تحلیل ساختار دانش عوامل موفقیت و شکست ابرپروژه‌ها
محورهای موضوعی : سایر موضوعات مرتبط
جعفر قیدر خلجانی
1
(دانشیار مهندسی صنایع، گروه مهندسی صنایع، مجتمع دانشگاهی مدیریت و مهندسی صنایع، دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر، تهران، ایران.)
پدرام جاهدی
2
(دکتری، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.)
کلید واژه: عوامل موفقیت و شکست, ابرپروژه, ساختار بافت, ساختار محتوا,
چکیده مقاله :
ابرپروژه لفظی برای تشخیص پروژه‌های راهبردی از پروژه‌های عادی است. ابرپروژه نیازمند تخصیص منابع زیاد و دارای پیامدهای تحول‌آفرین است. پژوهش‌های زیادی برای شناسایی مصداقی عوامل موفقیت و شکست ابرپروژه‌ها انجام شده‌است. هدف این پژوهش تحلیل ساختار دانش عوامل موفقیت و شکست ابرپروژه‌ها است. پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش محتوای نمایه شده مرتبط با عوامل موفقیت و شکست ابرپروژه‌ها در وبگاه علم، روش نمونه‌گیری قضاوتی و حجم نمونه 3728 است. راهکنش تحلیل داده‌های پژوهش شامل تحلیل ساختار بافت و تحلیل ساختار محتوا است. تحلیل ساختار بافت شامل گام‌های فهرست‌سازی، مرتب‌سازی، مصورسازی و تحلیل داده‌های زمینه‌ای و تحلیل ساختار محتوا شامل دو مرحله استخراج داده‌ه‌ها و کدگذاری است. تحلیل ساختار بافت مؤید روند صعودی نمایه‌سازی، جریان غالب معرفی یک کشور به‌عنوان سکوی ابرپروژه و سهم نمایه‌سازی بیش‌تر حوزه مدیریت پروژه است. تحلیل ساختار محتوا نیز موجب شناسایی 277 کد، 177 مفهوم، 101 زیرمقوله، 69 مقوله و 9 بُعد شده است. این بُعدها شامل موفقیت و شکست ابرپروژه‌ها، زمینه، حوزه، تیم‌های ابرپروژه، چرخه عمر ابرپروژه، سرمایه‌گذاری، محیط، طرفین درگیر و عوامل اجتماعی است. پراکندگی نظری در گزینش واژگان نشان‌دهنده نیاز به همگرایی در گزینش واژگان و ضرورت شناسایی چهارچوب‌های نظری از محتوای نمایه‌شده مرتبط با موفقیت و شکست ابرپروژه‌ها است.
Megaproject is a term used to distinguish strategic projects from normal projects. The super project requires the allocation of many resources and has transformative consequences. Much research has been done to identify the success and failure factors of megaprojects. This research aims to analyze the knowledge structure of the success and failure factors of megaprojects. Research is practical in terms of purpose. The statistical population of the indexed content research related to the success and failure factors of megaprojects in science websites, the judgmental sampling method, and the sample size are 3728. The method of research data analysis includes the analysis of the structure of the context and the analysis of the content structure. Contextual structure analysis includes the steps of cataloging, sorting, illustrating, and contextual data analysis, and content structure analysis includes two steps of data extraction and coding. The analysis of the texture structure confirms the upward trend of indexing, the dominant flow of introducing a country as a megaproject platform, and the greater contribution of indexing to the field of project management. Analysis of the content structure has identified 277 codes, 177 concepts, 101 subcategories, 69 categories, and 9 dimensions. These dimensions include the success and failure of megaprojects, context, domain, super project teams, super project life cycle, investment, environment, involved parties, and social factors. The theoretical dispersion in the selection of vocabulary indicates the need for convergence in the selection of vocabulary and the necessity of identifying theoretical frameworks from the indexed content related to the success and failure of megaprojects.
