مدل معادلات ساختاری پیش بینی تنوع طلبی جنسی بر اساس کیفیت زندگی زناشویی و میانجی گری طرحواره های شناختی فعال شونده در مردان مراجعه کننده به مراکز مشاوره
محورهای موضوعی : تکتونواستراتیگرافیعزت دیره 1 , مهرداد طباطبائی شوریجه 2 , مولود کی خسروانی 3 , علی پولادی ریشهری 4
1 - گروه روانشناسی، واحد بوشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بوشهر، ایران
2 - دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی، واحد بوشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بوشهر، ایران
3 - گروه روانشناسی، گروه روانشناسی، واحد بوشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بوشهر، ایران
4 - گروه روانشناسی. دانشیار. دانشگاه پیام نور بوشهر.
کلید واژه: کیفیت زندگی زناشویی, طرحواره های فعال شونده, تنوع طلبی جنسی,
چکیده مقاله :
چکیده تنوع طلبی جنسی در تمامی جوامع و به ویژه در ایران به لحاظ ملاحظات اخلاقی و فرهنگی تا حد زیادی پنهان و ناشناخته مانده است. این مسئله موجب بروز مشکلاتی در روابط زناشویی و حفظ کانون خانواده می‌شود. پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی مدل معادلات ساختاری پیش‌بینی تنوع‌طلبی جنسی بر اساس کیفیت زندگی و با میانجیگری طرحواره‌های شناختی فعال شونده در مردان مراجعه کننده به مراکز مشاوره شهر شیراز انجام شد. روش پژوهش از نوع توصیفی- همبستگی از نوع مدل معادلات ساختاری بود. نمونه آماری ۲۴۰ مرد متأهل بود که با استفاده از روش نمونهگیری در دسترس و مطابق با ملاک کلاین از مراکز مشاوره انتخاب شدند. برای گردآوری اطلاعات از پرسشنامه توجیه روابط فرازناشویی گلاس و رایت (1992)، پرسشنامه تجدید نظر شده کیفیت زندگی زناشویی باسبی و همکاران (1995) و پرسشنامه برانگیختگی طرحواره‌های شناختی در بافت جنسی ساخته نوبرهوپینت وگویا (2000) استفاده شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد مدل تحقیق برازش خوبی دارد، متغیر پیش بین کیفیت زندگی زناشویی و متغیر میانجی طرحواره های شناختی فعال شونده با تنوع طلبی جنسی مردان رابطه معنی دار دارند. کیفیت زندگی زناشویی بر طرحواره های فعال شونده و تنوع طلبی جنسی اثر مستقیم و غیر مستقیم معنی داری داشت. همچنین نتایج نشان داد طرحواره های فعال شونده بر تنوع طلبی جنسی در مردان متأهل اثر مستقیم و غیر مستقیم معنی داری داشته و در رابطه کیفیت زندگی زناشویی و تنوع طلبی جنسی مردان مراجعه کننده به مراکز مشاوره نقش میانجی داشت.
Sexual diversity in all societies, especially in Iran, has remained largely hidden and unknown in terms of ethical and cultural considerations. This raises problems, in marital relationship, can destroy the core of family. The purpose of this study was to investigate the structural equation model for predicting sexual variety based on marital life quality with mediation of cognitive Schemes activated in men referring to consultation centers in Shiraz. The research method was a descriptive-correlational type of structural equation model. The sample consisted of 240 married men who were selected by using availability sampling method and according to Kline criteria. Three questionnaires were used to collect data, Busby et al who made the revised version of marital life quality questionnaire, Glass& Wright who developed sexual diversity scale, and cognitive schema activation questionnaire that was invented by Nobre and Pinto-Gouveia.The results of the research showed that the research model has a good fit, the result showed that there are significant relationships between predicting variable, marital life quality, and mediating variable, activated cognitive schema, with male sexual diversity. The marital life quality has a significant direct and indirect effect on activated cognitive schema and sexual diversity. Also, the results indicated that the activated cognitive schema on sexual diversity in married men have direct and indirect effects on sexual diversity. Also, activated cognitive schema has a mediator role in relation to marital life quality and sexual diversity of men.
References
Ahmadloo M, Zeinali A.(2018). Predicting of emotional divorce based on novelty seeking, negative perfectionism and insecure attachment among employed women of Urmia city. ioh; 15 (2): 64-72.
Bell CA., Kampble, SV., & Fincham, FD.(2018). Forgiveness, Attributions, and Marital Quality in U.S. and Indian Marriages, J Couple & Relationship Therap,17(4), 276-293.
Busby DM, Crane DR, Larson JH, Christensen C. (1995). A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and non-distressed couples: Construct Hierarchy and multidimensional scale. J Marital and family therap; 21(7): 289- 308.
Carpenter KM., Anderson BL, Fowler JM, Maxwell GL. (2009). Sexual self-schema as a moderator of sexual and psychological outcomes for gynecologic cancer survivors. J Arch Sexual Behav; 23(38): 828–841.
Finkel EJ, Slotter EB, Luchies LB, Walton GM, Gross, JJ.(2013). A brief intervention to promote conflict reappraisal preserves marital quality over time. J Psycho Science, 24(1): 1595-1601.
