• صفحه اصلی
  • اثر بخشی آموزش بازی‌های شناختی شنیداری بر واج آگاهی دانش‌آموزان نارساخوان

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : JPMM-2204-3624 (R1) بازدید : 56 صفحه: 67 - 81

10.30495/jpmm.2022.30290.3624

20.1001.1.22285516.1401.13.48.5.7

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

اثر بخشی آموزش بازی‌های شناختی شنیداری بر واج آگاهی دانش‌آموزان نارساخوان

محورهای موضوعی : تکتونواستراتیگرافی

مرضیه زینی 1 , سعید رضایی 2 , عنبر شکری 3 , محمد بلوچی انارکی 4

1 - کارشناس کم توان ذهنی آموزش و پرورش استثنایی یزد
2 - دانشیار گروه روان‌شناسی و آموزش پرورش کودکان استثنائی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی تهران.
3 - کارشناس ارشد روان‌شناسی و آموزش پرورش کودکان استثنایی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی تهران.
4 - کارشناس ارشد روان‌شناسی و آموزش پرورش کودکان استثنایی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی تهران.

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/01/27 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/08/13 تاریخ انتشار : 1401/05/01

کلید واژه: دانش آموزان نارساخوان, آگاهی واج شناختی, بازی های شناختی شنیداری, طرح پژوهش تک آزمودنی,

چکیده مقاله :

زمینه و هدف: اختلال خواندن شایع‌ترین اختلال یادگیری است که بیشترین حجم خدمات آموزشی ویژه و برنامه‌ای مداخله ای تخصصی را به خود اختصاص می‌دهد. هدف کلی این پژوهش تعیین اثربخشی مداخلات آموزشی بازی های شناختی شنیداری بر واج آگاهی کودکان نارساخوان بود.

روش بررسی: پنج دانش آموز با اختلال خواندن در پایه اول ابتدایی از یک کلینک زیر نظر آموزش و پرورش یزد به عنوان آزمودنی‌های شرکت کننده در پژوهش انتخاب شدند. طرح پژوهش، تک آزمودنی از نوع طرح چند خط پایه ای با آزمودنی های مختلف بود. برای تشخیص اختلال خواندن، از آزمون آگاهی واج شناختی و مقیاس تجدید نظر شده هوشی وکسلر کودکان استفاده شد. داده های مورد نیاز در شرایط مختلف خط پایه، مداخله، و پیگیری جمع‌آوری شد. در شرایط مداخله آزمایشی هر آزمودنی دست کم دوازده جلسه اثر بخشی آموزش بازی‌های شناختی شنیداری بر واج‌آگاهی کودکان نارساخوان به مدت 60-45 دقیقه دریافت کرد، اما در شرایط خط پایه و شرایط پیگیری هیچ یک از آنها آموزش بازی‌های شناختی شنیداری بر واج آگاهی کودکان نارساخوان را دریافت نکردند. مقایسه عملکرد آزمودنی‌ها در شرایط خط پایه، مداخله و پیگیری نشان داد که آموزش مستقیم آموزش بازی‌های شناختی شنیداری بر واج‌آگاهی کودکان نارساخوان مهارت خواندن هر پنج آزمودنی تأثیر مثبت داشته و این یادگیری در طول زمان پایدار مانده است.

نتیجه گیری : اثر بخشی آموزش بازی‌های شناختی شنیداری بر واج آگاهی کودکان نارساخوان در دوره ابتدایی تأثیر مثبت دارد و موجب افزایش مهارت خواندن در آنها می شود.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Background and Aim: Reading disorder is the most common learning disorder that accounts for the largest number of special education services and specialized intervention programs. The overall purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of educational interventions in listening cognitive games on phonological awareness of dyslexic children Research. Methods:. Five students with reading disorders in the first grade of elementary school from a clinic under the supervision of Yazd Education were selected as participants in the study. The research design was a single subject of multi-line design with different subjects.
To diagnose reading disorder, phonological awareness test and revised Wechsler children's IQ scale were used. The required data were collected in different baseline conditions, intervention, and follow-up. In the case of experimental intervention, each subject received at least twelve sessions of effectiveness of listening cognitive games training on the vocabulary of dyslexic children for 45-60 minutes, but in the baseline and follow-up conditions, none of them received cognitive games training. They did not receive phonological hearing from dyslexic children. Comparison of subjects' performance in baseline, intervention and follow-up conditions showed that direct instruction in listening cognitive games had a positive effect on the vocabulary of reading dyslexic children of all five subjects and this learning remained stable over time.
Conclusion: The effectiveness of teaching cognitive listening games has a positive effect on the phonology of dyslexic children in primary school and increases their reading skills.

