طراحی الگوی پیشنهادی نوآوری در شرکتهای دانش بنیان نانو و بایو فناوری حوزه سلامت
محورهای موضوعی : -مدیریت اطلاعات بهداشتی و درمانی
مرضیه تهم
1
,
صدیقه محمد اسماعیل
2
*
,
فاطمه نوشین فرد
3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 - دانشیار گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
3 - دانشیارگروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
کلید واژه: نوآوری, شرکت دانش بنیان, نانوفناوری, بایو فناوری, سلامت.,
چکیده مقاله :
مقدمه: هدف پژوهش حاضر طراحی الگوی نوآوری در میان شرکت های دانش بنیان نانو و بایو فناوری حوزه سلامت بود.
روش پژوهش: این مطالعه از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و از نظر روش انجام پژوهش کیفی بود و با استفاده از انجام مصاحبه های نیمه ساختاریافته با 10 نفر از خبرگان که به صورت هدفمند انتخاب شده بودند، ابعاد، مولفه ها، و شاخص های نهایی برای الگوی نوآوری شناسایی و تعیین شد. براي حصول اطمينان از روايي بخش كيفي (روایی صوری و محتوایی کیفی) پژوهش و به منظور اطمينان يافته ها از ديدگاه پژوهشگر، اقداماتی از قبیل، بازبيني توسط اعضاء، تجربه و سوابق اساتيد راهنما و مشاور استفاده شد. برای پایایی نیز از تکنیک محاسبه پایایی بین دو کدگذار (شاخص تکرارپذیری) استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها: تجزیه و تحلیل داده های بدست آمده منجر به شکل گیری27 مقوله و 5 مضمون اصلی گردید، طی این پژوهش 5 عامل، شرایط علّی نوآوری، پیامدهای نوآوری، شرایط زمینه ای، شرایط مداخله گر و راهبردهای نوآوری به عنوان مضامین اصلی پژوهش انتخاب گردید، نتایج دلفی فازی نشان داد تمامی مفاهیم مربوط به مدل پارادایمی نوآوری دارای آستانه پذیرش بالای 0/7 بود و مؤلفه های شناسایی شده برای مدل پارادایمی تأیید شد.
نتیجه‌گیری: منطبق بر یافته‌ها فراهم کردن برخی عوامل و شرایط و از بین بردن موانع با استفاده از راهبردهای مناسب می‌تواند برای سیاست گزاران از منظر پیاده سازی الگوی نوآوری در شرکت های دانش بنیان نانو و بایوفناوری حوزه سلامت جهت کسب مزیت رقابتی و ارتقای جایگاه خود در سطح بین المللی حائز اهمیت است.
Introduction: The aim of the present study was to design an innovation model for knowledge-based companies in the field of nanotechnology and biotechnology related to health.
Methods: This study was applied in terms of purpose and used a qualitative research method. Through semi-structured interviews with 10 experts who were purposefully selected, the final dimensions, components, and indicators of the innovation model were identified and determined. To ensure the validity of the qualitative section (face and content validity), measures such as member checking, as well as the experience and expertise of supervisors and advisors, were employed. Reliability was also ensured using the technique of calculating inter-coder reliability (repeatability index).
Results: The analysis of the obtained data led to the formation of 27 categories and 5 main themes. During this research, five factors—causal conditions of innovation, innovation outcomes, contextual conditions, intervening conditions, and innovation strategies—were selected as the main themes of the study. The results of the fuzzy Delphi method showed that all concepts related to the innovation paradigm model had an acceptance threshold higher than 0.7, and the identified components of the paradigm model were confirmed.
Conclusion: Based on the findings, creating certain conditions and removing obstacles through the use of appropriate strategies can be of great importance for policymakers in the implementation of the innovation model in knowledge-based companies in the field of nanotechnology and biotechnology related to health, to gain a competitive advantage and enhance their position at the international level.
1- Entezari Y. The ecosystem of knowledge-based developmentâ and employment of higher education graduates. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 2023; 28(1): 1-32. doi: 10.52547/irphe.1401.1.1. [In Persian]
2- Liyanage Sh, Netswera F.G. "Greening universities with mode 3 and quintuple helix model of innovation–Production of knowledge and innovation in knowledge-based economy, Botswana. Journal of the Knowledge Economy; 2021: 1-31
3- Frishammar J, Lichtenthaler U & Rundquist J. Identifying technology commercialization opportunities: The importance of integrating product development knowledge. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2012; 29(4): 573-89.
4- Aliabadian A, Khamseh A, Zamani Moghadam A, Hosseini Shakib M. Identify and rank the key factors affecting the value acquisition based on the innovation economy in information technology knowledge-based companies. Program and Development Research, 2023; 4(1): 39-66. doi: 10.22034/pbr.2023.362913.1273. [In Persian]
5- Chugh G, Siddique K. H, Solaiman Z. M. Nanobiotechnology for agriculture: Smart technology for combating nutrient deficiencies with nanotoxicity challenges. Sustainability, s (2021); 13(4): 1781.
