• صفحه اصلی
  • پویایی جمعیت ماهی بیاح (Liza abu, Heckel, 1843) در تالاب شادگان

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : 14552 بازدید : 147 صفحه: 181 - 193

10.22034/jest.2019.14552

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

پویایی جمعیت ماهی بیاح (Liza abu, Heckel, 1843) در تالاب شادگان

محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت سواحل

سیداحمدرضا هاشمی 1 , سید علی اکبر هدایتی 2 , رسول قربانی 3 , احمدرضا جبله 4

1 - استادیار، مرکز تحقیقات شیلاتی آبهای دور، موسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، چابهار، ایران.
2 - دانشیار، گروه تولید و بهره‌برداری، دانش‌کده شیلات و محیط زیست، دانشگاه علوم کشاوزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان
3 - دانشیار، گروه تولید و بهره‌برداری، دانش‌کده شیلات و محیط زیست، دانشگاه علوم کشاوزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان
4 - دانشجوی دکترای شیلات، گروه تولید و بهره‌برداری، دانشکده شیلات و محیط زیست، دانشگاه علوم کشاوزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان *(مسوول مکاتبات).

تاریخ دریافت : 1348/10/11 تاریخ پذیرش : 1348/10/11 تاریخ انتشار : 1348/10/11

کلید واژه: ماهی بیاح Liza abu) ), رشد, مرگ‌ومیر, رابطه طول-وزن,

چکیده مقاله :

چکیده زمینه و هدف: در این تحقیق بررسی پارامترهای رشد و مرگ و میر ماهی بیاح (Liza abu)در تالاب شادگان مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. روش بررسی: به منظور بررسی فراوانی های طولی و وزنی نمونه برداری ماهانه در پنج ایست گاه شامل دورق(ماهشهر)، رگبه، خروسی، سلمانه و عطیش صورت گرفت. در طول اجرای پروژه از فروردین 1392 تا اسفند 1392، تعداد 493 ماهی صید و ماهانه به منظور زیست سنجی به آزمایش گاه منتقل شد. یافته ها: میانگین طولی (±SD) برحسب میلی متر به ترتیب برای جنس نر(20±138)، جنس ماده( 18±138) و میانگین وزنی (±SD) برحسب گرم به ترتیب برای جنس نر( 13±33) و جنس ماده( 14±33) به دست آمد. بحث و نتیجه گیری: معادله رابطه طول-وزن برای جنس ماده ماهی بیاح به صورت (R2=0.89، W=0.00001L3.33 (N=282 و برای جنس نر(,R2 =0.88W=0.00001L 2.98 (N=195حاصل شد. مقادیر طول بی نهایت جنس ماده، جنس نر و کل به ترتیب به صورت 247، 220 و 247 میلی متر، ضرایب رشد 56/0، 74/0، 66/0 و میزان مرگ و میر کل به ترتیب 83/2، 90/2 و 98/2، میزان مرگ و میر طبیعی به ترتیب 22/1، 36/1 و 22/1 و مرگ و میر صیادی به ترتیب73/1، 36/1 و 76/1 محاسبه گردید. با توجه به پارامترهای رشد و مرگ و میر به دست آمده از ماهیان و بر اساس شاخص انجمن شیلاتی آمریکا این ماهی جزء ماهیان با آسیب پذیری کم به حساب می آید.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Background and Objective: In this study, the parameters related to growth and mortality of Liza abu in Shadegan wetland were studied. Method: The sampling was carried out monthly to determine the length and weight at five stations including Douragh (Mahshahr), Rogbeh, Khoorosi, Salmaneh and Ateish. During implementation of the project from March 2013 to February 2014, a total of 493 fish were caught and transferred monthly to the laboratory for biometric analysis. Finding:The average lengths (±SD) in millimeters for male (20±138) and female (18±138) as well as the average weights (±SD) in grams for male (13±33) and female (14±33) were obtained respectively. Discussion and Conclusion: The length-weight relationships for female (R2=0.89, W=0.00001L3.33, N=282) and male (R2=0.88, W=0.00001L 2.98, N=195) Liza abu were obtained. The values of length (247, 220 and 247 mm), growth parameters (0.56, 0.74, and 0.66), total mortality (2.83, 2.90 and 2.98), natural mortality (1.22, 1.36 and 1.22) and fishing mortality (1.73, 1.36 and 1.76)  for male, female and total were calculated, respectively. Considering the growth and mortality parameters obtained from American fisheries society (AFS) indices, this speciesis classified as a low vulnerable group

منابع و مأخذ:


  1. Turan, C., Erguden, D. and Turan, F., 2004. Genetic and morphological structure of liza abu (Heckel, 1843) population from the Rivers Orontes, Euphrates and Tigris. Journal of Veterinary Animal Science. pp. 729-734.
    2.

