تبیین پیامدهای همدلی تعامل¬گرایانه بر روابط بین¬فردی زوجین با استفاده از رویکرد ترکیبی
سید محمد صادق سهروردی
1
(
دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی اصفهان واحد خوراسگان
)
مجتبی شاهنوشی
2
(
دانشیار- گروه مدیریت فرهنگی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اصفهان(خوراسگان)
)
رضا اسماعیلی
3
(
عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه آزاد واحد خوراسگان اصفهان
)
کلید واژه: همدلی, روابط زوجین, رویکرد ترکیبی,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر با هدف تبیین پیامدهای همدلی تعامل¬گرایانه بر روابط بین¬فردی زوجین با رویکرد ترکیبی انجام شد. روش تحقیق در مرحله کیفی، تحلیل مضمون و در مرحله کمی پیمایش بود. مشارکت کنندگان در بخش کیفی 15 نفر از اساتید رشته¬های ارتباطات و مشاوره¬ی شاغل در دانشگاه بودند. در بخش کمی، جامعه آماری زوج¬های مراجعه کننده به مراکز مشاوره شهر اصفهان در نیم¬سال دوم1400 می¬باشند که 192 نفر با روش تصادفی ساده به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. ابزار جمعآوری دادههای کیفی، مصاحبه نیمهساختیافته و در بخش کمی پرسشنامه بود. به منظور تحلیل دادهه¬ای کیفی از تکنیک کدگذاری و در بخش کمی از رویکرد مدل¬سازی معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. براساس یافته¬های کیفی، همدلی تعاملگرایانه (به‌عنوان اولین مضمون فراگیر) دارای چهار مضمون سازماندهندهی توجه همدلانه، آرامش شخصی، اتخاذ دیدگاه و تخیل است. همچنین روابط بین¬فردی زوجین (به‌عنوان دومین مضمون فراگیر) شامل سه مضمون سازماندهنده رضایتمندی پایدار، تعاملگرایی آگاهانه و پذیرندگی دوجانبه میباشد. یافته¬های بخش کمی بیانگر این بود که متغیر همدلی تعامل¬گرایانه و ابعاد آن، در حد بالایی توان تبیین واریانس متغیر روابط بین¬فردی زوجین را دارند و اثر آن¬ها بر این متغیر مستقیم برآورد شده است. یکپارچه¬سازی نتایج در قالب فرااستنتاج بیانگر همسویی در هر دو بخش است.
چکیده انگلیسی :
The purpose of study is to explain the consequences of interactionist empathy on interpersonal relationships of couples using the mixed method. In the qualitative phase, thematic analysis and survey method were used as methods in the quantitative phase. The research participants in the qualitative phase were15members of the faculty of communication and counselling working in University. The population of the quantitative phase, there were couples who visited counselling centeres in Esfahan in the second half of1400, of which192people were chosen by simple random sampling. The data collection techniques in the qualitative and quantitative phases were in-depth interview and questionnaire, respectively. The coding technique was used in the qualitative phase to analyze the data, and the structural equation modelling approach was adopted in the quantitative phase. The findings of the qualitative phase show Interactionist Empathy (as the first global theme) has four organizing themes, including empathic attention, personal peace, adopting a perspective and imagination. Interpersonal Relationships (as the second global theme) has three organizing themes: lasting satisfaction, Conscious interactionism and mutual acceptance. The results of the quantitative phase indicated that interactionist empathy and its dimension have a high level of power to explain the variance of the interpersonal relationship, and their effect on this variable is direct.the integration of results present as a meta-inference shows alignment in both parts.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research design; Qualitative, quantitative and combined approaches. Translated by Alireza Kiamanesh and Mariam Danaitos. Tehran: Academic Jihad Publications. 253-290. (in Persian)
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405.
Cramer, D., & Jowett, S. (2010). Perceived empathy, accurate empathy and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(3), 327-349. Creswell J W and Miller D L (2000) Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory into Practice 39(3): 124–130.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2006). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ghayem, N. (2020). Investigating the Phenomenon of Empathy through Qualitative Method. Master's Thesis in Clinical Psychology. Tehran: Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch.
Karimi, A., Ahmadi, S., & Zahrakar, K. (2020). Effectiveness of Educating Marital Skills Based on Gottman’s Approach on of Woman’s communication patterns. Psychotherapy Culture and Counseling, 11(44), 253-257. (in Persian)
Mirzaei Shamsabad, H., & Manzari Tavakoli, V. (2018). the relationship between couple empathy and the quality of life of employees of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, the 6th scientific research conference on educational and psychological sciences, social and cultural harms of Iran, Tehran, Association for the Development and Promotion of Sciences and Basic techniques. (in Persian)
Perrone-McGovern, K. M., Oliveira-Silva, P., Simon-Dack, S., Lefdahl-Davis, E., Adams, D., McConnell, J., ... & Gonçalves, Ó. F. (2014). Effects of empathy and conflict resolution strategies on psychophysiological arousal and satisfaction in romantic relationships. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 39(1), 19-25.
Pietrzak, T., Hauke, G., & Lohr, C. (2016). Connecting Couples Intervention: Improving couples’ empathy and emotional regulation using embodied empathy mechanisms. European psychotherapy, 13, 66-98
Rahbari, Maryam (2020). Prediction of marital satisfaction based on the emotional atmosphere of the family, attachment styles and empathy in couples referring to Khorramshahr counseling centers, Master's thesis in psychology, Shiraz: Faculty of Humanities, Zand Institute of Higher Education. (in Persian)
Ramezani, A., Ghamari, M., Jafari, A., & Aghdam, G. F. (2020). The effectiveness of a ToM training program in promoting empathy between married couples. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 19(1), 1-25.
Rosen, N. O., Mooney, K., & Muise, A. (2017). Dyadic empathy predicts sexual and relationship well-being in couples transitioning to parenthood. Journal of sex & marital therapy, 43(6), 543-559.
Sadeghi Fasaei, S., & Malekipou, Z. (2013). Gender Analysis of Distance in Marital Relationship: Examples and Contexts Formation. Women in Development and Policy Magazine, 11(1), 1-28. (in Persian)
Shuper Engelhard, E. (2019). Embodying the couple relationship: kinesthetic empathy and somatic mirroring in couples therapy. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(2), 126-147. Smith, A. (2006). Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution. The Psychological Record, 56(1), 3-21.
Tadli, Ch., & Tashri, A. (2016). Basics of combined research; Integration of quantitative and qualitative approaches, translated by Adel Azar and Saeed Jahanian, Tehran: Academic Jihad Publishing Organization. (in Persian)
Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.