Cantarelli, C. C. (2022). Innovation in megaprojects and the role of project complexity. Production Planning & Control, 33(9-10), 943-956. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1837934
Cerić, A., Vukomanović, M., Ivić, I., & Kolarić, S. (2021). Trust in megaprojects: A comprehensive literature review of research trends. International Journal of Project Management, 39(4), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.10.007
Coticchia, F., & Di Giulio, M. (2023). Nonuse and hypocritical use of strategic narratives in Megaprojects: the case of the Florence high-speed railway. Policy and Society, 42(2), 164-183. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puad006
Esposito, G., Nelson, T., Ferlie, E., & Crutzen, N. (2021). The institutional shaping of global megaprojects: The case of the Lyon-Turin high-speed railway. International Journal of Project Management, 39(6), 658-671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.06.001
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage.
Hajialikhani, M., Azizi, M., Sobhiyah, M. H., & Azizi, M. (2019). Investigating the Impact of Cultural Elements of Institutional Environment on Construction Megaprojects' Performance. Public Administration Perspective, 10(2), 15-39. https://doi.org/10.48308/jpap.2019.96506 [In Persian]
Hickman, L., Thapa, S., Tay, L., Cao, M., & Srinivasan, P. (2022). Text preprocessing for text mining in organizational research: Review and recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 25(1), 114-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120971683
Kheyroddin, R., & Bahremand, M. O. (2017). The Impact of Urban Mega-Project on Housing Price in Adjacent Neighborhoods (Case Study: Sadr Multi-layered Highway, Tehran). Journal of Urban Economics and Management, 5(17), 13-29. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.23452870.1395.5.17.3.5 [In Persian]
Lee, C. J. G. (2012). Reconsidering constructivism in qualitative research. Educational Philosophy and theory, 44(4), 403-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00720.x
Liu, C., Cao, J., Duan, K., & Wu, G. (2022). Effect of network position on inter-team conflict and project success in megaprojects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(10), 4955-4977. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2022-0438
Liu, K., Liu, Y., Kou, Y., Yang, X., & Hu, G. (2023). Formation mechanism for collaborative behaviour among stakeholders in megaprojects based on the theory of planned behaviour. Building Research & Information, 51(6), 667-681. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2023.2188444
Mehraliyev, F., Chan, I. C. C., & Kirilenko, A. P. (2022). Sentiment analysis in hospitality and tourism: a thematic and methodological review. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(1), 46-77. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2021-0132
Mukherjee, D., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research(148), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042
Rafiyian, M., & Pahlavan, S. (2015). Measuring and evaluating the effects of the creation of the Almas Sharq Mashhad urban superproject from the perspective of the surrounding residential areas with the Electre model. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism (JIAU), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2016.61999 [In Persian]
Sarkheyli, E., Rafieian, M., & Taghvaee, A. A. (2016). Review the Conflict Management Pattern of Beneficiaries and Influentials in Megaprojects of Mashhad City. Geography and Development, 14(45), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2016.2926 [In Persian]
Shenoy, D., & Mahanty, B. (2021). Measuring the readiness of a megaproject. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(4), 999-1022. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-05-2020-0154
Song, S., Park, S. B., & Park, K. (2021). Thematic analysis of destination images for social media engagement marketing. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(6), 1375-1397. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-12-2019-0667
Streule, M. (2023). Urban extractivism. Contesting megaprojects in Mexico City, rethinking urban values. Urban Geography, 44(1), 262-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2022.2146931
Tuğal, C. (2023). Politicized megaprojects and public sector interventions: Mass consent under neoliberal statism. Critical Sociology, 49(3), 457-473. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205221086284
Wang, T., Owusu, E. K., He, Q., Tian, Z., & Wu, D. (2022). Empirical Assessments of the Determinants of Construction Megaprojects’ Success: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(22), 14730. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214730
Wang, T., Xu, J., He, Q., Chan, A. P., & Owusu, E. K. (2023). Studies on the success criteria and critical success factors for mega infrastructure construction projects: A literature review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(5), 1809-1834. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2020-1042
Zeković, S., & Maričić, T. (2022). Contemporary governance of urban mega-projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront. Territory, Politics, Governance, 10(4), 527-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410
Zhou, S., Zhai, G., Lu, Y., & Shi, Y. (2021). The development of urban mega-projects in China: A case study of Nantong’s metro project. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(4), 759-774. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319894580
_||_Cantarelli, C. C. (2022). Innovation in megaprojects and the role of project complexity. Production Planning & Control, 33(9-10), 943-956. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1837934
Cerić, A., Vukomanović, M., Ivić, I., & Kolarić, S. (2021). Trust in megaprojects: A comprehensive literature review of research trends. International Journal of Project Management, 39(4), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.10.007
Coticchia, F., & Di Giulio, M. (2023). Nonuse and hypocritical use of strategic narratives in Megaprojects: the case of the Florence high-speed railway. Policy and Society, 42(2), 164-183. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puad006
Esposito, G., Nelson, T., Ferlie, E., & Crutzen, N. (2021). The institutional shaping of global megaprojects: The case of the Lyon-Turin high-speed railway. International Journal of Project Management, 39(6), 658-671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.06.001
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage.