منابع و مأخذ:


  1. Melekoglu, M. A. (2011). Impact of motivation to read on reading gains for struggling readers with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(4), 248-261.
    2.
  2. Dodastan, (1387). Language disorders: methods of diagnosis and rehabilitation. Samt Publications.
    3.
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.
    4.
  4. Hallahan, D; Lloyd, J.; Kaufman, J; Weiss, M.; Martins, (2014). Learning (basics, characteristics and effective teaching) translated by Alizadeh, H; Hemti Alamdarlou, A.; Rezaei Dehnavi, S. and Shujaei, S. (2016) Tehran: Arsbaran.
    5.
  5. Brooks, A.D., Berninger, V.W., & Abbott, R.D. (2011). Letter naming and letter writing reversals in children with dyslexia: Momentary inefficiency in the phonological and or ethnographic loops of working memory. Dev Neuropsychol. 36(7): 84 -95.
    6.
  6. Laing, S. P. & EspelanW. (2005). Low intensity phonological awareness training in a
    preschool classroom for children with communication impairments, Journal of
    Communication Disorders, 38(7), 65–82
    7.
  7. Harley, T. A. (2013). The psychology of language: From data to theory. New York: Psychology press
    8.
  8. Hecht, S. A. (2001). The relations between phonological processing abilities and emerging individual differences in mathematical computation skills: A longitudinal study from second to fifth grades. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79(4), 192–227
    9.
  9. Spencer, E. J., Schuele, C. M., Guillot, K. M., & Lee, M. W. (2011). Phonemic Awareness Skill of Undergraduate and Graduate Students Relative to Speech-Language Pathologists and Other Educators. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science & Disorders, 38, 109-118.
    10.
  10. Zigler, J.C., & Goswami, U. (2005). “Reading acquisition, Developmental Dyslexia and Skill Reading across Language: A Psycholinguistic Grain Size Theory”.Psychological Bulletin. American Psychological Association: 131(1), 3-29
    11.
  11. Jalalian Chalantari, Marzieh; Zarifian, Talia; Dastjerdi Kazemi, Mehdi; and Molodi, Reza (2016) Development of visual test of phonological awareness of phoneme elimination and determination of its validity and reliability in Persian language students from first to third grade of elementary school. Exceptional Children Quarterly, 17-65-82
    12.


  1. Moura, O., Simões , M. R. & Pereira, M. (2015). Executive Functioning in Children with
    Developmental Dyslexia. Clin Neuropsychol, 28(1), 20-41
    2.


  1. Abbas Bakhshipour ، Majid Mahmood Alilou  ،   Mohammadali Nazari  ،   Elnaz Mousanezhad Jeddi (2022). The effect of coherence training via neurofeedback on the improvement of reading in children with dyslexia: New Psychological Research Quarterly. June 1, 2022
    2.


