شناسایی و اولویت¬بندی عوامل مؤثر بر پیاده¬سازی جمع¬سپاری تأمین مالی در صنعت مخابرات کشور
شناسایی و اولویت بندی عوامل مؤثر بر پیادهسازی جمعسپاری تأمین مالی در صنعت مخابرات کشور
محورهای موضوعی : دانش مالی تحلیل اوراق بهادار
رمضان میرزائی 1 , پیمان غفاری 2 * , ایرج نوری 3 , علی لعل بار 4
1 - دانشجوی دکتری گروه مدیریت، واحد اراک، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اراک، ایران
2 - دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، واحد اراک، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اراک، ایران (نویسنده مسئول)
3 - استادیار، گروه مدیریت، واحد اراک، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اراک، ایران
4 - استادیار، گروه مدیریت، واحد اراک، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اراک، ایران
کلید واژه: جمع سپاری تأمین مالی, الگو, فراترکیب, عوامل, اولویت بندی,
چکیده مقاله :
مشارکت مردم در تصمیم¬گیری¬ها و اداره امور، به عنوان عاملی که بیشترین میزان مقبولیت را برای حکومت¬ها فراهم می¬آورد، همواره یکی از مهم¬ترین ارزش¬های مدنظر در حکمرانی بوده است. از سوی دیگر افزایش پیچیدگی مشکلات و نیازها به ویژه در دوران اخیر، باعث شده دولت¬ها بیشتر از گذشته خود را نیازمند به مشارکت عامه و بهره¬مندی از آرای آن¬ها و افزایش نوآوری ببینند. از همین رو به دنبال کشف و طراحی راه¬های جدید و برخط برای جلب مشارکت عمومی و رفع نواقص راه¬های پیشین در حوزه تأمین مالی هستند. صنعت مخابرات، به عنوان یکی از سازمان¬ها و صنایع تأثیرگذار در پیشرفت اقتصادی و ارتباطاتی کشور، نقش مهمی در اعتلای کشور دارد و این صنعت دارای مدیران و کارکنان متخصص در لایه¬های خُرد و کلان سازمانی می¬باشد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی و اولویت¬بندی عوامل مؤثر بر جمع سپاری تأمین مالی در صنعت مخابرات با استفاده از روش فراترکیب انجام شده است.
People's participation in decision-making and administration, as a factor that provides the most acceptance for governments, has always been one of the most important values considered in governance. On the other hand, the increasing complexity of problems and needs, especially in the recent era, has caused governments to see themselves more than in the past in need of public participation and benefiting from their votes and increasing innovation. Therefore, they seek to discover and design new and online ways to attract public participation and eliminate the shortcomings of previous ways in the field of financing. People's participation in decision-making and administration, as a factor that provides the most acceptance for governments, has always been one of the most important values considered in governance. On the other hand, the increasing complexity of problems and needs, especially in the recent era, has caused governments to see themselves more than in the past in need of public participation and benefiting from their votes and increasing innovation. Therefore, they seek to discover and design new and online ways to attract public participation and eliminate the shortcomings of previous ways in the field of financing.
- Acar, O., (2019.) Motivations and solution appropriateness in crowdsourcing
challenges for innovation. Research Policy. 48(8). 1-13. DOI:
10.1016/j.respol.2018.11.010
- Allison TH, Davis BC, Webb JW, Short JC (2017) Persuasion in crowdfunding: an elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance. J Bus Ventur 32(6):707–725
- Anglin AH, Short JC, Drover W, Stevenson RM, McKenny AF, Allison TH (2018) The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance. J Bus Ventur 33(4):470–492
- Lee In, Shin Yong Jae. (2018). Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. Business Horizons, 61,1, 35-46
- Kaartemo V (2017) The elements of a successful crowdfunding campaign: a systematic literature review of crowdfunding performance. Int Rev Entrep 15(3):291–3.
- Koch J, Siering M (2015) Crowdfunding success factors: the characteristics of successfully funded projects on crowdfund-ing platforms. In: Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Münster, Germany Kromidha E, Robson P (2016) Social identity and signalling success factors in online crowdfunding. Entrep Reg Dev 28(9–10):605–629. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 08985 626. 2016. 11984 25.
