طراحی الگوی برنامه‌درسی آموزش ترکیبی برای نظام آموزش عالی بر اساس الگوی اَکِر
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسیعلی اکبر عجم 1 , حسین جعفری ثانی 2 , محمد اکبری بورنگ 3
1 - استادیار گروه علوم‌تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام‌نور
2 - دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.
3 - استادیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران.
کلید واژه: الگوی اَکِر, آموزش عالی, آموزش تلفیقی, طراحی برنامه درسی, سازنده‌گرایی اجتماعی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف اصلی این پژوهش، بررسی چگونگی استفاده از رویکرد آموزش ترکیبی در طراحی برنامه‌درسی نظام آموزش عالی ایران بوده است. برای ارائه الگوی طراحی برنامه‌درسی آموزش ترکیبی از روش پژوهش داده بنیاد استفاده شده است. هدف روش پژوهش داده بنیاد خلق و نقد طرح‌واره‌های مفهومی است که ماهیت بنیادی و ساختار پدیده‌ها و فرایندهای برنامه‌درسی را قابل فهم کنند؛ بنابراین، پس از تبیین مبانی نظری و دیدگاه صاحب‌نظران درباره طراحی برنامه‌درسی آموزش ترکیبی و نظریه یادگیری سازنده‌گرایی اجتماعی، مفاهیم و مؤلفه‌های اساسی یا همان منطق طراحی برنامه‌درسی شناسایی شد و در نهایت، ویژگی‌های عناصر برنامه‌درسی بر اساس منطق برنامه‌درسی، ارائه شده است. در زمینه طراحی الگوی طراحی برنامه‌درسی در نظام آموزش عالی، منطق طراحی برنامه‌درسی با درنظرگرفتن کانون تمرکز رویکرد آموزش ترکیبی و شاخصه‌های نظریه یادگیری سازنده‌گرایی اجتماعی، ارائه شده است، بر اساس دلالت‌های مورد نظر در زمینه منطق طراحی برنامه‌درسی، ویژگی‌های عناصر برنامه‌درسی مبتنی بر آموزش ترکیبی برای نظام آموزش عالی استخراج شد و در نهایت اعتبار الگوی مذکور توسط متخصصان و صاحب‌نظران بررسی شد و مورد تأیید قرار گرفت
Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate how to use a blended learning approach in developing the curriculum Iran's higher education system. Foundation research methods have been used to design blended learning curriculum. The purpose of the foundation's research is Create conceptual schemas that the fundamental nature and structure phenomena and processes of curriculum are understandable. so, after explaining the theory and experts about curriculum design blended learning and social constructivism learning theory, concepts and key components and the rationale for curriculum design were identified, and finally, features elements of the curriculum on the basis of the curriculum, is provided. Curriculum Development in higher Education in the field of pattern design, logic design approach blended learning curriculum regarding the focus and characteristics of social constructivist learning theory, is provided, according to the logic of the implications of curriculum design, curriculum-based blended learning characteristic elements were combined for higher education system. And the validity of the model was evaluated by experts and was approved.
Adams, J. M. & Hanesiak, R. & Morgan, G. & Owston, R. & Lupshenyuk, D. & Mills, L. (2009). Blended learning for soft skills development: Testing a Four-Level Framework for Integrating Work and Learning to Maximize Personal Practice and Job Performance, new yourk: Institute for Research on Learning Technologies
ajam A A, jaafary suny H. The Role of Students' Self-regulated Learning Strategies, Computer Skills and Academic Achievement in Their Views about Synchronous and Asynchronous Interactions in Blended Combined Learning Approach. Research in curriculum planning. 2012; Vol 2, No 7 pp:1-17. [Persian]
Akker, J. V. D. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1-10). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Alberts, P. P. & Murray, L. A. & Stephenson, J. E. (2010). Eight Educational Considerations for Hybrid Learning, Chapter 12 of: F. L. Wang, J. Fong, and R. C. Kwan (EDs). Handbook of Research on Hybrid Learning Models: Advanced Tools, Technologies, and Applications. (PP. 185-203), New York: Information Science Reference.
Asareh, A. Hazin, N. (2009). E-learning in the curriculum, the first e-learning conference, 18 and 19 December, the University of elm va sanat. [Persian]
Attaran, M. (2004). IT infrastructure in education reform, Tehran: Institute of Educational Technology Smart Schools. [Persian]
Bachler, N. & Bachmair, B. & Cook, J. (2010). Mobile Learning Structure, Agency and Practices, London: Springer.