Frederick DA, Lever J,(2017). Gillespie BJ, Garcia JR. What Keeps Passion Alive? Sexual Satisfaction Is Associated With Sexual Communication, Mood Setting, Sexual Variety, Oral Sex, Orgasm, and Sex Frequency in a National U.S. Study, J Sex Res. 54(2): 186-201.
Glass, S. P., & Wright, T. L.(1992). Justifications for extramarital relationships: The association between attitudes, behaviors, and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 29(4): 361-387.
Hadi S, Eskandari H, SohrabiF, Motamedi A ,Farrokhi N.(2016). Relationship between Attachment Styles and Marital Commitment in Marital Insanity. J AdvisRes, 15 (60): 42-59.
John NA, Seme A, Rory MA, Tsui AO.(2017).Understanding the meaning of marital relationship quality among couples in peri-urban Ethiopia.J Cult Health Sex, 19(2): 267-278.
Khodabakhshikoolaee A, Bahrami S, Rasstak H.(2017). The Quality of Love and Sexual Satisfaction Survey among Loyal and Unfaithful Married Men. Socialworkmag. 5 (4) :12-5.
Khorram Abadi R, Sepehri Shamloo Z, Salehi Fadardi J, Bigdeli I.(2018). Structural model of executive function and extramarital relationship with mediating role of self-control. JCP, 6 (1):41-50.
Kline, R.B.(2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd ed. New York: The Guilford Press.
Leonhardt ND, Willoughby BJ.(2017). Pornography, provocative sexual media, and their differing associations with multiple aspects of sexual satisfaction. J Soci and PersonalRelationships, 36 (2): 618-641.
Medina JC.(2013). Causes that take to Infidelity: An analysis by sex. J Psycho Invest; 3(3):1271-279.
Modaresi F, Zahedian H, Hashemi Mohammad Abad N.(2014). The degree of marital adjustment and quality of love in divorced applicants have a history of marital betrayal and no history of marital betrayal. Journal of Armaghan Danesh, 19(1): 78-88.
Mohammadi Masiri F, Sharifi K.(2015). The role of emotional security and sexual activity in couples' tendency to relationships outside the marital domain, J Soci Psych, 2(35): 77-86.
Navaei J, Mohammadi Arya A.(2016). Association between the early Maladaptive Schemes and Extra Marital Relationship among Married People. IJPN, 3 (4):18-27.
Nobre, P. J., & Pinto-Gouveia, J.(2000). Questionnaire of Cognitive Schema Activation in Sexual Context (QCASC). Unpublished manuscript, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Science, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
Nobre, PJ. & Pinto-Gouveia J.(2009). Cognitive schemas associated with negative sexual events: a comparison of men and women with and without sexual dysfunction. Arch Sex Behav; 38(5):842-51.
Oliveira C, Nobre PJ.(2013). Cognitive structures in women with sexual dysfunction: The role of early maladaptive schemas. J Sexual Med., 10(3):1755-1763.
Otto D.(2016). Gender and Sexual Diversity: A Question of Humanity?. Melbourne J Int Law,17(2): 477- 488.
Pedersen DE.(2017). Quantity and Quality: A More Nuanced Look at the Association between Family Work and Marital Well-Being, Marriage & Family Rev; 53(3): 281-306.
Peixoto MM, Nobre P. (2017).Macho Beliefs Moderate the Association Between Negative Sexual Episodes and Activation of Incompetence Schemas in Sexual Context, in Gay and Heterosexual Men. J Sex Med; 14(4): 518-525.
Quinta-Gomes A, & Nobre P.(2012). Early maladaptive schemas and sexual dysfunction in men. J Arch Sex Behav., 41(4):311–320.
Salimi H, Najarian Pour S, MohammadiK, Mehr Ali Tabar Firoozjani, A. (2016). Prediction of marital adjustment based on decision making and solving problem, family cohesion, coping strategies, communication skills and religious beliefs (family process factors). J growth of psycho; 5 (1): 93-110.
Selterman D, Garcia JR,(2019). Tsapelas I. Motivations for Extra dyadic Infidelity Revisited. J Sex Res; 56(3):273-286.
Sharifian M, Safarian Nia M, Ali Zadeh Fard S.(2018). The Structure of Sexual Schemas by Mediation of the Equity Model in the Prognosis of Sexual Dysfunction: A Study of the Structural Equation Model., 7(27):169-190.
Warach B, Josephs L.(2019).The aftershocks of infidelity: a review of infidelity-based attachment trauma. Journal of Sexual and Relationship Therapy; 34(2):132-153.
Wood R, Hirst J, Wilson L,Burns-O'Connell G.(2019). The pleasure imperative? Reflecting on sexual pleasure’s inclusion in sex education and sexual health. J Sex Edu. , 19(1): 1-14.
Ziaei P, SepehriShamloo Z, Mashhadi A.(2013).The relationship between cognitive schemas-activated, negative automatic thoughts and content Automatic thoughts with sexual functioning in women married students, J Behav, 8(28): 17-26.
_||_