- Hang & Leo. (2015). Bye bye banks? Howe Retail Banks are Being Displaced, Diminishid and Disintermediated by Tech Startups – and What They Can Do to Survive.1 edition. USA. Wunderkammer
- Hörisch J, Tenner I (2020) How environmental and social orientations influence the funding success of investment-based crowdfunding: The mediating role of the number of funders and the average funding amount. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 161: 120,311. ht
- Hsieh H-C, Hsieh Y-C, Vu THC (2019) How social movements influence crowdfunding success. Pacific- Basin Finance Journal 53: 308–320. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. pacfin. 2018. 11. 00
- Lukkarinen A, Teich JE, Wallenius H, Wallenius J (2016) Success drivers of online equity crowdfunding campaigns. Decis Support Syst 87:26–38. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. dss. 2016. 04. 00
- Pyayt PO, Thomas HA, Arvin S, Sakdipon J (2019) User entrepreneurs’ multiple identities and crowdfunding performance: effects through product innovativeness, perceived passion, and need similarity. J Bus Ventur 34(5):105895.1–105895.16
- Petitjean M (2017) What explains the success of reward-based crowdfunding campaigns as they unfold? Evidence from the French crowdfunding platform Kisskissbankbank. Finance Res Lett 26:9–14
- Hildebrand T, Puri M, Rocholl J (2017) Adverse incentives in crowdfunding. Management Science 63(3): 587–608. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1287/ mnsc. 2015. 23
- Rose S, Wentzel D, Hopp C, Kaminsk J (2021) Launching for success: the effects of psychological distance and mental simulation on funding decisions and crowdfunding performance. J Bus Ventur 36:106021
- Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing 29 (1), 1–16
- McKenny, A. F., Allison, T. H., Ketchen, D. J., Short, J. C., & Ireland, R. D. (2017). How should crowdfunding research evolve? A survey of the Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice editorial board. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 41 (2), 291–304.
- Mollick E, Nanda R (2014) Wisdom or madness? Comparing crowds with expert evaluation in funding the arts. Manage Sci 62(6):1533–1553. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1287/ mnsc. 2015. 22
- Jin Y, Ding C, Duan Y, Cheng HK (2020) Click to success? The temporal effects of Facebook likes on
crowdfunding. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 21(5): 1191–1213. https:// doi. org/ 10. 17705/ 1jais. 0063
- Steigenberger N, Wilhelm H (2018) Extending signaling theory to rhetorical signals: Evidence from crowdfunding. Organization Science 29(3): 529–546.
- Schwienbacher, A., & Larralde, B. (2012). “Crowdfunding of small entrepreneurial ventures.” In: The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurial Finance, edited by Douglas Cumming, Oxford University Press, 369–391.
- Short, J. C., Ketchen, D. J., McKenny, A. F., Allison, T. H., & Ireland, R. D. (2017). Research on crowdfunding: Reviewing the (very recent) past and celebrating the present. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 41 (2), 149–160.
- Tafesse W (2021) Communicating crowdfunding campaigns: how message strategy, vivid media use and product type influence campaign success. J Bus Res 127:252–263
- Zhang Y, Tan CD, Sun J, Yang Z (2020b) Why do people patronize donationbased crowdfunding platforms? An activity perspective of critical success factors. Comput Hum Behav 112:106470
- Zhang X, Liu X, Wang X, Zhao H, Zhang W (2022) Exploring the effects of social capital on crowdfunding performance: a holistic analysis from the empirical and predictive views. Comput Hum Behav 126:1–17
- Zheng H, Li D, Wu J, Xu Y (2014) The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: a comparative study in China and US. Inf Manag 51(4):488–496
- Zheng H, Professor Wu H, Guandong Xu A, Hung J-L, Qi Z, Xu B (2016) The role of trust management in reward-based crowdfunding. Online Information Review 40(1): 97–118. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1108/ oir- 04- 2015- 0099.
- Yu, S., Johnson, S., Lai, C., Cricelli, A., & Fleming, L. (2017). Crowdfunding and regional entrepreneurial investment: an application of the CrowdBerkeley database. Research Policy, 46 (10), 1723–1737