تدوین مدل صمیمیت¬زناشویی با استفاده از سبکهای عشق ورزی با نقش میانجی بخشایش¬گری میان¬فردی
محورهای موضوعی : روانشناسیفاطمه نعمتی سوگلی تپه 1 , محمد خالدیان 2
1 - دانشیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران
2 - استادیار گروه روان¬شناسی، دانشگاه پیام¬نور، تهران، ایران
کلید واژه: بخشایشگری میان فردی, سبک عشقورزی, صمیمت زناشویی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف از پژوهش حاضر تدوین مدلساختاری برای صمیمیتزناشویی ازطریق سبکهای عشقورزی و بخشایشگری میانفردی میباشد. پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نظر روش گردآوری داده‌ها از نوع توصیفی از نوع همبستگی به روش مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری است، جامعه پژوهش دانشجویان متاهل مشغول به تحصیل دانشگاه پیام نور مرکز سقز در سال تحصيلي 98-97 بوده است. در این پژوهش100 دانشجو متاهل با نمونهگيري دردسترس بعنوان حجم نمونه انتخاب شدند. جهت جمعآوريدادهها ازپرسشنامه صمیمیتزناشویی اولیا، فتحی زاده و بهرامی (Oleya, Fathizadeh & Bahrami, 2007)، پرسشنامه سبکهای عشق لی ساخته (Hendrick & Hendrick, 1986) و پرسشنامهبخشایشگری (Ehteshamzadeh, Ahadi, Enayati & Heidari, 2010) استفاده شد. همچنین برای آزمون مدل کلی تحقیق از مدل معادلاتساختاری با نرم‌افزارPLS استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که بین سبک عشقورزی و بخشایشگری رابطه مثبت معناداری (366/0)؛ بین سبک عشقورزی و صمیمیت زناشوی رابطه مثبت معناداری (41/0)؛ و بین صمیمیت زناشویی و بخشایشگری رابطه مثبت معناداری (53/0)؛ وجود دارد. مقدار آماره آزمون با استفاده از آزمون سوبل 74/2 به دست آمد. همچنین برازش مدل ساختاری با استفاده از معیارهای ضریبتعیین (R2) ، افزونگی و در آماره GOF استفاده شده است که ضریب تعیین R2برای سازه صمیمت زناشویی این مقدار 753/0 گزارش و مقدار نیکویی برازش در این مطالعه با شاخص GOF برابر 510/0 بدست امد،که مقدار افزونگی برای صمیمیت زناشویی(584/)0، سبکهای عشقورزی (616/0) و بخشایشگری(556/0) میباشد.
The purpose of this study was to develop a model for predicting marital intimacy based on interpersonal lovemaking and forgiveness styles. The present study was applied in terms of purpose and a cross-sectional survey in terms of data collection method. The research population consisted of married students of Payame Noor University, Saqqez branch who were studying in the academic year of 2018-2019. In this study, as many as 100 married students were selected by convenience sampling as the sample size. For data collection, the 85-item marital intimacy of parents and colleague’s questionnaire, the 42-item love styles questionnaire developed by Lee and the 25-item forgiveness questionnaire by Ehteshamzadeh et al. were used. As well, to test the general research model, the structural equation model with PLS software was used. The findings suggested that the lovemaking and forgiveness styles have an effect on marital intimacy. The value of test statistics was obtained using Sobel test at 2.74. Also, the structural model fit was done using the criteria of coefficient of determination (R2), redundancy and the GOF statistic. It was found that the coefficient of determination (R2) for marital intimacy was 0.735, amount of redundancy for marital intimacy 0.584, love styles 0.616 and forgiveness 0.556. Using the Sobel test (2.74), it can be said that interpersonal forgiveness has a mediating effect on the relationship between lovemaking style and marital intimacy using and affects the extent of this relationship. Also, blindfolding values for all research structures were found to be positive and greater than 0.35. It is concluded that interpersonal forgiveness has a mediating role and effect in the relationship between lovemaking style and marital intimacy and affects the extent of this relationship.
Amani, A., Sohrabi, A., Bagheri, L., & Nasirihanis, G. (2017). The effectiveness of Adlerian group counseling on couples' intimacy and interpersonal forgiveness. Journal of Family Counseling and Psychotherapy, 7(1): 45-64. [Link].[Persian]
Bakhtiari, E., Hosseini, S., Arefi, M., & Afsharinia, K. (2019). Causal Model of Extramarital Affairs Based on Attachment Styles and Early Maladaptive Schemas: Mediating Role of Marital Intimacy and Love Styles. Journal of Health Education and Health Promotion, 7(2): 245-258. [Link].[Persian]
Besharat, M. A., & Rafiezadeh, B. (2016). Prediction of sexual satisfaction and marital adjustment levels according to job variables, commitment, intimacy, and sexual knowledge and attitude. Family Psychology, 3(1): 31-46. [Link]. [Persian]
Chalmeh, R. (2012). Personality and Psychological Well-Being: mediation role of Forgiveness in adolescents. Journal of Psychological Methods and Models, 2(6): 1-16. [Link]. [Persian]
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-33.
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217.
Daghaghele, F., Asgari, P., & Heidari, A. (2012). The relationship between forgiveness, love, intimacy and marital satisfaction. Journal of New findings in psychology (social psychology), 7 (24): 57-69. [Link]. [Persian]
Edwards, J.R., and Lambert, L.S. (2007), ‘Methods for Integrating Moderation and Mediation: AGeneral Analytical Framework Using Moderated Path Analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1,1–22.
