تأثیر اصول زیرساخت‌های شهری در ارتقا سطح رضایت‌مندی شهروندان (نمونه موردی: شهرهای جدید اندیشه و پرند)

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی پژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهری

پروانه مژگانی ¹ (دانشجوی دکتری، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی دانشگاه آزاداسلامی واحد امارات، دبی، امارات متحده عربی.)
لعلا جهانشاهلو ² (استادیار، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران)
فرهاد حسین زاده لطفی ³ (استاد گروه ریاضی دانشکده علوم پایه دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات ، تهران، ایران.)
آزیتا رجبی ⁴ (دانشیار گروه جغرافیا دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز)

تاریخ دریافت : 1400/04/04 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/07/19 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/12/01

کلید واژه: شهرهای جدید, زیرساخت های شهری, رضایت مندی شهروندان, اندیشه, پرند,

چکیده مقاله :

پژوهش حاضر دو هدف را دنبال می کند 1- تبیین چارچوب نظری جامعی از زیرساخت های شهری 2- بررسی میزان رضایت شهروندان از وضعیت زیرساخت های شهری در شهرهای جدید اندیشه و پرند.
به منظور دریافت میزان رضایتمندی شهروندان که از کدام یک از مولفه های زیرساخت های شهری رابطه بیشتری دارد و اینکه کدام مولفه در زیرساخت های شهری تاثیر بیشتری در رضایت ساکنین دارد و می تواند میزان ارجحیت جهت سکونت از نظر زیرساختارها را مشخص می کند از روش تحلیل عاملی و دسته بندی معیارها با توجه به خروجی پرسشنامه ها استفاده شده است. با استفاده از رگرسیون خطی چند متغیره و در نظر گرفتن رضایتمندی شهروندان به عنوان متغیر وابسته، به معیارها وشاخص های بدست آمده از چارچوب نظری به عنوان متغیرهای مستقل به سنجش روابط آن ها پرداخته می شود. در ابتدا داده های پرسشنامه در محیط نرم افزارAmos وارد می شود سپس با استفاده از روش تحلیل عاملی برازندگی متغیرها استخراج شود.
در شهر جدید پرند، اکوسیستم و منظر شهری می باشد که در این بین شاخص وجود مسیل ، نیروگاه تولید برق، تعداد تخت بیمارستان، کیفیت اب شاخص دسترسی به مسکن ، استفاده مجدد از اب باران و رواناب و وجود تصفیه خانه ابمی باشد. این شاخص ها بالاترین امتیاز در بین شاخص های زیرساخت ها در شهر پرند بودند. در این بین پایانه مسافربری اتوبوس ، ورزشگاه، موسسات آموزش عالی و تعداد موزه ها می باشد که کمترین امتیاز را در شهر جدید به خود اختصاص داده اند.
در شهر جدید اندیشه عدالت و برابری می باشد. شاخص های جمعیت تحت پوشش گازرسانی ، دسترسی به اینترنت خانگی بالاترین امتیاز را به خود اختصاص د اده است. شاخص خدمات آموزشی و فرهنگی، بیمه خدمات درمانی ، اشتغال و دستمزد و تعداد بیمارستان ها ، منابع آب آشامیدنی و دفاتر پست و مراکز مخابراتی است که کمترین امتیاز را دارند.
معیار اکوسیستم و منظر شهری در بالاترین سطح رضایت شهروندان قرار گرفته است . در شهر جدید اندیشه معیار فنی-موضوعی و مالی-اقتصادی و در شهر جدید پرند معیار دسترسی و شکل گیری فضایی در پایینترین سطح رضایتمندی قرار گرفته است .

