بررسی وضعیت مناسب‌سازی فضاهای شهری جهت دسترسی جانبازان و معلولین (مطالعه موردی؛ ادارات دولتی شهر ایذه)

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی پژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهری

زهرا سلطانی ¹ , مجید گودرزی ² , لاله لموچی ³

1 - استادیار جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
2 - دانشیار جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز
3 - دانش‌آموخته‌ی کارشناسی ارشد جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

تاریخ دریافت : 1400/03/27 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/10/01 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/09/01

کلید واژه: فضاهای شهری, شهر ایذه, مناسب‌سازی, ادارات دولتی, جانبازان و معلولین,

چکیده مقاله :

چکیده
اصل تساوی تأمین دسترسی و فرصت‌های برابر برای آحاد جامعه یکی از ارکان حقوق شهروندی و پیش‌نیاز سایر خدمات است. اصل تساوی حقوق معلولین و افراد سالم حاکی از آن است که تمامی افراد جامعه اهمیت یکسانی دارند و رفع این نیاز باید اساس برنامه‌ریزی جوامع را تشکیل دهد. به همین منظور، پژوهش حاضر باهدف بررسی وضعیت مناسب‌سازی فضاهای اداری شهر ایذه در جهت دسترسی مناسب معلولین تدوین شده است. پژوهش حاضر ازنظر هدف، کاربردی- نظری و به لحاظ ماهیت و روش، توصیفی ـ تحلیلی می‌باشد. نتایج نشان داد که میانگین رضایتمندی معلولین از فضاهای اداری شهر ایذه کمتر از میانگین فرض صفر (3) است و با توجه به میانگین نمونه‌ای (91/2) به‌دست‌آمده و همچنین سطح معناداری کمتر از 05/0؛ درمجموع، معلولین از فضاهای اداری شهر ایذه به لحاظ دسترسی مناسب راضی نیستند. همچنین طراحی محیط ادارات دولتی با توجه به آزمون تی که میانگین رعایت استانداردها را 54/2 و سطح معناداری آن را 001/0 نشان می‌دهد، با استانداردها مطابقت ندارد. بین مشارکت معلولین و رعایت استانداردهای مناسب‌سازی رابطه معنادار با ضریب همبستگی 592/0 وجود دارد. با استفاده از آزمون تی مشخص شد که میانگین اداراتی که با امور معلولین در ارتباط هستند از سطح مناسب‌تری برخوردار بوده و ادارات بهزیستی، بنیاد شهید و امور ایثارگران، کمیته امداد و تأمین اجتماعی به ترتیب 72/3، 48/3، 056/3 و 96/2 می‌باشد. همچنین، به لحاظ مناسب‌سازی فضاهای اداری برای معلولین، اداره بهزیستی رتبه یک و اداره آب و فاضلاب رتبه آخر را کسب نمودند.
واژه‌های کلیدی: مناسب‌سازی، فضاهای شهری، ادارات دولتی، جانبازان و معلولین، شهر ایذه.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The principle of providing equal access and opportunities for members of society is one of the pillars of citizenship rights and a prerequisite for providing other services. The principle of equal rights for the disabled and healthy people implies that all members of society are equally important. Meeting this need should form the basis of community planning. The present study aims to examine the status of the adaptation of office spaces in Izeh city for proper access for the disabled. The present applied-theoretical study employed a descriptive-analytical research method field study and library research techniques for data collection. Also, data analysis was done to review the adaptation of urban spaces (government offices, Izeh city) in 24 departments. The results show that in Izeh, in terms of adapting office space for the disabled, the Welfare Department ranks first, and the Water and Sewerage Department ranks last. The Governor's Office as a department that prepares an annual report on the performance of departments to adapt for the disabled They are ranked 11th. Generally speaking, designing the government office environment does not correspond to the standards according to the t-test, showing an average of 2.86 at a significance level of 0.000. There is a significant relationship between the participation of the disabled and the observance of adaptation standards with a correlation coefficient of 0.592. the t-test results showed that the average of departments related to the affairs of the disabled has a more appropriate level, and the welfare departments, the Martyr and Veterans Affairs Foundation, the Relief Committee, and Social Security are 3.72, 3.48, and 3.056, and 2.96 respectively. Also, in terms of adapting office space for the disabled, the Welfare Department ranked first, and the Water and Sewerage Department ranked last.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
According to urban planning, a healthy city is where all citizens can benefit from its spaces. These urban spaces should provide more services to the vulnerable so that this group does not disappear from the scene of society and is not forgotten. The part of the society practically deprived of urban spaces due to its physical disability seeks the cause, not in the “disability of the city” but in its “disability” and avoids approaching this urban space. Today, the social participation of people with disabilities in society is a challenging issue due to the neglect of their needs in developing public urban spaces, services, and modern technology.
Methodology
The present applied-theoretical study employed descriptive-analytical and survey research methods. The data were collected through documentary, library, survey techniques, and interviews with veterans, the disabled, and experts.
The statistical population consisted of veterans and the disabled under the auspices of the Welfare and Martyrs and Veterans Affairs Foundation of Izeh city as 3100 people according to official statistics and thirty experts at the research subject. The sample size was calculated using Cochran’s formula for veterans and the disabled as 360 people. Due to the limited population of experts, all were selected as a sample.
One sample t-test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and TOPSIS were used to analyze the data and test the research hypotheses. Data measurement and analysis tools in this study were SPSS.26 and TOPSIS.
Results and discussion
The results show that in Izeh, in terms of adapting office space for the disabled, the Welfare Department ranks first, and the Water and Sewerage Department ranks last. The Governor's Office as a department that prepares an annual report on the performance of departments to adapt for the disabled they are ranked 11th. Generally speaking, designing the government office environment does not correspond to the standards according to the t-test, showing an average of 2.86 at a significance level of 0.000. There is a significant relationship between the participation of the disabled and the observance of adaptation standards with a correlation coefficient of 0.592. The t-test results showed that the average of departments related to the affairs of the disabled has a more appropriate level, and the welfare departments, the Martyr and Veterans Affairs Foundation, the Relief Committee, and Social Security are 3.72, 3.48, and 3.056, and 2.96 respectively. Also, in terms of adapting office space for the disabled, the Welfare Department ranked first, and the Water and Sewerage Department ranked last.
Conclusion
As the findings show, the Welfare Department and the Martyrs and Veterans Affairs Foundation, with more contact with veterans and the disabled than other departments, are first and second in compliance. A noteworthy point in this ranking is the governorate office, which is ranked 11th. This is important if the office prepares an annual report on the adaptation of other government departments for access for veterans and the disabled. Generally, according to the results of various statistical tests, it can be concluded that the design of the environment of the governorate offices in Izeh does not comply with the standards of adaptation of spaces for veterans and the disabled. Veterans and the disabled also suffer from a lack of consideration for their needs in urban spaces and government offices