Ehteshamzadeh, P., Makundi, B., & Bagheri, A. (2009). The relationship between forgiveness, perfectionism and intimacy with marital satisfaction in veterans and their spouses. Journal of New findings in psychology (social psychology), 4(12), 123-136. [Link]. [Persian]
Esposito Vinzi, V., Trinchera, L., Squillacciotti, S., & Tenenhaus, M. (2008). REBUS‐PLS: A response‐based procedure for detecting unit segments in PLS path modelling. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 24(5), 439-458.
Ggaderi, Z., Refahi, Z., & Baghban, M. (2015). The Effect of Emotion Focused Method Training Approach on Marital Intimacy. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology, 16(2): 77-83. [Link]. [Persian]
Habibi, B., & Amanelahi, A. (2016). The Relationship Between Sexual Desire and Intimacy in women with Depressive Symptoms and Marital Satisfaction 3 Months to 2 Years Postpartum. Journal of Toloo-e-Behdasht, 15(2): 204-216. [Link]. [Persian]
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., and Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2^nd^ Ed., Sage: Thousand Oaks.
Hedayatidana, S., & Saberi, H. (2014). Predicting Marital Satisfaction According to Love-Making Styles (Intimacy, Desire, Commitment) and Anxiety. Journal of Family Research, 10(4): 511-527. [Link]. [Persian]
Hendrick, C., & Hendrick. S. S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2): 392-402.
Henseler. J. and Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28 (2): 565-580.
Hulland, J. S. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(4): 195–204.
Irandoust, R., Sohrai, F., Maliholzakerini, S., & Ahi, GH. (2018). The Casual Model of Relationship between Alexithymia and Female Sexual Function by Mediating Rule of Psychological Distress and Marital Intimacy. Journal of Family Research, 14(56): 515-531. [Link]. [Persian]
Jaberi, S., Etemadi, O., & Ahmadi. S. A. (2015). Investigation of Structural Relationship between Communication Skills and Marital Intimacy. Cognitive and Behavioral Research, 5(2): 143-151. [Link]. [Persian]
Karimi, M., Donyavi, V., Rahnedjat, A. M., & Kianimoghaddam, A. S. (2017). Relationship spirituality with loving style and couple’s communication pattern. Journal of Nurse and Physician Within War, 5(15): 44-52. [Link]. [Persian]
Karimian, N., Karimi, Y., & Molkari, B. (2018). Psychometric Properties of the Authenticity in relationship scale (AIRS) and its relationship with relationship satisfaction. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 8(31): 167-190. [Link]. [Persian]
Khalafi, A., Beshlideh, K., Arshadi, N., & Soodani, M. (2018). Designing and testing a model of some antecedents and outcomes of marital satisfaction and love. Journal of Family Counseling and Psychotherapy, 8(1): 3-26. [Link]. [Persian]
Khodadadisangdeh, J., Hajizadeh, T., Amousti, F., & Rezaie, M. (2016). The prediction of couple burnoutaccording to the general health and marital intimacy among Nurses. Preventive Care in Nursing & Midwifery Journal, 6(2): 45-53. [Link]. [Persian]
Mahmodi, G., & Hafezalkotob, L. (2010). The relationship between lovemaking styles and marital satisfaction. Psychological research, 2(6): 101-114. [Link]. [Persian]
Mansouri, M., Serajkhorami, N., & Heidari, H. (2013). Intimacy, Forgiveness, and Self-Disclosure and their Relationship to Teachers’ Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Family and Research, 10¬(3): 95-118. [Link]. [Persian]
Moshak, R. (2009). The relationship between love styles (intimacy, pleasure and commitment) with the marital satisfaction of married students. Journal of Women and Culture, 1(2): 83-97. [Link]. [Persian]
Namvarangarmi, K., Moradi, A., Farzad, V., & Zahrakar, K. (2018). Determining the dimensions of marital intimacy of Iranian couples, a qualitative study. Journal of Cultural and Educational Women and Family, 12(42): 61-78. [Link]. [Persian]
Nemati, S., Afrooz, G., Ghobari-Bonab, B., Shokoohi-Yekta, M., & Beh-Pajooh, A. (2016). The Relationship between the components of Forgiveness with Marital Satisfaction in Mothers of Children with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Applied Psychological Research Quarterly, 7(3): 103-113. [Link]. [Persian]
Oleya, N., Fathizadeh, M., & Bahrami, F. (2007). The effect of marital enrichment training on increasing marital intimacy. Journal of Family Studies, 2¬(6): 119-134.
Rafeie, A. R., Kalantari, M., Neshat Doost, H. T., & Oreyzi, H. (2017). Personal Constructs of Betrayed Spouses’ Understanding of Forgiveness. Journal of Family Research, 13(49): 131-152. [Link]. [Persian]
Razavi, S. H., Jazayeri, R., Ahmadi, S. A., & Etemadi, O. (2019). Comparing the Effectiveness of Premarital Prepare counseling based on Olson model and native premarital counseling package on Problems of Couples in Engagement Period. Journal of Family Research, 15(58): 181-195. [Link]. [Persian]
Rivard, S., & Huff, S. L. (1988). Factors of success for end-user computing. Communications of the ACM, 31(5): 552-561.
Sadeghi, M., Ahmadi, S. A., Bahrami, F., Etemadi, O., & Poursaied, S. (2013). The Effect of Transactional Analysis Training on Love Styles of Couples. The Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Science, 3(2): 71-84. [Link]. [Persian]
Saffarinia, M., Mohammadi, N., & Afshar, H. (2016). The role of interpersonal forgiveness in resilience and severity of pain in chronic pain patients. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health, 18(4): 212-219. [Persian]
Sepehrian-Azar, F., Mohammadi, N., Badalpoor, Z., & Norozzadeh, V. (2016). The Relationship between Hope and Happiness with Marital Satisfaction. Journal of health & care, 18 (1): 37-44. [Persian]
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational statistics & data analysis, 48(1), 159-205.
Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS quarterly, 177-195.