ارائه مدل پیشنهادی اقدامات آموزشی موثر ذی-نفعان برنامه‌درسی آموزش‌عالی در شرایط بحرانی کووید-19
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسیمحمد حسین زارعی 1 , احمدرضا نصر اصفهانی 2
1 - استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی. دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
2 - استاد گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه اصفهان ،اصفهان، ایران.
کلید واژه: ذی‌نفعان برنامه درسی, برنامه درسی آموزش عالی, کووید-19,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی اقدامات موثر ذی نفعان برنامه درسی در آموزش عالی(سیاستگذاران آموزشی، مدیران دانشگاه ها، اساتید و دانشجویان) به منظور ارائه مدل انجام شده است. این پژوهش از حیث هدف کاربردی و از نوع آمیخته است بدین ترتیب در بخش اول ازروش تحلیل مضمون و در بخش دوم از روش توصیفی- پیمایشی بهره گرفته شد. حوزه ی آماری پژوهش در بخش کیفی شامل متخصصان برنامه درسی و موضوعی باتجربه که در این زمینه پژوهش انجام داده اند با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری هدفمند ، و بخش کمی را متخصصان برنامه درسی در سراسر کشور تشکیل می‌دهد که به روش نمونه گیری دردسترس انتخاب شدند. تعداد مصاحبه شوندگان 13 نفر بود به بر حسب اشباع داده ها تعداد آنها مشخص گردید و در بخش کمی تعداد نمونه 83 نفر بود که با استفاده از فرمول کوکران تعداد آنها برآورد شد. ابزار جمع آوری اطلاعات مصاحبه نیمه ساختار یافته که به صورت تلفنی انجام شد و پرسشنامه محقق است که به صورت الکترونیکی تهیه و لینک آن در اختیار مشارکت کنندگان گذاشته شد. روایی مصاحبه ها و پرسشنامه از روش روایی محتوایی و پایایی پرسشنامه با آلفای کرونباخ(82/.) تعیین شد. تحلیل داده ها در بخش کیفی از پارادایم تفسیرگرایی و در بخش کمی از(آمار توصیفی، آزمون بارتلت، خی دو، آزمونt و تحلیل عامل اکتشافی و تحلیل عامل تاییدی) استفاده شد.پس از تحلیل داده ها در بخش کیفی و استخراج اقدامات موثر ذی نفعان برنامه درسی، 12 گویه در حوزه سیاستگذاران، 11 گویه در حوزه مدیران دانشگاه، 9 گویه در حوزه اساتید و 9 گویه در حوزه دانشجویان شناسایی شد. علاوه براین، تحلیل داده های کمی منتج به ارائه مدل تحلیل عاملی شدکه از برازندگی خوبی برخوردار است.(08/0 = Rmsea). از این مطالعه می توان نتیجه گرفت که بیشترین اقدامات باید در راستای ایجاد عدالت و برابری در دسترسی به فناوری و افزایش سواد رسانه‌ای صورت پذیرد.
The purpose of the present study, Identify effective actions of curriculum stakeholders in higher education (educational policy makers, universitymanagers, professors and students) and offered a Model for this purpose. This research is applied and mixed in terms of purpose,thus,in the first part, the method of themic analysis was used,and in the second part, the descriptive-survey method was used. The statistical area of the research in the qualitative section includes experienced curriculum and subject specialists who have conducted research in this field using the purposeful sampling method, and the quantitative section is made up of curriculum specialists across the country. Which were selected by available sampling method. The number of interviewees was 13, and their number was determined according to data saturation, and in the quantitative part, the number of samples was 83, which was estamated using Cochran’s formula. The data collection tool is a semi-structured interview that was conducted over the phone and a researcher’s questionnaire that was prepared electronically and its link was provided to the practicipants. The validity of the interviws and the questionnaire was determined by the content validity method and the reliability of the questionnaire was determined whith Cronbach’s alpha(0.82). Data analysis in the qualitative part of interpretivism paradigm and in the quantitative part (descriptive statistics, Bartlett test, KMO, chi square, t-test, EFA and CFA has taken. After analyzig the data in the qualitative section and extracting the effective actions of curriculum stakeholders, 12 items ewre identified in the field of pilicy makers, 11 items in university administrators, 9 items in professors and 9 items in students. In addition, the analysis of quantitative data led to the presentation of a factor analysis model that has a good fit(Rmsea=0/82). From this sstudy, it can be concluded that most measures should be taken in order to create justice and equality in access to technology and increase media literacy.