6- McNeil RD, Lowe J, Mastroianni T, Cronin J & Frek D. Barriers to nanotechnology commercialization. Availiable at: https://www.ntis.gov/pdf/Report-BarriersNanotechnologyComm ercialization.pdf; 2007.
7- Bawa R. Will the nanomedicine “patent land grab” thwart commercialization? Nanomedicine, 2005; 1(2005): 346-50.
8- Etheridge ML, Campbell SA, Erdman AG, Haynes CL, Wolf SM & McCullough J. The big picture on nanomedicine: The state of investigational and approved nanomedicine products. Nanomedicine, 2013; 9(1): 1-14.
9- Abdelhamid HN, Badr G. Nanobiotechnology as a platform for the diagnosis of COVID-19: a review. Nanotechnology for Environmental Engineerin, 2021; 6(1): 1–26.
10- Fouladvand N, Imankhan N, Mojibi T. Model of using open innovation in knowledge-based companies in Tehran province. Strategic Management Studies of National Defence Studies, 2022; 12(47): 251-280. [In Persian]
11- Capasso M, Rybalka M. Innovation Pattern Heterogeneity: Data Driven Retrieval of Firms’ Approaches to Innovation. Businesse, 2022: 2(1): 54- 81.
12- Zotoo I. K, Lu Z, Liu G. Big data management capabilities and librarians' innovative performance: The role of value perception using the theory of knowledge-based dynamic capability. The Journal of Academic Librarianshi, 2021: 47(2): 102272.
13- Bai X, Wu J, Liu Y, Yang Y, Wang M. Research on the Impact of Global Innovation Network on Corporate Performance. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2021; 34(5): 518-534.
14- Jahanifar M, Nejad Mohammad Nameghi E, Asadi A, & Bahmani Chub Basti A. Identifying and Prioritizing Factors Affecting Marketing Innovation in Medical Service Organizations. Journal of healthcare management, 2023: 14(3): 69-80. [In Persian].
15- Bahrami F, Shahmoradi B. Knowledge-based Companies and their Alignment with the Capabilities of the Iranian Economy - Product space approach. Journal of Economics of Knowledge_based Development, 2021; 1(2):1-30. [In Persian]
16- Varkey P, Horne A, Bennet K. Innovation in health care: a primer. American Journal of Medical Quality, 2008; 23(5): 382-388. doi:10.1177/1062860608317695.
17- Keshavarz S, Yaghoubi N, Deghati A. Evaluation of Success Factors of Knowledge-Based Companies of Fars’ Science and Technology Park Using Structural Equation Modeling. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 2021; 11(1): 35-50. [In Persian]
18- Barasaa L, Knobenb J.s, Vermeulenb P, Kimuyua P, Kinyanjui B. Institutions, resources and innovation in East Africa: A firm level approach. Research Policy, 2020; 46: 280–291.
19- Shirazi H, Hashemzadeh G, Radfar R, Torabi T. The effect innovation capability on technology commercialization performance in knowledge-based companies: The mediating role organizational innovation. Innovation Management in Defensive Organizations, 2019; 2(3): 81-106. doi: 10.22034/qjimdo.2019.101025. [In Persian]
20- Hosseinpour M., rezaee B, Bakhsham M, karimi H. Designing a Model of Creation and Development of Knowledge-Based Companies Using Qualitative Approach Grounded Theory in the City of Kermanshah. Karafan Quarterly Scientific Journal, 2022; 19(2): 653-680. doi: 10.48301/kssa.2021.129162. [In Persian]
21- Zandi M, Khayatian Yazdi M, Mohammadi M. Identifying the factors affecting the innovation capacity of Iranian ICT firms. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 2020; 13(1): 93-123. doi: 10.22035/isih.2021.3909.4026. [In Persian]
22- Amini B, Faqhi Farhamand N, iranzadeh S. Designing a service innovation model and investigating the factors affecting service innovation in Mellat Bank of Azerbaijan province. Geography (Regional Planning), 2022; 12(49): 91-105. doi: 10.22034/jgeoq.2023.359743.3844. [In Persian]
23- Mostafavi Z. S. Identification and Ranking of Factors Influencing Innovation in Universities in the View of Faculty Members; Case Study: Amir Kabir University. Strategic Management Thought, 2020; 14(1): 317-358. doi: 10.30497/smt.2020.2749. [In Persian]
24- Saber Kohneh Goorabi M H, Iranmanesh S H, Jafari P. Factors influencing Open Innovation: Case of Knowledge-Based Companies in Oil and Gas Industry. Quarterly Journal of Energy Policy and Planning Research, 2021; 6(4): 81-123. [In Persian]
25- Wasiq M, Kamal= M, Ali N. Factors Influencing Green Innovation Adoption and Its Impact on the Sustainability Performance of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 2023; 15: 2447. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032447
26- Ali O, Murray P.A, Muhammed Sh, Dwivedi Y, Rashiti Sh. Evaluating Organizational Level IT Innovation Adoption Factors among Global Firms. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2022; 7(3): 51-65.
27- Therin, F. Handbook of Research on Techno-entrepreneurship, Edward Elgar; 2007.