شناسایی مؤلفه‌های سازمان‌های مُبلغ (مأموریت‌محور) در دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران
محورهای موضوعی : -مدیریت خدمات بهداشتی و درمانی
اکبر بیات
1
(استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد ملایر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ملایر، ایران)
مرتضی مرادی
2
(دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران)
کلید واژه: پیکربندی ساختار, پیکربندی مُبلغ, سازمان‌های مُبلغ, ایدئولوژی سازمانی,
چکیده مقاله :
مقدمه: وقتی‌که ایدئولوژی سازمانی یک سازمان، بسیار قوی شود، می‌تواند تمامی ساختار را تحت تأثیر خود قرار دهد؛ و در نهایت ساختاری به وجود می‌آید که آن را ساختار مُبلغ (ماموریت محور) می‌گوید. لذا پژوهش حاضر، باهدف شناسایی مؤلفه‌های سازمان‌های مُبلغ انجام‌شده است. روش پژوهش: به‌منظور رسیدن به این هدف، در مرحله کیفی ضمن بررسی ادبیات موضوع با روش تحلیل مضمون و مصاحبه‌های نیمه عمیق از 15 نفر خبرگان که اساتید و مدیران دانشگاه علوم پزشگی تهران بودند با روش نمونه گیری غیر تصادفی هدفمند انتخاب شدند؛ برای سنجش روایی مضامین و اعتبار سنجی، از طریق زاویه بندی داده و برای محاسبه پایایی از روش هولستی که با ضریب 98/0 تأیید شدند. و با استفاده از نرم‌افزار مکس‌کیودا شماره 12، معیارهای مؤثر بر سازمان‌های مبلغ شناسایی شد. یافته‌ها: تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌های کیفی، منجر به شکل‌گیری پنجاه و یک مضمون پایه و یازده مضمون سازمان دهنده و سه مضمون فراگیر شامل مؤلفه‌های پیکربندی، مؤلفه‌های محتوایی و مؤلفه‌های ساختاری شد. نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج نشان دادند که معیار ایدئولوژی سازمانی جزء معیارهای اساسی و بازیکنان کلیدی است که در سازمان‌های مُبلغ وجودش ضروری است و باید مورد توجه قرار گیرد.
Introduction: When the organizational ideology of an organization becomes very strong, it can affect the entire structure; and finally, there is a structure that is called the missionary (mission-oriented) structure. Therefore, the current research was carried out with the aim of identifying the components of missionary organizations. Methods: Method: In order to achieve this goal, In the qualitative phase, while reviewing the subject literature through Thematic Analysis approach, and semi-in-depth interviews of 15 experts who were professors and managers of Tehran University of Medical Sciences were selected by non-random sampling method; To measure the validity of the themes and validation, through data angle and to calculate the reliability of the Holsty method, which were confirmed with a coefficient of 0.98. And with the use of MAXQDA No. 12 software, effective criteria on missionary organizations were identified. Results: Qualitative data analysis led to the formation of fifty-one basic themes and eleven organizing themes and three overarching themes including configuration components, content components and structural components. Conclusion: The results showed that the criterion of organizational ideology is one of the basic criteria and key players, which is necessary and should be taken into account in the organization of the missionary organizations.
1- Moradi, M. H. Khadem, S.M. Organizational structure and leadership styles with a community-oriented police approach, Journal of Order and Security, 2014; 6 (22): 1-32. (In Persian).
2- Mintzberg, H., Mintzberg on Management. 2016: Free Pres. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069001100414
3- Pugh, D. S. A taste for innovation. In Management Laureates; 2018: 236-276. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351127004
4- Sadeghi, L., Tabibi, S., & Khalesi, N. Challenges of Organizational Structure in Medical Equipment Management in Iran. Journal of healthcare management, 2021; 12(3): 117-124.doi: 10.30495/JHM.2022.68489.11056. (In Persian).
5- Jacobides, M. G. The inherent limits of organizational structure and the unfulfilled role of hierarchy: Lessons from a near-war. Organization Science, 2007; 18(3): 455-477. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0278
6- Alkhafaji, A., Nelson, R.A. Strategic management: Formulation, implementation, and control. Irwin/McGraw-Hill Columbus, OH; 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203862582
7- Seyed Javadin, S.R. Jalilian, H. Pourshoja, MR. Management Theories: Special for Master's and Doctor of Management exams, knowledge view; 2018 (In Persian).
8- Bayat, A., Latifi, M., Moradi, M., Slambolchi, A. Understanding the configuration of organizational structures with the emphasis on international mission-oriented organization. Journal of International Business Administration, 2019; 2(2): 43-63. 10.22034/JIBA.2019.9080 (In Persian).
9- Rezaian, Ali. Fundamentals of Organization and Management, SAMT Publications; 2016 (In Persian).
