تحلیل مفهومی شهروندی دیجیتال و نقش برنامه درسی در تربیت شهروند دیجیتالی
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی
سارا شهابی
1
(دانشجوی دکتری برنامه‌ریزی درسی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.)
جواد حاتمی
2
(استاد گروه علوم تربیتی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.)
ابراهیم طلایی
3
(دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.)
سیدمهدی سجادی
4
(استاد گروه علوم تربیتی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.)
کلید واژه: عناصر شهروندی دیجیتال, مشارکت و تعامل دیجیتالی, شهروندی دیجیتال, برنامه درسی,
چکیده مقاله :
ایده ها و قوانینی برای شهروندان در دنیای دیجیتال به منظور کاهش سوء رفتارها در ارتباط با فناوری ها و توانمندسازی کودکان برای استفاده مسئولانه از فناوری توسط اندیشمندان حوزه ارتباطات، سیاستگذاران و مسئولان آموزشی ارائه شده است. یکی از مفاهیم جدید جهت مواجهه مناسب با دنیای دیجیتال در عرصه‌های اجتماعی، اقتصادی و سیاسی، توسعه شهروندی دیجیتال است. این مطالعه به بررسی چیستی و عناصر شهروندی دیجیتال همچنین نقش برنامه درسی در تربیت شهروندی دیجیتال پرداخته است. روش تحقیق کیفی از نوع تبیینی تحلیلی است. داده ها به شیوه اسناد پژوهی گردآوری شده است. جامعه آماری شامل منابع مربوط به حوزه شهروندی دیجیتال می باشد. نمونه گیری به شیوه هدفمند انجام شده است. نتایج بررسی ها چهار دسته از شهروندی دیجیتال را به عنوان محور این مفهوم مشخص کرده است: 1- شهروندی دیجیتال به مثابه اخلاق. 2- شهروند دیجیتال به مثابه سواد رسانه ای. 3- شهروند دیجیتال به مثابه مشارکت و تعامل. 4- شهروند دیجیتال به مثابه مخالفت انتقادی. نکته دیگر اینکه چهار دسته از عناصر شهروندی دیجیتال(هویت شخصی، فعالیت آنلاین، تسلط بر محیط دیجیتالی و اخلاق مربوط به محیط دیجیتال) در قالب مدل SAFE ارائه شده است. نتایج تحقیق لزوم آموزش و برنامه های درسی فراگیر محور در جهت ترویج مسئولیت اجتماعی شهروندی در عصر دیجیتال را نشان می دهد.
Ideas, Skills, and Rules for Citizens in the Digital World to Reduce Technology-Related Abuses and empower children to use technology responsibly for learning and activity Presented by thinkers in the field of communications and media, policymakers and educators. One of the new concepts for appropriate dealing with the digital world in the social, economic and political fields is the development of digital citizenship, which has attracted much attention in recent years. To achieve a broad knowledge base and provide comprehensive digital citizenship categories for better civic education in the 21st century, this study examines the nature, characteristics and elements of digital citizenship as well as the role of the curriculum in digital citizenship education through in-depth review and analysis of related literature in this field. . The Qualitative research method is analytical explanatory type and the required data has been collected from reliable sources using the method of document research. Sampling was done in a targeted manner.The results of the survey has identified four categories of digital citizenship as Axis of this concept: 1- Digital citizenship as ethics. 2- Digital citizen as information and media literacy. 3- Digital citizen as participation and interaction. 4- The digital citizen as a critical opposition. Another point in the research results is that four categories of elements of digital citizenship (personal identity, online activity, mastery of the digital environment and ethics related to the digital environment) are presented in the form of SAFE model. The research results also show the need for education and the role of student-centered curricula in promoting the social responsibility of citizenship in the Digital age. Therefore, understanding the concept of digital citizenship will make it possible to take educational measures to educate digital citizens.
Afshar, V. (2013). Digital citizenship: Businesses can learn from K–12 educators. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com (Persian).
Ahmad, Aghazadeh (2007). Principles and rules governing the process of citizenship
education and examining the evolution and characteristics of such education in Japan, Educational Innovations, Vol. 17, pp. 45-66. (Persian)..
AL_Mallah, Tamer. (2017). Terms in education Technology, Retrieved from www.eductice.com.
AL_Qayid, Mustafa. (2014).The concept of Digital Citizenship, Retrieved from www.neweduc com/definition-of-digital-citizenship.
Alvermann, D. E., & Hagood, M. C. (2000). Critical media literacy: Research, theory and practice in “new times.” The Journal of Educational Research,93,193-205
Audrey Yue, Elmie Nekmat and Annisa R. Beta (2019). Digital LiteracyThrough Digital Citizenship: Online Civic Participation and Public Opinion Evaluation of Youth Minorities in Southeast Asia, Media and Communication, 7 (2), 100–114.
Becta (2010). Digital literacy: Teaching critical thinking for our digital world. History.org. Retrieved from http://www.history.org.
Bennett, W. L., Wells, C., & Rank, A. (2009). Young citizens and civic learning: Two paradigms of citizenship in the digital age. Citizenship Studies, 13,105-120.
Berson, I. R., & Berson, M. J. (2003). Digital literacy for effective citizenship. Social Education, 67, 164–167.
Brichacek, A. (2014). Infographic: Citizenship in the digital age. Retrieved from\ http://www.iste.org.
Bornu,T.(2018).the Impact of industry concentration on performance exploring a comprehensive bank, chapter five research desing and methodology, PHD thesis, university of south Africa.
