راهبرد های کارآمدی و اثربخشی کمیسیون های شهرسازی در فرایند ساخت و ساز شهری در منطقه یک تهران

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی پژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهری

مهرداد کبیری ¹ , حمیدرضا جودکی ² , علیرضا استعلاجی ³

1 - دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 - استادیار گروه جغرافیا، واحد اسلامشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
3 - استاد گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد یادگار امام خمینی (ره)، شهر ری، ایران

تاریخ دریافت : 1400/11/23 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/04/31 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/12/01

کلید واژه: کمیسیون ماده 100, کمیسیون ماده 5, کمیسیون ماده 55, منطقه 1 شهرداری تهران, مدل تلفیقی SWOT-AHP,

چکیده مقاله :

چکیده امروزه توسعه شهری بیش از هر چیزی تحت تاثیر نظام ساخت و سازهای شهری است و در این بین ضوابط و مقررات شهرسازی مصوب، نقش به سزایی در نظم و نسق بخشی به توسعه شهری دارد. با توسعه سریع شهرنشینی و افزایش روزافزون ساخت و ساز در چنددهه اخیر، شاهد تغییرات اساسی در منظر شهری هستیم که شهرهامحل خود نمایی هر یک از تک بناها در ارتفاع، رنگ، نوع مصالح و... در جداره ممتد خیابان‌ها شده اند. در این روند ساخت و ساز، مدیران و مسئولین شهر با تصویب و لازم الاجرا کردن قوانین وآیین نامه‌های مختلف سعی در کنترل کردن شرایط نامناسب این دوره داشته اند.در این زمینه در جوامع شهری ایران ضوابط و مقررات تعریف شده در زمینه توسعه شهری متاسفانه از کارایی قابل ملاحظه ای برخوردار نبوده و این امر توسعه شهری را با اختلالات جدی مواجه ساخته است. دراین پژوهش که با روش توصیفی – تحلیلی و با روش میدانی و استفاده از ابزار پرسشنامه ای صورت گرفته است حجم نمونه 20 نفر از کارشناسان و خبرگان طرح های توسعه شهری مورد سوال در زمینه نقاط قوت و ضعف و تهدید و فرصت کارآیی این ضوابط و مقررات شامل (کمیسیون های ماده 100، 5 و 55) قرار گرفته اند. لذا ابتدا از طریق مدل سوات عوامل قوت‌، ضعف‌، تهدید و فرصت از طریق روش دلفی جمع‌آوری و سپس مولفه‌های پژوهش مشخص شد و پس از انجام محاسبات طی روشی تلفیقی با مدل AHP ‌مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفته است. نتایج این پژوهش نشان میدهد که راهبرد تدافعی با مقدار اندازه گیری شده 078/4 به‌عنوان راهبرد برتر در زمینه ارائه راهبرد های افزایش کارآیی طرح های توسعه شهری شناخته شده و پس از آن راهبرد تهاجمی با مقدار 895/3 به عنوان راهبرد مکمل آمده است که نشان دهنده تاثیر مقایسه‌های زوجی گویه‌های مندرج در مدل سوات می باشد

چکیده انگلیسی:

Abstract Today, urban development is more than anything influenced by the urban construction system, and in the meantime, the approved rules and regulations play an important role in regulating urban development. With the rapid development of urbanization and the increasing increase of construction in recent decades, we are witnessing fundamental changes in the urban landscape that the cities have become the manifestation of each building in height, color, type of materials, etc. in the continuous wall of the streets. In this construction process, city managers and officials have tried to control the unfavorable conditions of this period by approving and enforcing various laws and regulations. In this regard, in the urban communities of Iran, the rules and regulations defined in the field of urban development, unfortunately, have not been significantly effective and this has caused serious disruptions in urban development. In this research, which has been done by descriptive-analytical method and field method and using a questionnaire tool, the sample size of 20 experts and experts of urban development projects in question in the field of strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities for efficiency of these rules and regulations Included (Article 100, 5 and 55 commissions). Therefore, first, the factors of strength, weakness, threat and opportunity were collected through the Delphi method through the Delphi method, and then the components of the research were identified. . The results of this study show that a defensive strategy with a measured value of 4.078 is recognized as a superior strategy in the field of providing strategies to increase the efficiency of urban development plans, followed by an offensive strategy with a value of 3.895 as a complementary strategy. Which shows the effect of pairwise comparisons of the items in the SWOT model.   Extended Abstract   Introduction Urban development in the era of the need to approve and implement urban development plans more than ever. In this regard, the problem that causes problems in large metropolises is the lack of accurate implementation and violations in the implementation of urban development plans. In this study, we intend to investigate the areas of occurrence of these problems and violations in the implementation of urban development plans.   Methodology In this research, which has been done by descriptive-analytical method and field method and using a questionnaire tool, the sample size of 20 experts and experts of urban development projects in question in the field of strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities for efficiency of these rules and regulations Included (Article 100, 5 and 55 commissions). Therefore, first, the factors of strength, weakness, threat and opportunity were collected through the Delphi method through the Delphi method, and then the components of the research were identified.   Results and discussion The results of this study show that the defensive strategy with a measured value of 4.078 is recognized as a superior strategy in the field of providing strategies to increase the efficiency of urban development plans, followed by an offensive strategy with a value of 3.895 as a complementary strategy. Which shows the effect of pairwise comparisons of the items in the SWOT model.   Conclusion Based on the results, the most important strategies for implementing urban development plans are: resolving conflicts of law and developing transparency in determining crimes, developing specialized workshops in the field of spatial and physical development vision of the region with emphasis on the role of local institutions and Neighborhoods, resolving conflicts of law and developing transparency in determining severe punishments, paying attention to social justice by strengthening local institutions in the region and ... .