  1. Ramus, F. & Ahissar, M. (2012). "Developmental dyslexia: the difficulties to interpreting
    poor performance, and the importance of normal performance". Cognitive
    neuropsychology, 29(1-2), 104-122.
    2.
  2. Tibi, S., & Kirby, J. R. (2018). Investigating phonological awareness and naming speed as
    predictors of reading in Arabic. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(1), 70-84
    3.
  3. Cowan, N., Hogan, T. P., Alt, M., Green, S., Cabbage, K. L., Brinkley, S. & Gray, S. (2017). Short‐term memory in childhood dyslexia: Deficient serial order in multiple
    Dyslexia. 23 (3), 209-233
    4.
  4. Masoumi, A., Aranikashani, Z. & Kamali, M. (2014). Investigating the effect of length and The syllabic structures of pseudowords on the frequency of speech disorders in adults, (3) has a stutter. Quarterly Journal of Paramedical Sciences and Rehabilitation, Mashhad, 451-58
    5.
  5. Pullen, P. C., & Justice, L. M. (2003). Enhancing phonological awareness, print awareness, and oral language skills in preschool children. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39(2), 87-98.
    6.
  6. Moura, O., Simões, M. R. & Pereira, M. (2015). Executive Functioning in Children with Developmental Dyslexia. Clin Neuropsychol, 28(1), 20-41.
    7.
  7. Omidhar, D., Sabzi, H., & Porpanahi Kol Tepe, 1397; Nazari, Vahedi, Roshandel Rad and Kafi, 1395. The effect of education based on developmental physical education on the working memory of elementary school students. Journal of School Psychology, (1) 7, 101 83
    8.
  8. Barger-Anderson, R., Domaracki, J.W., Kearney Vakulick, N., Kubina, Jr. RM. Multiple baseline
    designs: the use of a single-case experimental design in literacy research. Reading Improvement. 2004;41(4):217-25
    9.
  9. Afrooz, G., Kamkari, K., Shekarzadeh, S., Halet, A. (2013) Implementation guide, Scoring and interpretation of children's Wechsler intelligence scales - 4th edition. Tehran: Alam Ostadan Publications.
    10.
  10. Soleimani, Z. (2008). Its phonological awareness and spelling scores of Farsispeaking students in the elementary .taz·h Cognitive Science, 10 (1), 21-28
    11.
  11. .Soleimani, Z. (2010). Phonological awareness test and its psychometric characteristics. Tehran: Cent Exceptional Children, 5 (2), 58-65
    12.
  12. Dastjerdi Kazemi, Mehdi and Soleimani, Zahra (2012) Phonological awareness test. Tehran: Exceptional Children Research School, Exceptional Education Organization of the country.
    13.
  13. Hamidpour, H. (2016). Investigating the efficiency and effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) in treating and preventing the recurrence and return of depression. Research in psychological health. First cycle, second issue, 25-3
    14.
  14. Dastjerdi Kazemi, M., & Soleimani, Z. (2015). Determining the validity and reliability of phonological awareness test. Research in the field of exceptional children, 58. 43
    15.
  15. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Pearson
    16.
  16. Meshkani, M., Nouri, I.; Lotfi, M., & Ebadi-Niya, Q. (2016) The effect of strengthening phonological awareness on improving reading and self-esteem of dyslexic students. Journal of child mental health
    17.
  17. Hecht, S. A. (2001). The relations between phonological processing abilities and emerging individual differences in mathematical computation skills: A longitudinal study from second to fifth grades. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79(4), 192–227.
    18.
  18. Modirect, Z. A., & Soleimani, Z. (1384). The effect of phonological awareness training on reading ability 22-32) (1) Mentally retarded girls in the second grade of primary school. Cognitive science news, 7
    19.
  19. . Tabrizi, M. (2001). Treatment of reading .entsharat creative discourse, Erwin printing, printing.
    20.
  20. Michael, F. & Farahani, M. N. (2005). Van den will study the phonological processing in normal and dyslexic school male students. Research on Exceptional Children, 5 (4), 379-416.
    21.
  21. Kaltner, S., & Jansen, P. (2014). Mental rotation and motor performance in children with developmental dyslexia. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 3(35): 741-754.
    22.
  22. Pape-Neumann, J., Ermingen-Marbach, M.V., Grande, M., Willmes, K., & Heim, S. (2015). The role phonological awareness in treatments of dyslexic primary school
    Acta Nurobiol Exp, 75, 80-106
    23.

 

 

 

 

_||_

مقالات مرتبط

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]