بررسی رفتار مدیر در برخورد با هزینه ها بر اساس رویکرد رتبه بندی شرکت ها با مکانیزم های حاکمیت شرکتی در تاپسیس فازی
محورهای موضوعی : حسابداری
وحید بخردی نسب
1
,
فاطمه ژولانژاد
2
1 - دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد حسابداری، کارمند دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان
2 - دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد حسابداری، مدرس دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
کلید واژه: تاپسیس, رفتار مدیریت, رتبه بندی حاکمیت شرکتی, چسبندگی هزینه,
چکیده مقاله :
این پژوهش به بررسی رفتار مدیریت در برخورد با هزینه ها پرداخته است. نحوه برخورد مدیریت مبتنی بر رتبه بندی شرکت ها بر اساس امتیاز حاکمیت شرکتی است. لذا با استفاده از روش تاپسیس فازی، شاخصی به منظور رتبه بندی شرکت های نمونه بر اساس امتیاز حاکمیت شرکتی، تبیین شد. شاخص مزبور متشکل از شش معیاراندازه هیأت مدیره، استقلال هیأت مدیره، دوگانگی وظایف مدیرعامل، مالکیت نهادی، تمرکز مالکیت و حسابرس مستقل می باشد. جامعه آماری این مطالعه کلیه شرکت های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران را طی بازه زمانی 1387 تا 1394 بوده و حجم نمونه با استفاده از روش حذف سیستماتیک 133 شرکت می باشد. روش اجرای پژوهش مبتنی بر داده های ترکیبی و رگرسیون چند متغیره به روش حداقل مربعات تعمیم یافته می باشد. فرضیه های پژوهش پیرامون تمرکز مدیریت بر رتبه بندی شرکت ها بر اساس حاکمیت شرکتی با استفاده از روش تاپسیس، در برخورد با هزینه ها در شرکت های دارایی رتبه بالای حاکمیت شرکتی و چسبندگی هزینه های عمومی، اداری و تشکیلاتی بوده و لذا با استفاده از نرم افزار اقتصاد سنجی ایویوز به بررسی فرضیه های پژوهش پرداخته شده است. شواهد حاکی از آن است که چنانچه مدیریت، معیارهای حاکمیت شرکتی را همواره به صورت محسوس و نامحسوس ناظر بر رفتار خود قرار داده، کمتر دست به اقدامات اختیاری و فرصت طلبانه دست می زنند.
Adams, R., & Mehran, H.(2002). Board structure and banking firm performance, Working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of NewYork.
Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. (2001). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 377−397
Anderson, M. C., Banker, R., & Janakiraman, S. (2003). Are Selling, General and Administrative Costs “Sticky”? Journal of Accounting Research,41(1), 47- 63.
Ashoori, E. (2014). The impact of earnings management incentives on costs stickiness Ha.payan a master(in persian).
Azizi ,A, Abdul Karim Nasser Moghaddam and Abdoli, (2015), to examine the relationship between corporate governance and earnings management on cost stickiness in listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange, Third International Conference on Accounting and Management, Tehran, October Hmayshgran Institute illumination, http://www.civilica.com/Paper-MOCONF03-MOCONF03_420.html(in persian(.
Banker, R., Byzalov, D., & Plehn-Dujowich, J. M. (2011). Sticky cost behavior: Theory and evidence. Working paper, TempleUniversity. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1659493
Brickley, J., Lease, R. C., & Smith, C. W. (1988). “Ownership structure and voting on anti-takeover amendments”, Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 267–291.
Calleja, K., Steliaros, M., & Thomas, D. (2006). A Note on Cost Stickiness: Some International Comparisons. Management Accounting Research,17(2), 127- 140.
Chen, C. H.,Lu, H., & Sougiannis, T. (2008). Managerial empire building, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs.AAA 2008 Financial Accounting and Reporting Section (FARS) Paper; (CAAA) 2008 Annual Conference Paper. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1014088
Chen, C. X., Lu, H., & Sougiannis, T. (2012). The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs, Contemporary Accounting Research,29(1), 252–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01094.x
Chung, Kee H. and Zhang, Hao, (2009) , Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA), Forthcoming. Available at SSRN.
Dedman, E.(2000).An investigation into the determinants of UK board structure before and after Cadbury. Corporate Governance, 8:133-153.
Delgado hurtado, maria del mar, (2001 ) , economic determinants of accounting discreation: emerical evidence from spain. Pruquest.com pages 1 -461.
Fama, E. F. and M.c. Jensen.(1983). The Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics,26:301-325.
Fama, E.F.(1980) "Agency Problems and the theory of firm", Journal of political Economy,88.
