تدوین بسته آموزشی انصراف از طلاق و تعیین اثر بخشی آن بر میل به طلاق زنان متاهل مایل به طلاق در مقایسه با روش گاتمن
محورهای موضوعی : تکتونواستراتیگرافی
زهرا پاداش
1
,
زهرا یوسفی
2
,
محمدرضا عابدی
3
,
هاجر ترکان
4
1 - دانشجوی دکتری مشاوره، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران
2 - استادیار گروه روان‌شناسی بالینی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران.
3 - استاد گروه مشاوره، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان شناسی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
4 - استادیار گروه روان‌شناسی بالینی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران.
کلید واژه: مشاوره زناشویی, روش گاتمن, انصراف از طلاق, میل به طلاق,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه و هدف: میل به طلاق زمینه ساز از هم گسیختگی ساختار بنیادی‌ترین بخش جامعه یعنی خانواده است. بنابراین پژوهش حاضر با هدف تدوین بسته آموزشی انصراف از طلاق و تعیین اثر بخشی آن بر میل به طلاق در مقایسه با روش گاتمن در زنان متأهل مایل به طلاق انجام گرفت.
مواد و روش‌ها: روش پژوهش ترکیبی از نوع اکتشافی متوالی بود. بخش کیفی با هدف کشف بازدارنده‌های طلاق و تدوین بسته آموزشی انصراف از طلاق انجام شد. نتایج در دو دسته کلی چرایی انصراف از طلاق و چگونگی مکانیسم های تداوم از هم تفکیک شدند. در بخش کمی از روش نیمه آزمایشی با طرح پیش آزمون، پس آزمون و پیگیری استفاده شد. جامعه آماری، زنان متاهل مایل به طلاق شهر اصفهان و نمونه آماری شامل 45 زن متاهل بود که به شکل در دسترس انتخاب و به شکل تصادفی در دو گروه آزمایش (گروه آموزش مبتنی بر نظریه و گروه آموزش گاتمن و گروه کنترل) (هر گروه 15 نفر) گمارش شدند. گروه های آزمایش 8 جلسه آموزش نود دقیقه ای دریافت کردند. ابزار پژوهش عبارت بود از پرسشنامه میل به طلاق ( روزبلت و همکاران ۱۹۸۶).
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که هر دو روش بر کاهش میل به طلاق موثر بوده اند و بسته آموزشی انصراف از طلاق اثر معنادارتری داشته است.
بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: یافته‌های پژوهش حاضر شاهدی بر مفید و موثر بودن بسته آموزشی انصراف از طلاق، در مداخلات خانواده بود.
Aim and Background: The desire for divorce causes the disintegration of the most fundamental structure of society, namely the family. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of developing an educational package to abandon divorce and determine its effectiveness on the desire for divorce in comparison with the Guttman method in married women seeking divorce.
Method and Materials: The research method was a combination of consecutive exploratory type. The qualitative part was done with the aim of discovering divorce barriers and compiling an educational-counseling package for divorcing. The results were divided into two general categories: why divorce is abandoned and how the mechanisms of persistence. In a small part, the quasi-experimental method with pre-test, post-test and follow-up design was used. The statistical population was married women seeking divorce in Isfahan and the statistical sample consisted of 45 married women who were selected by convenience sampling and randomly assigned to two experimental groups (theory-based education group, Guttman education group and control group) (15 people in each group). The experimental groups received 8 90-minute training sessions. The research instruments was Divorce Desire Questionnaire (Rosebelt et al., 1984).
Findings: The results showed that both methods were effective in reducing the desire for divorce and the educational package for quitting divorce had a more significant effect.
Conclusions: The findings of the present study were evidence of the usefulness and effectiveness of the divorce package in family interventions.
References
1- Trudel G, Goldfarb MR. Marital a sexual functioning and dysfunctioning. 2010; 19: 137-142.
2- Young ME, Long LL. Counselling and psychotherapy of couple. New York: The GuilfordPress.1998; 174-9.
3- Narimani M, Abasi M, Beigiankolemarz MJ, Bakhti M. Comparison of Two Approaches based on Acceptance and Commitment Training (ACT) and a Modified Version of Group Therapy on Early Maladaptive Schemas in Clients in Divorce. Quarterly Counseling and Psychotherapy Family. 1395; 4(1). [In Persian]
4- Thelen MH, Miller DJ. Handbook of adolescent psychopathology. New York. 1995; 48 (2-3): 343-9.
5- Goldenberg, H., & Goldenberg, I. Family therapy: An overview. Boston, Massachusetts: Cengage Learning. 2012.
