طراحی مدل مشارکت شرکت‌های دانش بنیان طی مطالعات برنامهریزی شهری در راستای تأمین نیازهای تکنولوژیک راه آهن شهری (مطالعه موردی: شرکت متروی تهران )
محورهای موضوعی : مطالعات برنامه ریزی شهری و منطقه ای
حامد عباسی نامی
1
(دانشجوی دکتری گروه کار آفرینی ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، واحد قزوین ، قزوین ، ایران)
مرتضی موسی خانی
2
(استاد، گروه مدیریت، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران)
علی بدیع زاده
3
(استادیار، گروه مدیریت، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران)
جواد محرابی
4
(استادیار، گروه مدیریت، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران)
کلید واژه: مدل مشارکتی, نیازهای تکنولوژیکی, راه آهن شهری, مطالعات برنامهریزی شده,
چکیده مقاله :
توسعه مترو در راستای رفع معضل آلودگی های زیست محیطی، به شدت وابسته به تکنولوژی می باشدکه عموما وارداتی و بسیار هزینه بر است. لذا تدبیر اساسی در شرایط تحریم فعلی، توسعه تکنولوژی مرتبط با مترو و بومی سازی آن است که نیازمند مشارکت اثر بخش شرکت های دانش بیان داخلی می باشد. در این مقاله به طراحی مدل بهینه مشارکت بر اساس روش کیفی به شیوه مصاحبه نیمه ساختار یافته و نظریه داده بنیاد برای مدل پرداخته شده است. شرکت کنندگان در پژوهش 15 نفر از خبرگان، مدیران شهری، دانشگاهیان متخصص و مدیران شرکت های دانش بیان بوده و روش نمونه گیری به صورت هدفمند می باشد. روش تحلیل داده ها کد گذاری نظری برگرفته از روش نظریه پردازی داده بنیاد است. یافته های تحقیق بعد از مقایسه پاسخ های مصاحبه، مفاهیم مشابه از آن ها استخراج شد. با انجام دادن این مرحله از تحقیق در پاسخ به شرایط علّی (نیروی انسانی، ساختار شرکت، تحقیق و توسعه، کارگروهی، نیازسنجی تکنولوژی مترو، بهبود عملکرد) در پاسخ به زمینه (مشوق ها، پذیرش شرکت های دانش بیان، ارتباطات صنعتی) و در پاسخ به راهبردها (ظرفیت جذب فناوری، رقابت گرایی) و در پاسخ به پیامدها (تامین تکنولوژِیکی، تولید، اشتغال، خود کفایی صنعتی و هزینه)، استخراج شد. نتایج تحقیق نشان می دهد ابعاد مشارکت شرکت های دانش بنیان در بحث حمل و نقل و به خصوص مترو گسترده می باشد و می تواند موجبات توسعه مترو اثرات آن را بهتر فراهم کند.
One of the strategic solutions to reduction of environmental pollution for urban residents due to traffic congestion is the development of metro. Therefore, during the boycott, the basic thrust in these conditions is the development of Metro-related technology and its localization with the geographical, climatic, economic and social conditions in the rail sector, which requires the participation of the domestic knowledge companies to provide the technology of this industry. In this paper, we seek to design an optimal participatory model; on this basis, the semi-structured qualitative method and the data theory of the foundation are used to design the model. The participants in the research are 15 experts, urban managers, academics specializing in the metro area and managers of knowledge companies, and the sampling method is purposeful. The data analysis method is the theoretical codification derived from the theorizing of the data of the foundation. Findings of the research were compared after comparing interview responses. Similar concepts were extracted from them. The data analysis method is the theoretical codification derived from the theorizing of the data of the foundation. Findings of the research were compared after comparing interview responses. Similar concepts were extracted from them.
Arrington, GB., & Faulkener, T. (2012). State Wide TOD Study Factors for Success in California, Technical Appendix, California DT, 12-19.
Bandarian, R. (2013). Strategies for implementation of technology development and commercialization projects at the Research Institute of Oil Industry. Quarterly of Technology Development Management, 2, 87-101. (In Persian)
Cahill, C., Palcic, D., & Reeves, E. (2017). Commercialisation and airport performance: The case of Ireland's DAA. Journal of Air Transport Management, 59, 155-163.
Entezari, Y., & Mahjub, H. (2014). Analysis of the Development of Iranian Knowledge Economy Based on the Outlook 1404, Journal of Culture Strategy. 24, 97.(In Persian)
Etzkowitz, H. (2016). The evolution of technology transfer.
