بررسی و تحلیل وضعیت شهر شاد و شناسایی تعیین کننده های آن در فضاهای کوچک شهری (مطالعه موردی: شهر روانسر)

محورهای موضوعی : توسعه پایدار شهری

داود جمینی ¹ (استادیار گروه ژئومورفولوژی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران و گروه پژوهشی مطالعات محیطی دریاچه زریبار، پژوهشکده کردستان‌شناسی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران)
علیرضا جمشیدی ² (استادیار گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران)
زهرا اسمعیلی ³ (کارشناس ارشد جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه پیام نور، واحد وزوان، اصفهان، ایران)

تاریخ دریافت : 1400/09/05 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/10/01 تاریخ انتشار : 1400/10/01

کلید واژه: روانسر, توسعه پایدار شهری, شهر شاد, کیفیت زندگی, سیاست‌گذاری,

چکیده مقاله :

تأمین و ارتقای سطح شادی و نشاط شهروندان از مهم ترین ارکان کیفیت زندگی در فضاهای شهری است که طی دهه های اخیر، توجه روزافزون متخصصان و برنامه ریزان شهری را به خود جلب نموده است و به عنوان یکی از مهم ترین اهداف دولت ها و سازمان ملل مطرح شده است. هدف مطالعه کمی و کاربردی حاضر که ترکیبی از روش های توصیفی ـ تحلیلی و اکتشافی انجام گرفته است، بررسی و تحلیل وضعیت شهر شاد و شناسایی تعیین کننده های آن در فضاهای کوچک شهری است که به صورت مطالعه موردی در شهر روانسر از توابع استان کرمانشاه انجام گرفته است. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل 7122 نفر سرپرست خانوار است که با استفاده از روش های محاسبه حجم نمونه، 364 نفر به عنوان نمونه آماری برآورد گردید و نمونه ها به روش کاملاً تصادفی انتخاب شده اند. ابزار اصلی پژوهش برای جمع آوری داده های میدانی، پرسشنامه محقق ساخته است که روایی و پایایی آن به تأیید رسیده است. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد در میان شاخص های سه گانه شهر شاد (شاخص های اجتماعی، کالبدی و اقتصادی) میانگین شاخص اجتماعی با مقدار 124/3، به صورت معناداری بیشتر از میانگین مبنا (عدد 3) بوده است و میانگین دو شاخص کالبدی و اقتصادی به ترتیب با مقادیر 608/2 و 587/2، به صورت معناداری کمتر از میانگین مبنا بوده اند. نتایج بررسی وضعیت کلی شهر شاد نشان داد میانگین محاسبه شده با مقدار 788/2 به صورت معناداری، پایین تر از حد متوسط بوده است. در خصوص تعیین کننده های شهر شاد نتایج نشان داد به واسطه چهار عامل کلیدی شناسایی شده 956/61 درصد از وایانس متغیر وابسته تبیین شده است. این عوامل و درصد واریانس مقدار ویژه آن ها به ترتیب اهمیت عبارت اند از: پایداری فیزیکی ـ کالبدی (041/21)، پایداری اجتماعی ـ فرهنگی (4/16)، پایداری اقتصادی (151/13) و پایداری زیست محیطی (356/11). به نظر می رسد عوامل شناسایی شده زیرمجموعه عامل کلان "مدیریت یکپارچه و کارآمد شهری" هستند و ارتقای این عامل، به عنوان منشأ اصلی اکثر سیاست گذاری ها و برنامه ریزی ها، می تواند در تحقق شهر شاد در محدوده مطالعاتی تأثیر بسزایی داشته باشد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