Ahmed, S.A.(2020). Model for Utilizing Distance Learning post COVID-19 using (PACT) A Cross Sectional Qualitative Study. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-31027/v1.
Ali, W.(2020). Online and Remote Learning in Higher Education Institutes: A Necessity in light of COVID-19 Pandemic. Higher Education Studies; vol.10, No.3. doi: 10.5539/hes.v10n3p16.
Ankiah- gangadeen, A; Mahadeo-Doorgakant, Y; & Goburdhun, S.(2020). Covid-19: A Liability or serendipity for Teacher Education? Exploring Lockdown as an Opportunity for ' Innovative Disruption' in TEPs. Pp.124-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29086/978-0-9869936-4-0/2020/AASBS03
Ardalan, M.R.; Manafi sharaf Abad, K. & Zamani, E.(2015). Obstacles and challenges of using mobile learning system in the era of globalization. Challenges of the world. 1, 3(3). 7-33 .(In Persian)
Asghari, M; Fathi vajargah, K; Arefi, M; & Khorasani, A.(2022).A Perceptual Framework To Explain The Effects And Consequences Of Curriculum Policy In The Iranian Education System, Research in curriculum Planning; 19, 73. 1-25.
https://doi.org/10.30486/jsre.2022.1957339.2160(In persian)
Azar, A. et al.(2020). Creating a 'simulacrum' of in-class learning environment employing distance learning modality during the COVID-19 pandemia: Quod Erat Demonstrandum. Research squer. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.30932/v1.
Bozkurt, A et al.(2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 Pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education.vol:15.No:1,1-126. http://www.asianjde.org
Brown, G.T.L.(2020). Schooling Beeyond COVOID-19: AnUnevenly Distributed Future.Front. Educ,5:82. Doi: 10.3389/feduc.2020.00082.
Chan, R.Y.(2020). Studying coronavirus(COVID-19) and global higher education: Evidence for future research and practice(Unpublished paper). Bloomington, IN:Indiana University. Retrieved from Social Science Research Network(SSRN)
Cronin, C.(2017). Openness and Praxis: Exploring the Use of Open Educational practices in Higher Education. The International Review of Research in open and Distributed Kearning, 18(5). http://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096.
Easterly, R.G; Humphrey, K & Robert, G. (2021). Exploring how COVID-19 Impacted selected School- based Agricultural Education Teachers in the United States, Advancements in Agricultural Development, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v2i1.79
Ferdig, R.E, et al.(2020). Teaching, Technology, and Teacher Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Stories from the Field. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education(AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/216903/.
Fuller, R. Joynes, V. Cooper, J. Boursicot, K & Roberts, T.(2020). Could COVID-19 be our 'There is no alternative' (TINA) opportunity to enhance assessment?, Medical Teacher, DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2020.1779206.
Ghaaderi S A, Mahraam, B, Noghanidokht Bahmani, M, Saeedi Rezvaani, M, Karami, M.(2021).Lived Experiences of a Group of Students, Teachers, and Principals with the Post-Earthquake Implemented Curriculum in Sarpol-e Zahab. QJOE; 37 (3) .141-162. http://qjoe.ir/article-1-1267-fa.html(In persian)
Grover, AK.(2020). Covid-19 crisi and residency education: Amoment to seize the opportunity and create a new road map, Indian J Ophthalmol; 68:959-60. Doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_1498_20
Joseph, C.; Kerryn, B.H.; Jurgen, R.; Matthias; &et al.(2020). COVID-19:20 Countries'Higher Education Intra- Period Digital Pedagogy Responses. Journal of Applied Teaching and Learning(JALT), 3(1). DOI:10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
Keramati, M H; Narenji Thani, F; Mobin Rahni, y.(2022). A systematic review of the mobile learning components in iranian higher education, Research in curriculum planning; 19, 73. 26-48. https://doi.org/10.30486/jsre.2022.1937718.1959(In persian)
Kohan, L; & et al.(2020). Pain fellows’ education and research during Covid-19, American Academy of Pain Medicine, https://acgme.org/COVID-19/Three-Stages-of-GMEDuring-the-COVID-19-Pandemic
Koseoglu,S. Bozkurt, A.(2018). An exploratory literature review on open educational practices. Distance Education, 39(4),441-461. https:// doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520042
Lall, Sh & Singh, N.(2020). COVID-19: Unmasking the new face of Education. International Journal of research in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 11(1), 48-53.doi: https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v11iSPL1.2122
Mailizar et al.(2020). Secondary School Mathematics Teachers' Views on E-learning Implementation Barriers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8240.