Hajialikhani, M., Azizi, M., Sobhiyah, M. H., & Azizi, M. (2019). Investigating the Impact of Cultural Elements of Institutional Environment on Construction Megaprojects' Performance. Public Administration Perspective, 10(2), 15-39. https://doi.org/10.48308/jpap.2019.96506 [In Persian]
Hickman, L., Thapa, S., Tay, L., Cao, M., & Srinivasan, P. (2022). Text preprocessing for text mining in organizational research: Review and recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 25(1), 114-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120971683
Kheyroddin, R., & Bahremand, M. O. (2017). The Impact of Urban Mega-Project on Housing Price in Adjacent Neighborhoods (Case Study: Sadr Multi-layered Highway, Tehran). Journal of Urban Economics and Management, 5(17), 13-29. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.23452870.1395.5.17.3.5 [In Persian]
Lee, C. J. G. (2012). Reconsidering constructivism in qualitative research. Educational Philosophy and theory, 44(4), 403-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00720.x
Liu, C., Cao, J., Duan, K., & Wu, G. (2022). Effect of network position on inter-team conflict and project success in megaprojects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(10), 4955-4977. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2022-0438
Liu, K., Liu, Y., Kou, Y., Yang, X., & Hu, G. (2023). Formation mechanism for collaborative behaviour among stakeholders in megaprojects based on the theory of planned behaviour. Building Research & Information, 51(6), 667-681. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2023.2188444
Mehraliyev, F., Chan, I. C. C., & Kirilenko, A. P. (2022). Sentiment analysis in hospitality and tourism: a thematic and methodological review. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(1), 46-77. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2021-0132
Mukherjee, D., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research(148), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042
Rafiyian, M., & Pahlavan, S. (2015). Measuring and evaluating the effects of the creation of the Almas Sharq Mashhad urban superproject from the perspective of the surrounding residential areas with the Electre model. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism (JIAU), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2016.61999 [In Persian]
Sarkheyli, E., Rafieian, M., & Taghvaee, A. A. (2016). Review the Conflict Management Pattern of Beneficiaries and Influentials in Megaprojects of Mashhad City. Geography and Development, 14(45), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2016.2926 [In Persian]
Shenoy, D., & Mahanty, B. (2021). Measuring the readiness of a megaproject. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(4), 999-1022. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-05-2020-0154
Song, S., Park, S. B., & Park, K. (2021). Thematic analysis of destination images for social media engagement marketing. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(6), 1375-1397. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-12-2019-0667
Streule, M. (2023). Urban extractivism. Contesting megaprojects in Mexico City, rethinking urban values. Urban Geography, 44(1), 262-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2022.2146931
Tuğal, C. (2023). Politicized megaprojects and public sector interventions: Mass consent under neoliberal statism. Critical Sociology, 49(3), 457-473. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205221086284
Wang, T., Owusu, E. K., He, Q., Tian, Z., & Wu, D. (2022). Empirical Assessments of the Determinants of Construction Megaprojects’ Success: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(22), 14730. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214730
Wang, T., Xu, J., He, Q., Chan, A. P., & Owusu, E. K. (2023). Studies on the success criteria and critical success factors for mega infrastructure construction projects: A literature review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(5), 1809-1834. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2020-1042
Zeković, S., & Maričić, T. (2022). Contemporary governance of urban mega-projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront. Territory, Politics, Governance, 10(4), 527-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410
Zhou, S., Zhai, G., Lu, Y., & Shi, Y. (2021). The development of urban mega-projects in China: A case study of Nantong’s metro project. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(4), 759-774. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319894580