بررسی اعتبار و هنجاریابی پرسشنامه چندوجهی شخصیتی مینهسوتا-3 فرم بزرگسال (MMPI-3)
محورهای موضوعی : روانشناسی
1 - گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده تعلیم و تربیت اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران.
کلید واژه: اعتبار, پرسشنامه چندوجهی مینهسوتا-3, جامعه بزرگسال ایرانی, هنجار,
چکیده مقاله :
این پژوهش به منظور تعیین اعتبار و هنجار جدیدترین نسخه پرسشنامه چندوجهی مینهسوتا با عنوان MMPI-3 در بین جامعه بزرگسال ایرانی انجام گرفته است. پژوهش از نوع پیمایشی است و جامعه آماری کلیه افراد بالای 18 سال استان اصفهان در سال 1402 بود که دارای سواد خواندن و نوشتن بودند. حجم نمونه 1987 آزمودنی بود که به روش غیر تصادفی در دسترس انتخاب شدند. ابزار مورد استفاده پرسشنامه MMPI-3 بود. برای محاسبه آمارههای توصیفی، استنباطی و نمرات استاندارد از نرم افزار SPSS نسخه 27 استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که اعتبار مقیاسهای روائی در سطح خوبی قرار دارد. کمترین ضریب اعتبار متعلق به TRIN (53/0) و بیشترین اعتبار متعلق به F (89/0) بود. اعتبار مقیاسهای بالینی نیز در سطح خوبی قرار داشت. کمترین اعتبار متعلق به NUC (35/0) و بیشترین اعتبار متعلق به EID (88/0) بود. از بین مقیاسهای بالینی در 17 مقیاس میانگین نمرات مردان بیشتر از زنان، در 12 مقیاس میانگین زنان بیشتر از مردان و در 13 مقیاس دیگر تفاوت معناداری بین زنان و مردان مشاهده نشد. در نهایت میانگین نمرات نرم ایرانی تاحدی کمتر از نرم اصلی بود اما همسو و مطابق بود. نتیجهگیری: اعتبار نسخه فارسی هنجار شده MMPI-3 در سطح خوبی قرار دارد و میتواند بهعنوان یک ابزار بهروز و مطمئن استفاده شود. همچنین ضرایب اعتبار و نرم جامعه بزرگسال ایرانی با نرم اصلی همخوان است و پرسشنامه MMPI-3 قابلیت استفاده برای سنجش در مراکز روانپزشکی و پزشکی را دارد.
This research was conducted in order to determine the reliability and standardization of the latest version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) Among the Iranian adult community. The research is survey. The statistical Society was all people over 18 years in Isfahan province in 2023 who were literate. The sample size was 1987 subject who were selected by non-random method available. The tools used was the MMPI-3. SPSS software version 27 was used to calculate descriptive and inferential statistics and standard scores. The results showed that the reliability of validity scales is at a good level. The lowest reliability coefficient was TRIN (0.53) and the highest reliability was F (0.89). The reliability of the clinical scales was also at a good level. The lowest reliability was NUC (0.35) and the highest reliability was EID (0.88). Among the clinical scales, in 17 scales the mean scores of men are higher than women, in 12 scales the mean scores of women are higher than men, and in 13 other scales, no significant difference between women and men was observed. In the end, the mean scores of Iranians were somewhat lower than the original norm, but they were consistent. The reliability of the Persian standardized version of MMPI-3 is at a good level and can be used as an updated and reliable tool. Also, the reliability coefficients and the norm of the Iranian adult community are consistent with the original norm, and MMPI-3 can be used for measurement in psychiatric and medical centers.
This research was conducted in order to determine the reliability and standardization of the latest version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) Among the Iranian adult community. The research is survey. The statistical Society was all people over 18 years in Isfahan province in 2023 who were literate. The sample size was 1987 subject who were selected by non-random method available. The tools used was the MMPI-3. SPSS software version 27 was used to calculate descriptive and inferential statistics and standard scores. The results showed that the reliability of validity scales is at a good level. The lowest reliability coefficient was TRIN (0.53) and the highest reliability was F (0.89). The reliability of the clinical scales was also at a good level. The lowest reliability was NUC (0.35) and the highest reliability was EID (0.88). Among the clinical scales, in 17 scales the mean scores of men are higher than women, in 12 scales the mean scores of women are higher than men, and in 13 other scales, no significant difference between women and men was observed. In the end, the mean scores of Iranians were somewhat lower than the original norm, but they were consistent. The reliability of the Persian standardized version of MMPI-3 is at a good level and can be used as an updated and reliable tool. Also, the reliability coefficients and the norm of the Iranian adult community are consistent with the original norm, and MMPI-3 can be used for measurement in psychiatric and medical centers.
