تأثیر فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات بر مشارکت ذی‌نفعان و پایداری شهری هوشمند در شهر تهران
نوید آهنگری
1
(
دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه¬ریزی شهری، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
)
اسما یاوری
2
(
دانشجوی دکتری شهرسازی، پردیس بین الملل تهران جنوب، کیش، ایران
)
کلید واژه: فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات, پایداری هوشمند شهری, مشارکت ذی‌نفعان, مدل¬سازی معادلات ساختاری, شهر تهران,
چکیده مقاله :
فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات رویکرد اساسی برای ارتقا مشارکت ذی‌نفعان و پایداری در شهرهای هوشمند است، زیرا باعث افزایش دسترسی به اطلاعات، بهبود ارتباطات و شفافیت در فرایندهای تصمیم‌گیری شهری می‌شود. در این راستا، هدف پژوهش بررسی نقش فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در پیشبرد پایداری شهری، در میان رشد سریع جمعیت شهر و اجرای پروژه‌های هوشمند در شهر تهران است. روش پژوهش توصيفي - تحلیلی و از شاخه تحلیل مسیر محسوب مي¬شود. ابزار گردآوري داده¬ها پرسش‌نامه استاندارد فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات، پایداری شهری هوشمند، مشارکت ذی‌نفعان و انطباق و تاب¬آوری شهری می¬باشد. جامعه آماری کلیه خبرگان شهری می¬باشد که حجم نمونه به روش گلوله‌برفی 70 نفر انتخاب شده است. برای تحلیل و تجزیه داده¬ها از مدل¬سازی معادلات ساختاری (PLS) استفاده‌شده است. نتایج توصیفی نشان داد که میانگین برای متغیرهای فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات (72/3) در سطح نیمه‌پایدار، پایداری شهری هوشمند (72/3)، مشارکت ذی‌نفعان (86/3) و انطباق و تاب¬آوری شهری (8/3) در سطح پایدار تعیین شده است. نتایج استنباطی بیانگر این است که تأثیر فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات بر مشارکت ذی‌نفعان با ضریب معناداری (41/2)، تأثیر فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات بر پایداری شهری هوشمند با ضریب معناداری (706/4)، تأثیر مشارکت ذی‌نفعان بر پایداری شهری هوشمند با ضریب معناداری (766/4)، تأثیر فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات بر پایداری شهری هوشمند با نقش میانجی مشارکت ذی‌نفعان با ضریب معناداری (130/2 ) و تأثیر انطباق و تاب¬آوری شهری بر پایداری شهری هوشمند با ضریب معناداری (363/3) که بزرگ‌تر از 96/1 هستند، تأیید می¬گردد؛ بنابراین مفهوم این مطالعه امکان بهینه‌سازی تأثیر محیط شهری مبتنی بر فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات را فراهم می‌کند و در نتیجه جوامع پایدار و تاب‌آوری را ایجاد می‌کند که نیازها و اولویت‌های همه اعضای جامعه را برآورده می‌کند.
چکیده انگلیسی :
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is a fundamental approach to enhancing stakeholder participation and sustainability in smart cities, as it increases access to information, improves communications, and enhances transparency in urban decision-making processes. In this regard, the aim of the research is to investigate the role of ICT in advancing urban sustainability amidst rapid urban population growth and the implementation of smart projects in Tehran. The research method is descriptive-analytical and falls within the path analysis branch. Data collection tools include standardized questionnaires on ICT, smart urban sustainability, stakeholder participation, and urban resilience. The target population consists of all urban experts, with a sample size of 70 determined using the snowball sampling method. Structural Equation Modeling (PLS) is utilized for data analysis. Descriptive results indicate that the mean for ICT variables (3.72) is at a semi-stable level, while smart urban sustainability (3.72), stakeholder participation (3.86), and urban resilience and adaptation (3.8) are determined at a stable level. Inferential results suggest that the impact of ICT on stakeholder participation with a significant coefficient (2.41), the impact of ICT on smart urban sustainability with a significant coefficient (4.706), the impact of stakeholder participation on smart urban sustainability with a significant coefficient (4.766), the mediating role of stakeholder participation in the relationship between ICT and smart urban sustainability with a significant coefficient (2.130), and the impact of urban resilience and adaptation on smart urban sustainability with a significant coefficient (3.363) which are all greater than 1.96, are confirmed. Therefore, the concept of this study facilitates optimizing the influence of the urban environment based on ICT and creates sustainable and resilient communities that meet the needs and priorities of all members of society
1. Agboola, O. P., Tunay, M. (2023). Urban resilience in the digital age: The influence of Information-Communication Technology for sustainability, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139304.
2. Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppa, I., Airaksinen, M. (¬2017). What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities, 60, 234–245. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009.
3. Akande, A., Cabral, P., Casteleyn, S. (¬2019). Assessing the gap between technology and the environmental sustainability of european cities. Information Systems Frontiers. 21 (2019), 581–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09903-3.
4. Alamoudi, A.K.; Abidoye, R.B.; Lam, T.Y.M. (2022). The Impact of Stakeholders’ Management Measures on Citizens’ Participation Level in Implementing Smart Sustainable Cities. Sustainability, 14, 16617. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416617.
5. Al-Nasrawi, H., Irshaid, F. (¬2020). Information and communication technology (ICT) in smart cities: opportunities and challenges. Sustainability, 12 (8), 3362. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083362.
6. Anabistani, A., Kalantari, M., Niknami, N. (2023), Explanation of the key drivers affecting the establishment of a smart city based on Internet of Things technology, case study: Mashhad Metropolis, Economy and Urban Planning, 4, 1 (13), pp. 232-248. Doi: 10.22034/uep.2023.390907.1346. (In Persian)
7. Bibri, S.E. (2015b). The human face of ambient intelligence. Atlantis Ambient and Pervasive Intelligence. Atlantis Press. Available at: https://link.springer.com/book/ 10.2991/978-94-6239-130-7.
8. Bifulco, F., Tregua, M., Amitrano, C.C., D’Auria, A. (¬2016). ICT and sustainability in smart cities management. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 29 (2), 132–147. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/IJPSM-07-2015-0132.
9. Cai, M., Kassens-Noor, E., Zhao, Z., Colbry, D. (¬2023). Are more sustainable? An exploratory study of 103 US cities, Journal of Cleaner Production, 137986 https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jclepro.2023.137986.
10. Chatti, W., Majeed, M.T. (2022). Information communication technology (ICT), smart urbanization, and environmental quality: Evidence from a panel of developing and developed economies, Journal of Cleaner Production, 366. doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132925.
11. Chen, Q., Hu, Y. (¬2020). Smart city and information communication technology: a bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 12 (13), 5404. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135404.
12. Cruz-Jesus, F., Oliveira, T., Bacao, F., Irani, Z. (¬2017). Assessing the pattern between economic and digital development of countries. Information Systems Frontiers. 19 (4), 835–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9634-1.
13. Del-Real, C., Ward, C., Sartipi, M. (¬2023). What do people want in a smart city? Exploring the stakeholders’ opinions, priorities, and perceived barriers in a medium-sized city in the United States. International Journal of Urban Sciences. 27 (sup1), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1968939.
14. Deng, G., Fei, S. (2023). Exploring the factors influencing online civic engagement in a smart city: The mediating roles of ICT self-efficacy and commitment to community, Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107682.
15. Fachinelli, A.C., Yigitcanlar, T., Sabatini-Marques, J., Cortese, T.T.P., Sotto, D., Libardi, B., (2023) Urban smartness and city performance: identifying Brazilian smart cities through a novel approach. Sustainability, 15 (13), 10323. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310323
16. Fuenfschilling, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Coenen, L. (¬2019). Urban experimentation & sustainability transitions. Eur. Plan. Stud. 27 (2), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1532977.
17. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna. http://www.smart-cities. eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2018.
18. Goel, K.R., Vishnoi, S. (2022). Urbanization and sustainable development for inclusiveness using ICTs, Telecommunications Policy, 46(6). DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102311.
19. Gouvea, R., Kapelianis, D., Kassicieh, S. (¬2017). Assessing the nexus of sustainability and information & communications technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.023.
20. Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M. (¬2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. 31, 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
21. Henseler, J., Hubona, G. and Ray, P.A. (2016), Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 116 No. 1, pp. 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382.
22. Iqbal, M., Yanuarni, E., Mawardi, M.K., Astuti, E.S. (2023). Linking knowledge management to tourism business of SMEs in aftermath of disaster: Implications for open innovation, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, 9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100054.
23. Jayasena, N.S., Waidyasekara, K.G.A.S., Mallawaarachchi, H., Peiris, S. (¬2021). Ensuring engagement of stakeholders in smart city projects: a case study in Sri Lanka. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 147 (4), 05021045. DOI: 10.1061/ (ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000762.
24. Kusumastuti, R. D., Nurmala, N., Juliana, R., Herdis, H. (2022). Analyzing the factors that influence the seeking and sharing of information on the smart city digital platform: Empirical evidence from Indonesia, Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101876.
25. Kutty, A.A., Abdella, G.M., Kucukvar, M., Onat, N.C., Bulu, M. (¬2020). A system thinking approach for harmonizing smart and sustainable city initiatives with United Nations sustainable development goals. Sustainable Development. 28 (5), 1347–1365. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2088.
26. Lalicic, L., ¨Onder, I. (2018). Residents’ involvement in urban tourism planning: opportunities from a smart city perspective. Sustainability, 10 (6), 1852. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061852.
27. Lee, H., Lee, D., Kim, S. (¬2020). Leveraging information and communication technology for smart urban transportation systems: a review. Sustainability, 12 (6), 2512. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062512.
28. Lee, J., Babcock, J., Pham, T.S., Bui, T.H., Kang, M. (¬2023). Smart city as a social transition towards inclusive development through technology: a tale of four smart cities. International Journal of Urban Sciences. 27 (sup1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2074076.
29. Majeed, M.T. (¬2018). Information and communication technology (ICT) and environmental sustainability in developed and developing countries. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences. 12 (3), 758–783. Retrieved from. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/information-communication-technology-ict/docview/217662 0886/se-2.
30. Margherita, E.G., Escobar, S.D., Esposito, G., Crutzen, N. (2023). Exploring the potential impact of smart urban technologies on urban sustainability using structural topic modelling: Evidence from Belgium, Cities, Volume 141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104475.
31. Mehmood, A. (¬2016). Of resilient places: planning for urban resilience. European Planning Studies. 24. (2), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980.
32. Owojori, O.M., Okoro, C. (¬2022). The private sector role as a key supporting stakeholder towards circular economy in the built environment: a scientometric and content analysis. Buildings, 12 (5), 695. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12050695.
33. Park, J., Kim, M., Joo, Y. (¬2021). Leveraging information and communication technology for smart urban management: a systematic review. Sustainability, 13 (2), 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020604.
34. Paskaleva, K.; Evans, J.; Martin, C.; Linjordet, T.; Yang, D.; Karvonen, A. (2017) Data Governance in the Sustainable Smart City. Informatics, 4, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics4040041.
35. Sameer, N., Alalouch, C., Al-Saadi, S. and Saleh, M.S. (2023), Toward smart sustainable cities: assessment of stakeholders' readiness for digital participatory planning, International Journal of Architectural Research, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-06-2023-0159.
36. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M, Hair, J.F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In: Handbook of market research. Cham: Springer International Publishing; p. 587e632 pp. 587e632. https://DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15.
