بررسی تأثیر قابلیت‌ها‌ی پویا‌ی فناوری اطلاعات بر عملکرد شرکت‌های کوچک و متوسط از طریق رابطه تعدیلگری رهبری تحول آفرین و نقش میانجی قابلیت نوآورانه
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت بازرگانی
محسن رحمانی
1
*
,
مهدی زکی پور
2
,
حسین عابدی
3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران.
2 - استادیار، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران
3 - گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، موسسه آموزش عالی کار، قزوین، ایران.
کلید واژه: قابلیت‌ها‌ی پویا‌ی فناوری اطلاعات, قابلیت نوآورانه, شرکت‌های‌کوچک و متوسط, رهبری‌تحول‌آفرین.,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف از این تحقیق، تعیین میزان تأثیر قابلیت‌ها‌ی پویا‌ی فناوری‌ا طلاعات و قابلیت نوآورانه از طریق رابطه تعدیلگری رهبری تحول‌آفرین بر عملکرد شرکت‌های‌کوچک و متوسط و ارائه راهکار‌ها‌ی علمی در این رابطه جهت بهبود عملکرد شرکت‌های‌کوچک و متوسط می‌باشد. جامعه آماری تحقیق حاضر، شرکت‌های کوچک و متوسط با عملکرد سریع و فعال در سطح استان قزوین می‌باشد. حجم نمونه بر اساس تکنیک معادلات ساختاری که حداقل باید 5 و حداکثر ۱۵ برابر تعداد سؤالات پرسشنامه باشد 225 نفر از کارکنان شرکت‌های کوچک و متوسط فعال در استان قزوین در نظر گرفته شد که به وسیله پرسشنامه‌ها‌ی استاندارد گردآوری شد. با تأیید پایایی پرسشنامه استاندارد با استفاده از روش پایایی ترکیبی، تنظیم نهایی برای نشان دادن اعتبار ابزارهای استفاده شده قبل از استفاده به پاسخ دهندگان انجام گردید. برای بررسی روایی گویه‌های پرسشنامه پژوهش، ابتدا از روایی محتوایی و سپس از روایی همگرا (ضریب آلفای کرونباخ) و روایی واگرا (بارهای عاملی) استفاده شده است. فرضیه‌ها با استفاده از مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری با روش حداقل مربعات جزئی و با استفاده از نرم‌افزار Smart PLS و SPSS آزمون شد. در نتیجه، قابلیت‌ها‌ی پویا‌ی فناوری اطلاعات تأثیر مستقیم، مثبت و معناداری بر قابلیت نوآورانه و عملکرد شرکت‌های کوچک و متوسط دارند. همچنین، قابلیت نوآورانه نیز تأثیر معناداری بر عملکرد شرکت‌های کوچک و متوسط دارد. رهبری تحول آفرین رابطه بین قابلیت نوآورانه و عملکرد شرکت‌های کوچک و متوسط را تعدیل می‌کند. همچنین، تأیید می‌شود که قابلیت نوآورانه در تأثیر قابلیت‌ها‌ی پویا‌ی فناوری اطلاعات بر عملکرد شرکت‌های کوچک و متوسط نقش میانجی دارد.
The purpose of this research is to determine the impact of the IT-enabled dynamic capability on innovative capabilities and to provide scientific solutions in this regard to improve the performance of small and medium-sized enterprises. The data were collected from a sample of 225 employees of small and medium-sized enterprises active in Qazvin province by means of standard questionnaires. Hypotheses were tested using structural equation modeling with the partial least squares method and using Smart PLS and SPSS software. The results of the structural model test for hypotheses with a direct effect showed that the IT-enabled dynamic capability has a direct, positive, and significant effect on the innovative capability and performance of small and medium-sized enterprises, and innovative capability also has a significant effect on the performance of small and medium-sized enterprises. Transformational leadership moderates the relationship between innovative capability and the performance of small and medium-sized enterprises. The results of the structural model test for the mediation hypothesis indicated the confirmation of this hypothesis. In general, the creation and development of innovative capabilities combined with transformational leadership can strengthen the impact of the IT-enabled dynamic capability on the performance of small and medium-sized enterprises.
Afriyie, S., Du, J., & Ibn Musah, A. A. (2020). The nexus among innovation types, knowledge sharing, transformational leadership, and marketing performance in an emerging economy An empirical study International Review of Management and Marketing, 8, 78-92.
Agyapong, F. O., Agyapong, A., & Poku, K. (2017). Nexus between social capital and performance of micro and small firms in an emerging economy: the mediating role of innovation. Cogent Business and Management, 4(2), 1309784.
Anning Dorson, T. (2016). Interactivity innovations, competitive intensity, customer demand and performance. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 8(4), 536-554.
Aral, S., & Weill, P. (2007). It assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: how resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organization Science, 18(5), 763-780.
Barclay, D. W., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The Partial Last Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modelling, Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285-309.
