• صفحه اصلی
  • معیارهای برنامه‌ریزی کلان توسعه گردشگری روستایی در کشور مطالعه موردی: استان خراسان رضوی

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : 527649 بازدید : 65 صفحه: 77 - 87

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

معیارهای برنامه‌ریزی کلان توسعه گردشگری روستایی در کشور مطالعه موردی: استان خراسان رضوی

محورهای موضوعی : جنگلداری

بیت الله محمودی 1 (دانشگاه شهرکرد)

تاریخ دریافت : 1394/11/23 تاریخ پذیرش : 1395/04/26 تاریخ انتشار : 1395/06/01

کلید واژه: استان خراسان, روش دلفی, توسعه گردشگری روستایی, معیارهای برنامه‌ریزی,

چکیده مقاله :

در این تحقیق، برنامه ریزی کلان توسعه گردشگری روستایی در سطح استان خراسان رضوی، از طریق جمع آوری و تدوین معیارهای موثر و اولویت بندی آنها بر اساس روش دلفی صورت پذیرفت. پس از تعیین امتیاز و اولویت معیارها، نقشه کلان مناطق مستعد برنامه ریزی گردشگری روستایی بدست آمد. مطابق این بررسی از 8 گروه معیار گردشگری، محیطی، کالبدی– زیرساختی، اقتصادی، فرهنگی– اجتماعی، طراحی، مدیریتی و معماری 24 معیار اصلی و 89 زیرمعیار شناسایی گردید. در این راستا بیشترین زیرمعیارها در گروه معیار فرهنگی– اجتماعی با 19 معیار و کمترین آنها در گروه معیار مدیریتی است که 5 معیار را در برگرفته است. نتایج دلفی برای گروه معیارها نشان داد گروه معیارهای گردشگری، محیطی، فرهنگی – اجتماعی، کالبدی – زیرساختی، معماری، اقتصادی، طراحی و مدیریتی به ترتیب دارای اولویت 1 تا 8 هستند. مطابق بررسی انجام گرفته برای سطح بندی میزان تاثیرگذاری زیرمعیارها، 3/8 درصد از زیرمعیارها در طبقه با تأثیرگذاری بسیار زیاد، 6/22 درصد در طبقه با تأثیرگذاری زیاد، 7/35 درصد تأثیرگذاری متوسط و 4/33 درصد در طبقه تأثیرگذاری کم واقع شده اند. همچنین نتایج نشان داد زیر معیارهای جاذبه ها و مقاصد گردشگری، تقاضا و بازار گردشگری، پوشش گیاهی، اقلیم، امنیت، مخاطرات محیطی و موقعیت نسبت به محورهای گردشگری به ترتیب بیشترین اولویت را داشته اند.

چکیده انگلیسی:

  In this study, the investigation of the macro planning of rural tourism in khorasan Razavi province, was done by selection criteria and their priority with Delphi method. After determining the priority and rating criteria, map-prone rural tourism planning at the provincial level According to the study, 8 group criteria including: tourism, environmental, cultural – social physically – infrastructural, architecture, economic, design and management were identified that separated to 24 main criteria and 89 sub criteria. In this case, the most of the sub criteria of cultural– social aspect with 19 criteria and the least of the sub criteria were in the management criteria. The results of Delphi for criteria showed that tourism, environmental, cultural–social physically– infrastructural, architecture, economic, design and management group criteria had   1 to 8 priorities respectively. According to the survey conducted for the sub level effectiveness is prone village of the selection process, 8.3% of the sub floor with enormous influence, 22.6 percent of the class of high – impact, moderate – impact, 35.7 percent and 33.4 percent are located in low – impact class. Also the result indicated that attractions and tourist destinations, demand and market tourism, land cover, climate, safety, environmental hazards, tourism roads criteria had the highest priority respectively.  

منابع و مأخذ:


  1. Boyerahmad Province), Journal of Geographical Research, 95.(In Persian).
    2.
  2. Balli, S., & S, Korukoglu, 2009. Operating System Selection Using Fuzzy AHP And Topsis Methods, Mathematical and Computational Applications. 4 (2): 119-130.
    3.
  3. Bhattacharya, P., & S, Kumari, 2004. Application of Criteria and Indicator for Sustainable Ecotourism, Submitted for the IASCP Bi-Annual Conference on (The Commons in an Age of Global Transition: Challenges, Risk and Opportunities at Oaxaca, Mexico.
    4.
  4. Brown, K., 2001. Trade-off analysis for marine protected area management, Journal of Ecological Economics, 37:417-434.
    5.
  5. Bunruamkaewa, K., & Y, Murayamaa, 2011. Site Suitability Evaluation for Ecotourism Using GIS & AHP: A Case Study of Surat Thani Province , Thailand, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 21, 269–278.
    6.
  6. Castellani, V., S,  & Sala, 2009. Sustainable performance  index  for  tourism  policy development, University  of  Milano  Bicocca, Department  of  Environmental  Science, Piazza della Scienza 2026 Milano, Italy, Tourism Management, 1:45-58.
    7.
  7. Danehkar, A., & B. Mahmoudi, 2013. Nature Tourism, Jahad of university press, 293p. .(In Persian).
    8.
  8. Danehkar, A., and H. Majnonian, 2004. Proposed criteria for evaluation coastal – marine in order to determine coastal-marine protected areas of Iran, Case study: evaluation of protected areas in the Caspian Sea, Journal of Environmental Studies. 35, 9-32. (In Persian).
    9.
  9. Egger, S., 2006. Determining a Sustainable City Model, Environmental Modeling and Software. 21, 1235-1246.
    10.
  10. Fletcher, S., 2001. Planning policy and development guidelines for ecotourism development within the northern rivers new south wales region, Prepared by Nature Tourism Task Force.
    11.
  11. Ghaderi, Z. 2004. Principles of sustainable development of rural tourism, publications of Iran Municipalities and Rural Management Organization. .(In Persian).
    12.
  12. Hatzichristos, T., and  M. Giaoutzi, 2006. Landfill siting using GIS, fuzzy logic and the Delphi method, International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management.
    13.
  13. Jamrozy,   U., 2007. Marketing  of  Tourism:  A  Paradigm  Shift  Toward sustainability International  journal of culture, tourism and hospitality research. 2(1): 117-130.
    14.
  14. Jerry Ho, WR., 2010. Combined DEMATEL technique with a novel MCDM model for exploring portfolio selection based on CAPM Expert Systems with Applications.
    15.
  15. Kitsiou, D,. 2002. Multi-dimensional evaluation and ranking of coastal areas using GIS and multiple criteria choice methods” Journal of The science of Total Environment. 284,1-17.
    16.
  16. Kumari, S., 2010. Identification of Potential Ecotourism Sites in West District, Sikkim using Geospatial Tools, Tropical Ecology. 51, 75-85.
    17.
  17. Mahmoudi, B., Ahmadian, R., and A. Haghsetan, 2013. Macro planning of tourism sample regions through selecting effective criteria on tourism planning process in Khorasan Razavi Province, Journal of Natural Environment, 66(4): 423-434. .(In Persian).
    18.
  18. Makhdoum, M., 2001.Fundamental principles of Land use planning, Fifth Edition, Tehran, University of Tehran Publications, .(In Persian).
    19.
  19. Manely, C., 1990. what is tourism, Journal of tourism studies. 11(1):251-267.
    20.
  20. Minciardi, R., 2008. Multi-objective Optimization of Solid Waste Flows: Environmentally Sustainable  Strategies  for Municipalities,  Waste Management. 28, 113-126.
    21.
  21. Nouri, J., 2008. Evaluation of ecotourism potential in northern coastline of the Persian Gulf” Journal of Environ Geology, 55(3):681-686.
    22.
  22. Powell, C,. 2003. The Delphi technique: Myths and realities, Methodological Issues in Nursing Research, 41(4):2132-2146.
    23.
  23. Rosa,   E.,  Eduardo. G,  and  J, Erin, 2005. Social  adaptation ecotourism  in  the  Lacandon forest,  Annals  of  Tourism Research. 32, 610 - 627 .
    24.
  24. Sarvar, R., 2011. Applied geography and land use planning, Samt press, 182p.
    25.
  25. Tourism, Cultural Organization, 2007. Tourism plan of Kurdistan province, volume,1:323p. 
    26.
  26. Tourism, Cultural Organization, 2008. Guidelines and roles for tourism area plan, 126p.
    27.
  27. Tremblay, P., 2006. Desert Tourism Scoping, Study Desert knowledge CRC, 54 p.
    28.
  28. Tsai, WH., 2010. An integrated approach for selecting corporate social responsibility programs and costs evaluation in the international tourist hotel, International Journal of Hospitality Management. 29, 385-396.
    29.
  29. WTO/UNEP/IUCN, 2001. Guidelines: Development of National Parks and Protected Areas for Tourism IUCN, Gland, Switzerland In: Henric Majnounian, Iran Protected Area, Department Of Environment, 598p
    30.