      Providing and promoting the level of happiness and vitality of citizens is one of the most important pillars of quality of life in urban spaces Which in recent decades, has attracted increasing attention from experts and urban planners and Has been raised as one of the most important goals of governments and the United Nations. The purpose of this quantitative and applied study has been done using a combination of descriptive-analytical and exploratory methods, is a study and analyze the situation of Shad city and identify its determinants in small urban spaces Which has been done as a case study in Ravansar city which is part of Kermanshah province. The statistical population of the study includes 7122 heads of households and among them with Using sample size calculation methods, 364 people were estimated as a statistical sample and the samples were selected completely randomly. The main research tool for collecting field data is a researcher-made questionnaire whose validity and reliability have been confirmed. The results showed that among the three indicators of a happy city (Social, physical and economic indicators) The average of social index with the value of 3.124 was significantly higher than the average of base (number 3) and The average of two physical and economic indicators respectively with values of 2.608 and 2.587, Have been significantly lower than the baseline mean. The results of the survey showed the general condition of the city happy the average calculated with the value of 2.788 Has been significantly below average. Regarding the determinants of a happy city, the results showed Due to the four identified key factors, 61.956% of the variance of the dependent variable has been explained. These factors and the percentage of variance of their specific value in order of importance are: Physical stability (21.041), Socio-cultural sustainability (16.4), Economic Stability (13.151) and Environmental sustainability (11.356). The identified factors seem to be a subset of the macro factor "integrated and efficient urban management" and Promoting this factor, as the main source of most policies and planning, can have a significant impact on the realization of a happy city in the study area.Extended AbstractIntroduction:One of the most important pillars of social sustainability and achieving sustainable development is to improve the quality of life of residents of different residential spaces for which several dimensions and components can be considered. Meanwhile, happiness and vitality are one of the most important psychological components of quality of life. Evidence shows that human society is always looking for more peace, well-being, happiness and vitality in their lives in order to improve the quality of life. The importance of happiness and symbols among citizens is such that in most societies, more joy and happiness than life is a major goal and indicator.In expressing the importance of happiness in the development of urban spaces, it is sufficient to mention that the main goal of governments is to provide more happiness to citizens and to provide vitality and happiness of citizens is one of the ultimate goals of sustainable urban development and one of the central concepts of sustainable development since 2000. It is considered later in the UN debate. Studies also show that happiness has a direct effect on the life expectancy index of citizens and is associated with feelings of successful outcomes in people's lives; In a way, happier people are more successful in life than others. Because of the importance of the happiness index in the sustainable development of urban spaces, according to Montgomery (the first theorist of the happy city), a city after meeting basic needs such as food and housing, should provide the following: the city should maximize pleasure and hardship Reduce; Lead us to health instead of disease; Give us the real freedom, movement and construction of life we ​​desire; Allocate space, services, facilities, pleasure and entertainment, difficulty and cost among people in a fair way; Above all, it empowers us to build and strengthen groups between friends, family, and strangers that give meaning to life and must acknowledge and share our common destiny, and open the door to solidarity, cooperation, and cooperation, as well as to us. It will help us to meet the greatest challenge of the contemporary century, namely happiness. Decreasing the level and amount of happiness and vitality among citizens, reduces the sense of social cooperation and group ties, reduces family and local solidarity, reduces emotional support and satisfaction, and weakens the presence in public arenas, and so on. Thus, strengthening the indicators and components of a happy city can be a strong step towards sustainable urban development, and conversely, the decline of indicators and components of a happy city can be effective in accelerating urban instability.Methodology:The present research is methodical, quantitative and applied, which has been done with a combination of descriptive-analytical and exploratory methods, and in it, articles, books, data of the Statistics Center of Iran, etc. have been used to collect documentary data. Questionnaire technique has been used in the field studies section. The statistical population of the study includes 7122 heads of households in Ravansar. Due to the large size of the statistical population and the difficulty of conducting the census, 364 people have been estimated as a statistical sample using the Cochran's formula. The main research tool for collecting field data is a researcher-made questionnaire that has been used to evaluate its (formal) validity from the opinions of urban planning experts as well as university professors. To evaluate the reliability of the questionnaires, the pre-test method and completing 30 questionnaires were used and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the main parts of the questionnaire was more than 0.7. The questionnaire is designed in three main parts. A completely randomized method was used to distribute and complete the questionnaires among the citizens, and the frequency distribution table, mean comparison test and exploratory factor analysis in SPSS software were used to analyze the collected data.Results and discussion:The results showed that among the three indicators of a happy city (Social, physical and economic indicators) The average of social index with the value of 3.124 was significantly higher than the average of base (number 3) and The average of two physical and economic indicators respectively with values of 2.608 and 2.587, Have been significantly lower than the baseline mean. The results of the survey showed the general condition of the city happy the average calculated with the value of 2.788 Has been significantly below average. Regarding the determinants of a happy city, the results showed Due to the four identified key factors, 61.956% of the variance of the dependent variable has been explained. These factors and the percentage of variance of their specific value in order of importance are: Physical stability (21.041), Socio-cultural sustainability (16.4), Economic Stability (13.151) and Environmental sustainability (11.356). The identified factors seem to be a subset of the macro factor "integrated and efficient urban management" and Promoting this factor, as the main source of most policies and planning, can have a significant impact on the realization of a happy city in the study area.Conclusion: The main reason for the unfavorable situation of Shad city in the study area can be attributed to the weakness of citizens in having economic and physical indicators. Accuracy in the nature of the factors identified as determinants of a happy city in the study area (physical stability, socio-cultural sustainability, economic sustainability and environmental sustainability) shows these factors are a subset and a function of a macro variable called "Integrated and efficient urban management" that can be directly and indirectly affecting the various dimensions of physical-physical, socio-cultural, economic and environmental development of Ravansar, in the promotion, development and prosperity of the happy city in the study area. In fact, integrated and efficient urban management is a major factor and the main link in the realization of a happy city in the study area and other similar urban spaces. Therefore, it is suggested that for the development and sustainability of a happy city and other new urban concepts, special attention and focus be paid to the issue of integrated and efficient urban management. Therefore, employing and using urban and regional planning specialists with experience and selecting specialized and committed councils, as well as the best experts at the top of urban management, is one of the operational and executive suggestions of the present study. Also, clarifying the performance of city managers and establishing interaction and two-way communication between citizens and city managers, can be effective in improving the level of happy city indicators in the study area. 