منابع و مأخذ:

References

1. Ajzashakouhi, M., Samadi, R., Goudarzi, N., & Ghanbari, M. (2016). Analysis and investigation of the causes of building violations in metropolitan areas with an emphasis on urban planning laws and regulations (Case study: Districts three and nine of Mashhad city). Geography and Urban Space Development, 3(2 (Serial 5)), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.22067/gusd.v3i2.32114 [In Persian]


2. Azizi, M., Abouyiardakan, M., & Nouri, N. (2011). The role of laws and regulations in the realization of integrated management in the urban complex of Tehran. Armanshahr Magazine, 4(6), 117-128. [In Persian]


3. Bahmani Monfared, H., & Kalantari, M. (2012). Investigating the effects of Article 100 Municipal Commission in controlling construction violations. Fourth Conference on Urban Planning and Management, Holy Mashhad. [In Persian]


4. Douglas, I. (2006). Peri-urban ecosystems and societies: Transitional zones and contrasting values. In D. McGregor, D. Simon, & D. Thompson (Eds.), The Peri-Urban Interface: Approaches to Sustainable Natural and Human Resource Use. Earthscan, London.


5. Esmaeilpour, N., Dehghan Dehkordi, E., & Khakiyan Dehkordi, M. (2016). Causes of construction violations in Iranian cities with emphasis on building density and solutions to reduce it (Case study: Farrokhshahr). International Conference on Engineering Sciences, Arts and Law. [In Persian]


6. Gallego-Ayala, J., & Juízo, D. (2011). Strategic implementation of integrated water resources management in Mozambique: An A’WOT analysis. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 36, 1103-1111.


7. Jawaid, M. F., & Khan, S. A. (2015). Evaluating the need for smart cities in India. International Journal of Advance Research in Science and Engineering, 4(Special Issue (01)), 991-996.


8. Kajanus, M., Kangas, J., & Kurttila, M. (2004). The use of value-focused thinking and the SWOT hybrid method in tourism management. Tourism Management.


9. Kapoor, M., & Blanc, D. (2008). Measuring risk on investment in informal (illegal) housing: Theory and evidence from Pune, India. Journal of Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38, 311-329.


10. Khodaparasti, M., Abedini, R., Sadeghi, M., & Najafgholizadeh, N. (2016). Urban construction control and monitoring strategies from the perspective of urban management (Case study: District 17 of Tehran). International Conference on Urban Engineering, Civil Engineering, Architecture. [In Persian]


11. Kumar, A., & Pushplata. (2017). Problems and prospects of building regulations in Shimla, India – A step towards achieving sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 6, 207-215.


12. Kumar, A., & Pushplata. (2018). Building regulations for hill towns of India. Elsevier HBRC Journal, 11, 275-284.


13. Lotfi, H., Edalatkhah, F., Mirzayi, M., & Vazirpour, S. (2009). Urban management and its place in promoting citizenship rights. Journal of Human Geography, 2(1), 101-110. [In Persian]


14. Mokhtari, A., & Azad, S. M. (2009). The role of Article 100 Commission votes in the prevalence of construction violations. Quarterly Report, No 61. [In Persian]


15. Pazhouhan, M., Darabkhani, R., Jafari, E., & Zeynalzadeh, A. (2014). Investigation and analysis of factors affecting construction violations in small cities (Case study: Babolsar city). Geographical Research on Urban Planning, 2(2), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.22059/JURBANGEO.2014.51970 [In Persian]


16. Pourahmad, A., Hatami Nejad, H., & Hosseini, S. H. (2006). Pathology of urban development plans in the country. Geographical Research, 38(58), 167-180. [In Persian]


17. Salari, M., & Safavisoha, M. (2017). An analysis of the role of construction violations in the failure of urban development plans in Tehran. Garden Comment Magazine, 14(51), 5-20. [In Persian]


18. Salehi Milani, S., & Mohammadi, M. (2009). Formulation of construction rules and regulations in foothill areas (Case study: Baghe Shater neighborhood, Tehran). Architecture and Urban Planning Letter, 2(3), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.30480/AUP.2010.203 [In Persian]


19. Soofi, M., & Alaeddin, V. (2016). Investigating the effect of urban rules and regulations on the formation of urban facades. The First International Congress of Target Architecture. [In Persian]


20. Tian, L., & Shen, T. (2011). Evaluation of plan implementation in transitional China: A case of Guangzhou city master plan. Cities, 28, 11-27.


21. Wickramasinghe, V., & Takano, S. (2009). Application of combined SWOT and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for tourism revival strategic marketing planning: A case of Sri Lanka tourism. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 8, 954-969.