_||_

  1. Boyerahmad Province), Journal of Geographical Research, 95.(In Persian).
    2.
  2. Balli, S., & S, Korukoglu, 2009. Operating System Selection Using Fuzzy AHP And Topsis Methods, Mathematical and Computational Applications. 4 (2): 119-130.
    3.
  3. Bhattacharya, P., & S, Kumari, 2004. Application of Criteria and Indicator for Sustainable Ecotourism, Submitted for the IASCP Bi-Annual Conference on (The Commons in an Age of Global Transition: Challenges, Risk and Opportunities at Oaxaca, Mexico.
    4.
  4. Brown, K., 2001. Trade-off analysis for marine protected area management, Journal of Ecological Economics, 37:417-434.
    5.
  5. Bunruamkaewa, K., & Y, Murayamaa, 2011. Site Suitability Evaluation for Ecotourism Using GIS & AHP: A Case Study of Surat Thani Province , Thailand, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 21, 269–278.
    6.
  6. Castellani, V., S,  & Sala, 2009. Sustainable performance  index  for  tourism  policy development, University  of  Milano  Bicocca, Department  of  Environmental  Science, Piazza della Scienza 2026 Milano, Italy, Tourism Management, 1:45-58.
    7.
  7. Danehkar, A., & B. Mahmoudi, 2013. Nature Tourism, Jahad of university press, 293p. .(In Persian).
    8.
  8. Danehkar, A., and H. Majnonian, 2004. Proposed criteria for evaluation coastal – marine in order to determine coastal-marine protected areas of Iran, Case study: evaluation of protected areas in the Caspian Sea, Journal of Environmental Studies. 35, 9-32. (In Persian).
    9.
  9. Egger, S., 2006. Determining a Sustainable City Model, Environmental Modeling and Software. 21, 1235-1246.
    10.
  10. Fletcher, S., 2001. Planning policy and development guidelines for ecotourism development within the northern rivers new south wales region, Prepared by Nature Tourism Task Force.
    11.
  11. Ghaderi, Z. 2004. Principles of sustainable development of rural tourism, publications of Iran Municipalities and Rural Management Organization. .(In Persian).
    12.
  12. Hatzichristos, T., and  M. Giaoutzi, 2006. Landfill siting using GIS, fuzzy logic and the Delphi method, International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management.
    13.
  13. Jamrozy,   U., 2007. Marketing  of  Tourism:  A  Paradigm  Shift  Toward sustainability International  journal of culture, tourism and hospitality research. 2(1): 117-130.
    14.
  14. Jerry Ho, WR., 2010. Combined DEMATEL technique with a novel MCDM model for exploring portfolio selection based on CAPM Expert Systems with Applications.
    15.
  15. Kitsiou, D,. 2002. Multi-dimensional evaluation and ranking of coastal areas using GIS and multiple criteria choice methods” Journal of The science of Total Environment. 284,1-17.
    16.
  16. Kumari, S., 2010. Identification of Potential Ecotourism Sites in West District, Sikkim using Geospatial Tools, Tropical Ecology. 51, 75-85.
    17.
  17. Mahmoudi, B., Ahmadian, R., and A. Haghsetan, 2013. Macro planning of tourism sample regions through selecting effective criteria on tourism planning process in Khorasan Razavi Province, Journal of Natural Environment, 66(4): 423-434. .(In Persian).
    18.
  18. Makhdoum, M., 2001.Fundamental principles of Land use planning, Fifth Edition, Tehran, University of Tehran Publications, .(In Persian).
    19.
  19. Manely, C., 1990. what is tourism, Journal of tourism studies. 11(1):251-267.
    20.
  20. Minciardi, R., 2008. Multi-objective Optimization of Solid Waste Flows: Environmentally Sustainable  Strategies  for Municipalities,  Waste Management. 28, 113-126.
    21.
  21. Nouri, J., 2008. Evaluation of ecotourism potential in northern coastline of the Persian Gulf” Journal of Environ Geology, 55(3):681-686.
    22.
  22. Powell, C,. 2003. The Delphi technique: Myths and realities, Methodological Issues in Nursing Research, 41(4):2132-2146.
    23.
  23. Rosa,   E.,  Eduardo. G,  and  J, Erin, 2005. Social  adaptation ecotourism  in  the  Lacandon forest,  Annals  of  Tourism Research. 32, 610 - 627 .
    24.
  24. Sarvar, R., 2011. Applied geography and land use planning, Samt press, 182p.
    25.
  25. Tourism, Cultural Organization, 2007. Tourism plan of Kurdistan province, volume,1:323p. 
    26.
  26. Tourism, Cultural Organization, 2008. Guidelines and roles for tourism area plan, 126p.
    27.
  27. Tremblay, P., 2006. Desert Tourism Scoping, Study Desert knowledge CRC, 54 p.
    28.
  28. Tsai, WH., 2010. An integrated approach for selecting corporate social responsibility programs and costs evaluation in the international tourist hotel, International Journal of Hospitality Management. 29, 385-396.
    29.
  29. WTO/UNEP/IUCN, 2001. Guidelines: Development of National Parks and Protected Areas for Tourism IUCN, Gland, Switzerland In: Henric Majnounian, Iran Protected Area, Department Of Environment, 598p
    30.


مقالات مرتبط

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]