Finkelstein, S. and D’Aveni, R .(1994). CEO Duality as a Doubleedged Sword: How Boards of Directors Balance Entrenchment Avoidance and Unity of Command., Academy of Management Journal,37(5):1079-1108.
Foroughi, D, Saeedi, A, Azhdar, M., (2011), "The impact of institutional shareholders on dividend policy in listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange", Accounting Research, Issue Two, Summer, 129-114(in persian(.
Ghaemi, Hossein and Nematollahi, M. (2007). Behavior and structure of operating costs and financial costs on companies listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange. Knowledge Audit, No. 22, pp. 16 to 29(in persian).
Gul, F., Lynn, S and Tsui, J.(2002).Audit Quality, Management Ownership, and the Informativeness of Accounting Earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance,17(1):25-51.
He, D., Teruya, J. & Shimizu, T. (2010). Sticky selling, general, and administrative cost behavior and its changes in Japan. Journal of Business Research, 4(4): 1-10.
Hermalin, B and Weisbach, M.(1998).The Determinants of Board Composition., Rand Journal of Economics,19:589-606.
Jelinek,K (2007); "The Effect of Leverage Increases on Earnings Managemen", Journal of Business and Economic Studies,vol13,pp 24–46.
Khoshtinat, M, Yousefi, F. (2009), the relationship between symmetry and asymmetry with conservatism intelligence, financial accounting Experimental Studies Quarterly, No. 20(in persian(.
Kordestani, Gh. Mortazavi, M. "The effect of the decisions of managers determined on costs stickiness". Review of accounting and auditing. (2013). No. 67, pp. 73-90(in persian).
LaFond, R., & Watts, R., (2008), The information role of conservatism, The Accounting Review, 83(2): 447.
Lawler E., Finegold, D., Benson, G., Conger, J.(2002).Corporate Boards: Keys to Effectiveness, Organizational Dynamics 30(4):301-324.
McCahery, Joseph A., Starks, Laura T. and Sautner, Zacharias, (2010) , Behind the Scenes: The Corporate Governance Preferences of Institutional Investors . Available at SSRN
Namazi, M. Davanipor, I. Experimental Study of adhesion behavior of costs in the Tehran Stock Exchange. Review of accounting and auditing. (2013). No. 62, pp. 85-102(in persian(.
Peasnell, K. , Pope, P. , Young, S, (2000). Accrual Management to Meet Earnings Targets: UK Evidence Pre- and Post-Cadbury, British Accounting Review,No. 32,PP. 415-445.
Prowse, S.D.(1992) "The structure of corporate ownership in Japan" Journal of finance, 47(3).
Raee, R, Hassanzadeh, H, "The effect of financial ratios on adhesion costs", Journal of Financial Accounting, (2015), Number Twenty-Two, pp. 22-44(in persian)
Ramakrishnan, R., Thomas, J.(1998). Valuation of permanent, transitory, and price- irrelevant components of reported earnings Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 13:301-336.
Rechner, P and Dalton, D.(1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: a longitudinal analysis.12(2):155-161.
Safarzadeh, MH (2015), described the role of corporate governance in cohesion spending, the Financial Accounting Quarterly, Volume 6, Number 23, Pages 1-21(in Persian.(
Seifert, Bruce & Halit, Gonenc & Jim, Wright, (2005) , "The International Evidence on Performance and Equity Ownership By Insiders Block holders and Institutions", Journal of Multi. Fin. Manage, Vol 15.
Technical Committee on Corporate Audit, 2003, auditing standards, the auditing, publication 160(in persian(.
Thomsen, S and Pedersen, T.(2000).Ownership Structure and economic performance in the Largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal,21: 689-705.
Tsui, J., Jaggi, B., Gul, F.(2001).CEO Domination, Growth Opportunities and their.Impact on Audit Fees, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance,16(3).
Xie, B., Davidson, W and DaDalt, P .(2003). Earnings management and corporate governance:The roles of the board and the audit committee., Journal of Corporate Fiance, 9(3):295-317.
Xue, Sh. & Hong, Y. (2015). Earning management, corporate governance and expense stickiness. China Journal of Accounting Research, article in press.
Yermack, D.(1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors”, Journal of Financial Economics.40(2):185-211.
Yoon, S.S. and Miller, G.A. (2002). Cash From Operations and Earnings Management In Korea, the International Journal of Accounting, 37 (4), 395-412.
Yu, Frank, (2006) ," Corporate Governance and Earnings Management", Available at www. Google.Com
Zanjirdar, M, Ghafari Ashtiani, P, Madahi, Z. "Investigate and analyze the factors influencing the behavior of costs stickiness", Journal of Management Accounting Research, (2015), Twentieth Issue, p. 79-91(in persian).