Bagby, R.M., Onno, K.A., Mortezaei, A., & Sellbom, M. (2020). Examining the “traditional background hypothesis” for the MMPI-2-RF L-r scores in a Muslim faith-based sample. American Psychological Association, 32(10), 991-995. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000941.
Baker, C. A., Baum, L. J., Francis, R. D., shura, R. D. and Ord, A. S. (2023). Assessment of Test Bias on the MMPI-2-RF Higher Order and Restructured Clinical Scales as a Function of Gender and Race. American Psychological Association. DOI:10.1037/pro0000517.
Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2020a). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.
Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2020b). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3): Technical manual. University of Minnesota Press.
Ben-Porath, Y. S., Graham, J. R. & Tellegen A. (2009). The MMPI-2 Symptom Validity (FBS) Scale Development, Research Findings, and lnterpretive Recommendations. Minneapolis, Mn.: University of Minnesota Press.
Butcher, J.N., Arbisi, P.A., Atlis, M.M. & McNulty, J.L. (2008). The construct validity of the Lees-Haley Fake Bad Scale. Does this scale measure somatic malingering and feigned emotional distress? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23, 855-864.
Cherry, K. (2021) The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). Updated on September 02 Medically reviewed by Amy Morin, LCSW.
Corey, D. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2020). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3): User’s guide for the Police Candidate Interpretive Report. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Delawalla, C. N., Lee, T. C. and Keen, M. A. (2023). The Use of MMPI-3 Scales to Assess Personality-Based Vulnerabilities for Alcohol Use and Problems. American Psychological Association. Vol. 35, No. 8, 633–645. DOI:10.1037/pas0001245.
Fakhari, A., Nejatbakhsh, A., Noohi, S., Mohagheghi, A., Shafiee-Kandijani, A.R. (2008). Rate of Agreement of clinical interview and MMPI in Diagnosis of psychiatric Disorders. Journal of Behavioral Sciences. Vol 2, No. 3. [Persian]
Gass, C.S., Williams, C.L., Cumella, E., Butcher, J.N., Kally, Z. (2010). Ambiguous Measures of Unknown Constructs: The MMPI-2 Fake Bad Scale (aka Symptom Validity Scale, FBS, FBS-r). Psychological Injury and Law.
Haber, j. c. and Baum, L. J. (2014). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) Scales as predictors of psychiatric diagnoses. South African Journal of Psychology, Vol. 44(4) 439– 453. DOI: 10.1177/0081246314532788.
Hall, J. T., Menton, W. H., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2022). Examining the psychometric equivalency of MMPI-3 scale scores derived from the MMPI-3 and the MMPI-2-RF-EX. American Psychological Association, 29(4), 842–853. DOI: 10.1177/1073191121991921
Leonard, E. A. (2022). An Examination of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) Profiles of International Saudi Arabian College Students. A doctoral research project submitted to The College of Psychology and Liberal Arts at Florida Institute of Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Psychology in Clinical Psychology. Melbourne, Florida.
Mohammadi, M.R., Amini, H., Malek Afzali, H., Naqvi, H.R., Poretamad, H.R., Bagheri Yazdi, S.A., Rahgozar, M., Alagbandarad, J., Mohammad Razaghi, O., Davidian, H. and Noorbala, A.A. (2001). An epidemiological study of psychiatric disorders in Iran. Hakim Health Systems research journal. Vol 6, No. 1. [Persian]
Rahmani Malekabad, M., Falsafinejad, M. R., Minaei, A. and Farrokhi, N. A. (2023). Differential Item Functioning of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (Depression) Items in among Recruitment Candidates: A Comparison Between the Rasch Model and Mantel-Haenszel. (In press). Journal of Applied Psychological Research. ISSN: 2676-4504. [Persian]
Rahmani Malekabad, M., Falsafinejad, M. R., Minaei, A. and Farrokhi, N. A. (2023). Differential Item Functioning of Psychasthenia and Psychopathic Deviate Items in Entrance Employment Tests: A Comparison between the Mantel-Haenszel and Rasch Model. (In press). Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology. ISSN: 2676-5128. [Persian]
Sellbom, M. (2021). Examining the criterion and incremental validity of the MMPI-3 Self-Importance scale American Psychological Association, 33(4), 363-368. DOI:10.1037/pas0000975.
Whitman, M. R., Elias, L. S., Cappo, B. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2021). Criterion Validity of MMPI-3 scores in Preemployment Evaluations of Public Safety Candidates. American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/pas0001042.