بررسی ویژگی های روانسنجی مقیاس طمع هایزلمن
محورهای موضوعی : روان سنجیملیکا مرشدلو 1 , محسن جدیدی 2 *
1 -
2 - دانشیار، گروه روان‏شناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد شهر قدس، شهر قدس، ایران
کلید واژه: روانسنجی, مقیاس, طمع, هایزلمن,
چکیده مقاله :
مقدمه: ساخت پرسشنامه «مقیاس طمع هایزلمن» در نمونه ایرانی، دانش بسیاری را در مورد تغییرات فرهنگی طمع و نقش آن در رفتارهای روانی اجتماعی در جامعه ارائه میدهد. این پرسشنامه یک بعد فرهنگی در رابطه با طمع افراد است و تاثیر عوامل اجتماعی- فرهنگی را مشخص میکند. هدف از پژوهش حاضر، ساخت و اعتباریابی نسخه فارسی مقیاس طمع هایزلمن بود.
روش کار: این پژوهش از نوع همبستگی با هدف توصیفی است. روش همبستگی با استفاده از تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و ماتریس همبستگی میباشد. این پژوهش کابردی و از نوع توسعه ابزار است. برای بررسی ویژگیهای روانسنجی این پرسشنامه شاخصهای آماری KMO، آزمون بارتلت، وزنهای عاملی استفاده شده؛ همچنین جهت بررسی همسانی گویهها از آلفای کرونباخ و روش تنصیف استفاده گردید.
یافته ها: پرسشنامه مقیاس طمع هایزلمن شامل 20 سوال است. نتیجه تحلیل عامل اکتشافی این پرسشنامه، سه عامل شامل: سیری ناپذیری در همه موارد، حرص بیشتر، پول دوستی میباشد. این سه عامل در مجموع 78 درصد واریانس کل آزمون را تبیین کردند ، ضریب آلفای کرونباخ کلی 0.823 به دست آمد.
نتیجه گیری: با توجه به روایی و پایایی مطلوب پرسشنامه 20 گویهای طمع در جامعه ایرانی؛ بکارگیری پرسشنامه طمع توسط محققین در زمینه ارزیابی ریسک اعتیاد، پژوهش های روان شناختی، ارزیابی قمار و مشاوره توصیه میشود.
Introduction: The construction of the Heintzelman Greed Scale questionnaire in an Iranian sample provides a lot of knowledge about the cultural changes of greed and its role in psychosocial behaviors in society. This questionnaire is a cultural dimension related to individuals' greed and identifies the impact of socio-cultural factors. The aim of the present study was to construct and validate the Persian version of the Heintzelman Greed Scale.
Methods: This is a correlational study with a descriptive purpose. The correlational method uses exploratory factor analysis and correlation matrix. This is an applied and instrument development study. To examine the psychometric properties of this questionnaire, KMO statistical indicators, Bartlett test, and factor weights were used; Cronbach's alpha and the split-half method were also used to examine the homogeneity of the items.
Results: The Heintzelman Greed Scale questionnaire consists of 20 items. The result of the exploratory factor analysis of this questionnaire is three factors: insatiability in all cases, greater greed, and money-loving. These three factors explained 78% of the total variance of the test, and the overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.823.
Conclusion: Given the desirable validity and reliability of the 20-item greed questionnaire in Iranian society; the use of the greed questionnaire by researchers in the field of addiction risk assessment, psychological research, gambling assessment, and counseling is recommended.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Balot, R. K. (2001). Greed and injustice in classic Athens. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Bloch, A. P. (1984). A book of Jewish ethical concepts. Ktav Publishing House.
Bruhn, J. G., & Lowrey, J. (2012). The good and bad about greed: How the manifestations of greed can be used to improve organizational and individual behavior and performance. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 64(2), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029355
Cassill, D., & Watkins, A. (2004). Mogul games: In defense of inequality as an evolutionary strategy to cope with multiple agents of selection. In R. Koppl (Ed.), Evolutionary psychology and economic theory: Advances in Austrian economics (Vol. 7, pp. 35–59). Elsevier.
Cervellati, M., & Vanin, P. (2013). Moral values and economic behavior: The role of greed in self-regulation. *Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization*, 92, 123-135.
Chen, B. (2018). An evolutionary life history approach to understanding greed. Personality and Individual Differences, 127, 74-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.006
Crusius, J., Thierhoff, J., Lange, J. (2021). Dispositional Greed Predicts benign and Malicious Envy. Personality and Individual Differences. (Vol. 168). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110361
DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Dimitrov, D. M. (2012). Statistical methods for validation of assessment scale data in counseling and related fields. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
Eriksson, K., Vartanova, I., Strimling, P., Simpson, B., & Simpson, B. (2020). Generosity pays: Selfish people have fewer children and earn less money. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(3), 532–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000213
Gilliland, S. W., & Anderson, J. S. (2014). On the psychology of greed. In J. K. Ford, J. R.
Gordon, R. A. (1963). Ambition and social progress: A sociological analysis. *Sociological Quarterly*, 4(3), 215-230.
Greed: What Is It Good for?¬\ Karlijn Hoyer1 , Marcel Zeelenberg1,2 , and Seger M. Breugelmans 2022
Greenfeld, L. (2001). The spirit of capitalism: Nationalism and economic growth. Harvard University Press.
Haladyna, T. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2013). Developing and validating test items. New York, NY: Routledge.
Haynes, K. T. (2021). The psychology of greed. In A. W. Kruglanski, C. Kopetz, & E. Szumowska (Eds.), The psychology of extremism: A motivational perspective (pp. 203–229). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003030898-11
Heintzelman Greed Scale© (HGS©) Theoretical Framework and Item Development .Glenn W.