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Amnesty International. (2009): Amnesty International Report 2009 e The State of the World's Human Rights. Amnesty International, London, UK.


2. Azadi, Y., Taghdisi, A., Jamshidi, A and Jamini, D (2013): Assessment of Quality of life in rural areas of Ilam province: A case study of Karezan DehestanDistrict, Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 2(1): 49-77. (In Persian)


3. Ballas, D (2013): What makes a ‘happy city’?, Cities, 32, 539–550, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.04.009.


4. Balogun, A. (2014): Dispositional Factors, Perceived Social Support and Happiness among Prison Inmates in Nigeria: A New Look. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being, 2(1), 16-33.


5. Cassarino, M.; Shahab, S and Biscaya, S (2021): Envisioning Happy Places for All: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Transformations in the Urban Environment on the Wellbeing of Vulnerable Groups. Sustainability, 13, 8086. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148086.


6. Cloutier, S.; Jambeck, J and Scott, N (2014): The Sustainable Neighborhoods for Happiness Index (SNHI): A metric for assessing a community’s sustainability and potential influence on happiness. Ecol. Indic, 40, 147–152.


7. Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D and Wissing, M (2011): The eudemonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings, Social Indicators Research, Vol.100, No.2, pp.185-207.


8. Demir, M and Özdemir, M. (2010): Friendship, need satisfaction and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(2), 243-259.


9. Diener, E (2000): Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. Am. Psychol, 55, 34–43.


10. Diener, E., and Chan, M. Y. (2011): Happy people live longer: Subjective well‐being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 3(1), 1-43.


11. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T and White, M. (2008): Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94-122.


12. Engelbrecht, H.-J (2009): Natural capital, subjective well-being, and the new welfare economics of sustainability: Some evidence from cross-country regressions. Ecological Economics, 69(2), 380-388.


