تعیین و بهبود محدوده‌های بالقوه وقوع جرم د توسط رهیافت "جلوگیری از جرائم از طریق طراحی محیطی" (مطالعه موردی: محله همت‌آباد شهر اصفهان)
محورهای موضوعی : مطالعات برنامه ریزی شهری و منطقه ای
1 - استادیار گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
کلید واژه: امنیت, پیشگیری از جرم, اسکان غیررسمی, محله همت آباد اصفهان, رهیافت "جلوگیری از جرایم شهری با استفاده از طراحی محیطی",
چکیده مقاله :
هدف این تحقیق بررسی و تحلیل محله همت‌آباد از منظر اصول رهیافت "جلوگیری از جرائم شهری با استفاده از طراحی محیطی" جهت شناسایی نقاط بالقوه برای وقوع جرم، و ارائه پیشنهادهایی در جهت ارتقای امنیت این محله به‌صورت خاص (پیلوت عملی رهیافت) بر اساس جنبه مکانی بخشیدن به اصول رهیافت "جلوگیری از جرائم شهری با استفاده از طراحی محیطی" می‌باشد. برای دستیابی به این هدف از روش تحقیق توصیفی- تحلیلی از نوع موردکاوانه (محله همت‌آباد) استفاده گردید و برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از مطالعه کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی (مشاهده‌ای و پرسشنامه‌ای) و برای تحلیل داده‌های جمع‌آوری شده، از سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی (GIS) و نرم‌افزارهای SPSS و Expert Choice کمک گرفته شد. نتایج حاکی از آن است که اولاً از منظر رهیافت "جلوگیری از جرائم شهری با استفاده از طراحی محیطی" (شامل اصل "تقویت نظارت طبیعی" با 4 سنجه، اصل "قابلیت کنترل دسترسی‌ها" با 3 سنجه، اصل "تقویت قلمروهای طبیعی" با 5 سنجه، اصل "حفظ و نگهداری از محیط" با یک سنجه و اصل "حمایت از فعالیت-های اجتماعی سالم" با 2 سنجه)، محله همت‌آباد دارای نقاط بالقوه بسیاری برای وقوع جرم است و ثانیاً در مجموع بر اساس سنجه‌های رهیافت "جلوگیری از جرائم شهری با استفاده از طراحی محیطی" بیشترینِ این نقاط بالقوه برای وقوع جرم، ، در بدنه و حاشیه محله همت‌آباد اصفهان، و نه در مرکز این محله، قرار دارند و این موضوع به‌ویژه به دلیل کمبود قابلیت نظارت طبیعی، فعالیت‌های اجتماعی به‌هنجار و حفاظت و نگهداری از محیط در این محدوده‌ها است.
The aim of this research is to apply Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) approach for security improvement of Hematabad district in Isfahan as the case study. To achieve this goal, we used documentary and surveying methods for data gathering and geographic information system (GIS), SPSS and expert choice software for data analysis and overlaying. Results indicate that Hematabad district have a lot of potential point for crime in term of CPTED approach and in terms of the principles of CPTED approach (Consists of "enhancing natural surveillance", "enhancing natural access control", "Territorial reinforcement", "Protection and maintenance of environment" and "community-based activity support"). Also, the results show overall, according to the measures of the CPTED, most of these potential points for the occurrence of crime are located in the piriphery the Hemmat Abad district in Isfahan, not in the center of the district. This is especially due to the lack of "natural surveillance capabilities", "community-based activities" and the "protection and maintenance of the environment" in these areas.
Altman, I. (1976). Environment and Social Behaviour. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
Armitage, R., & Monchuk, L. (2010). Sustaining the Crime Reduction Impact of Designing Out Crime: Re-evaluating the Secured by Design Scheme 10 Years on. University of Huddersfield.
Atlas, R., & Leblanc, W.G. (1994). Environmental Barriers to Crime. Ergonomics in Design, Vol. 2. pp. 9-16.
Bahraini, S. H., & Tajbakhsh, G. (1998). The concept of territory in urban space and the role of insider city design in its realization. Fine Arts, Tehran University, No. 6, Pages. 18-31 (In Persian).
Bennett, T. (1986). Situational Crime Prevention from The Offender Perspective. In Heal & Laycoke.
Brinckerhoff, J. J. (1994). A Sense of Place, A Sense of Time. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.
Brown, B.B. & Bentley, D.L. (1993). Residential burglars judge risk: the role of territoriality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 13, No.1. pp. 51-61.
Canter, D. V. (2007). The psychology of place, new edition. the University of Michigan. Michigan.
Cochran, William, Jay. (2006). Sampling techniques. Translation by Abbas Saleh Ardestani, Mohammad Reza Saadi, Publishing Union, Tehran (In Persian).
Cozens, P., & Love, T. (2015). A Review and Current Status of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED). Vol 30, Issue 4, pp. 1-20.
Cozens, P. M., Hillier, D. & Thorn, M. (2008). Designing out crime in Western Australia: a case study. Property Management, Vol. 26. No. 5, pp. 295-309.
Cozens, P., Hiller, D., & Prescott, G. (2001). Crime and the design residential Property–Exploring the Theoretical Background. Journal of Property Management, Vol.19, Issue 2, 136-164.
