تحلیل نقش سرمایه اجتماعی در ارتقای تابآوری اقتصاد شهری در برابر مخاطرات (مطالعه موردی: شهر زنجان)
                                                
                                                    
                                                        حسین طهماسبی مقدم
                                                        
                                                            1
                                                            
                                                        
                                                    
                                                (
                                                استادیار، گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران.
                                                )
                                                
                                                
                                                    
                                                            زهرا رسولزاده
                                                            
                                                                2
                                                            
                                                    
                                                (
                                                دانشجوی دکتری گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران	
                                                )
                                                
                                    
کلید واژه: سرمایه اجتماعی, تابآوری اقتصادی, مدل معادلات ساختاری, دلفی فازی, شهر زنجان.,
چکیده مقاله :
در دهههای اخیر، شدت و پیچیدگی مخاطرات طبیعی و انسانی، شهرها را با چالشهای گستردهای همچون تمرکز زیاد جمعیت، فرسودگی زیرساختها، ضعف نظامهای مدیریت ریسک و عدم تابآوری نهادی، بیش از پیش در معرض اثرات مستقیم و غیرمستقیم مواجه ساخته است. در این میان، تابآوری اقتصاد شهری بهعنوان یکی از ابعاد کلیدی پایداری، به ظرفیت شهرها در مقابله، انطباق و بازیابی از شوکهای اقتصادی اشاره دارد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی نقش سرمایه اجتماعی در ارتقای تابآوری اقتصادی شهر زنجان انجام شده است. روش تحقیق ترکیبی بوده و شامل دو بخش کیفی (دلفی فازی با مشارکت 20 متخصص) و کمّی، مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری PLS میباشد. در بخش کیفی، مؤلفههای سرمایه اجتماعی در چهار بُعد اصلی شامل اعتماد اجتماعی، انسجام اجتماعی، آگاهی اجتماعی و شبکههای اجتماعی و مولفه های تاب آوری اقتصادی در سه بعد تنوع و پایداری ساختار اقتصادی، توانمندی نهادی و حکمرانی مالی، زیرساختها و دسترسی به منابع شناسایی شدند. نتایج تحلیل فازی نشان داد که از میان 46 شاخص اولیه، 27 شاخص توسط خبرگان تأیید و وارد مدل نهایی شدند. در بخش کمّی، نتایج مدل PLS نشان داد که همه ابعاد سرمایه اجتماعی تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر تابآوری اقتصادی دارند (ضریب تأثیر کل: 0.788). در این میان، اعتماد اجتماعی بیشترین اثر را بر تابآوری اقتصادی داشته است (316/0β=) یافتهها بیانگر آن است که سرمایه اجتماعی میتواند همچون زیرساختی نرم، نقش بنیادینی در افزایش توان انطباقپذیری و بازیابی اقتصادی شهر زنجان در برابر مخاطرات ایفا کند.
چکیده انگلیسی :
In recent decades, the intensity and complexity of natural and human-induced hazards have increasingly exposed cities to a wide range of challenges, including high population density, deteriorating infrastructure, weak risk management systems, and a lack of institutional resilience. In this context, urban economic resilience—recognized as a key dimension of sustainability—refers to the capacity of cities to withstand, adapt to, and recover from economic shocks.This study aims to examine the role of social capital in enhancing the economic resilience of the city of Zanjan. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, consisting of a qualitative phase using the Fuzzy Delphi method involving 20 experts, and a quantitative phase utilizing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling(PLS-SEM).In the qualitative phase, components of social capital were identified across four main dimensions: social trust, social cohesion,social awareness, and social networks. Meanwhile, components of economic resilience were classified into three main dimensions: diversity and sustainability of the economic structure, institutional capacity and financial governance, and infrastructure and access to resources. The results of the fuzzy analysis revealed that, out of an initial set of 46 indicators, 27 were validated by experts and included in the final model. In the quantitative phase, the PLS-SEM results indicated that all dimensions of social capital had a positive and statistically significant effect on economic resilience (overall impact coefficient: 0.788). Among them, social trust had the greatest influence on economic resilience (β = 0.316).
1- Aldrich, D. P. (2012). Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery. University of Chicago Press.
2- Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social Capital and Community Resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214550299