منابع و مأخذ:

References

1. Abodllahi, H., Kamali, M., & Mubaraki, H. (2016). Investigating the Relationship between Extraversion and Introversion with Job Satisfaction of employed persons with disabilities. Journal of Organizational Culture Management, No. 4, 1025-1042. [In Persian]


2. Ahadi, M.R., & Hassanpour, M.Z. (2017). The situation of urban space for the presence of the disabled and veterans with the approach of environmental safety (Case study: Borj Ghorban neighborhood of Hamadan). Quarterly Journal of Rahvar Research Studies, No. 21, pp. 127-146. [In Persian]


3. Akbari Oghaz, Z., & Hanaei, T. (2019). Explaining the factors of increasing security in order to promote the social interactions of the people with physical disability. Quarterly Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Planning, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 85-98. [In Persian]


4. Azimi Aghdash, M. (2016). Rules and regulations of urban planning and architecture for the disabled. Tehran: Noavar Publications. [In Persian]


5. Bahmanpour, H., & Salajagheh, B. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative study of urban spaces in Tehran from a user perspective for the disabled (Case study: Laleh Park). Quarterly Journal of Urban Management, No. 21, pp. 7-18. [In Persian]


6. Bazi, K.R., Kiani, A., & Afrasiabi Rad, M.S. (2010). Assessing urban traffic and the needs of the disabled and veterans using the Topsis decision model (Case study: Shiraz). Journal of Urban Research and Planning, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 103-130[In Persian].


7. Borjian, M., & Joghtabi, B. (2009). Adaptation standards of buildings and urban environments for people with disabilities, Public Relations of the Welfare Organization. First Edition, Tehran. [In Persian]


8. Etemad Sheikh al-Islami, S.F., & Deljavan, S. (2014). Urban adaptation method for people with disabilities (guide to using adaptation rules and regulations on a case-by-case basis). Soffeh Magazine, No. 65, pp. 35-60[In Persian].


9. Farhangi, A.A., & Safarzadeh, H. (2010). Research methods in humanities. Tehran: Pooyesh Publications, Third Edition. [In Persian]


10. Ganjgali Sharahi, M., Sam Aram, E., & Khaksari, A. (2017). Assessing the suitability of urban public spaces with the needs of the people with (physical) disability in Rey City. Master Thesis, Allameh Tabatabai University. [In Persian]


11. Hafezniya, M.R. (2012). An introduction to research methodology in humanities. Tehran: Organization for the Study and Compilation of University Humanities Books (SAMT), Twelfth Edition. [In Persian]


12. Jomepoor, M., Issalou, A.A., & Issailou, S. (2016). Capacity assessment of urban spaces in responding to the needs of physically-impaired groups, Case study: Central part of Qom. Journal of Urban Research and Planning, Vol. 7, No. 26, pp. 36-21.