.badiee E, farajollahi M. (2016). The Effect of designed content based on every Gardner's Multiple Intelligences in interactive gamut on students learning in conservatory school in compound education. Research in curriculum planning.Vol 2, No 22, PP:13-22. [Persian]
Berzinca, V. (2007). Science education, the third chapter of the book of Khosrow Bagheri and Mohammad Attar (authors) Contemporary philosophy of education PP: 153-177, Tehran: mehrabe ghalam. (Persian]
Bhatti, A., Tubaisahat, A., & El-Qawasmeh, E. (2005). Using technology-mediated learning environment to overcome social and cultural limitations in higher education. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, Vol 2, PP: 67-76.
Bliuc, A., Goodyear, P. & Ellis, R. A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students' experiences of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, Vol 10, PP: 231-244.
Burgon, H. & Williams, D. D. (2003). "Bringing off-campus students on campus: An evaluation of a blended course". The Quarterly Review of Distance Education. Vol 4, No 3, PP: 253-260.
Dziuban, C. & Moskal, P. (2001) Evaluating distributed learning in metropolitan universities. Metropolitan Universities, Vol 12, No 1, PP: 41 – 49.
Dziuban, C. D., Moskal, P. D. & Hartman, J. (2005). Higher education, blended learning, and the generations: Knowledge is power, no more. In: J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of Quality Online Education: Engaging Communities. Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.
Fong, J. & Wang, F. L. (2007). Blended Learning, Workshop on Blended Learning, 2007, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Fook, F. S., Kong, N. W., Lan, O. S., Atan, H. & Idrus, R. (2005). Research in e-learning in a hybrid environment: A case for blended instruction, Malaysian OnlineJornal of Instructional Technology, Vol 2 No 2, PP: 124-136.
Gal, M. Bourg, W. Gal, J. (2005). Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods in Psychology. Translation: A group of writers to the attention of Ahmad Reza Nasr, Second Edition, Tehran: samt and Beheshti University pubication. [persian]
Garrison, D. R. & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education, Internet and Higher Education, Vol 7, No 2, PP:95-105.
Garrison, R., & Vaughan, H. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles and guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
George‐Walker, L. D. & Keeffe, M. (2010). Self‐determined blended learning: a case study of blended learning design, Higher Education Research & Development, Vol 29, No 1, PP: 1-13.
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. Definitions, current trends and future directions. In C. Bonk & C. Graham (eds), the handbook of blended learning: global perspective, local designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco: john Wiley and Sons.
Henry, R. (2008). Hybrid Learning Environments in Higher Education Can Transformational Learning Outcomes Be Achieved? United States: Proquest LLC.
Honey, P. (2001). E-learning: A performance appraisal and some suggestions for improvement. Learning Organization, Vol 8, No 5, pp: 200-202.
Huang, R, Ma, D. & Zhang, H. (2008), Toward a design theory of blended learning curriculum. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5169 LNCS, pp: 66-78.
Huang, R., Zhou, Y. L. (2005). Designing Blended Learning Focused on Knowledge Category and Learning Activities: Case Studies from Beijing Normal University, in: Bonk, C. J. & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs (pp. 296–310). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Huang, R., Zhou, Y. L. & Wang, Y. (2006). Blended learning: theory into practice. Peijing: Higher Education Press.
Huang, R., & Zheng, L. (2009) An empirical study on blended learning in the introduction to educational technology course, in: Wang, F. L., Fong, J., Zhang, L. & Lee, V. S. K. (Eds.) Hybrid Learning and Education (pp:122-132). Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Jones, V., Jo, J. H. & Cranitch, G. (2003). Hyweb: a blended e-learning solution for the delivery of tertiary education. Paper presented in IADIS international conference e-society, Australia.
Joques, D. & Salmon, G. (2007). Learning in Groups: A Handbook for Face to Face and Online Eenvironments, London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Kase, W. (2010). A blended learning model supported with web 2.0 technologies, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol 2, pp: 2794-2802.
Kerres, M., De-Witt, C. (2003). A didactical framework for the design of blended learning arrangements'. Learning, Media and Technology, Vol 28, No 2, PP: 101—113.