3- Cutter, S. L., Burton, C. G., & Emrich, C. T. (2008). Disaster Resilience Indicators for Benchmarking Baseline Conditions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 5(1).
4- Pelling, M. (2011). Adaptation to Climate Change: From Resilience to Transformation. Routledge.
5- Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.
6- Rose, A. (2007). Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters: Multidisciplinary origins and contextual dimensions. Environmental Hazards, 7(4), 383–398.
7- Sharifi, A., & Yamagata, Y. (2016). Principles and criteria for assessing urban energy resilience: A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 1654–1677.
8- UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction). (2022). Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva: United Nations.
9- Apraxine, P., Duquenne, A., Fetta, S. & Helly, D. (2012). Urban violence and humanitarian challenges. European Union Institute for Security Studies and International Committee of the Red Cross Joint Report EUISS-ICRC Colloquium, Brussels, 19 January 2012 (Paris, Institute for Security Studies)
10- Pantuliano S, Metcalfe V, Haysom S, Davey E (2012) Urban vulnerability and displacement: a review of current issues. Disasters 36:s1.
11- Pavanello, S. (2012). Rethinking the humanitarian response: emerging approaches for engagement in urban crises. ATHA, retrieved from http://www.alnap.org/ resource/20067.aspx
12- Parker E, Maynard V (2015) Humanitarian response to urban crises: a review of area-based approaches. IIED working paper. London, IIED
13- Murshed, Z., (2015). United Nation Development Programme. Retrieved January 12, 2016, from http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/blog/2015/1/ 29/Bigger-cities-don-t-have-to-mean-bigger-risks.html
14- UN-Habitat, (2016). UN-Habitat III, adoption of the final outcome of the conference, Quito, 17-20 October 2016, A/CONF.226/4
15- IFRC (2016) World disasters report 2016: resilience: saving lives today, investing for tomorrow. IFRC, Geneva.
16- Drobniak, A. (2012). The urban resilience–economic perspective. Journal of Economics and Management, 10, 5-20.
17- Glaeser, E. L. (2022). Urban resilience. Urban studies, 59(1), 3-35.
18- Östh, J., Dolciotti, M., Reggiani, A., & Nijkamp, P. (2018). Social capital, resilience and accessibility in urban systems: a study on Sweden. Networks and Spatial Economics, 18, 313-336.
19- Shahid, M., Rana, I. A., Jamshed, A., Najam, F. A., Ali, A., & Aslam, A. (2022). Quantifying the role of social capital for enhancing urban resilience against climate crisis: Empirical evidence from formal and informal settlements of Pakistan. Cities, 130, 103851.
20- Ledogar, R. J., & Fleming, J. (2008). Social capital and resilience: A review of concepts and selected literature relevant to Aboriginal youth resilience research. Pimatisiwin, 6(2), 25.
21- Pelling, M., & High, C. (2005). Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity?. Global environmental change, 15(4), 308-319.
22- Savari, M., Damaneh, H. E., and Damaneh, H. E. (2023). Effective factors to increase rural households' resilience under drought conditions in Iran. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci. 90:103644. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103644.
23- Seyed Akhlaghi, S. J., and Taleshi, M. (2018). Improving the resilience of local communities; future strategy for dealing with drought case study: Hablehrood watershed. Iran Nature 3, 60–68. doi: 10.22092/IRN.2018.116783.
24- Zhou, H., Wang, J. a., Wan, J., and Jia, H. (2010). Resilience to natural hazards: a geographic perspective. Nat. Hazards 53, 21–41. doi: 10.1007/s11069-009-9407-y
25- Marschke, M. J., and Berkes, F. (2006). Exploring strategies that build livelihood resilience: a case from Cambodia. Ecol. Soc. 11:16. doi: 10.5751/ES-01730-110142
26- Laverack, G. (2006). Improving health outcomes through community empowerment: a review of the literature. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 113-120.
27- Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, S95-S120.
28- Putnam, R. D., Nanetti, R. Y., & Leonardi, R. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy.
29- Savari, S., Shabanali Fami, H., and Daneshvar Ameri, Z. (2015). Rural women's empowerment in improving household food security in the Divandarreh County. J. Res. Rural Plan. 3, 107–121. doi: 10.22067/JRRP.V3I8.33836.
30- Panday, S., Rushton, S., Karki, J., Balen, J., and Barnes, A. (2021). The role of social capital in disaster resilience in remote communities after the 2015 Nepal earthquake. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci. 55:102112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102112
31- Dolnicar, S., and Hurlimann, A. (2010). Australians’ water conservation behaviours and attitudes. Australas. J. Water Res. 14, 43–53. doi: 10.1080/13241583.2010.11465373.
32- Blackburn, M. R. (2013). The co–worker training mode. J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 26, 143–159,