Frishammar, J., Lichtenthaler, U., & Rundquist, J. (2012). Identifying technology commercialization opportunities: the importance of integrating product development knowledge. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29 (4), 573-589.
Goodarzi, M., Bomdad Sufi, Sh., Arabi, S. M., & Amiri, M. (1391). A Comprehensive Model of Technology Commercialization in Iranian Government Researches, Quarterly Journal of Technology Development Management, 1, 37-69. (In Persian)
Hsu, D. W., Shen, Y. C., Yuan, B. J., & Chou, C. J. (2015). Toward successful commercialization of university technology: Performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 25-39.
Kassicieh, S. K., & Radosevich, H. R. (Eds.). (2013). from lab to market: commercialization of public sector technology. Springer Science & Business Media.
Lee, J. C., Hong, J. W., & Lee, S. K. (2016). A study on Business Model Consulting Framework for Technology Commercialization of ICT SMEs. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9 (26).
Lee, M.N.N. (2014). Restructuring Higher Education in Malaysia. Available at: www. cshe.nagoyau.ac.jp/seminar/kokusai/lee.pdfwww.cshe.nagoyau.ac.jp/seminar/kokusai/lee.pdf
Litman.T. (2004). Evaluating Public Transit Benefits and Costs, Victoria Transport Policy Institute. WWW .vtpi.org.
Livingston, C. A., Fabre, K. M., & Tagle, D. A. (2016). Facilitating the commercialization and use of organ platforms generated by the microphysiological systems (Tissue Chip) program through public–private partnerships. Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 14, 207-210.
Ltd., T. P. (2000). Quality Bus infrastructure, A Manual and Guide London, Labor publishing.
M’Chirgui, Z., Lamine, W., Mian, S., & Fayolle, A. (2016). University technology commercialization through new venture projects: An assessment of the French regional incubator program. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-19.
Mirzaee, H.A., Athari, Ebadi A. (1394). Interviewing Writer. (In Persian)
Myres, F. (2010). the benefits of public transit in Lee county, Florida".
O’kane, C., Mangematin, V., Geoghegan, W., & Fitzgerald, C. (2015). University technology transfer offices: The search for identity to build legitimacy. Research Policy, 44(2), 421-437.
Padfield, R., Tham, M. H., Costes, S., & Smith, L. (2016). Uneven development and the commercialisation of public utilities: A political ecology analysis of water reforms in Malaysia. Utilities Policy, 40, 152-161.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., & Krabel, S. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research policy, 42 (2), 423-442.
Rossiyskaya, Schwandl, R. (2014). Samara. UrbanRail.Net. Retrieved 8 January.
Saeed, A. (1383). Income on the urban economy. University Publication Center. (In Persian)
Sarrashedari, N. (2008). Public Transportation and its Effects on the Environment, 9th Rail Transportation Conference. Tehran, Rail Transportation Association, University of Science and Technology. (In Persian)
Schacht, W. H. (2012). Technology transfer: Use of federally funded research and development.
Schwandl, R. ) 2013(.Chengdu. UrbanRail.Net. Retrieved 7 January.
Sengupta, S., Mohr, J., & Slater, S. (2006). Strategic opportunities at the intersection of globalization, technology and lifestyles. Handbook of Business Strategy, 7(1), 43-50.
Shakeri, Ata, Faridmar, Modaberi, Soroush, (2011), Environmental impacts of large industrial city of Shiraz on heavy metal release to Qarabagh drainage, Second National Conference on Water Resources Research, Zanjan, Zanjan Regional Water Company. (In Persian)
Slater, S. F., & Mohr, J. J. (2006). Successful development and commercialization of technological innovation: insights based on strategy type. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 26-33.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Sage publications.
Weckowska, D. M. (2015). Learning in university technology transfer offices: Transactions-focused and relations-focused approaches to commercialization of academic research. Technovation, 41, 62-74.
Willson, R. (2009). Parking Policy for Transit-Oriented Development: Lessons forCities, Transit.
_||_Arrington, GB., & Faulkener, T. (2012). State Wide TOD Study Factors for Success in California, Technical Appendix, California DT, 12-19.
Bandarian, R. (2013). Strategies for implementation of technology development and commercialization projects at the Research Institute of Oil Industry. Quarterly of Technology Development Management, 2, 87-101. (In Persian)
Cahill, C., Palcic, D., & Reeves, E. (2017). Commercialisation and airport performance: The case of Ireland's DAA. Journal of Air Transport Management, 59, 155-163.