13. Galani-Moutafi, V. (2013): Rural space (re)produced e Practices, performances and visions, A case study from an Aegean island, Journal of Rural Studies, 32, pp. 103-113.


14. Glaeser, E. L., Gottlieb, J. D and Ziv, O. (2016): Unhappy cities. Journal of labor economics, 34(2), 129-182.


15. Gong, L. (2007): Is happy better than sad even if they are both non-adaptive? Effects of emotional expressions of talking-head interface agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(3), 183-191.


16. Helliwell, J.F (2018): Global Happiness Policy Synthesis 2018. In Global Happiness Policy Report; Sustainable Development Solutions Network: New York, NY, USA.


17. Jain, T.K (2019): Concept of Happy City: The Smart Cities of the Future, SSRN Electronic Journal, DOI:2139/ssrn.3314531.


18. Jamini, D and Jamshidi, A (2015): Analysis of the factors that explain the social stability in rural areas (Case study: Chardavol township), Journal of Spatial Planning, 4(4): 147-65. (In Persian)


19. Kummitha, R.K.R. (2019): Smart cities and entrepreneurship: An agenda for future research, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 149, pp. 1-10.


20. Lawrence, E. M., Rogers, R. G and Wadsworth, T. (2015): Happiness and longevity in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 145, 115-119.


21. Loo, B.P.Y (2021): Walking towards a happy city, Journal of Transport Geography, 93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103078.


22. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M and Schkade, D. (2005): Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of general psychology, 9(2), 111-131.


23. Maddison, D and Rehdanz, K. (2011): The impact of climate on life satisfaction. Ecological Economics, 70(12), 2437-2445.


24. Mahadea, D and Rawat, T. (2008): Economic growth, income and happiness: An exploratory study. South African Journal of Economics, 76(2), 276-290.


25. McCay, L.; Bremer, I.; Endale, T.; Jannati, M and Yi, J. (2017): Urban Design and Mental Health. In Mental Health and Illness in the City; Okkels, N., Kristiansen, C.B., Munk-Jørgensen, P., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, pp. 421–444.


26. Melore, T.W and Nel, V., (2020): Resilience of informal settlements to climate change in the mountainous areas of Konso, Ethiopia and QwaQwa, South Africa, Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies 12(1), a778. https://doi.org/10.4102/ jamba.v12i1.778.


27. Missimer, M. Robèrt, K.H. Broman, G and Sverdrup, H. (2010): Exploring the possibility of a systematic and generic approach to social sustainability, Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, pp. 1107 – 1112.


28. Montgomery, C (2013): Happy City: Transforming Our Lives through Urban Design; Farras, Straus and Giroux: New York, NY, USA, ISBN 0374168237.


29. Montgomery, C (2017): Happy City: Transforming Our Lives through Urban Design, Translators: Seyed Hossein Hatami Nejad, Mohammad Reza Soleimanzadeh and Baqer Fotouhi Mehraban, Arad Ketab Publications, Tehran. (In Persian)


30. Mosazade, A and Mohammadi, M (2018): Recognition of Effective Factors on Promoting Happiness Quality in Urban Spaces by Using the Principles of a Happy City Approach (Case Study: Isfahan Chahar Bagh-e-Abbasi Street), Social Development & Welfare Planing, 10(37): 2-25. (In Persian)


31. Munar, J.L.S., Juana-Espinosa, S.D., Martínez-Buelvas, L., Abarca, Y.V and Tirado, J.O (2020): Organizational Happiness Dimensions as a Contribution to Sustainable Development Goals: A Prospective Study in Higher Education Institutions in Chile, Colombia and Spain, Sustainability, 12, 10502; doi:10.3390/su122410502.


32. Myers, D. G and Diener, E. (1995): Who is happy? Psychological science, 6(1), 10-19.


33. Nassar, D.M and Elsayed, H.G (2018), From Informal Settlements to sustainable communities, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 57, 2367–2376.