37. Shahyoundi, A., Mousavipour, E. (2016), the effect of new information and communication technologies on the physical-spatial structure of the city with the creative city approach, a case study: Isfahan City, Urban Studies, 7, 25 (25), pp. 77-90. Doi: 10.34785/J011.2018.025. (In Persian)
38. Shami, M., Begdali Rad, V., Moinifar, M. (2021), explaining the concepts and evaluating the dimensions of the smart city with an emphasis on smart urban life in Tehran metropolis, Geography (Regional Planning), 11, 4 (45) , pp. 137-151. Doi: 10. 2034/jgeoq.2021.141774. (In Persian)
39. Sharaj Sharifi, A., Memari, M. (2019), investigating the impact of digital transformation and smart city in the realization of smart tourism, tourism research and sustainable development, 3, 4 (12), pp. 85-95. (In Persian)
40. Simonofski, A., Vall´e, T., Serral, E., Wautelet, Y. (¬2021). Investigating context factors in citizen participation strategies: a comparative analysis of Swedish and Belgian smart cities. International Journal of Information Management. 56, 102011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.09.007.
41. Singh, P.K., Chan, S.W. (2022). The Impact of Electronic Procurement Adoption on Green Procurement towards Sustainable Supply Chain Performance-Evidence from Malaysian ISO Organizations. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8, 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8020061.
42. Slavova, M., Okwechime, E. (¬2016). African smart cities strategies for agenda 2063. Africa Journal of Management, 2 (2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322373.2016.1175266.
43. Stanley, T.D., Doucouliagos, H., Steel, P. (¬2018). Does ICT generate economic growth? A meta-regression analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys. 32 (3), 705–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12211.
44. Toli, A.M., Murtagh, N. (¬ 2020). The concept of sustainability in smart city definitions, Frontiers in Built Environment. 6, 77. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.
45. Truong, B.T.T., Nguyen, P. V. (2023). Driving business performance through intellectual capital, absorptive capacity, and innovation: The mediating influence of environmental compliance and innovation, Asia Pacific Management Review, Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2023.06.004.
46. Udemba, E.N., Emir, F., Khan, N.U., Hussain, S. (¬2022). Policy inference from technological innovation, renewable energy, and financial development for sustainable development goals (SDGs): insight from asymmetric and bootstrap Granger causality approaches. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29 (39), 59104–59117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19730-w.
47. Wang, Di, Zhou, T., Mengmeng, W. (¬2021). Information and communication technology (ICT), digital divide and urbanization: evidence from Chinese cities, Technology in Society. 64, 101516 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101516.
48. Wu, S.J., Raghupathi, W. (2018). The strategic association between information and communication technologies and sustainability: A country-level study. In: Sustainable development: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. IGI Global, pp. 694–719. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-3817-2.ch032.
49. Xiaolong, T., Gull, N., Iqbal, S., Asghar, M., Nawaz, A., Albasher, G., Hameed, J., Maqsoom, A. (¬2021). Exploring and validating the effects of mega projects on infrastructure development influencing sustainable environment and project management. Frontiers in Psychology. 12, 1251. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663199.
50. Yang, X., Yu, Z. (2024). Interplay of network information dissemination in the era of big data on environmentally sustainable development and agricultural consumers’ purchase decisions, Journal of King Saud University – Science, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2024.103117.
51. Yilmaz, D.G. (2021). Model cities for resilience: climate-led initiatives. Journal of Urban Affairs. 5 (1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2021.v5n1-4.
52. Zeng, X., Yu, Y., Yang, S., Lv, Y., Sarker, M.N.I. (¬2022). Urban resilience for urban sustainability: concepts, dimensions, and perspectives. Sustainability, 14 (5), 2481. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052481.
53. Zygiaris, S (2013) Smart city reference model: assisting planners to conceptualize the building of smart city innovation ecosystems. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 4, 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0089-4