Buckingham, D. (2007). Digital media literacies: Rethinking media education in the age of the Internet. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2, 43–55.
Choi, M. (2016). A Concept Analysis of Digital Citizenship for Democratic Citizenship Education in the Internet Age. Theory and Research in Social Education, 44(4), 565–607.
Choi, M., Glassman, M., & Cristol, D. (2017). What it means to be a citizen in the internet age: Development of a reliable and valid digital citizenship scale. Computers & education, 107, 100-112.
Clifton J. Boyle (2010). The Effectiveness of a Digital Citizenship Curriculum in an Urban School, A Dissertation Proposal Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Education. johnson & Wales University.
Coleman, S. (2006). Digital voices and analogue citizenship: Bridging the gap between young people and the democratic process. Public Policy Research, 13(4), 257–261.
Common Sense Media White Paper (March 2011). Digital Literacy and Citizenship in the 21st Century: Educating, Empowering and Protecting America's Kids. Retrieved from http://www.commonsensemedia.org.
Cortesi, Sandra, Alexa Hasse, Anders Lombana-Bermudez, Sonia Kim, and Urs Gasser. Youth and Digital Citizenship+ (Plus):Understanding Skills for a Digital World." Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society (2020).
Council of Europe (2019). Handbook of Digital Citizenship Education: Being online, Well-being online, Rights Online. Council of Europe Publishing
CyberWise. (2014).Top ten digital citizenship resources. Retrieved from http:// www.cyberwise.org/Digital-Citizenship-Top-Ten.html.
DeLuca, K. M., Lawson, S., & Sun, Y. (2012). Occupy Wall Street on the public screens of social media: The many framings of the birth of a protest movement. Communication, Culture & Critique, 5, 483–509.
Farmer, L. (2011). Digital citizen. Digital Citizen. Retrieved from http://www.ecitizenship.csla.net
Floridi, L. (1999). "Informational ethics: On the theoretical foundation of computer ethics". Ethics and Informational Technology, 1.1, 37-56.
Guardchild. (2017). Internet statistics. Retrieved from https://www.guardchild.com/statistics.
Hadianfar, Seyed Kamal (2009). Cybercrime in the country. From the website http://www.irna.ir/fa/News/82900640 May 4, 2016. News ID: 82900640.
Hauben, M., & Hauben, R. (1997). Netizens IEEE Computer Society Press.
Hobbs, R. & Jensen, A. (2009). The past, present, and future of media literacy education. Journal of Media Literacy Education 1, 1-11
Isman, A., & Gungoren, O. C. (2014). Digital citizenship. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 73-77.
ISTE – International Society for Technology Education (2016), ISTE Standards for Students, available at www.iste.org/standards/standards/for-students.
Johnson, G. J. (1990). Computer ethics. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Jones, L. M., & Mitchell, K. J. (2016). Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship. New media & society, 18(9), 2063-2079.
Kahne, J., Lee, N. J., & Feezell, J. T. (2013). The civic and political significance of online participatory cultures among youth transitioning to adulthood. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10, 1–20.
Kourosh, Fathi (2010). Electronic Citizen, Information Education Research, Efficient Schools, Vol. 9, pp. 24-30. (Persian).
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2019). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites: How American teens navigate the new world of “digital citizenship". Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org.
lndian Department of Education (2013). Retrieved from http:// www newsnowwarsa .com. Indiana News
Longford, G. (2005). Pedagogies of digital citizenship and the politics of code Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 9, 1–17.
McGillivray, D., McPherson, G., Jones, J., & McCandlish, A. (2016). Young people, digital media making and critical digital citizenship. Leisure Studies, 35(6), 724–738.
McGuire, D. (2004). Report: Kids pirate music freely. The Washington Post. Retrieved June 6, 2004, from www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ articles/ A37231- 2004May18. Html.
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Paulson, A. (2003). Internet bullying. The Christian Science Monitor Retrieved January 5, 2004, from www. .csmonitor.com/2003/1230/p11s01-legn.html.
Ribble M. (2011), Digital citizenship in schools (2nd edn), International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE), Arlington.
Ribble, M. (2004). Digital citizenship: Addressing appropriate technology behavior. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(1), 6–11.
Ribble, M. S., Bailey, G. D., & Ross, T. W. (2004). Digital citizenship: Addressing appropriate technology behavio. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(1), 6.
Searson, M., Hancock, M., Soheil, N., & Shepherd, G. (2015). Digital citizenship within global contexts. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 729-741.
Shelley, M., Shulman, S., Lang, E., Beisser, S., & Mutiti, J. (2004). Digital citizenship Parameters of the digital divide. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 256-269.
Short. (2008). Curriculum Studies Methodology: Translated by Mahmoud Mehrmohammadi, Tehran Post Publications and Institute of Educational Studies.
Simsek, E., & Simsek, A. (2013). New literacies for digital citizenship. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4, 126–137.
Snyder, S. (2016). Teachers' perceptions of digital citizenship development in middle school students using social media and global collaborative projects.
Urbina, I. (2003). For techies, school bells mean let the games begin The New York Times. Available from www.nytimes.com
VanFossen, P. J. (2006). The electronic republic? Evidence on the impact of the Internet on citizenship and civic engagement in the US. International Journal of Social Education, 21(1), 18–43.
Weiner, N. (1954). The human use of human beings cybernetics and society. United States: Da Capo Press.
_||_