تاثیر فناوری اطلاعات بر همگرایی حسابداری مدیریت و حسابداری مالی
محورهای موضوعی : حسابداری مدیریت
فریدون رهنمای رودپشتی
1
(استاد و عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات)
راحله همایونی راد
2
(دانشجوی دکتری حسابداری دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات و عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد هشتگرد)
کلید واژه: حسابداری مالی, حسابداری مدیریت, همگرایی حسابداری مالی و حسابدا, فناوری اطلاعات,
چکیده مقاله :
در این مقاله، همگرایی حسابداری مدیریت (MA[i]) و حسابداری مالی(FA[ii]) با تاکید بر پیشرفتهای فناوری اطلاعات(IT[iii]) بررسی شده است، و این موضوع که چگونه این همگرایی در دامنه فنی و تکنولوژیکی ظاهر می‌شود و چگونه در حوزه سازمانی و رفتاری انعکاس می یابد، مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است.طراحی مدل تحلیلی توسط همر و لابرو(2008) با چشم انداز آینده‌نگر حسابداری مالی، منجر به حرکت رو به جلو در حسابداری مدیریتگردید و یک چارچوب مفهومی برای تحلیل این همگرایی ایجاد نموده. مطابق با این چارچوب، فناوری اطلاعات(IT) به عنوان یک تسهیل کننده، کاتالیزور، محرک یا عامل بهبود در جهت همگرایی حسابداری مدیریت باحسابداری مالی بکار گرفته می شود. همگرایی پدیده ای بسیار گسترده تر از آن چیزی است که توسط همر و لابرو ایجاد گردیده است. این همگرایی در حوزه فنی و تکنولوژی شامل یکپارچه سازی عمدی سیستم های اطلاعاتی و نرم افزاری، وترکیب روش‌ها و استانداردها است.در حوزه سازمانی و رفتاری نیز شامل رفتارهای عمدی یا سهوی مطابق با نقش ها و فرآیندها، و همچنین همگرایی عمدی و یا سهوی مطابق با کار و وظایف می‌باشد. بر اساس مشاهدات بدست آمده، چنین نتیجه گیری شد که حرکت روبه جلوی عناصر حسابداری مالی، اغلب با حسابداری مدیریت در هم تنیده هستند و بالعکس، و به نظر می رسد همگرایی در حوزه فنی و تکنولوژی جلوتر از دامنه رفتاری و سازمانی است. در بیشتر مشاهدات ، فناوری اطلاعات نقش مهم و یا حتی در برخی موارد نقش تعیین کننده در فرایند همگرایی ایفا می کند.
In this article we investigate and conceptualize the recent convergence of management accounting (MA) and financial accounting (FA) with the advancements in information technology (IT), and illustrate that how this convergence is manifested in the technical and technological domain, and how it is reflected in behavioral and organizational domain.Designing the analytical model by Hemmer and Labro (2008) with forward-looking of financial accounting leads to forward-looking managerial accounting, and lead to build a conceptual framing to analyze this convergence. According to this framing, information technology serves as a facilitator, catalyst, motivator or even as an enabler for the convergence of MA and FA. We further argue that convergence is a much broader than claimed by Hemmer and Labro. This convergence in technical and technological domain, including the intentional integration of information systems and software, intentional combinations of methods or standards, and in behavioral and organizational domain including (un)intentional alignment regarding both work and functions.Based on observations, it is concluded that the forward-looking FA elements are often intertwined with MA, and vice versa, and that convergence in technical and technological domain appears to precede convergence in the behavioral and organizational domain. In most of observations, IT plays an important or even crucial role in this convergence process. Also, suggested several avenues for further research.
* رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون. حسابداری مدیریت راهبردی (مبتنی بر مدیریت هزینه ارزش آفرین). انتشارات ترمه. 1392
* رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون. جلیلی، محمد. هزینه یابی بر مبنای هدف (مبتنی بر ارزش آفرینی). انتشارات ترمه، 1388
* Alles M, Debreceny R. The evolution and future of XBRL research.Int J Account InfSyst 2012;13:83–90.
