بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر بهره وری و ارتقای کیفیت مراکز و واحدهای دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی منطقه 2
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت بازرگانیناصر صدقی بوکانی 1 , میر محمد سید عباس زاده 2 , علیرضا قلعه ای 3 , بهناز مهاجران 4 , روح اله باقری مجد 5
1 - دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزش عالی و عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی مهاباد
2 - استاد، دانشگاه ارومیه،ارومیه-ایران
3 - استادیار، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه-ایران
4 - استادیار، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه-ایران
5 - دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت اموزش عالی دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه-ایران
کلید واژه: مدیریتی, آموزش عالی, پژوهشی, عوامل آموزشی, فرهنگی, ساختاری, دانشجویی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف از این مطالعه شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر ارتقای کیفیت وبهره وری مراکز و واحدهای دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی منطقه 2 بوده است. برای انجام این پژوهش از روش پیمایشی استفاده و داده ها با بهره گیری از پرسشنامه محقق ساخته با 50 سوال بر اساس اهداف ومولفه های کیفیت در مراکز آموزش عالی ساخته وگردآوری شد. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر، کلیه اعضای هیات علمی ( 1778) وغیر هیأت علمی ( 1517) نفراست که در سال 1391در استانهای اذربایجان غربی- زنجان- اردبیل مشغول به خدمت بودند که از میان انها تعداد 350نفر (هیات علمی161)و (غیر هیات علمی189) نفربا استفاده از جدول مورگان و با روش نمونه گیری خوشه ای چند مرحله ای و به صورت تصادفی طبقه ای انتخاب شدند. داده ها با استفاده از میانگین رتبه ای وآزمون فریدمن تحلیل شدند و برای مقایسه نظرات گروه ها از ازمون تی تست دوگروه مستقل وتحلیل واریانس یکراهه استفاده گردید. نتایج حاصل از تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها نشان می دهد که دربین عوامل موثر ؛عوامل آموزشی فرهنگی و عوامل مدیریتی وساختاری، عوامل دانشجویی و عوامل پژوهشی به ترتیب مهمترین عوامل هستند. و بین نظرات گروهای نمونه تفاوت معناداری وجود ندارد.
The Purpose of this study was to identify the factors affecting the quality improvement and productivity of Islamic Azad University centers and branches in Region 2. The study is a survey, and the data were gathered by a researcher – made questionnaire consisting of 50 questions based on the objectives and indices of quality in higher education centers. The statistical population included all faculty members (1778) and non-academic staff (1517) who worked in west Azerbaijan, Zanjan, and Ardebil Provinces during 2012. A sample of 350 (161 faculty members and 189 non-academic staff members) was selected through random stratified multi-stage cluster sampling method and by using Morag's Table. The data were analyzed by mean rank test and Friedman test, and for the comparison of the views of the two groups, t-test and one-way variance analysis were used. The results indicated that among the effective factors, the educational-cultural factors, the management and structural factors, the student factors, and the research factors are ranked in order of importance, respectively. Furthermore, the result showed that there is not a significant difference between the views of the sample groups.
Abtahei, H & kazemei, B. (2002), Productivity. Tehran, Institute for Trade Studies and Research.
Abtahi, H., & Kazemi, B. (2002). Productivity. Tehran: Institute for Business Studies and Research, (In Persian).
Afroze, A. (2002), Study of labor productivity in industry in Iran. Allameh University master's thesis.
Arasteh, H. (2000), Leadership and Management in Higher Education. Tehran, publishing company bazargan.
Arti, H. R. (2004). Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship Higher Education. The Effectiveness of the Faculty, (In Persian).
Akbarei, A. (2005), The relationship between leadership styles of managers and staff productivity Branch city zanjan. Islamic Azad University ROUDEHEN Master's thesis.
Bland, C. J.; Burce, A. C.; Deborah, A. F.; Kelly, R.; Justin, G. S. (2005), A Theorical, practical, predictive model of Faculty and department research productivity. Aacademic medicine, 80 (3): 225-237.
Brown, T. (1995). Scientific Indicators: Comparative Evaluation of Publishing Activities and the Impact of Citation in 32 Countries, (In Persian).
Creswell, J. (1985), Faculty Research Performance: Lessons from the Sciences and the Social Sciences. Washington: ERIC.
Carayol, M.; Matt, M. (2006), Individual and Collective Determinants of Academic Scientists- Productivity. Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 18, p. 55-72
Feroder, J.(2004), Faculty Productivity, Encyclopedia of Higher Education. Translation by Arasteh, H. Tehran.
Fairweathr, James (2003),''productivity of faculty''inJmeJ.forest and Kevin kinser. Higher Education in the United States: An Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara.ABC-CLIO
Ghorchian, J. R. (2009). Designing a Model for Performance Evaluation of Units of Islamic Azad University based on Organizational Excellence Indicators. Journal of Research in Educational Management, 1, (In Persian).
Ghorchian, A. (2009), Evaluation design is based on indicators of excellence in Islamic Azad universities. Jornal of rahyaft, 2(88),24. 35
Hamideizadeh, M. (2004), Productivity in Higher Education, Encyclopedia of Higher Education, Tehran, Volume I.
Isfahan, H. R. (2000). Leadership and Management in Higher Education Institutions. Tehran: Bazargan Publishing Company, (In Persian).
Khorshidei, A & Mirkamalei, SayedMohammad (2004), provided the theoretical framework of performance indicators in higher education. Journal of Human Sciences Semnan, 7(2), 30- 46.
Merabian, F.(2009), Labor productivity enhancing factors from the perspective of faculty and non-faculty Guilan University of Medical Sciences, The basic concepts of productivity, Economic and Planning Department of the translation programs to remember the poor and veterans Islamic Revolution. Tehran.