Crowe, T. (2000). Crime Prevention through Environmental Design. 2nd edition. Boston: Butterworth - Heinman.
Falahat, M. S. (2006). The concept of the sense of place and its forming factors. Beautiful Arts, No. 26, pp. 57-66 (In Persian).
Giordano, L. M. (2008), Land Use, Street Networks, and Crime Patterns in the Mattapan Section of Boston, Massachusetts, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the ASC Annual Meeting, St. Louis Adam's Mark, St. Louis, Missouri, November 12, pp. 44-56.
Gronland, B. (2000). Towards the Humans City for the 21st Century. Stockholm.
Ha, T., et al., (2015). Comparative analysis of Defensible Space in CPTED housing and non-CPTED housing, International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp. 496-511.
Hashemi, S. M., Mahmoudinejad, H., & Ahadian, O. (2011). Improvement of environment security and decrease of crimes with the confirmation of CPTED (with the emphasis on Iran’s condition). Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 4, No. 3, 142-151
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Vintage Books.
Landsman, K. (2000). An Overview of Enclosed Neighborhoods in South Africa, CSIR, Pretoria.
Mahmoudi-jahani, Firooz & Majid Gourchibibi. (2009). The Role of Environmental Design in Crime Prevention. Quarterly Journal of Law, Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages. 345-367 (In Persian).
Md Sakip, S.R., & Abdullah, A. (2017). CPTED Measures in a Gated Residential Area. Asian Journal of Environmen-Behaviour Studies, 2(4), pp.33-42.
Meyer, T., & Qhobela, M. (1998). The History of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design: A Comparative Study. Pretoria: CSIR.
Mortazai, R. (2002). Designing a tool for coping with vandalism in urban environment, Municipality Magazine, Third Year, No. 52 (In Persian).
Najafi Abrandabadi, A. H., & Hashem Beigi, H. (1998). Criminology Encyclopedia. Tehran, Shahid Beheshti University Press (In Persian).
Nooraie, H., Rezaei, N., & Alizadeh, S. (2010). Investigating the security of the urban spaces of the marginal neighborhoods and providing improvement strategies (Case study: Golshan Park, Khol-e-Sefid District of Tehran). Presented at the 2nd Conference on the Reconstruction and Reconstruction of Historic Texts, Exhausted and Informal Settlements, Shiraz, Housing and Urban Development (In Persian).
Norberg-Schulz, Ch. (1997). The Phenomenon of Place. Princton Architectural Press, New York.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. (2004). Safer Places: The Planning System and Crime Prevention, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, Home Office, London.
Police station in Isfahan. (2013). Intelligence ID of Police Station, 3 Police Station, Esfahan, 16. Isfahan Police Command, Prevention Police (In Persian).
Pour Jafar, M.R., Mahmoudinezhad, H., Rafiean, M., & Ansari, M. (2008). Promoting environmental safety and reducing urban crime with an emphasis on the CPTED approach. International Journal of Engineering Sciences of Iran University of Science and Technology, Special Issue on Architecture and Urban Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 73-82 (In Persian).
Poyner, B. (1983). Designing Against Crime: Beyond Defensible Space. Butterworths, London.
Poyner, B. (1993). What works in crime prevention: an overview of evaluations, in Clarke, R.V. (Ed.), Crime Prevention Studies, Volume 1, Criminal Justice Press, New York, NY.
Ranjbar, H., Salsaly, A., Khoshdel, M., Soleimani, A., Bahrami, M., & Bahrami, N. (2012). Sampling for qualitative research: starting Guidance. Olum va Salamat Research. Vol 10. pp. 238-250 (In Persian).
Rapoport, A. (1990). The meaning of the built environment: a nonverbal communication approach. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. Pion, London.
Salehi, I. (2011). Planning and environmental design of urban environment security. Publications of the municipality and state organizations (In Persian).
Shamai, Sh. (1991). Sense of place: An empirical measurement, Geoforum, Vol. 22, Issue 3: pp. 347–358.
Sharmand Consultant Engineers. (2006). Isfahan Wasted Textile Management Plan: Report of Level 1 Studies, Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, Civil Engineering and Improvement Company (In Persian).
Stucky, T. D. & Ottensmann, J. R. (2009). Land use and Violent Crime, Criminology, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 1223-1264.
Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology with Examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100.
Tuan, Y. F. (2001). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Univ of Minnesota Press.
Wekerle, M., Whitzman, R. (1995). Safe Cities: Guidelines for Planning, Design and Management; Van Nostrand Reinhold, USA.
Wilson james & George Kling. (2003). Broken Window Theory. Translation by Muhammad Sadri of Monahid Khan. Journal of Justice and Justice of Justice, No. 34 (In Persian).
Wilson, J.Q., & Knelling, G.L. (1999). Making Neighborhoods Safe, The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 263, Number 2, pp. 46-52.
Woldendorp T. (2015). Improving the quality of life in high-rise. A sustainable approach CPTED observed in the public realm in Widzew, [w:] Janiszewska A. (red.), Jakość życia ludzi starych – wybrane problemy, „Space – Society – Economy”, 14, Department of Population and Services Studies, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź, s. 213–225.
_||_