* Arnold V, Benford T, Canada J, Sutton SG.The role of strategic enterprise risk management and organizational flexibility in easing new regulatory compliance.Int J Account InfSyst 2011;12:171–88.
* Bhimani A, Keshtvarz MH. British management accountants: strategically oriented. J Cost Manage 1999:25–31. [March/April].
* Brazel JF, Dang L. The effect of ERP System implementations on the management of earnings and earnings release dates. J InfSyst2008;22:1–21.
* Burns J, Vaivio J. Management accounting changes. Manage Account Res 2001;12:389–402.
* Cadez S, Guilding C. An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting. AccountOrgan Soc 2008;33:836–63.
* Cobb I, Helliar C, Innes J. Management accounting change in a bank. Manage Account Res 1995;6:155–75.
* Cooper R, Kaplan RS.The promise – and peril – of integrated cost systems.Harv Bus Rev 1998;76:109–19.
* Davenport TH.Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system.Harv Bus Rev 1998;76:121–31.
* Debreceny R, Gray GL. The production and use of semantically rich accounting reports on the Internet: XML and XBRL. Int J Account InfSyst 2001;2:47–74.
* Debreceny R, Chandra A, Cheh J, Guithues-Ammrhein D, Hannon N, Hutchison P, et al. Financial reporting in XBRL in the SEC's EDGAR system: a critique and evaluation. J InfSyst 2005;19:191–210.
* Dechow N, Mouritsen J. Enterprise resource planning systems, management control and the quest for integration. Account Organ Soc 2005;30:691–733.
* Dechow N, Granlund M, Mouritsen J. Management control of the complex organization: relationships between management accounting and information technology. In: Chapman C, Hopwood AG, Shields MD, editors. Handbook of management accountingresearch, vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007a. p. 625–40.
* Eierle, B., Schultze, W. The role of management as a user of accounting information: implications for standard setting. University of Regensburg, Regensburg. Unpublished manuscript, 2008.
* Goretzki L, Strauss E, Weber J. An institutional perspective on the changes in management accountants' professional role. Manage Account Res 2013;24:41–63.
* Graham JR, Harvey CR, Rajgopal S.The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. J Account Econ 2005;40:3–73.
* GranlundM.Extending AIS research to management accounting and control issues: a research note.Int J Account InfSyst 2011;12:3–19.
* Granlund M, Lukka K. Towards increasing business orientation: Finnish management accountants in a changing cultural context. Manage Account Res 1998a;9:185–211.
* Granlund M, Lukka K. It's a small world of management accounting practices. J Manage Account Res 1998b;10:153–79.
* Granlund M, Malmi T. Moderate impact of ERPs on management accounting: a lag or permanent outcome. Manage Account Res 2002;13:299–321.
* Granlund M, Mouritsen J. Introduction: problematizing the relationship between management control and information technology. Eur Account Rev 2003;12:77–83.
* Granlund M, Taipaleenmäki J. Management control and controllership in new economy firms. Manage Account Res 2005;16:21–57.
* Guilding C, Cravens K, Tayles M. An international comparison of strategic management accounting practices. Manage Account Res2000;11:113–35.
* Hartmann F, Vaassen E. The changing role of management accounting and control systems: accounting for knowledge across controldomains. In: Bhimani A, editor. Management accounting in the digital economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 112–32.
* Hemmer T, Labro E.On the optimal relation between the properties of managerial and financial reporting systems. J Account Res2008;46:1209–40.
* Hopper T, Kirkham L, Scapens R. Does financial accounting dominate management accounting — a research note. Manage AccountRes 1992;3:307–11.
* Hunton JE. Blending information and communication technology with accounting research. Account Horiz 2002;16:55–67.
* Hyvönen T, Järvinen J, Pellinen J. The role of standard software packages in mediating management accounting knowledge. Qual ResAccount Manage 2006;3:145–60.