10- Jost, J.T. The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 2006; 61(7): 651-670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651
11- Turani S., Zanganeh Baigi M., Salehi M., Chooban Qaleh Jogh B. Investigating the relationship between content dimensions and structural dimensions in the organizational structure of Khatam Hospital in Zahedan. Health system research, 2015; 11 (1): 21-29. http://hsr.mui.ac.ir/article-1-766-fa.html (In Persian).
12- Bayat, A., Latifi, M., Moradi, M., Slambolchi, A. Analysis of the Relationship between Medical Myths and Organizational Ideology with the Role of Mediating Organizational Saga in a Mission - Oriented Organization of the University of Medical Sciences. Journal of healthcare management, 2019; 10(no 1): 67-77(In Persian).
13- Bayat, A. Identifying the Underlying Components of Organizational Ideology. Journal of Public Administration, 2019; 11(3): 481-508. https://doi.org/10.30473/ipom.2019.42380.3324 (In Persian).
14- Mintzberg, H. Ideology and the missionary organization. The strategy process; 2005: 361-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399104400424
15- Wood, S. J. New wave management? Work, Employment Society; 1989: 379-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017089003003007
16- McAuley, J., Duberley, J., Johnson, P. Organization theory: Challenges and perspectives. Pearson Education; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608094705
17- Tomanek, R. Koleje Śląskie as an Example of H. Mintzberg’s Structural Configuration Theory Application in Designing Organizational Structure of a Railway Operator, Transport Development Challenges in the Twenty-First Century. Springer; 2016: 231-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26848-4_21
_||_1- Moradi, M. H. Khadem, S.M. Organizational structure and leadership styles with a community-oriented police approach, Journal of Order and Security, 2014; 6 (22): 1-32. (In Persian).
2- Mintzberg, H., Mintzberg on Management. 2016: Free Pres. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069001100414
3- Pugh, D. S. A taste for innovation. In Management Laureates; 2018: 236-276. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351127004
4- Sadeghi, L., Tabibi, S., & Khalesi, N. Challenges of Organizational Structure in Medical Equipment Management in Iran. Journal of healthcare management, 2021; 12(3): 117-124.doi: 10.30495/JHM.2022.68489.11056. (In Persian).
5- Jacobides, M. G. The inherent limits of organizational structure and the unfulfilled role of hierarchy: Lessons from a near-war. Organization Science, 2007; 18(3): 455-477. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0278
6- Alkhafaji, A., Nelson, R.A. Strategic management: Formulation, implementation, and control. Irwin/McGraw-Hill Columbus, OH; 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203862582
7- Seyed Javadin, S.R. Jalilian, H. Pourshoja, MR. Management Theories: Special for Master's and Doctor of Management exams, knowledge view; 2018 (In Persian).
8- Bayat, A., Latifi, M., Moradi, M., Slambolchi, A. Understanding the configuration of organizational structures with the emphasis on international mission-oriented organization. Journal of International Business Administration, 2019; 2(2): 43-63. 10.22034/JIBA.2019.9080 (In Persian).
9- Rezaian, Ali. Fundamentals of Organization and Management, SAMT Publications; 2016 (In Persian).
10- Jost, J.T. The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 2006; 61(7): 651-670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651
11- Turani S., Zanganeh Baigi M., Salehi M., Chooban Qaleh Jogh B. Investigating the relationship between content dimensions and structural dimensions in the organizational structure of Khatam Hospital in Zahedan. Health system research, 2015; 11 (1): 21-29. http://hsr.mui.ac.ir/article-1-766-fa.html (In Persian).
12- Bayat, A., Latifi, M., Moradi, M., Slambolchi, A. Analysis of the Relationship between Medical Myths and Organizational Ideology with the Role of Mediating Organizational Saga in a Mission - Oriented Organization of the University of Medical Sciences. Journal of healthcare management, 2019; 10(no 1): 67-77(In Persian).
13- Bayat, A. Identifying the Underlying Components of Organizational Ideology. Journal of Public Administration, 2019; 11(3): 481-508. https://doi.org/10.30473/ipom.2019.42380.3324 (In Persian).
14- Mintzberg, H. Ideology and the missionary organization. The strategy process; 2005: 361-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399104400424
15- Wood, S. J. New wave management? Work, Employment Society; 1989: 379-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017089003003007
16- McAuley, J., Duberley, J., Johnson, P. Organization theory: Challenges and perspectives. Pearson Education; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608094705
17- Tomanek, R. Koleje Śląskie as an Example of H. Mintzberg’s Structural Configuration Theory Application in Designing Organizational Structure of a Railway Operator, Transport Development Challenges in the Twenty-First Century. Springer; 2016: 231-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26848-4_21