چکیده انگلیسی:

The expansion of urbanization and the concentration of facilities in metropolitan areas have forced people to live in these cities. However, this increase in population has led to insecurity, unemployment, air pollution, and environmental issues. New cities have been established to solve these problems and to organize the overpopulation. Examining the urban infrastructure of new cities leads to extracting their strengths and weaknesses. More accurate planning should be formed to attract the population and the coefficient of survival in these cities should be higher. Accordingly, in this study, two new cities, Andisheh and Parand, have been studied to measure the level of citizens' satisfaction with urban infrastructure. Explanation of criteria and indicators was extracted through a review of international articles and the level of satisfaction was assessed through a questionnaire (381 items) in each city and field survey. The research method is descriptive-analytical and to examine the indicators, t-test, factor analysis model, and linear regression in Amos software have been statistically analyzed. First, the significance of the indicators was examined and then the factor analysis method was performed and a load of each factor was extracted. Using the linear regression method, the indicators were prioritized in the studied areas. The results show that the level of citizens 'satisfaction with the index andsub-indices of the ecosystem and urban and technical-thematic landscape and inthe city of Andisheh, the index and sub-indices of justice and equality and ecosystem and urban landscape have a higher impact on citizens' satisfaction than other factors. On the other hand, financial-economic, technical-thematic factors, and human development in the new city of Andisheh have the lowest, and access and spatial and institutional formation in the new city of Parand has the lowest level of satisfaction among people. Extended Abstract   Introduction A comprehensive theoretical framework can help planners and managers deal with urban problems. On the other hand, looking at the physical dimensions of urban infrastructure shows that the soft dimension of urban infrastructure has been neglected. Therefore, the present article focuses on providing a comprehensive framework of urban infrastructure to take a comprehensive approach to the urban infrastructure for new cities, by considering its various dimensions. The present study has two aims: 1- present a comprehensive theoretical framework of urban infrastructure 2- Examining the level of citizens' satisfaction with the state of urban infrastructure in the new cities of Andisheh and Parand.   Methodology The purpose is to investigate the residents' level of satisfaction of the two new cities of Parand and Andisheh as indicators of urban infrastructure. In order the level of citizens 'satisfaction, which of the components of urban infrastructure is more relevant and which component in urban infrastructure has a greater impact on residents' satisfaction and can determine the preference for housing in terms of infrastructure, the Factor analysis, and classification of criteria according to the output of the questionnaires was used. Using multivariate linear regression and considering citizens' satisfaction as a dependent variable, the criteria, and indicators obtained from the theoretical framework as independent variables are measured to measure their relationships. First, the questionnaire data is entered into the Amos software, then the variables are extracted using the factor analysis method. There are several fitness indicators to evaluate the fit of the structural equation model.   Results and discussion The purpose of this article is to investigate the level of satisfaction of residents of the two new cities of Andisheh and Parand with urban infrastructure indicators. In order to obtain the level of satisfaction of citizens, which one of the components of urban infrastructure is more related, and which component of urban infrastructure has a greater impact on the satisfaction of residents, and can determine the level of preference for residence in terms of infrastructure.   Conclusion According to the surveys, in the two new cities of Andisheh and Parand, the criterion of ecosystem and urban landscape is at the highest level of citizens' satisfaction, which should be maintained and improved. On the other hand, in order to increase the level of satisfaction of the residents, the weak points should be given more importance than the strong points. In the new city of Andisheh, the factors of financial-economic, technical-thematic and human development, and in the new city of Parand, the factor of accessibility and spatial and institutional formation is at the lowest level of satisfaction, which requires more attention at different levels of management and planning. The present study explained a comprehensive theoretical framework in the field of identifying urban infrastructure in the new city.  

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Arjmandnia A.(1999). Social life in the new city Abadi. 8(29):91-108. [In Persian].


2. Azargoon N, Mansouri SA, Barati N. (2018). Providing Assessing Indicators and Evaluating Urban Sustainable Development in City Development Strategies Using the Balanced Scorecard Model. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development. 11(23):265-81.


3. Behzadfar M(2014). Urban Infrastructure: Water Supply and Sewerage. Edition S, editor: Shahidi Publisher. [In Persian].


4. Bor Bor Ajdari M, Bor Bor Torpedo M. (2016) Conceptual model of modeling suitable residential plots in new cities using location-based data mining: A case study of the new city of Pardis. Quarterly Journal of Geography, Civil Engineering and Urban Management Studies.;1(2):44 - 36. [In Persian].


5. Dastan MK. (2005).The place of new cities in sustainable development. Collection of articles of New Cities Development Company, third volume. : Tehran: New Cities Development Company Publications. [In Persian].