Mirkamali, S. M., & Khorshidi, A. (2007). Presentation of the Theoretical Framework of Performance Indicators in Higher Education. Journal of the Faculty of Humanities of Semnan, 7, (In Persian).
Morabiyan, F. (2009). Determining the Factors for Improving the Productivity of Manpower from the Viewpoint of Faculty Members and Non-Faculty Members of Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Basic Concepts of Productivity, (In Persian).
Park, H.; Leydesdorff, L. (2010), longitudinal trends in networks of university–industry–government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39(5): 640-649.
Ransedel, L. (2001), Personality characteristics and research productivity. Translating by Hejazei, Y(2009), Journal of Agricultural Extension Education in Iran 1(5), 47-60.
Smeby, Y. C., Try, S. (2005), Depaartmental contexts and Faculty research activity in Norway. Higher Education, 46(6): 593-619.
Svesson,M&B.klefsjo(2006),"TQM.based self-Assessment intheducation sector Experiences from aswedishuper secondary schod project "Guality Assurance in E ducation,4(14), 47-59.
Tarbatinezhad, N. (2004). University Quality Management, Encyclopedia of Excellence, (In Persian).
Torbateinejad, M.(2004), Quality improvement of university management, Encyclopedia of Higher Education. Tehran, Volume I.
Watty, k.; Bellamy, S.,; Morely, C. (2008), Changes in higher education and valuing the job: The views of accounting in Australia. Journal of Higher Education policy and management, 30 (2): 139-151.
_||_
Abtahei, H & kazemei, B. (2002), Productivity. Tehran, Institute for Trade Studies and Research.
Abtahi, H., & Kazemi, B. (2002). Productivity. Tehran: Institute for Business Studies and Research, (In Persian).
Afroze, A. (2002), Study of labor productivity in industry in Iran. Allameh University master's thesis.
Arasteh, H. (2000), Leadership and Management in Higher Education. Tehran, publishing company bazargan.
Arti, H. R. (2004). Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship Higher Education. The Effectiveness of the Faculty, (In Persian).
Akbarei, A. (2005), The relationship between leadership styles of managers and staff productivity Branch city zanjan. Islamic Azad University ROUDEHEN Master's thesis.
Bland, C. J.; Burce, A. C.; Deborah, A. F.; Kelly, R.; Justin, G. S. (2005), A Theorical, practical, predictive model of Faculty and department research productivity. Aacademic medicine, 80 (3): 225-237.
Brown, T. (1995). Scientific Indicators: Comparative Evaluation of Publishing Activities and the Impact of Citation in 32 Countries, (In Persian).
Creswell, J. (1985), Faculty Research Performance: Lessons from the Sciences and the Social Sciences. Washington: ERIC.
Carayol, M.; Matt, M. (2006), Individual and Collective Determinants of Academic Scientists- Productivity. Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 18, p. 55-72
Feroder, J.(2004), Faculty Productivity, Encyclopedia of Higher Education. Translation by Arasteh, H. Tehran.
Fairweathr, James (2003),''productivity of faculty''inJmeJ.forest and Kevin kinser. Higher Education in the United States: An Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara.ABC-CLIO
Ghorchian, J. R. (2009). Designing a Model for Performance Evaluation of Units of Islamic Azad University based on Organizational Excellence Indicators. Journal of Research in Educational Management, 1, (In Persian).
Ghorchian, A. (2009), Evaluation design is based on indicators of excellence in Islamic Azad universities. Jornal of rahyaft, 2(88),24. 35
Hamideizadeh, M. (2004), Productivity in Higher Education, Encyclopedia of Higher Education, Tehran, Volume I.
Isfahan, H. R. (2000). Leadership and Management in Higher Education Institutions. Tehran: Bazargan Publishing Company, (In Persian).
Khorshidei, A & Mirkamalei, SayedMohammad (2004), provided the theoretical framework of performance indicators in higher education. Journal of Human Sciences Semnan, 7(2), 30- 46.
Merabian, F.(2009), Labor productivity enhancing factors from the perspective of faculty and non-faculty Guilan University of Medical Sciences, The basic concepts of productivity, Economic and Planning Department of the translation programs to remember the poor and veterans Islamic Revolution. Tehran.
Mirkamali, S. M., & Khorshidi, A. (2007). Presentation of the Theoretical Framework of Performance Indicators in Higher Education. Journal of the Faculty of Humanities of Semnan, 7, (In Persian).
Morabiyan, F. (2009). Determining the Factors for Improving the Productivity of Manpower from the Viewpoint of Faculty Members and Non-Faculty Members of Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Basic Concepts of Productivity, (In Persian).
Park, H.; Leydesdorff, L. (2010), longitudinal trends in networks of university–industry–government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39(5): 640-649.
Ransedel, L. (2001), Personality characteristics and research productivity. Translating by Hejazei, Y(2009), Journal of Agricultural Extension Education in Iran 1(5), 47-60.
Smeby, Y. C., Try, S. (2005), Depaartmental contexts and Faculty research activity in Norway. Higher Education, 46(6): 593-619.
Svesson,M&B.klefsjo(2006),"TQM.based self-Assessment intheducation sector Experiences from aswedishuper secondary schod project "Guality Assurance in E ducation,4(14), 47-59.
Tarbatinezhad, N. (2004). University Quality Management, Encyclopedia of Excellence, (In Persian).
Torbateinejad, M.(2004), Quality improvement of university management, Encyclopedia of Higher Education. Tehran, Volume I.
Watty, k.; Bellamy, S.,; Morely, C. (2008), Changes in higher education and valuing the job: The views of accounting in Australia. Journal of Higher Education policy and management, 30 (2): 139-151.