Helzer, E. G., & Rosenzweig, E. (2020). Examining the role of harm-to-others in lay perceptions of greed. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 160, 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.02.008
Hollenbeck, & A. M. Ryan (Eds.), The nature of work: Advances in psychological theory, methods, and practice (pp. 99–116). APA Press.
Hoyer, K. (2022). Insatiable desires: How dispositional greed affects everyday life (Doctoral thesis). Tilburg University.
Hoyer, K., Zeisberger, S., Breugelmans, S. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2021). Greed and individual trading behavior in experimental asset markets. Decision.
Jett, W. (2000). A general theory of acquisitivity: On human nature, productivity and survival. Writer’s Digest.
Joubert, C. E. (2013). The moral psychology of greed: A theoretical exploration. *Journal of Moral Psychology*, 2(1), 45-60.
Kirchgassner, G. (2014). On self-interest and greed. Journal of Business Economics, 84, 1191-1209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-014-0737-1
Krekels, G. (2015). Essays on dispositional greed: The effect of insatiability on consumer behavior (Doctoral dissertation). Universiteit Gent, Belgium.
Krekels, G., & Pandelaere, M. (2015). Dispositional greed. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 225-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.036
Lambie and Jaimie Stickl Haugen University of Central Florida College of Community Innovation and Education 2019.
Lambie, G. W., & Stickl Haugen, J. (2019). Understanding greed as a unified construct. Personality and Individuals Difference, 141, 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.12.011
Lambie, G. W., & Stickl Haugen, J. (2019). Understanding greed as a unified construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.12.011 Lambie, G. W., Blount, A. J., & Mullen, P. R. (2017). Establishing content-oriented evidence for psychological assessments. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50, 210-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1336930 Levine, D. P. (2000). The attachment of greed to self-interest. Psychoanalytic Studies, 2, 131- 140. Li, X., Dang, J., Liu, L., Liang, Yu. & (2021). Are Greedy Individuals More Corrupt? Current Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01415-1 Livingstone, S. M., & Lunt, P. K. (1992). Predicting personal debt and debt repayment: Psychological, social and economic determinants. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(92)90055-C Melleuish, G. (2009). Greed is great. IPA Review, 61(2), 23–24. Mussel, P., Reiter, A. M., Osinsky, R., & Hewig, J. (2015). State and trait-greed, its impact on risky decision-making and underlying neural mechanisms. Social Neuroscience, 10, 126-134. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.965340 Mussel, P., Rodrigues, J., Krumm, S., & Hewig, J. (2018). The convergent validity of five Dispositional Greed Scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 131, 249–253. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.006 Oka, R., & Kuijt, I. (2014a). Introducing an inquiry into the social economies of greed and excess. Economic Anthropology, 1, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12000 Richins, M. L. (2004). The material values scale: Measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1086/383436 Robertson, A. F. (2001). Greed: Gut feelings, growth, and history. Polity Press. Scorsese, M. (Producer), & Scorsese, M. (Director). (2013). The wolf of Wall Street [Motion picture]. United States: Paramount Pictures. Sekhar, S., Uppa, N., & Shukla, A. (2020). Dispositional greed and its dark allies: An investigation among prospective managers. Personality and Individual Differences, 162, Article 110005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110005 Seuntjens, T. G., Zeelenberg, M., Breugelmans, S. M., & Van de Ven, N. (2015a). Defining greed. British Journal of Psychology, 106, 505-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12100 Seuntjens, T. G., Zeelenberg, M., Van de Ven, N., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2015b). Dispositional greed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 917-933. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000031.
Seuntjens, T. G., Zeelenberg, M., Van de Ven, N., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2019). Greedy bastards: Testing the relationship between wanting more and unethical behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018. 09.027
TerBush, K. (2021). The irrationality of greed. In M. S. Pritchard & E. Englehardt (Eds.), Everyday greed: Analysis and appraisal (pp. 69–82). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-030-70087-4_5
Tickle, P. A. (2004). Greed: The seven deadly sins. Oxford University Press.
Tripathi, R. C., & Singh, S. (2017). Psychosocial pathways towards a sustainable society: The role of greed, altruism and social capital. Psychology and Developing Societies, 29, 200-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333617721761
Van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2011). The envy premium in product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 984–998. https://doi.org/10.1086/657239
Verburg, R. (2012). The rise of greed in early economic thought: From deadly sin to social benefit. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 34(4), 515–539. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1053837212000508.
Wang, L., & Murnighan, J. K. (2009). Economics and greed. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual International Association of Conflict Management Conference. Koyoto, Japan.
Wang, L., Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2011). Economics education and greed. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10, 643-660. http://dx/doi.org/10.5465.amle.2009.0185
Wight, J. B. (2005). Adam Smith and greed. Journal of Private Enterprise, 21(1), 46–58.
Williams, W. E. (2000). Greed versus compassion. https://fee.org/ articles/greed-versus-compassion/
Zeelenberg, M., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2022). The good, bad and ugly of dispositional greed. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101323
حسنی حمیدآبادی، م.، یزدانپناه مهرعلی، م.، و جهانیان، س. (1399). بررسی تطبیقی رویکرد قرآن کریم و مثنوی معنوی به حرص و طمع. *پژوهشهای اسلامی و اخلاقی*
طباطبایی، س. م. ح. (1374). *المیزان فی تفسیر القرآن* (ترجمه مهدی موسوی همدانی، چاپ پنجم). قم: جامعه مدرسین حوزه علمیه قم.