33- Fikret, M. R. (2018). Harnessing difference: a capability-based framework for stakeholder engagement in environmental innovation. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 35, 254–279. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12394
34- Ito, K., Ida, T., and Tanaka, M. (2018). Moral suasion and economic incentives: field experimental evidence from energy demand. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Pol. 10, 240–267. doi: 10.1257/pol.20160093
35- Wang, X., Wang, L., Zhang, X., & Fan, F. (2022). The spatiotemporal evolution of COVID-19 in China and its impact on urban economic resilience. China Economic Review, 74, 101806.
36- Huston, S., & Warren, C. (2013). Knowledge city and urban economic resilience. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 31(1), 78-88.
37- Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2015). On the notion of regional economic resilience: conceptualization and explanation. Journal of economic geography, 15(1), 1-42.
38- Drobniak, A. (2012). The urban resilience–economic perspective. Journal of Economics and Management, 10, 5-20.
39- Giannakis, E., & Bruggeman, A. (2020). Regional disparities in economic resilience in the European Union across the urban–rural divide. Regional Studies, 54(9), 1200-1213.
40- Zhang, M., Wu, Q., Li, W., Sun, D., & Huang, F. (2021). Intensifier of urban economic resilience: Specialized or diversified agglomeration?. PLoS One, 16(11), e0260214.
41- Wen, H., Liu, Y., & Zhou, F. (2024). New-type infrastructure and urban economic resilience: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 96, 103560.
42- Chen, Y., Liu, H., Lin, S., Wang, Y., Zhang, Q., & Feng, L. (2024). The Impact of Social Capital on Community Resilience: A Comparative Study of Seven Flood-Prone Communities in Nanjing, China. Land, 13(8), 1145.
43- Mpanje, D., Gibbons, P., & McDermott, R. (2018). Social capital in vulnerable urban settings: an analytical framework. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 3(1), 1-14.
44- Mngumi, L. E. (2021). Exploring the contribution of social capital in building resilience for climate change effects in peri-urban areas, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. GeoJournal, 86(6), 2671-2689.
45- Savari, M., Jafari, A., & Sheheytavi, A. (2024). The impact of social capital to improve rural households’ resilience against flooding: evidence from Iran. Frontiers in Water, 6, 1393226.
46- Du, R., Liu, K., Zhao, D., & Fang, Q. (2024). Urban amenity and urban economic resilience: evidence from China. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1392908.
47- Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
48- Jensen, B. B. (2002). Knowledge, action and pro-environmental behaviour. Environmental education research, 8(3), 325-334.
49- Education, G. C. (2015). Topics and learning objectives. Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’éducation, la science et la culture. Printed in France.
50- UNESCO (2017). Global Citizenship Education: Topics and Learning Objectives.
51- Miyamoto, K., Huerta, M. C., & Kubacka, K. (2015). Fostering social and emotional skills for well‐being and social progress. European Journal of Education, 50(2), 147-159.
52- OECD (2017), OECD Guidelines on Measuring Trust, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264278219-en
53- Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288.
54- Narayan, D., & Cassidy, M. F. (2001). A dimensional approach to measuring social capital: development and validation of a social capital inventory. Current sociology, 49(2), 59-102.
55- Chan, J., To, H. P., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social indicators research, 75, 273-302.
56- Please cite this publication as: OECD (2011), Perspectives on Global Development 2012: Social Cohesion in a Shifting World, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/persp_glob_dev-2012-en
57- Sisk, T. D. (2020). Strengthening social cohesion: Conceptual framing and programming implications. United Nations Development Programme: New York, NY, USA.
58- UNDP (2016). Social Cohesion Framework for Monitoring and Evaluation.
59- Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2015). On the notion of regional economic resilience: conceptualization and explanation. Journal of economic geography, 15(1), 1-42.
60- Habitat, U. N. (2021). City Resilience Profiling Programme. Pozyskano z: https://unhabitat. org/programme/city-resilience-profiling-programme (dostęp: 15.12. 2021).
61- OECD (2021), Strengthening Economic Resilience Following the COVID-19 Crisis: A Firm and Industry Perspective, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/2a7081d8-en.
62- World Bank (2013). Building Urban Resilience: Principles, Tools, and Practice.
63- UNDRR (2022). Making Cities Resilient 2030 (MCR2030) Tools.
64- Simmie, J., & Martin, R. (2010). The economic resilience of regions: towards an evolutionary approach. Cambridge journal of regions, economy and society, 3(1), 27-43