Kerr, R. A. 2007 Scientists tell policy makers we’re all warming the world.Science315, 754–757.
20.Kintisch, E. 2007 New congress may be warming up to plans for capping emissions. Science315, 444.
21.Kirby, K. R. & C. Potvin. 2007. Variation in carbon storage among tree species: Implications for the management of a small-scale carbon sink project. Forest Ecology and Management246: 208–221.
22.Kauffman, J.B., Thorpe, A.S. and Brookshire, E.N.J., 2004. Livestock exclusion and below ground ecosystem responses in riparian meadows of Eastern Oregon. Ecological Applications, 14: 1671–1679.
23.Lal R. 2008. Carbon sequestration. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 363:815–830.
24.Li X.G., Wang Z.F., Qi-Fu Ma Q.F. & Li F.M. 2007. Crop cultivation and intensive grazing affect organic C pools and aggregate stability in arid grassland soil. Soil & Tillage Research, 95: 172-181.
25.Manier, D.J. and Hobbs, N.T., 2007. Large herbivores in sagebrush steppe ecosystems: livestock and wild ungulates influence structure and function. Oecologia, 152:739–750.
26.Nelson D.W. & Sommers L.E. 1982. total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: A.L. page R.H. Miller and D.R. keeney (Eds), Methods of Soil Analysis, pat 2. Chemical and Microbiological properties, American Society of Agronomy, Madisn, Wisconsin. usa. pp. 539-577.
27.Peichl, M. & M. A. Arain. 2006. Above- and belowground ecosystem biomass and carbon pools in an agesequence of white pine plantations in southern Onfario, Canada. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology140:51–63.
28.Riahi Samani, M. & F. Raiesi, 2014. Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics in Native Rangelands Exposed to Grazing and Ungrazing Management in Rangeland Ecosystems of Central Zagrous. Journal of Water and Soil, 4; 742-753.
29.Fang, S., Xue, J. & Tang, L., 2007. Biomass production and carbon sequestration potential in poplar plantations with different management patterns. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(3): 672–679..
30.Satoo, T. & H,A,I. Madgwick, 1982. Forest Biomass, Foresty sciences, 152 pp.
31.Shrestha, G & P.D. Stahl, 2008. Carbon Accumulation and Storage in Semi-arid Sagebrush Steppe: Effects of Long-term Grazing Exclusion, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 125: 173-181.
32.Snorrason, A., B.D. Sigurdsson, G. Gudbergsson,K. Svavarsdottir& T.H.H. Jonsson, 2002. Carbon sequestration in forest plantations in Iceland. J. of Agricultural Sciences, 15: 81-93.
33.Solomon, A.M., I.C. Prentice, R. Leemans, & W.P. Cramer, 1993: The interaction of climate & land use in future terrestrial carbon storage and release. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 70, 595-614.
34.Tamartash, R., M. Yosefian., Kh. Mahdavi& M. Mahdavi, 2012.Investigation of Enclosure Effect on ArtemisiaCarbon Sequestration in the Arid Zone of Semnan Province,. Journal of Natural Environment, Iranian Journal of Natural Resources,3: 341-352.
35.Thomson,A., et al .2008. Integrated estimates of global terrestrial carbon sequestration. Global Environmental Change, vol.18:192–203.
36.Walsh, B. 2007 Greenhouse airlines: traveling by jet is a dirty business. As passenger load increases, enviros look for ways to cut back the carbon. Time, 12 Feb. 2007, 57.
37.WMO 2006 Greenhouse gas bulletin: the state of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere using global observations up to December 2004. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization.