میزان تحرک اجتماعی مهاجرین روستا- شهری و ارتباط آن با سرمایه اجتماعی (مورد مطالعه، مهاجرین شهرهای یاسوج و مادوان)

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی برنامه ریزی منطقه ای

اصغر میرفردی ¹ , آرمان حیدری ² , مصطفی امینی خو ³

1 - بخش جامعه شناسی و برنامه ریزی اجتماعی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شیراز
2 - گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه یاسوج
3 - دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد جامعه شناسی، گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه یاسوج

تاریخ دریافت : 1397/05/20 تاریخ پذیرش : 1398/07/26 تاریخ انتشار : 1399/02/01

کلید واژه: سرمایه اجتماعی, یاسوج, تحرک اجتماعی, مهاجرت روستا – شهری,

چکیده مقاله :

        مهاجران با داشتن انتظار بهبود وضعیت اقتصادی و اجتماعی از سکونت­گاه اصلی خود به مناطق دیگر مهاجرت می­کنند. تحرک اجتماعی مهاجران در مکان مقصد از موضوعات مهم در مباحث مهاجرتی و قشربندی اجتماعی است. در این پژوهش وضعیت تحرک اجتماعی مهاجرین روستا- شهری، وارد شده به شهرهای یاسوج و مادوان در 5 سال اخیر با توجه به متغیر سرمایه اجتماعی و متغیرهای جمعیت شناختی چون سن و تحصیلات، مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت. از روش پیمایشی و برای گردآوری داده­ها از پرسشنامه محقق ساخته استفاده شد. بر اساس جدول نمونه‌گیری کرجسی و مورگانحجم نمونه 364 نفر محاسبه شده است. نمونه­های مورد مطالعه به شیوه نمونه­گیری خوشه­ای و گلوله­برفی انتخاب و مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند. جهت سنجش اعتبار از اعتبار صوری استفاده گردید. برای شناخت میزان انسجام درونی (پایایی) گویه‌های متغیر مستقل و وابسته از آلفای کرونباخ شده است که مقدار آلفا برای متغیر سرمایه اجتماعی 90/0 و برای متغیر تحرک اجتماعی 88/0 بدست آمد. برای تحلیل داده­ها، از آماره­های رگرسیون چند متغیره، ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و آنوا در محیط نرم­افزار SPSS استفاده شده است. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد میزان تحرک اجتماعی با متغیر سرمایه اجتماعی مهاجرین روستا - شهری رابطه­ی مثبت معنادار دارد و با توجه به سطح تحصیلات آنها دارای تفاوت معنادار است، اما بین تحرک اجتماعی و سن مهاجرین روستا شهری رابطه معنادار و معکوسی وجود دارد. متغیرهای سرمایه اجتماعی، سطح تحصیلات و سن به عنوان متغیرهای مستقل توانسته­اند 1/26 درصد از تحرک اجتماعی مهاجرین روستا - شهری را پیش‌بینی کنند. نتیجه اینکه مهاجران روستا- شهری به ویژه مهاجران جوان با سرمایه اجتماعی و تحصیلات بالا از تحرک اجتماعی عمودی صعودی بیشتری برخوردارند.

چکیده انگلیسی:

         Having expectation for improving socio-economic situations, rural migrants migrate from their main residence to other regions. The social mobility of migrants in purposive place is one of important debates in migration and social stratification. This research investigated the social mobility status of rural-migrants that entered to Yasouj and Madevan cities during 5 past years. Using survey method, self-administrated questionnaire was used for collecting data. The Krejcie and Morgan's sample table (1970), was used for sample size (364 cases) determination and clustering and snow-bulling methods were used for sample selection. Face validity and Cronbach Alpha (social capital= 0.90, social mobility= 0.88) were used for validity and reliability evaluation, respectively. Using SPSS software, multiple regression, Pearson Correlation, and ANOVA were used for data analysis. Findings showed that there is significant and direct relationship between social mobility and social capital of rural-urban migrant, and there is significant difference in social mobility according migrants' education. but there is significant and indirect relationship between social mobility and age of urban-rural migrants. Multiple regression showed that social capital, education level and age can explain 26.1% of the social mobility variance of rural-urban migrants. As a result, rural-urban migrants with more social capital and education level, especially youth migrants, have more upward vertical social mobility.       Extended Abstract Introduction:           Immigration is nowadays recognized as an important phenomenon in the distribution and composition of populations in different regions. Migration, especially rural-urban migration, is one of the factors contributing to the growth of urban population, and this rate is higher in developing countries than in developed countries. According to some studies, the rate of rural-urban migration in each regional hub has an inverse relationship with the level of development of that region or country (Jamshidi et al., 2018). Social mobility refers to the movement of individuals or families from one dignity or class to another dignity or social class (Azadanloo, 2007: 176), which can be horizontal and vertical, or intergenerational and intergenerational. Immigrants migrate to other areas with the expectation of an improved economic and social situation. Various theories on migration (Lee, 1966; Taghavi, 1992) have been presented and various studies on migration and especially rural-urban migration in the interior (Malek, 2009; Iran Statistics Center, 2011; Mirayai et al., 2017; Ghaffari, 2017; Zare and Latifi, 2015; Hosseini et al, 2018) and overseas (Charney, 1993; Felding & Halford, 1993; Lu, 1998; Shubin, 2013; Cui, 2015; Tian and Zhou, 2015). According to Ashraf and Benoazizi narratives, Iranian society experienced significant and significant changes in social mobility and individual mobility across the class pyramid of its population between the early 1920s and the end of the 1970s (Ashraf & Benoazizi, 2008). The social mobility of immigrants at their destination is an important topic in immigration and social stratification. The city of Yasouj, as the capital of this province, is one of the cities that have been heavily influenced by the executive policies of the Islamic Republic since the Islamic Revolution, and especially since 1986, its population and urban area have greatly increased (Noroozi, 2019). Yasouj enjoys a high tourist attraction (Mirfirdi et al., 2014) and as the center of the province, it holds important and comprehensive educational and academic centers in the province (Mirfirdi and Vali Nezhad, 2018). The two cities of Yasouj and Madawan are among the toddlers that have experienced an increasing migration trend in recent years. In this study, the social mobility status of rural-urban immigrants entering Yasouj and Madawan cities over the last 5 years was studied with respect to social capital variables and demographic variables such as age and education. Methodology:        This study considers the purpose and nature of the research in the category of applied research. In this research, a survey method was used to collect the required information. The statistical population of the present study was household heads (caregivers who are over 18 years of age and able to answer research questions) of rural immigrants who arrived in Yasouj and Madawan during the past ten years with at least five years of their migration. Using survey method, self-administrated questionnaire was used for collecting data. The Krejcie and Morgan's sample table (1970), was used for sample size (364 cases) determination and clustering and snow-bulling methods were used for sample selection. Face validity and Cronbach Alpha (social capital= 0.90, social mobility= 0.88) were used for validity and reliability evaluation, respectively. Using SPSS software, multiple regression, Pearson Correlation, and ANOVA were used for data analysis. Results and discussion:           The respondents ranged in age from 23 to 93 years; their mean age was 41.42 years and its standard deviation was 10.45 years. The least (8.8%) of the respondents had descending social mobility and most of them (65.9%) had no social mobility, 25.3% of them had ascending social mobility. In other words, a large proportion of the immigrants studied did not have a social base status prior to migration to the city and were in the same social base as before. Immigrants who were degraded in social status compared to pre-migration were the least number of respondents. Most of the respondents (71.7%) had moderate social capital and the least (12.9%) had high social capital. The internal dimensions of this variable have the same distribution as the social capital variable and the average level of these variables has the most respondents. This situation reflects the intermediate status of social capital and its constituent dimensions among rural-urban immigrants. The results of this study showed that social mobility has a significant positive relationship with social capital variable of rural-urban immigrants and there is a significant difference with regard to their level of education, but there is a significant and inverse relationship between social mobility and age of urban rural migrants. Bourdieu (2016) sees social capital as an important and decisive element in economic and social competition and class action. Social capital encompasses aspects such as social trust, social norms, communication and social interaction networks, social assistance, and social cohesion. Among the immigrants, these communication and social elements of social capital are of fundamental importance. Immigrants who migrate from rural to urban areas can experience economic and social activities that lead to changes in their socio-economic status if they are placed in the social communication circuit and have trust, norms and social assistance. Multiple regression showed that social capital, education level and age can explain 26.1% of the social mobility variance of rural-urban migrants. Conclusion:              As a result, rural-urban migrants with more social capital and education level, especially youth migrants, have more upward vertical social mobility. Young people, as actors more familiar with the elements and characteristics of modern times, are more educated than older immigrants and pursue future aspirations, are more likely to experience economic and social success and social mobility.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Ashraf, A Banoazizi, A (2008): Social Classes, State and Revolution in Iran. Translated to Persian language by Soheyla Torabi Farsani, Niloufar Publication, Tehran.


2. Azdanloo, H (2007). The Basic Concepts of Sociology, second edition, Ney Publications, Tehran.


3. Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, 1st Edition. London: R. K. Translated to Persian language by Hassn Chavoshian, (2016) Saless Publications, Tehran.


4. Bourdieu, P. (2016). "Capital forms" in Social capital, Democracy and Development, by Kian Tajbakhsh, Translated to Persian by Afshin Khakbaz and Hassn Pouyan, Shirazh Publications, Tehran.


5. Charney, A. H. (1993): "Migration and public sector: A survey, Alberta", Regional Study, 27 (4): 313-326.


6. Cohen, B J (2007). Introduction to Sociology 9th edition, McGraw-Hill, Inc. translated to Persian by Mohsen Solathi, Tootia Publications, Tehran.


7. Cui, C (2015)," Residential Mobility of Skilled Migrants in Nanjing, China", Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 47(3): 625-642.


8. Ejtehadi, Mostafa (2007): "Social Capital", The Journal of Literature and Humanities Research, 53: 4-12.


9. Fakhraei, S.; Abdi, M. (2012). "The Study of effective Factors in the Migration of villagers to Miandoab in 2010", The Journal of Sociology Studies, 4 (13): 33-46.


10. Fielding, A.; Halford, S. (1993): "Geographies of Opportunity: A Regional Analysis of Gender-Specific Social and Spatial Mobilities in England and Wales, 1971–81", Environment and Planning- A: Economy and Space, 25 (10): 1421-1440.


11. Ghafari, Z (2017). " The Impact of Embodied Cultural Capital (Subjective) on Intergeneration Social Mobility (Case Study: 30-54 Year-Old Citizens in Gorgan) "Quarterly Journal of Social Development, Volume 11, Issue 4 - Serial Number 44, Summer 2017, Pages 183-206, Doi: 0.22055/qjsd.2017.13011.


12. Giddens, A (1998). Sociology. Cambridge: Polity. Translated to Persian by Manouchehr Saboori, Ney Publications, Tehran.


13. Hosseini, Gh; Sadeghi, R, Ghasemi Ardahali, A; Rostamalizadeh, V (2018), " Trends and Patterns of Internal Migration in Iran", Journal Management System, 8(31): 1-18.


14. Iran Statistics Center (2011). Inner Migrations on County based according to Public National Census Results, 2011, Iran Statistics Center, Tehran.


15. Iran Statistics Center (2016). Annual Statistics Report, 2016, Iran Statistics Center, Tehran. Available at: https://www.amar.org.ir.


16. Jamshidi, M K; Mohamadi yegane, B; Hosseinzadeh, A (2019). " An Analysis of the Effective Influences on Development and Its Role in Emigration", Journal Management System, 8(32):11-22.