6. Edwards PN, (2008). Meterology as infrastructure globalism: school of information,301 D West Hall. Michigan:university of Michigan. [In Persian].


7. Etemad G, (1989). Urbanism and its issues,. Proceedings of the first urban planning seminar, Tehran Tehran. [In Persian].


8. Heshmati A, Rashidghalam M. (2020). Measurement and Analysis of Urban Infrastructure and Its Effects on Urbanization in China. Journal of Infrastructure Systems. 26(1):04019030.


9. Hung Y-Y, Aquino G, Waldheim C, Czerniak J, GeuzeAlexander Robinson A, Skjonsberg M, (2011). Landscape Infrastructure: Case Studies by SWA. Basel: Birkhauser: Australian Institute of Landscape Architects( .AILA.). [In Persian].


10. Kalantari K, Hemati G, Jomehpour M. (2017). Localization Pattern of Water Sensitive Cities (Case study: Tehran Metropolis) Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR).5(3):469-93. [In Persian].


11. Khakpoor B, Mousavi S, Abdollahpoor S, Ghazi R. (2019). Evaluation of dimensions of urban infrastructure planning in small towns’ comprehensive plans: the case of Maku, Saveh and Khorramshahr. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design. 7(1):49-67.


12. Khansefid M. (2016). Infrastructure as Landscape: Integrating Human and Natural Realms in Urban Highways Planning and Design. MANZAR, the Scientific Journal of landscape. 8(36):78-89.


13. Meshkini A, Solaimani MS, Azizi H, Zarehpisheh N.( 2013). Evaluating the degree of goals achievement of New Towns in Iran (A case study of Sadra New Town). Urban Structure and Function Studies;1(1):29-41. [In Persian].


14. Mohammadpour s, amiri s, Zali N. (2020). 2Strategic planning of regional transport integrated development (Case Study: Kerman Province). Geography and Planning. 2020;24(73):277-303. assessment of the GOFORDEV Index. Issues & Letters, 10(3).


15. Mokhtari R, Marsooed N, Hosseini A, Gholami M. ( 2015). JUPM. 5(19):91-110.


16. Najafi kani A, Bargahi R. (2016). Survey and analysis of citizens' satisfaction with new cities with emphasis on sustainable development Case study: Aali Shahr new city Sustainabile city. 3(4).


17. Nations U.(2019). Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects: Highlights. ST/ESA/SER.A/423.


18. Nezami N, Shafiee R(2016). Integrated urban waste management with a sustainable development approach comparative study of 6 cities in the world)


19. Rabbani R, Vahida F.(2002). Urban Sociology. Tehran: Samat. [In Persian].


20. Saberifar R. (2018). Determining the appropriate areas for health tourism infrastructure in the outskirts of Metropolises (A Case Study of Mashhad Metropolis). Urban Structure and Function Studies. 5(16):27-46.


21. Sharafi H, (2014). Investigation of Transportation Infrastructure and Its Role in Traffic-Social Security of Citizens Case Study: Kerman Zagros Landscape Geographical Quarterly.5(17):91-114.


22. Sobhieh M, Rdayee A. (2016). Status of realization of the goals and programs of Mehr housing project in the mass production section of the 11,000-unit Mehr housing project in Mahdasht Bagh Nazar.12(33).


23. Soleimani m, Hafeznia m, Ghorchi m, Mohammadian H. (2017). Explanation of the Relationship between Urban Infrastructures and Globalization of Metropolis Local Government. Journal of Research Political Geography(PG).1(1):55-81. [In Persian].


24. Sun Y, Deng L, Pan S-Y, Chiang P-C, Sable SS, Shah KJ. (2020). Integration of green and gray infrastructures for sponge city: Water and energy nexus. Water-Energy Nexus. 3:29-40. [In Persian].


25. Wang Y. (2004). Environmental degradation and environmental threats in China. Environmental monitoring and assessment. 90(1-3):161-9. [In Persian].


26. Williams R(2012). paper presented at landscape infrastructure: system and strategies for contemporary urbanization”piper auditorium, grund Hall 48 quincy street.Cambrifge.MA.


27. Ziari KA, (2015). New Cities Planning. Edition t, editor. Tehran: Samat Publications