شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی راهکارهای رفع سندروم هوبریس در میان مدیران سازمان‌های ورزشی ایران
محورهای موضوعی : رفتار سازمانی در ورزشالهام ارشادی رابری 1 , فهیمه ادیب صابر 2 * , علیرضا علمیه 3
1 - دانشجوی دکترای مدیریت ورزشی، واحد رشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رشت، ایران
2 - استادیارگروه تربیت بدنی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد رشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رشت، ایران
3 - دانشیارگروه تربیت بدنی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد رشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رشت، ایران
کلید واژه: سندروم هوبریس, قدرت, منابع انسانی, مدیران,
چکیده مقاله :
تحقیق حاضر باهدف شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی راهکارهای رفع سندروم هوبریس در میان مدیران سازمان‌های ورزشی ایران طراحی و اجرا گردید. تحقیق حاضر از نوع، تحقیقات توصیفی تحلیلی می¬باشد که به‌صورت میدانی انجام گردید. جامعه آماری تحقیق حاضر شامل خبرگان آگاه به موضوع پژوهش می‌باشند. بر اساس انتخاب گلوله¬برفی، تعداد ۱۴ نفر به‌عنوان نمونه تحقیق مشخص گردیدند. در پژوهش حاضر، به‌منظور طراحـی چـارچوب مفهـومی تحقیق از نظریه سه‌شاخگی کمک گرفته شد. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات در تحقیق حاضر شامل پرسشنامه محقق ساخته بود. کلیه روند تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده-های تحقیق با استفاده از نرم‌افزار بی تی تاپسیس اسلور انجام گردید. نتایج تحقیق حاضر نشان داد که تعداد 12 راهکار به‌عنوان راهکارهای رفع سندروم هوبریس در میان مدیران سازمان‌های ورزشی ایران شناسایی گردید. با توجه به نتایج روش تاپسیس مشخص گردید که شناسایی ذینفعان سازمان‌های ورزشی و تعامل با آنان جهت شناسایی نیازها و دغدغه‌های آنان با ضریب 7684/0 مهم‌ترین راهکار رفع سندروم هوبریس در میان مدیران سازمان‌های ورزشی ایران مشخص گردید. بنابراین پیشنهاد می‌گردد تا با شفاف‌سازی فعالیت‌های رسانه‌ای و روابط عمومی سازمان‌های ورزشی در جهت بیان حقایق موجود در سازمان و قدرت بخشی به کمیسیون ها، کمیته‌ها و گروه‌های فعال در سازمان‌های ورزشی؛ شرایطی در جهت کنترل سندروم هوبریس در سازمان‌های ورزشی ایران را فراهم نمود.
The present study was designed and implemented with the aim of identifying and prioritizing solutions to eliminate hubris syndrome among managers of Iranian sports organizations. The present study is a descriptive-analytical research that was conducted in the field. The statistical population of the present study includes experts aware of the research topic. Based on snowball selection, 14 people were identified as the research sample. In the present study, the triangulation theory was used to design the conceptual framework of the study. The data collection tool in the present study included a researcher-made questionnaire. The entire process of analyzing research data was carried out using BT Topsys Slower software. The results of the present study showed that 12 solutions were identified as solutions to eliminate hubris syndrome among managers of Iranian sports organizations. According to the results of the TOPSIS method, it was determined that identifying the stakeholders of sports organizations and interacting with them to identify their needs and concerns was determined to be the most important solution to eliminate hubris syndrome among managers of Iranian sports organizations with a coefficient of 0.7684. Therefore, it is suggested that by clarifying the media activities and public relations of sports organizations in order to express the facts existing in the organization and empowering the commissions, committees and groups active in sports organizations, conditions should be provided for controlling hubris syndrome in Iranian sports organizations.