* Ikäheimo S, Taipaleenmäki J. The divergence and convergence of financial accounting and management accounting — historical andinternational perspectives from the U.S., Germany, and Finland. Die BetriebswirtshaftSpecial issue on integration of financial andmanagerial accounting, 70; 2010349–68.
* Innes J, Mitchell F. The process of change in management accounting: some field study evidence. Manage Account Res 1990;1:3–19.
* Jensen MC. The agency costs of overvalued equity and the current state of corporate finance. EurFinanc Manage 2004;10:549–65.
* Jones TC, Luther R. Impact of IFRS on German manufacturing companies. Account Eur 2005;2:165–93.
* Joseph N, Turley S, Burns J, Lewis L, Scapens R, Southworth A. External financial reporting and management information: a survey ofU.K. management accountants. Manage Account Res 1996;7:73–93.
* Landsman WR. Is fair value accounting information relevant and reliable? Evidence from capital market research. Account Bus Res2007;37:19–30. [Special Issue: International Accounting Policy Forum].
* Llewellyn S. What counts as “theory” in qualitative management and accounting research? Introducing five levels of theorizing.Account Audit Account J 2003;16:662–708.
* Lucas HC, Baroudi J. The role of information technology in organization design. J Manage InfSyst 1994;10:9–23.
* Lukka K. Management accounting change and stability: loosely coupled rules and routines in action. Manage Account Res 2007;18:76–101.
* Malmi T, Brown DA. Management control systems as a package — opportunities, challenges and research directions. Manage AccountRes 2008;19:287–300.
* Malmi T, Ikäheimo S. Value based management practices — some evidence from the field. Manage Account Res 2003;14:235–54.
* Nicholson B, Jones J, Espenlaub S. Transaction costs and control of outsourced accounting: case evidence from India. Manage AccountRes 2006;17:238–58.
* Orlikowski W. Integrated information environment or matrix of control?The contradictory implications of information technology.Account Manage InfTechnol 1991;1:9–42.
* Orlikowski W. The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ Sci 1992;3:398–427.
* Paulheim H. Ontology-based application integration. New York: Springer; 2011.
* Paulheim H, Probst F. Application integration on the user interface level: an ontology-based approach. Data KnowlEng 2010;69:1103–16.
* Penman SH. Financial reporting quality: is fair value a plus or minus? Account Bus Res 2007;37:33–44. [Special Issue: InternationalAccounting Policy Forum].
* Raschke RL. Process-based view of agility: the value contribution of IT and the effects of process outcomes. Int J Account InfSyst2010;11:297–313.
* Rom A, Rohde C. Management accounting and integrated information systems: a literature review. Int J Account InfSyst 2007;8:40–68.
* Scapens RW, Jazayeri M. ERP systems and management accounting change: opportunities or impacts? A research note.Eur AccountRev 2003;12:201–33.
* Taipaleenmäki J, Ikäheimo S. on the convergence of management accounting and financial accounting(the role of information technology in accounting change. Int J Account InfSyst 2013;14:321–348.
* Troberg P. IFRS and US GAAP.A Finnish perspective. Helsinki: Talentum; 2007.
* Vaassen EHJ, Hunton JE. An eclectic approach to accounting information systems.Int J Account InfSyst 2009;10:173–6.
* van der Vecken HJM, Wouters MJF. Using accounting information systems by operations managers in a project company. ManageAccount Res 2002;13:345–70.
* Wagner EL, Moll J, Newell S. Accounting logics, reconfiguration of ERP systems and the emergence of new accounting practices:asociomaterial perspective. Manage Account Res 2011;22:181–97.
* Weißenberger BE, Angelkort H. Integration of financial and management accounting systems: the mediating influence of a consistentfinancial language on controllership effectiveness. Manage Account Res 2011;22:160–80.
* Yoon H, Zo H, Ciganek A. Does XBRL adoption reduce information asymmetry? J Bus Res 2011;64:157–63.
* Zeff SA. The evolution of U.S. GAAP: the political forces behind professional standards. CPA J 2005;75(1):18–27.
* Zimmerman J. Accounting for decision making and control. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill; 2000