Entezari, Y., & Mahjub, H. (2014). Analysis of the Development of Iranian Knowledge Economy Based on the Outlook 1404, Journal of Culture Strategy. 24, 97.(In Persian)
Etzkowitz, H. (2016). The evolution of technology transfer.
Frishammar, J., Lichtenthaler, U., & Rundquist, J. (2012). Identifying technology commercialization opportunities: the importance of integrating product development knowledge. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29 (4), 573-589.
Goodarzi, M., Bomdad Sufi, Sh., Arabi, S. M., & Amiri, M. (1391). A Comprehensive Model of Technology Commercialization in Iranian Government Researches, Quarterly Journal of Technology Development Management, 1, 37-69. (In Persian)
Hsu, D. W., Shen, Y. C., Yuan, B. J., & Chou, C. J. (2015). Toward successful commercialization of university technology: Performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 25-39.
Kassicieh, S. K., & Radosevich, H. R. (Eds.). (2013). from lab to market: commercialization of public sector technology. Springer Science & Business Media.
Lee, J. C., Hong, J. W., & Lee, S. K. (2016). A study on Business Model Consulting Framework for Technology Commercialization of ICT SMEs. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9 (26).
Lee, M.N.N. (2014). Restructuring Higher Education in Malaysia. Available at: www. cshe.nagoyau.ac.jp/seminar/kokusai/lee.pdfwww.cshe.nagoyau.ac.jp/seminar/kokusai/lee.pdf
Litman.T. (2004). Evaluating Public Transit Benefits and Costs, Victoria Transport Policy Institute. WWW .vtpi.org.
Livingston, C. A., Fabre, K. M., & Tagle, D. A. (2016). Facilitating the commercialization and use of organ platforms generated by the microphysiological systems (Tissue Chip) program through public–private partnerships. Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 14, 207-210.
Ltd., T. P. (2000). Quality Bus infrastructure, A Manual and Guide London, Labor publishing.
M’Chirgui, Z., Lamine, W., Mian, S., & Fayolle, A. (2016). University technology commercialization through new venture projects: An assessment of the French regional incubator program. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-19.
Mirzaee, H.A., Athari, Ebadi A. (1394). Interviewing Writer. (In Persian)
Myres, F. (2010). the benefits of public transit in Lee county, Florida".
O’kane, C., Mangematin, V., Geoghegan, W., & Fitzgerald, C. (2015). University technology transfer offices: The search for identity to build legitimacy. Research Policy, 44(2), 421-437.
Padfield, R., Tham, M. H., Costes, S., & Smith, L. (2016). Uneven development and the commercialisation of public utilities: A political ecology analysis of water reforms in Malaysia. Utilities Policy, 40, 152-161.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., & Krabel, S. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research policy, 42 (2), 423-442.
Rossiyskaya, Schwandl, R. (2014). Samara. UrbanRail.Net. Retrieved 8 January.
Saeed, A. (1383). Income on the urban economy. University Publication Center. (In Persian)
Sarrashedari, N. (2008). Public Transportation and its Effects on the Environment, 9th Rail Transportation Conference. Tehran, Rail Transportation Association, University of Science and Technology. (In Persian)
Schacht, W. H. (2012). Technology transfer: Use of federally funded research and development.
Schwandl, R. ) 2013(.Chengdu. UrbanRail.Net. Retrieved 7 January.
Sengupta, S., Mohr, J., & Slater, S. (2006). Strategic opportunities at the intersection of globalization, technology and lifestyles. Handbook of Business Strategy, 7(1), 43-50.
Shakeri, Ata, Faridmar, Modaberi, Soroush, (2011), Environmental impacts of large industrial city of Shiraz on heavy metal release to Qarabagh drainage, Second National Conference on Water Resources Research, Zanjan, Zanjan Regional Water Company. (In Persian)
Slater, S. F., & Mohr, J. J. (2006). Successful development and commercialization of technological innovation: insights based on strategy type. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 26-33.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Sage publications.
Weckowska, D. M. (2015). Learning in university technology transfer offices: Transactions-focused and relations-focused approaches to commercialization of academic research. Technovation, 41, 62-74.
Willson, R. (2009). Parking Policy for Transit-Oriented Development: Lessons forCities, Transit.