13. Kamanroudi Kajori, M. (2010). Structural pathology of Tehran urban development management with emphasis on adaptation of urban spaces for the disabled. Quarterly Journal of Urban Management, No. 25, 99-114. [In Persian]


14. Khalouipour, E., Aminizadeh, N.K., Shamsoddin Baftani, N., & Rafian, M. (2016). Adaptation and accessibility of the environment for groups with visual impairments, selected papers of the National Conference on Adaptation of Places and Passages, pp. 272-279. [In Persian]


15. Maab Consulting Engineers. (2014). A comprehensive plan (development and civil engineering) of Izeh city. [In Persian]


16. Mo'meni, M. (2016). New topics in operations research. Tehran: Moallef Publications, Seventh Edition. [In Persian]


17. Moradzadeh, F., Ghazanfarpour, H., & Abdullahi, A.A. (2018). Urban space planning to meet the needs of the disabled and veterans (Case study: District 2 of Kerman). Master Thesis, Bahonar University of Kerman. [In Persian]


18. Oraki, P. (2015). Geographical analysis of factors affecting social security of Ahvaz. Perspectives of Izeh Citizens, Supervised by Nahid Sajjadian and Morteza Nemati, Master Thesis, Department of Geography, Shahid Chamran University. [In Persian]


19. Pakzad, J. (2004). Node and Square: Semantic Study of Three Words in Urban Planning. Municipalities Monthly, No. 67, pp. 8-17. [In Persian]


20. Reiki, A.N., Kiani, A., Khamar, G.A. (2018). Analysis of urban road spaces with emphasis on adaptation for the disabled and physically disabled (Case study: Zabol city center). Master Thesis, Zabol University. [In Persian]


21. Savari, M. (2012). Investigation of the worn-out texture of Izeh city. Supervised by Saeed Maleki, Bachelor's thesis, Department of Geography, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. [In Persian]


22. Shaterian, M., Ashnavi, A., & Ganjipour, M. (2015). A study of the adaptation of urban spaces for the access of the disabled and veterans (Case Study: Kashan Governorate Offices). Journal of Spatial Planning, No. 22, pp. 59-75. [In Persian]


23. Statistical yearbook of the country. (2018). Statistical Center of Iran. Tehran: Office of the President, Public Relations and International Cooperation, First Edition. [In Persian]


24. Tavassoli Naeini, M., & Kaviar, M.H. (2008). Reflections on the rights of persons with disabilities from the perspective of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Journal of Private Law Thoughts, No. 13, pp. 51-81. [In Persian]


25. Tehran Municipality Adaptation Headquarters. (2012). Instructions for adapting urban spaces for people with physical and mobility disabilities. Tehran Municipality. [In Persian]


26. Vahed Shirtari, M., Hassani, A., & Aghaei Bajestani, M. (2018). Investigating the compensation of claims compensable to veterans and the disabled due to lack of management of urban environment adaptation. Quarterly Journal of Urban Management, No. 52, pp. 219-229. [In Persian]


27. Gharebaghi, A., Mostafavi, M. A., Chavoshi, S. H., Edwards, G., & Fougeyrollas, P. (2018). The role of social factors in the accessibility of urban areas for people with motor disabilities. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(4), 131. [In Persian]


28. Melnikova, E. Lepert, M. Popov, A. & Sorokoymova, T. (2019). Adapting urban areas for people with limited mobility. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 97, p. 01033). EDP Sciences.‏


29. Meshur, H. F. A. (2013). Accessibility for People With Disabilities in Urman Spaces: A Case Study of Ankara, Turkey. ArchNet-IJAR, 7(2).


30. Rafizadeh, N., Nozari, Sh., Ghasemzadeh, M., Mandegar, M. (2015). Application Guide of Design Criteria for People with Disability, Tehran: BHRC Publication. No 678, (Second Publication). [In Persian]


31. Shawn Lawton, H., Abou-Zahra, Sh. Brewer, j. (2014). The Role of Accessibility in Universal Web. Preceding of the 11 the Web for all, Seoul, and Republic of Korea.


32. Sitter, K. C. & Mitchell, J. (2019). Perceptions of Para transit accessibility among persons with disabilities: an adapted photo voice study. Published on Sep 1, 2020in Health Promotion Practice. DOI: 10.1177/1524839919888484.