Budlaei, H., Gholizadeh Jourab, N., & Fakhraei, R. (2015). The Impact of Dynamic Capabilities on Green Innovation Performance Due to the Role of Relational Learning Capability, 3rd International Conference on Dynamic Management. Accounting and Auditing Review. (In Persian)
Camis on, C., & Villar-L opez, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891-2902.
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
Cyril Eze, U., Guan Gan Goh, G., Yih Goh, C., & Ling Tan, T. (2013). Perspectives of SMEs on knowledge sharing. VINE, 43(2), 210-236.
Danis, W. M., DE Clercq, D., & Petricevic, O. (2011). Are social networks more important for new business activity in emerging than developed economies? An empirical extension, International Business Review, 20(4), 394-408.
DATA, I. I. (2005). Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3 ed.). Statistical Office of the European Communities, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Davari, A., & Rezazadeh, A. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling with PLS Software (2 ed.). Jahad Daneshgahi Publications, Tehran. (In Persian)
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(11), 1105-1121.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Ghasemieh, R., Nisi, A., & Hardani, Y. (2019). Assessing the mediating effect of organizational innovation and entrepreneurship on the relationship between ICT and improving organizational performance Fourth National Conference on Economics, Management and Accounting, Ahvaz, Iran. (In Persian)
Hayat, N., & Riaz, M. T. (2011). The influence of the SMEs top-level managers’ leadership styles and their entrepreneurial orientation on the business performance. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1884069 (SSRN eLibrary)
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squres in stratgic management research: a review of four recent studies. Stratgic Management Journal, 3(5), 20-195.
Ilmudeen, A., Bao, Y., Alharbi, I. M., & Zubair, N. (2020). Revisiting dynamic capability for organizations' innovation types: Does it matter for organizational performance in China? European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(2), 107-121.
Kalantari, A., & Kalantaripour, J. (2020). Investigating the Impact of Management Innovation and Technology Innovation on Organizational Performance The First International Conference on Challenges and New Solutions in Industrial Engineering and Management and Accounting, Sari, Iran. (In Persian)
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in pls-sem: a full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10.
Li, D., & Liu, J. (2014). Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2793-2799.
Matzler, K., Schwarz, E., Deutinger, N., & Harms, R. (2008). The relationship between transformational leadership, product innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 21, 139-151.
Mikalef, P. A., & Pateli, A. (2016). Developing and validating a measurement instrument of it-enabled dynamic capabilities, Serving Society in the Advancement of Knowledge and Excellence in the Study and Profession of Information Systems. Adamantia: Association for Information Systems, Article 39.
Mu, J. (2017). Dynamic capability and firm performance: the role of marketing capability and operations capability. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 64(4), 554-565.
Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage publications.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, Psychology, 4(11), 128-139.
O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206.
Obeng, B. A., Robson, P., & Haugh, H. (2014). Strategic entrepreneurship and small firm growth in Ghana. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 32(5), 501-524.
Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2006). From it leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: the case of new product development. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 198-227.
Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2011). Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 239-273.
Putri, N. T., & Kurnia, S. (2016). The role of organizational culture and individual towards knowledge management practice in cement industry International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology (ICMIT),
Ravichandran, T. (2018). Exploring the relationships between it competence, innovation capacity and organizational agility. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(1), 22-42.
Raymond, L., Uwizeyemungu, S., Fabi, B., & St-Pierre, J. (2018). It capabilities for product innovation in smes: a configurational approach. Information Technology and Management, 19(1), 75-87.
Roberts, N., & Grover, V. (2012). Leveraging information technology infrastructure to facilitate a firm’s customer agility and competitive activity: an empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(4), 231-270.
Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237-263.
Sinha, M., & Sheth, J. (2018). Growing the pie in emerging markets: Marketing strategies for increasing the ratio of non-users to users. Journal of Business Research, 86, 217-224.
T., K., Lazic, M., Heinzl, A., & Neff, A. (2018). Achieving it-based synergies through regulation- oriented and consensus-oriented it governance capabilities. Information Systems Journal, 28(5), 765-795.
Tai, J. C., Wang, E. T., & Yeh, H.-Y. (2019). A study of is assets, is ambidexterity, and is alignment: the dynamic managerial capability perspective. Information and Management, 56(1), 55-69.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(1), 1319-1350.
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long range planning, 51(1), 40-49.
Thornhill, S., & White, R. E. (2007). Strategic purity: a multi-industry evaluation of pure vs. Hybrid business strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 28(5), 553-561.
Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., & Joreskog, K. G. (1974). Intra class reliability estimates; Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1(34), 177-183.
Yang, J. (2012). Innovation capability and corporate growth: an empirical investigation in China. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(1), 34-46.
Zarei, Z., & Heidari, M. (2020). The effect of transformational leadership and credible leadership on organizational innovation by considering the moderating role of knowledge sharing. Initiative and Creativity in the Humanities, 9(4), 161-192. (In Persian)
Zhuang, C., Chen, G., & Wang, L. (2018). Internet Resources and Organizational Knowledge Creation: Role of Environmental Dynamism. J. Oper. Res. Soc. China, 7(11), 337–354.