17. Kazemi, N. (1996). "Learning and responsibility", Quarterly Journal of Education, 110: 104-107.


18. Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W., (1970): "Determining Sample Size for Research Activities", Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30: 607-610.


19. Lahsaeizadeh, A (1998). Social Inequality and Stratification, Shiraz University Publications, Shiraz.


20. Lee, E S. (1966). "A Theory of Migration", Demography, 3(1): 47-57


21. Lu, M. (1998): "Analyzing migration decision-making: Relationships between residential satisfaction mobility intention and moving behavior", Environment and Planning- A: Economy and Space, 30 (8): 1473-1495.


22. Malek, H (2009). Sociology of Stratifications and Social Inequality. Payam Noor publications, Tehran.


23. Mirehei, M; Hossieni, A; Samadi, S (2018). " Analyzing the changes in the pattern of urban systems of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province", Quarterly of Geography (Regional Planning), 7(2): 41-58.


24. Mirfardi, A; Mokhtari, M; heidari, A; Daneshpazir, H (2014). "A Study of the Effect of Social Capital on the Tendency of Tourists in Visiting a Place (Case Study: city of Yasouj)", 3(10): 106-125.


25. Mirfardi, A; Valinezhad, A (2018)."Socio-Strategic Analysis of the Relationship between National Identity and Social Capital of Students in Yasouj University", Social Capital management, 5(1): 67-90.


26. Mobaraki, M; Ghaemi Zadeh, M.; Mahmodzadeh, M (2017). Modernization or Social reproduction (A study on stratification and social mobility), "The Sociological analysis of Social Factors Influencing Intergenerational Social Mobility in Kermanshah", Social Analysis of Order and Inequality, 9 (1 Serial n. 72): 81-114.


27. Moghadas, A A; Iran Mahboub, J (2006). "Social Classes and Mobility in Fars Cities and Bushehr", Quarterly Iranian Journal of Social Studies, 1 (1): 201-234.


28. Mohseni, M (1997) An Introduction of Sociology, 14th edition, Dowran Publications.


29. Nickgohar, A H (1990). An Introduction to Sociology 2nd edition, Tehran: Rayzan Publications, Tehran.


30. Noroozi, H (2019). "The study of various dimensions of Yasouj city vertical development and its impact on the periphery agriculture lands (using Shanon's Anthropic model and Moran's coefficient", 8(32):81-92.


31. Ritzer, G. (1988). Contemporary Sociological Theory, Mc Graw-Hill Publishing Company.  


32. Salimi, A; Davari, M (2008). Deviance Sociology 2ed edition, Research Institute of Hawzah and University Publications, Qom.


33. Shubin, S (2013), " Integration and Mobility of Eastern European Migrants in Scotland", Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 45 (12): 2959-2979.


34. Taghavi, Neamatollah (1992): Rural-Urban Migrations: A sociological Introduction on Theories. Setoudeh Publications, Tabriz.


35. Tayebi Nia, M (2009). "Consequences of Migration of Families to the City of Tehran", Urban Regional Studies and Research, 1 (1): 143-164.


36. Tian, M.; Xu, L. (2015): "Investigating the job mobility of migrant workers in China", Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 24(3): 353-375.


37. Tumin, M (1984). Social Stratification: The Forms and Functions of Inequality (2nd Edition), Prentice-Hall; 2nd edition.


38. Vothoughi, M (2005). Sociology of Rural Social and Cultural Problems, Iran Municipalities and Rural Assistants Organization Publications, Tehran.


39. Zare, B; Latifi, M (2015). "An Examination of Social Factors Influencing Intergenerational Social Mobility in Kermanshah", Social analysis of order and social inequality, 7 (1): 37-66.


40. Zare, B; Latifi, M (2013). "An Examination of Social Factors Influencing Intergenerational Social Mobility in Kermanshah", Journal of Social Problem of Iran, 4(1): 113-139.