Lambe, J. (2007). Student teachers, special educational needs and inclusion education: reviewing the potential for problem-based, e-learning pedagogy to support practice. Journal of education for teaching, Vol 33, No 3, pp: 359-377.
Lewin, L. O., Singh, M., Bateman, B. L. & Glover, P. B. (2009). Improving education in primary care: development of an online curriculum using the blended learning model. Licensee BioMed Central Ltd, BMC Medical Education, available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/9/33.
Lindsay, E. B. (2004). The best of both worlds: Teaching a hybrid course. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8, Available at: http://www.rapidintellect.com/AEQweb/cho2738z4.htm
Littlejohn, A., & Pegler, C. (2007). Preparing for Blended e-Learning. London: Routledge.
López-Pérez, M.V. & Pérez-López, M.C. & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’perceptions and their relation to outcomes, Computers & Education, Vol 56, No 3, PP: 818–826.
Macdonald, J. (2008). Blended Learning and Online Tutoring Planning Learner Support and Activity Design, England: Gover Publishing Company.
Mace. H. A. (2008). Hybrid Learning: Understanding Experiences in Adult Secondary Education, Unpublished Dissertation: University of Ottawa, Canada's University.
Mehr mohammadi, M. (2004). Rethinking the meaning and significance of the educational revolution in the era of information and communication, on the Curriculum in the age of information technology and communications, Tehran: ayeezh publication. [persian]
Mehr mohammadi, M. (2006). Knowledge based society and education theory questions based on the books of writers (authors), Educational Sciences, Tehran: samt publication. [persian]
Milne, A. J. (2006). Designing Blended Learning Space to the Student Experience, Chapter 11 of: Diana G. Oblinger (editor), learning Spaces, Washington: Educause.
Norberg, A., Dziuban, C. D. & Moskal, P. D. (2011). A time based blended learning model, On the Horizon, Vol 19, No 3, pp: 207-216.
Omrani sarvi, B. hemmati, N. (2010). Blended learnin. Tehran: boshra Publications. [Persian]
Pehlivanova, M. and Ducheva, Z. (2010). Developing pedagogical competence students through blended learning, paper presented at: The 5 th International Conference on Virtual Learning ICVL, University of Bucharest and University of Medicine and Pharmacy Târgu-Mureş.
Qu, Y., Wang, C., Liu, F. & Zhang, X. (2008). Blended learning applying in university education, Paper presented at International Conference on Hybrid Learning Committee, Hong Kong.
Rastegar, T. (2003). Evaluation at the service of education: new approaches in assessment and evaluation with emphasis on continuous assessment and dynamic and effective feedback to students in the learning process. Tehran: Ministry of Education, Cultural and precursor to training Institute. [Persian]
Rogers, T., Ohrn, G. (2007). Hybrid Curriculum for Improving Faculty Productivity and Learner-Centered Effectiveness. Available at: http://ascpro0.ascweb.org/archives/cd/2007/paper/CEGT114002007.pdf
Seraji, F. attaran, M. nadery, E. aliaskary, M. (2007). Virtual University Curriculum Development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol 2, No 6, pp 79-118. [Persian]
Seraji, F. (2007). Web-based curriculum: a step towards decentralization or intensified focus on lesson planning system. Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol 1, No 4, pp: 84-69. [Persian]
Schneiderheinze, D. D. (2006). Model for e-learning curriculum: differences from traditional classroom curriculum models, Available in: http://wed.siu.edu/journal/vollnum3elearningcurriculum.
Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G. & Francis, R. (2006). The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice, England: Oxford Brookes University.
Short, ES. (2009). Methodology of Curriculum Studies, translator Mahmoud Mehrmohammadi et al., Tehran: the side and the Institute of Education Studies. [Persian]
Singh, H. & Reed, C. (2001). Achieving success with blended learning, Retrieved 13th June, 2012 from: http://www.centra.com/download/whitepapers/blendedlearning.pdf.
Spiliotopoulos, V. (2011). Towards a technology enhanced university education, (p: 1-16), Chapter 1 of: Andrew kitchenham, Blended Learning across Disciplines, Models for Implementation, United States of America: Information Science Reference.
Thijs, A. & Akker, J. V. D. (2009). Curriculum in development, Netherlands: Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO), Enschede.
Uibu, K. & Kikas, E. (2008). The roles of a primary school teacher in the information society, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, Vol 52, No 5, pp:459-480.
_||_