شناخت عوامل بازدارنده استقرار نظام شایسته سالاری در سطح مدیران حرفه ای سازمان های دولتی شهرستان اهواز
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت بازرگانیفرج اله رهنورد 1 , محمود شیرازی 2 , فرهاد قیصری 3
1 - عضو هیأت علمی ( دانشیار ) مؤسسه عالی آموزش و پژوهش مدیریت و برنامه ریزی
2 - عضو هیأت علمی (استادیار ) گروه مدیریت ،دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، تهران،ایران
3 - کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت دولتی، واحد رامهرمز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ،رامهرمز،ایران مکاتبه کننده
کلید واژه: نظام شایسته سالاری, مدیر حرفه ای, تجزیه و تحلیل عاملی,
چکیده مقاله :
در پژوهش حاضر به منظور شناخت عوامل بازدارنده استقرار نظام شایسته سالاری در سطح مدیران حرفه ای شهرستان اهواز سه سؤال تدوین گردیده است. سؤال اول به دنبال کشف عوامل بازدارنده استقرار نظام شایسته سالاری بوده است، سؤال دوم اهمیت رتبه ای هر یک از عوامل بازدارنده را جستجو می کند و در نهایت سؤال سوم درصدد تعیین روابط ساختاری بین عوامل بازدارنده و نظام شایسته سالاری می باشد. بر مبنای روش تحقیق تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی در جامعه آماری (10377=N) و با استفاده از جدول نمونه گیری مورگان، حجم نمونه (384=n) تعیین شده است. همچنین برای جمع آوری داده ها از پرسش نامه ی محقق ساخته با دو بخش، بخش اول،شناخت درجه استقرار نظام شایسته سالاری و بخش دوم،شناخت عوامل بازدارنده استقرار نظام شایسته سالاری به ترتیب با ضریب پایایی 93/0 و 83/0 بر حسب آلفای کرونباخ استفاده شده است. داده های جمع آوری شده با استفاده از نرم افزار آماری spss و سایر ابزارها در حوزه آمار توصیفی و استنباطی مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفته است. بر اساس یافته های پژوهش می توان نتیجه گیری کرد که سه عامل پارتی بازی، عدم برابری فرصت و سطحی نگری عوامل بازدارنده می باشند. ضمن اینکه پارتی بازی در رتبه اول، عدم برابری فرصت در رتبه دوم و سطحی نگری در رتبه سوم اهمیت قرار دارند. همچنین بین سه عامل بازدارنده و استقرار نظام شایسته سالاری رابطه ی آماری معنی داری وجود دارد.
The present research has been carried out to identify the factors inhibiting the establishment of meritocracy at the level of professional managers of governmental organizations in the city of Ahwaz. To do this, the researchers have addressed three questions. The first question tries to discover the factors preventing the establishment of meritocracy. The second question seeks to rate the inhibitory factors according to their importance. And finally, the third question tries to determine the structural relations between the preventing factors and meritocracy system. Based on the research methodology, the exploratory factor analysis has been applied for the statistical population (N=10377), and through the use of Morgan’s Sampling Table, a sample of 384 has been chosen. Also, for data analysis, a researcher-designed questionnaire has been utilized in two parts. The first part to identify the degree of meritocracy establishment and the second part to recognize the factors inhibiting the establishment of meritocracy. The reliability of the questionnaires, based on Cronbach’s alpha has been 0.93 and 0.83, respectively. The collected data have been analyzed by using the statistical software spss and other tools in descriptive and inferential statistics. The findings have led to the conclusion that nepotism, inequality of opportunities, and superficiality are the three preventing factors. Also, it can be concluded that nepotism is ranked first, inequality of opportunities the second, and superficiality the third from the viewpoint of importance. Finally, the results showed that there is a statistically significant relation between the inhibitory factors and meritocracy establishment.
Abili, Kh. (2006). The Need for Discussion on the Development of Meritocracy in Organizations, (In Persian).