Mc Master, D; Veremu, M; & Santucci, C.(2020). Covid-19:oppirtunities forprofessional development and disruptive innovation, study of Medical Education, 17:238-240. doi:10.1111/tct.13175
Murgatrotd, S.(2020). COVID-19 and Online learning . doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.31132.85120.
Rafiei, M.; ghaffari, H. & Khorami, M.(2017). Evaluating the Effectiveness of E-Learning Method in Human Resource Education (Case Study of Markazi Province PNU). Research in School and Virtual Learning. 4,4(16). 71-84.(In Persian)
Salehi Omran, E; & Einkhah, F .(2021). Higher Vocational Education during the Corina Era: Challenges, Policies and Action , Rahyaft, 80. 16- 31. (In Persian)
Salimi, S & fardin, M.A.(2020). The Role of Corona Virus In Virtual Education, with an Emphasis on Opportunities and Challenges, Researchin School and Virtual Learning. 8,2(30), 49- 60.(In Persian).
Saylor, G.J, Alexander, W.M, & Lewis, A.J. (2001). Curriculum Planning for Better Teaching and Learning, Translated by Gholam-reza Khoynezhad, Astan Ghods Razavi. (in persian)
Sintema, E.J.(2020) Effect of COVID-19 on the Performance of Grade 12 Students: Implications for STEM Education, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7893.
Taghizadeh, S; Haji, M; & Mohammadimehr, M.(2020). Acomparative Study of the challenges and Opportunities of Higher Education in the Corona pandemic in Iran and around the World, Nurse and Physician within war, 8, 27,1. Pp37-57. (in persian)
Tari, F. ; shams,Gh.R. & rezaei zadeh, M.(2017). Identifying and modelling of challenges for Implementing E- Learning in the Iranian National Gas company: An Interpretive Stractural Modeling (ISM) approach, Quarterly Journal of Training & Development of Human Resources. 4(14).1-27(In persian)
Tarus, J.KGichoya,D., & Muumbo, A.(2015). Challenges of Implementing E-Learning in Kenyan Public Universities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1).
Toquero,C.M.(2020). Challenges and Opportunities for Higher Education amid the COVOID-19 Pandemic: The Philippine Context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), em0063.
UNESCO.(2020). COVID-19 Educational Disruption and Response.Retrieved from http://en.unesco.org/covid-19/educationresponse/
Verawardina, U. et al.(2020). Reviewing Online Learning Facing the COVID-19 Outbreak. Talent Development & Excellence. 12(30.385-392.
Wodon, Q.(2020). COVID-19 crisis, impacts on catholic schools, and potential responses | Part 1: Developed countries with focus on the United States. Journal of Catholic Education. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ce-covid/.
World Bank.(2020). Remote learning and COVID-19 The use of educational technologies at scale across an education system as a result of massive school closings in response to the COVID-19 pandemic to enable distance education and online learning. Retrieved from file:///E:/PC/Rapid-Response-Briefing-Note-Remote-Learning-and-COVID-19-Outbreak.pdf
Yen, T.F.)2020). The Performance of Online Teaching for Flipped Classroom Based on COVID-19 Aspect. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies. 8(3). 57-64. doi:10.9734/AJESS/2020/v8i330229
Zhao,Y.(2020).COVOID-19 as a catalyst for educational change. Springer.Published online11 June. http://doi.org/10/1007/s11125-020-09477-y
Zhu, X & Liu, J.(2020). Education in and after Covid-19: lmmediate Responses and long- Term Visions. Postdigital Science and education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00126-3.
_||_