34. Noorian, F., Ghazi, R and Abdullahpur, S (2021): Dimensions and Indicators of the Happy City in Mashhad’s Neighborhoods (Case Studies: Tabarsee Fareq Altahsilan Neighborhoods), Motaleate Shahri, 9(36): 101-116. (In Persian)


35. Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam and Joan Maya, Mazelis. (2018): Urbanism and happiness: A test of Wirth’s theory of urban life, Urban Studies, Vol.55, No.2, pp.349-364.


36. Ono, H and Kidokoro. T (2020): Understanding the development patterns of informal settlements in Nairobi, Japan Architectural Review, 3(3): 384–393.


37. Oraki, P., Rezaei MR., Mobaraki, M and Akbarian, SR (2019): Spatial Analysis effective factors happy city from the perspective of the citizensCase Study: Yazd City, Journal of Sustainable City, 2(3): 19-39. (In Persian)


38. Rahmani, L (2015): Investigating and identifying the effective factors in the happy city "Child Friendly", Master Thesis, Supervisor: Mohammad Musakhani, University of Tehran (Alborz Campus), Department of Management. (In Persian)


39. Sargolzaee Javan, T and Hadyani, Z (2017): Investigating the Feasibility of Empowering the Informal Settlements Quarters by Increasing the Social Capital (Case Study: Shir-Abad Quarter of Zahedan), Social Welfare Quarterly, 16(63): 185-214. (In Persian)


40. Shahbazi, A., Sargazi, Z and Ghanizadeghasemabadi, H (2020): Analytical assessment of the components of the happy city in cities with enormous disaster: Case study Bam city, Research and Urban Planning, 11(41): 53-64. (In Persian)


41. Shamsoldini, A., Jamini, D and Jamshidi, AR (2016), Measurement and analysis of social stability in rural areas (Case study: Javanrood Township), Journal of Rural Research, 7(3): 486-503. (In Persian)


42. Statistics Center of Iran )2016): Results of Population and Housing Census, Statistics Center Publications, Tehran. (In Persian)


43. Steffen, W. Sanderson, A. Jäger, J. Tyson, P.D. Moore, III, B. Matson, P.A. Richardson, K. Oldfield, F. Schellnhuber, H.-J. Turner II, B.L and Wasson, R.J. (2004): Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet Under Pressure, IGBP Book Series. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.


44. Stewart, M. E., Watson, R., Clark, A., Ebmeier, K. P and Deary, I. J. (2010): A hierarchy of happiness? Mokken scaling analysis of the Oxford Happiness Inventory. Personality and Individual differences, 48(7), 845-848.


45. Tamir, M., Schwartz, S.H., Oishi, S and Kim, M.Y (2017): The secret to happiness: Feeling good or feeling right? J. Exp. Psychol. Gen, 146, 1448–1459.


46. Taubenböck, H and Kraff, N.J. (2015): Das globale Gesicht urbaner Armut?, Siedlungsstrukturen in slums. In Globale Urbanisierung; Springer: Berlin, Germany, pp. 107–119.


47. Tu, K.-J and Lin, L.-T. (2008): Evaluative structure of perceived residential environment quality in high-density and mixed-use urban settings: An exploratory study on Taipei City. Landscape and urban planning, 87(3), 157-171.


48. Uchida, Y and Ogihara, Y. (2012): Personal or interpersonal construal of happiness: A cultural psychological perspective. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(4): 354-369.


49. United Nations (2009): The Millennium Development Goals Report 2009. New York: United Nations.


50. Veenhoven, R (2017): World Database of Happiness: Archive of research findings on subjective enjoyment of life, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.


51. Von Wirth, T.; Grêt-Regamey, A.; Moser, C and Stauffacher, M (2016): Exploring the influence of perceived urban change on residents’ place attachment. J. Environ. Psychol, 46, 67–82.


52. Zangiabadi, A and Mirzaei, S (2020): Explanation the factors affecting on achievement a happy city in Shiraz Metropolis, Journal of Spatial Planning, 24(3): 65-103. (In Persian)