Aliadari, M. (2006). A Strong Factor Analysis and Study of Student Fellowship in Shahid Chamran University Students from the Viewpoints of Contingent Students at the Entrants. Master's Thesis, Ahvaz: University of Chamran, (In Persian).
Amy Liu, (2007), The Myth Of Meritocracy And Its Implicatio For Higher Education , University Of California , Los Angele.
Anastassios Karayiannis, (2001), Imperfect Meritocracy And Inefficiency , Vol 2
Azerbaijani, K., & Atafar, A. (2001). Studying the Degree of Meritocracy in the Selection of Public and Private Sector Managers. Management Knowledge Management Monthly, No, (In Persian).
Besharat, A. R., & Sadeghpour, A. (1723). Theories about Bureaucracy or Large Administrative Organizations. Tehran: Publication of the Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Business Administration, (In Persian).
Goldstone, A. (1998). Software Guide, SPSS 6, Tehran: Tehran Statistics, (In Persian).
Hosseinian, S. R. (2002). Investigating the Effective Factors and Determining the Important Indices of Academic Collapse at the Governmental High Schools of the City of Golveyeh and Boyer Ahmad, Using Factor Analysis. Master's Thesis, Ahvaz: University of Chamran, (In Persian).
Kebriaei, A., Rakhsh Khorshid, A., & Asghari, H. (2006). The First Conference on Meritocracy Development in Organizations, (In Persian).
Ronagh, Y. (2009). National Service Management Act. Tehran: Farmanesh Publication, (In Persian).
Saroukhani, B. (2003). Research Method in Social Sciences. Tehran: Didar Publishing, (In Persian).
Soltani, I. (2006). The Mechanism of Meritocracy Establishment in Industrial and Governmental Organizations. Proceedings of Management, (In Persian).
Nazari manesh, L. (2006). Selection and Appointment Indicators of Managers with an Appropriate Approach, (In Persian).
_||_
Abili, Kh. (2006). The Need for Discussion on the Development of Meritocracy in Organizations, (In Persian).
Aliadari, M. (2006). A Strong Factor Analysis and Study of Student Fellowship in Shahid Chamran University Students from the Viewpoints of Contingent Students at the Entrants. Master's Thesis, Ahvaz: University of Chamran, (In Persian).
Amy Liu, (2007), The Myth Of Meritocracy And Its Implicatio For Higher Education , University Of California , Los Angele.
Anastassios Karayiannis, (2001), Imperfect Meritocracy And Inefficiency , Vol 2
Azerbaijani, K., & Atafar, A. (2001). Studying the Degree of Meritocracy in the Selection of Public and Private Sector Managers. Management Knowledge Management Monthly, No, (In Persian).
Besharat, A. R., & Sadeghpour, A. (1723). Theories about Bureaucracy or Large Administrative Organizations. Tehran: Publication of the Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Business Administration, (In Persian).
Goldstone, A. (1998). Software Guide, SPSS 6, Tehran: Tehran Statistics, (In Persian).
Hosseinian, S. R. (2002). Investigating the Effective Factors and Determining the Important Indices of Academic Collapse at the Governmental High Schools of the City of Golveyeh and Boyer Ahmad, Using Factor Analysis. Master's Thesis, Ahvaz: University of Chamran, (In Persian).
Kebriaei, A., Rakhsh Khorshid, A., & Asghari, H. (2006). The First Conference on Meritocracy Development in Organizations, (In Persian).
Ronagh, Y. (2009). National Service Management Act. Tehran: Farmanesh Publication, (In Persian).
Saroukhani, B. (2003). Research Method in Social Sciences. Tehran: Didar Publishing, (In Persian).
Soltani, I. (2006). The Mechanism of Meritocracy Establishment in Industrial and Governmental Organizations. Proceedings of Management, (In Persian).
Nazari manesh, L. (2006). Selection and Appointment Indicators of Managers with an Appropriate Approach, (In Persian).