6- Bourassa KJ, Sbarra DA, Whisman MA. Women in very low quality marriages gain life satisfaction following divorce. Journal of Family Psychology. 2015; 29(3):490-9.
7- Karney BR, Bardbury TN. Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. 2010; 72(5):1075-92.
8- Young ME, Long LL. Counseling and Therapy for Couples (SW 393R 15-Couples Counseling). 1998; New York.ISBN10:0-495-00595-9.
9- Gottman J, Swanson C, Swanson K. A General Systems Theory of Marriage: Nonlinear Difference Equation Modeling of Marital Interaction. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2002; 6(4):326-40.
10- Jiang H, Wang L, Zhang O, Liu DX, Ding J, Lei Z, Lu Q, Pan F. Family functioning, Marital Satisfaction and social support in hemodialysis patients and their spouses. Stress Health. 2015; 31(2), 166-74.
11- Maher Mofrad R. Examining the relationship between attachment styles and marital satisfaction with empathy and forgiveness mediation. Master Thesis in Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. 2017. [In Persian]
12- Afrooz Gh. Family psychology-Superior married couple. 9th ed. Tehran: Institute of parents and educators; 2006. [In Persian]
13- Jalali I, Ahadi H, Kiamanesh A. The Effectiveness of Family Training Based on Olson Approach for Family Adaptation and Cohesion. 2016. [In Persian]
14- Parvin NFA, aminian F, rafieivardjani L. Effectiveness of life skills education on marital satisfaction status of female nurse occupying in hajar hospital Shahrekord city- a clinical trial. J Clin Nurs Midw. 2014; 3(1): 37-46. [In Persian]
15- Saadat L, Zeinali A.The effect of family life education on marital satisfaction among behzisti employees. Urmia medical Journal. 2016; 27(9): 744-52. [In Persian]
16- Kline SL, Stafford L. A comparison of interaction rules and interaction frequency in relationship to marital quality. Communication Reports. 2004; 17(1): 11-26.
17- Carson JW, Carson KM, Gil KM, Baucom DH. Mindfulness-based relationship enhancement. Behavior therapy. 2004; 35(3): 471-94.
18- Xiong A, Gottman A, Park C, Baetens M, Pandza S, Matin A. The EmrR protein represses the Escherichia coli emrRAB multidrug resistance operon by directlybinding to its promoter region. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000; 44(10): 2905-7.
19- Gottman J, Swanson C, Swanson K. A General Systems Theory of Marriage: Nonlinear Difference Equation Modeling of Marital Interaction. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2002; 6(4):326-40.
20- Delavar A, Research methodology in psychology and education. Tehran: Virayesh; 2015. [In Persian].
21- Rusbult CE, Johnson DJ, Morrow GD. Predicting satisfaction and commitment in adult romantic involvements: An assessment of the generalizability of the investment model. Social Psychology Quarterly. 1986; 49(1): 81–89.
22- Zare H. rediction of marital burnout based on family function and early maladaptive schemas in employed women of Mehriz city. Thesis for MA, Yazd, Iran: Yazd University. 2017. [In Persian]
23- Padash Z, Yousefi Z, Abedi M.R, Torkan H. The exploration of marital womens divorce hinderances and providing marital counseling package based on it and comparison its effectiveness with Gottman marital therapy method efectiveness on marital satisfaction, marital adjustment and marital boredom and tendency to divorce marital womens with desire to divorce. Ph.D. Isfahan, Iran: Faculty of psychology, Islamic Azad University Khorasgan Branch. 2020. [In Persian]
24- Funk JL, Rogge RD. Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology. 2007; 21(4,): 572-583.
25- Nilforooshan P. Structural Equation Modeling Quality of Marital Relationship Based on Psychological Characteristics of Wives. PhD Thesis. Faculty of Education and Psychology. University of Esfahan. 2012. [In Persian]
26- Charmes K. Construction of contextual theory. Translated by Ghorbanizadeh et al., Tehran: Modiran Publication. 2019.
27- Yahyae Rad E, Salimi H, Asgari M, Farahbakhsh K. Developing a model for promoting marital satisfaction and examining its effectiveness in reducing the tendency to divorce. Cultural and Educational Quarterly of Women and Family. 2020; 14 (50). [In Persian]
28- Amani and Letafati. The effectiveness of communication skills training on reducing marital conflicts in couples. Quarterly Journal of Applied Consulting. 2013; 3 (2): 17-36. [In Persian]
29- Ahmadikhoei SH, Mehdad A, KeshtiAraye N. Developing of prevention of divorce training package and determination of its effectiveness on marital satisfaction and emotional divorce on employees of education organization of URMIA City Journal of Urmia School of Nursing and Midwifery. 2020; 16 (5): 106. [In Persian]
_||_