تحلیل اثرات مدیریت مشارکتی بر ابعاد توسعه پایدار محلات شهری نمونه موردی: شهر زابل)
محورهای موضوعی : برنامه ریزی شهری
سید عبداله داودی
1
,
معصومه حافظ رضازاده
2
*
,
مریم کریمیان بستانی
3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، واحد زاهدان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، زاهدان، ایران.
2 - استادیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، واحد زاهدان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، زاهدان، ایران
3 - استادیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، واحد زاهدان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، زاهدان، ایران.
کلید واژه: شهر زابل, تحلیل اثرات, ابعاد پایداری, محلات شهری, مدیریت مشارکتی,
چکیده مقاله :
امروزه مشارکت آگاهانه نقطه ثقل و عنصر مرکزی در دستیابی به حکمروایی خوب شهری و توسعه پایدار است. در این راستا هدف پژوهش حاضر تحلیل اثرات مدیریت مشارکتی بر ابعاد پایداری در سطح محلات شهر زابل می باشد. این تحقیق به لحاظ هدف کاربردی و از نظر ماهیت و روش تحقیق روش کمی و پیمایشی است. داده های مورد نیاز تحقیق با روش اسنادی-پرسشنامه ای گردآوری شد. در این پژوهش از 2 نوع جامعه آماری استفاده شد. الف) شهروندان ساکن در شهر زابل به عنوان جامعه نمونه (134950 نفر) که حجم نمونه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 383 نفر تعیین شد. ب) جامعه آماری، متخصصان که بر اساس نمونه گیری هدفمند تعدد 20 نفر به عنوان نمونه آماری انتخاب شد. جهت تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات از نرمافزار SPSS و مدلهای (EDAS and F-AHP) استفاده شد. نتایج آزمون ضریب تغییرات نشان داد در تمامی گویه های مطرح شده، مرتبه های متوسط رو به پایین، درصد بیشتری را به خود اختصاص داده است، در واقع، نتایج گویای وضعیت نامناسب مدیریت مشارکتی در شهر زابل می باشد. در مطالعه همبستگی بین ابعاد پایداری (اقتصادی و اجتماعی، کالبدی و زیست محیطی) با مدیریت مشارکتی در سطح محلات شهر زابل، بررسی مقادیر آزمون کای اسکوئر نشان داد که بین تمامی متغیر های وابسته با مدیریت مشارکتی رابطه مثبت و معنی داری در سطح اطمینان 99 درصد وجود دارد. در نهایت نتایج میزان تاثیرپذیری هر یک از ابعاد پایداری محلات شهر زابل مبتنی بر رویکرد مدیریت مشارکتی با استفاده از مدل EDAS، نشان داد به ترتیب بعد کالبدی با مقدار وزن 98/0 و بعد زیست محیطی با مقدار وزن 011/0، بالاترین و پایین ترین رتبه را به خود اختصاص داده اند.
Today, conscious participation is the focal point and central element in achieving good urban governance and sustainable development. In this regard, the aim of the current research is to Analysis the impact of participatory management on the dimensions of sustainability in the level of urban neighborhoods in Zabol city. This research is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of the nature and method of research, it is a quantitative and survey method. The data needed for the research was collected by a documentary-questionnaire method. In this research, 2 types of statistical population were used. A) Citizens living in Zabol city as a sample community (134950 people) whose sample size was determined by using Cochran's formula as 383 people. b) Statistical population, specialists who were selected as a statistical sample based on the purposeful sampling of 20 people. SPSS software and models (EDAS and F-AHP) were used for data analysis. The results of the coefficient of variation test showed that in all the mentioned items, the middle and lower ranks have a higher percentage, in fact, the results indicate the poor state of participatory management in Zabol city. In the study of the correlation between the dimensions of sustainability (economic, social, physical and environmental) with participatory management at the local level of Zabol city, the chi-square test values showed that, there is a positive and significant relationship between all dependent variables with collaborative management at the 99% confidence level. Finally, the results of the effectiveness of each of the dimensions of the sustainability of the neighborhoods of Zabol based on the participatory management approach using the EDAS model showed the physical dimension with a weight of 0.98 and the environmental dimension with a weight of 0.011, respectively, they have assigned the highest and lowest rank.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Today, conscious participation is the focal point and central element in achieving good urban governance and sustainable development. In this regard, the aim of the current research is to Analysis the impact of participatory management on the dimensions of sustainability in the level of urban neighborhoods in Zabol city. Zabol city, located in the north of Sistan and Baluchestan Province with a population of 134,950, has faced significant strategic and political challenges in recent years due to border closures, droughts, and subsequent rural migration. These factors have contributed to the city's ongoing physical expansion, with its area increasing from 2,084.52 hectares to 2,786.81 hectares over the past decade. This growth is marked by the horizontal expansion of the city as surrounding villages have merged into the main urban fabric, adding several new neighborhoods. Currently, Zabol consists of 6 districts and 26 neighborhoods. These developments have posed numerous challenges for urban management. By building capacity in urban management and enhancing citizen participation in neighborhood affairs, many of these challenges can be addressed. Reducing vulnerabilities and creating a comfortable environment for citizens requires a strong focus on participation in urban programs. The core issue in this research is the perspective of participatory management at the neighborhood level and its impact on the dimensions of sustainability in Zabol. Participation at the local level can play a crucial role in reducing costs. Therefore, leveraging the potential of public participation in urban management can help resolve many issues, especially given the cultural and social background of the people of Sistan, who have a strong tradition of participation.
Neighborhood-based organization in Zabol provides an opportunity to empower residents and strengthen their participation in various dimensions of sustainable development (social, economic, physical, and environmental). Thus, this study aims to examine the effects of participatory management on sustainability dimensions at the neighborhood level in Zabol. The research seeks to answer the following questions: Is there a significant relationship between participatory management at the neighborhood level in Zabol and the dimensions of sustainability (economic, social, physical, and environmental)? Which indicators of development in Zabol have been most influenced by participatory management at the neighborhood level?
Methodology
This research is applied in terms of purpose and quantitative-survey in terms of nature and methodology. The required data were collected using a documentary-questionnaire method. In this study, two types of statistical populations were used: a) Citizens residing in Zabol city as the sample population (134,590 people), with the sample size determined using Cochran's formula as 383 individuals. b) The statistical population of experts, selected through purposive sampling, included 20 individuals (8 university professors and 12 urban managers) as the statistical sample. The research indicators were collected based on the study of theoretical foundations and research background. Some indicators were adjusted to fit the study area and were reflected in two questionnaires: the first questionnaire (participatory management) and the second questionnaire (sustainability: physical, environmental, social, and economic). The respondents to the questionnaires included households residing in Zabol city, university professors, and urban managers. The face validity of the questionnaires was confirmed by experts, and Cronbach's alpha statistic was used to determine the reliability of the questionnaires. The Cronbach's alpha values were as follows: 0.81 for the participatory management questionnaire, 0.78 for the economic development questionnaire, 0.75 for the social questionnaire, 0.74 for the physical questionnaire, and 0.68 for the environmental questionnaire. The Cronbach's alpha results indicate acceptable reliability for the questionnaires. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software and the EDAS and F-AHP models.
Results and discussion
The results of the coefficient of variation test showed that in all the mentioned items, the middle and lower ranks have a higher percentage, in fact, the results indicate the poor state of participatory management in Zabol city. In the study of the correlation between the dimensions of sustainability (economic, social, physical and environmental) with participatory management at the local level of Zabol city, the chi-square test values showed that, there is a positive and significant relationship between all dependent variables with collaborative management at the 99% confidence level. Finally, the results of the effectiveness of each of the dimensions of the sustainability of the neighborhoods of Zabol based on the participatory management approach using the EDAS model showed the physical dimension with a weight of 0.98 and the environmental dimension with a weight of 0.011, respectively, they have assigned the highest and lowest rank.
Conclusion
The According to the results and their analysis, the mechanisms governing the neighborhoods of Zabol city are not aligned with the model of achieving local sustainable development in various dimensions, and fundamental changes are required in different aspects of development at the local level.
1. Agyemang, F.S.K. Silva, E. Poku-boansi, M. (2019). Understanding the urban spatial structure of Sub-Saharan African cities using the case of urban development patterns of a Ghanaian city-region, Habitat International, 85 (October 2018) (2019), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.02.001
2. Alaeddini, P. Pourmirghaffari, M. S. (2018). Tehran’s Neighborhood Management and Sub-Councils: Assessing Urban Governance in Hassan-Abad-e Zargandeh. Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran, 7(1), 25-52. doi: 10.22059/jisr.2018.207350.356 [In Persian].
3. Arzani birgani M, Kohzadi seyf abad O. (2021). Evaluative analysis Procedural challenges of urban management with a content analysis approach Granheim and Landmann (case study: metropolis Ahvaz). Urban Design Discourse a Review of Contemporary Litreatures and Theories, 2(2). 85-105. URL: http://udd.modares.ac.ir/article-40-52324-fa.html [In Persian].
4. Ashnavar, M. Vasheghani Farahani, E. Rabiei Fardad, A. (2021). The role and position of participatory management in urban development. Geography and Human Relationships, 4(3), 147-164. https://www.gahr.ir/article_144778.html?lang=en [In Persian].
5. Azimi Amoli, J. and Ershadi Vahram, S. (2017). Urban management based on neighborhood participatory planning approach (Case Study: Neighborhood Urban areas of Tehran 1st District). Geography (Regional Planning), 7(26), 21-40. dor 20.1001.1.22286462.1396.7.2.2.4 [In Persian].
6. Bado, V. B. Bationo, A. (2018). Chapter One - Integrated Management of Soil Fertility and Land Resources in Sub-Saharan Africa: Involving Local Communities. Advances in Agronomy, Volume 150, 2018, pp 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2018.02.001
7. Conroy, M.M. Berke, P.R. (2004). What makes a good sustainable development plan? An analysis of factors that influence principles of sustainable development, Environment and planning, 36(8), 1381-1396. https://doi.org/10.1068/a367
8. Davoodi, S.A; Hafez Rezazadeh, M; Karimian-Bostani, M. (2021). The Role of Neighborhood-Based Management in the Socio-Economic Sustainability of Zabol City, Geographical Research Quarterly, 37(1), 101-110. http://georesearch.ir/article-۱-۱۲۶۰-fa.html [In Persian].
9. Fanni, Z. (2021). Survey effects of the socio-cultural regeneration in sustainability of historic neighborhood (A research in Iran neighborhood, district 12, Tehran). Researches in Earth Sciences, 12(1), 202-221. doi: 10.52547/esrj.12.1.202 [In Persian].
10. Freestone, R, (2000). Urban planning in changing world, e & FN spod. https://www.routledge.com/Urban-Planning-in-a-Changing-World-The-Twentieth-Century-Experience/Freestone/p/book/9780419246503
11. Geekiyanage, D, Fernando, T, Keraminiyage, K. (2020). Assessing the state of the art in community engagement for participatory decision-making in disaster risk-sensitive urban development, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Volume 51, December 2020, 101847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101847
12. Hajipour, KH. (2006). community based planning, an efficient approach for sustainable urban management. honar-ha-ye-ziba, -(26), 37-46. sid. https://sid.ir/paper/5844/en [In Persian].
13. Innes, J.E. Booher, D.E. (2001). Indicators for Sustainable Communities: A Strategy Building on Complexity Theory and Distributed Intelligence, Planning Theory & Practice, 1(2), 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350020008378
14. Jafari, F., Dashti Rahmatabadi, Mohammad Mehdi. (1401), Investigating the role of participatory management in empowering local communities in dealing with drought in Bafq County, Sixth International and National Conference on Management, Accounting and Law Studies, Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/1480579/ [In Persian].
15. Jamali haji hassan sofla, E, Nematollahi Bonab, S. (2021). Examining and evaluating the role of citizens and their social participation in achieving sustainable urban development goals (case example: city of tabriz), Urban Environmental Planning and Development, 1(1), 95-112. 20.1001.1.27833496.1400.1.1.16.4 [In Persian].
16. Karimzadeh, M.M. (2022). Participatory Planning and Management of Ecotourism and Its Impact on the Development of Arvand Free Zone in the Vision of 1404; Case Study: Minoo Island, The 7th International Conference on Modern Studies in Civil Engineering, Architecture, Urban Planning, and Environment in the 21st Century, Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/1508290 [In Persian].
17. Khadka, Ch. Prasad Aryal, K. Edwards-jonasova, M. Upadhyaya, A. Nabin, D. Cudin, P. Vacik, H. (2018). Evaluating participatory techniques for adaptation to climate change: Nepal case study. Forest Policy and Economics, Volume 97, December 2018, pp 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.017
18. Kordi, A. (2006). Principles and Fundamentals of Creativity in Urban Management, Municipalities Journal, No. 75, 1-10. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/255240 [In Persian].
19. Lia, J, Krishnamurthy, S, Roders, P, Wesemael, P. (2020). Informing or consulting? Exploring community participation within urban heritage management in China, Habitat International, Volume 105, November 2020, 102268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102268
20. Masoumi Ashkavari, H. (2008). Practical Guide to Planning and Futures Studies, Tehran, Payam Publications. [In Persian].
21. Master Plan of Zabol City. (2019). Zabol Municipality [In Persian].
22. Miśkowiec, M. (2023). Urban courtyards as local points of sustainable urban regeneration challenges to community participation in urban courtyard-related projects in Polish Cities, City, Culture and Society, Volume 34, September 2023, 100522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2023.100522
23. Molaei, A; Daryabari, S.J; Bakhshandeh Nasrat, A. (2018). The Performance of Participatory Management in Planning for the Development of Tehran, Quarterly Journal of New Approaches in Human Geography, 10(3), 249-269. https://www.sid.ir/paper/516833 [In Persian].
24. Moosa kazemi, S.M, Almasi, R. (2019). The role of neighborhood houses in realization of urban management purposes; Case Study, Region seven of metropolitan Tehran. urban management, 18(54 ), 183-196. sid. https://sid.ir/paper/92055/en [In Persian].
25. Musai, M, Razavi Alhashem, B. (2011). SWOT Analysis of Citizens’ Participation in Civic Affairs in Tehran. refahj. 11(41), 123-152. URL: http://refahj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-715-fa.html [In Persian].
26. Parker, S. (2003). Urban theory & urban experience. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Urban-Theory-and-the-Urban-Experience-Encountering-the-City/Parker/p/book/9780415520706
27. Pourahmad, A., Babaei, H.R., Rafi, A., (2018): Explaining the role of neighborhood management on the social sustainability of Tehran city through urban connecting social capitals, Journal of Iranian Islamic City Studies, 8(31), pp. 75-82. https://www.sid.ir/paper/513995/fa [In Persian].
28. Rashid, A.A, Takyi, S.A, Amponsah, O, Banor Kyei, K.O. (2023). Rethinking sustainable urban management: effects of urbanization on the socio-spatial structure of the tamale metropolis, Urban Governance, Available online 25 June 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2023.06.003
29. Redclift, M. (1992). The Meaning of Sustainable Development in: Sustainable Development in Peru: A Review of a Document from the Pachamama Society, International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London, Pearce D.W. DOI:10.1016/0016-7185(92)90050-E
30. Rezaei, M.R, Negin-Naji, S. (2015). Investigating Effective Strategies for Creating a Sustainable Neighborhood with a Participatory Approach (Case Study: Rahnamayi Neighborhood, Yasuj), Journal of Urban Research and Planning, 6(20), 69-82. 20.1001.1.22285229.1394.6.20.5.7[In Persian].
31. Rezazadeh, R, & SELSELEH, A. (2010). a review of sustainable community development policies through an assetbased approach, with emphasis on social & physical capital. Journal of architecture and urban planning, 2(4), 121-139. sid. https://sid.ir/paper/215880/en [In Persian].
32. Salari Sardari, F., Kiani, A. (2017). Analysis of the Urban Management Model in Iran (Structure, Function, and Strategy). Urban Management Studies, 9(32), pp. 35-52. https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/824580?FullText=FullText [In Persian].
33. Sarkissian, W. Hofer, N (2009). Kitchen Table Sustainability: practical recipes for community engagement with sustainability, London: Earth scan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849771795
34. Savari. M, Eskandari damaneh. H. (2019). The role of participatory management in empowering local communities in coping with droughts in southern Kerman province. MJSP. 23 (2). 123-171. http://hsmsp.modares.ac.ir/article-21-29527-fa.html [In Persian].
35. Seo, B.K. (2022). Co-creation of knowledge in the urban planning context: The case of participatory planning for transitional social housing in Hong Kong, Cities, Volume 122, March 2022, 103518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103518
36. Statistical Center of Iran. (2016). Census Results. [In Persian].
37. Törnroth, S, Day, J, Fürst, M.F, Mander, S. (2022). Participatory utopian sketching: A methodological framework for collaborative citizen (re)imagination of urban spatial futures, Futures, Volume 139, May 2022, 102938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.102938
38. Vaňo, S, Olafsson, A.S. Mederly, P. (2021). Advancing urban green infrastructure through participatory integrated planning: A case from Slovakia, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Volume 58, March 2021, 126957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126957
39. Ziari, K. , Zandav, S. M. , Aghajani, M. and Moghdam, M. (2009). Investigating Citizen Participation and Its Role in Urban Management of Small Cities (Case studies: Galeh Dar, Varzaneh and Hidege). Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 7(2), -. doi: 10.22067/geography.v7i13.8983 [In Persian].