Abed, R. T. (2011). The hubris syndrome: is it necessarily pathological? The Psychiatrist, 35(6), 237-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.35.6.237a. Akstinaite, V., Garrard, P., & Sadler‐Smith, E. (2022). Identifying linguistic markers of CEO hubris: a machine learning approach. British Journal of Management, 33(3), 1163-1178. DOI: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-8551.12503. Alan, Y., Arrais, J., Çelik, G., Chan, K. W., Crippen, C., Hean, L. L., & Welongo, M. (2020). Global servant-leadership: Wisdom, love, and legitimate power in the age of chaos. Lexington Books. DOI: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ATQGEAAAQBAJ&oi. Ali, B. J., & Anwar, G. (2021). Strategic leadership effectiveness and its influence on organizational effectiveness. International Journal of Electrical, Electronics and Computers, 6(2). 1-10. DOI: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3835697. Andrade, J., Mendes, L., & Franco, M. (2024). The Effect of Owner-Managers’ Personality Traits on Organisational Ambidexterity in the Context of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Sustainability, 16(2), 507-513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020507. Asad, S., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2020). Differentiating leader hubris and narcissism on the basis of power. Leadership, 16(1), 39-61. DOI: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1742715019885763. Berger, J., Osterloh, M., Rost, K., & Ehrmann, T. (2020). How to prevent leadership hubris? Comparing competitive selections, lotteries, and their combination. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(5), 101-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101388. Brink, A., Benyayer, L. D., & Kupp, M. (2024). Decision-making in organizations: should managers use AI? Journal of Business Strategy, 45(4), 267-274. DOI: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/jbs-04-2023-0068/full/html. Brown, B. A. (2018). Hubris syndrome in the relationship between School-Heads and Board-Chairs in private commercial secondary schools in Botswana: Implications for school leadership. International Journal of Educational Development, 60, 157-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.07.007. Claxton, G., Owen, D., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2015). Hubris in leadership: A peril of unbridled intuition? Leadership, 11(1), 57-78. DOI: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1742715013511482. Garrard, P., Garrard, & Barlow. (2018). Leadership hubris epidemic. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-57255-0. Jha, R., Roy, S., & Tripathi, U. (2020). The hubris syndrome: the ethical failure of successful leaders, 1-11. DOI: https://jsm.ut.ac.ir/article_99386_04c79dee0e30775111afa9e31fdca3bf.pdf. Jiang, Z., Peng, C., & Yan, H. (2024). Personality differences and investment decision-making. Journal of Financial Economics, 153, 103776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2023.103776. Liapis, C. C. (2022). From Ancient Hatei to Hubris Syndrome in SARS-CoV-2 Health Crisis Management. Psychiatria Danubina, 34(1), 111-115. DOI: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/401798. Molavi, Z., Nouri, L. (2022). Positive deviant behaviors and factors affecting their occurrence among employees of government organizations, case study: government organizations of Qom province, Management of government organizations, 10 (3), 86-75. (Persian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30473/ipom.2022.61973.4503. Rivers, M. N. (2022). A Builder’s Mind: The Strategic Roles of Humility, Wisdom,
1-15 ، مدیریت و رفتار سازمانی در ورزش، بهار 1404 ، دوره 14 ، شماره 17
15
and Cooperation in Leadership. In The Mind of a Leader (pp. 217-231). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. DOI: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-07206-2_14. Rodgers, C. (2011). Hubris syndrome: An emergent outcome of the complex social process of everyday interaction. The Daedalus Trust. 1-9. DOI: https://informalcoalitions.typepad.com/HUBRIS%20SYNDROME%20. Russell, G. (2011). Psychiatry and politicians: the ‘hubris syndrome’. The Psychiatrist, 35(4), 140-145. DOI: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-psychiatrist/articl. Sadler-Smith, E. (2021). Hubris, bad judgement and practical wisdom in politics and business. In Judgment and Leadership (pp. 104-116). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://www.elgaronline.com/abstract/edcoll/9781839104091/9781839104091.00014.xml. Sadler-Smith, E., & Tourish, D. (2021). Hubris in management. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.334. Shariatnejad, A. (2022). Identifying the effective factors and consequences of the phenomenon of leaders' hubris using the fuzzy DEMATEL method, case study: government organizations, Management of government organizations, 10 (3), 102-87. (Persian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30473/ipom.2022.61501.4489. Shiri, A., Seifi, A., Heydarnejad, Z. (2022). Designing a model of meritocratic behavior of managers of government organizations, Management of government organizations, 10 (3), 26-1. (Persian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30473/ipom.2022.60884.4476. WARNING, W. (2018). The hubris syndrome approach. Hubristic Leadership, 50, 1-28. DOI: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=E4bwEAAAQBAJ&oi. Wijayanti, D. M., Senjani, Y. P., & Farah, W. (2024). The role of Machiavellian personality, altruistic personality, religiosity, whistleblowing system, and accounting firm size in mitigating fraud intention. Journal of Financial Crime, 31(1), 119-134. DOI: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/jfc-02-2023-0034/full/html. Wray, T. (2016). The role of leader hubris in the decline of RBS and Lehman Brothers. In The intoxication of power (pp. 229-251). Palgrave Macmillan, London. DOI: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137439666_12. Yuengert, A. M. (2021). Practical Wisdom and Management Science. Business Ethics and Catholic Social Thought, 49, 1-8. DOI: https://philpapers.org/rec/YUEPWA. Zeitoun, H., Nordberg, D., & Homberg, F. (2019). The dark and bright sides of hubris: Conceptual implications for leadership and governance research. Leadership, 15(6), 647-672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715019848198