  1. Coad, B. W. 2006. Endemicity in the freshwater fishes of Iran. Iranian Journal of Animal Biosystematics, 1(1) (2005):1-13.
    2.
  2. Sattari, M,. Shahsavani, D. and Shafii,. Sh. 2005. Ichthyology 2 (systematic). Press HaqShenas.: 246 -245.
    3.
  3. Abdoli, A. 2000. Iranian freshwater fish, The Museum of Nature and Wildlife Iran, page 377.
    4.
  4. Khalfe nilsaz,. M. 2012. Comprehensive monitoring Shadegan  wetland. Aquaculture Research Center south of the country. 172 pages.
    5.
  5. Dezfolnejad, M,. Jamili, Sh,. Sharifpor,. A. and Abbasi,. F. 2007. Studying the process of sexual maturation Liza abu material (Liza abu) in waters province, Research and development in cattle breeding.
    6.
  6. Cheraghi, M., Porkhabaz, H. and Javanmardi,. S. 2013. Mercury concentration in fish feed Liza abu (Liza abu) Karun River, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, during the twenty-Issue.
    7.
  7. Ghaflemarzi, J. 1996. Fisheries and Fish Resources Valuation Comprehensive Studies Hoor Shadegan, Fishery Research Center of Khuzestan Province, 257 p. (In Persian).
    8.
  8. Ansari, H. and  Mohamadi, GH. 1999. Comparison of fishing and fishing status in Shadegan wetland, Southern Water Resources Research Center, 60 p. (In Persian).
    9.
  9. Lotfi, A. Ghafari, H. Behroozirad, B. Savari, A. and Kavoosi, K. 2002. Human activities and their effects on Shadegan wetland ecosystems, Shadegan wetland environmental management project, Report No. 2, Pandam Consulting Engineers, 74 p. (In Persian).
    10.
  10. Hashemi, S. A. R. 2010b. Study of some biology characteristics of fish main species in the Shadegan wetland. National Wildlife Conference, Azad University, Ahvaz, March 2010. 13 pp. (In Persian).
    11.
  11. Doğu, Z., Sahinoz, E., Aral, F., sevik, R. 2013. The growth characteristics of LizaabuHeckel, 1843) in Atatürk Dam Lake, African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(34):4434-4440.
    12.
  12. Sparre, P. and Venema, S. C. 1998. Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment, FAO Fisheries technical paper, Roma, 450 pp.
    13.
  13. Hashemi, S. A. R. 2010a. Survey growth parameters of fish species in the Shadegan wetland. National Wildlife Conference, Azad University, Ahvaz, March 2010. 14 pp. (In Persian).
    14.
  14. Bartulovic, V., Glamuzina, B., Conides, A., Dulcic, J., Lucic, D., Njire, J. and Kozul, V., 2004. Age, Growth, Mortality and Sex Ratio of Sand Smelt, Atherinaboyeri, Risso, 1810 (Pisces: Atherinidae) in the Estuary of the Mala Neretva River (Middle-Eastern Adriatic, Croatia), J. Appl. Ichthyol., 20: 427-430.
    15.

  1. Hashemi, S., Ghorbani, R., Kymaram, F., Hossini S. A., Eskandari, G., Hedayati, A., 2015.  Fish Species Composition, Distribution and Abundance in Shadegan Wetland. Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal. 6: 128. doi:10.4172/2150-3508.1000128.
    2.
  2. Mitsch, W.J and Gosselink., J. G. 2000. The value of wetlands: Importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecological Economics, 35(1):25-35.
    3.
  3. Ramsar Convention 1971. http://www.ramsar.org/ Wetlands International Ramsar.http://www.ramsar.org/key_sitelist.htm sites database. 2014.
    4.

  1. Pillia, P., Pillia, N., Muthian, C., Yohannan, T., Mohamad kasiam, H. and Gopakumar, G., 2000. Stock assessment of castal tuna in the Indian sea. In. Pillai, N.G.K., Menon, N.G., Pillai, P.P. and Ganga, U. (Eds.) Management Scombroids Fisheries, Central Marine Fishery Research Institute, Kochin. Pp. 125-130.
    2.

  1. Van den Eelaart, A., 1954. Report to the Government of Iraq on the
    Development of Inland Fisheries. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Report of the Expanded Technical Assistance Program, 270:42 p.
    2.
  2. Szypula, J., P. Epler, R. Bartel and J. Szczerbowksi, 2001. Age and growth of fish in lakes Tharthar, Razzazah and Habbaniya. Arch. Pol. Fish. 9 (Suppl. 1):185-197.
    3.
  3. Ünlü, E., K. Balci and N. Meriç, 2000. Aspects of the biology of Liza abu (Mugilidae) in the Tigris River (Turkey). Cybium 24(1):27-43.
    4.

  1. Vain, D. 2003.  Principles and methods of Biostatistics .Press AmirKabir, Mohammad Taghi ayatollah translation, page 611.
    2.

  1. Froese, R. and Binohlan, C. 2000. Empirical relationships to estimate asymptotic length, length at first maturity and length at maximum yield per recruit in fishes, with a simple method to evaluate length frequency data. J. Fish Biol. 56:758-773.
    2.
  2.  Gayanilo, F.C. Jr., P. Sparre and Pauly. D. 2003. FAO-ICLARM Stock Assessment Tools(FiSAT) user’s Guide. FAO Computerised Information Series (Fisheries). No. 8. Rome, FAO, 266p.
    3.
  3. Jenning, S. Kasier, M. and Reynold, J. 2000. Marine Fisheries Ecology.Black well Science.391pp.
    4.

  1. King, M. G. 2007.  Fisheries biology assessment and management. Second edition published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd., ISBN. 978-1-4051-5831-2, pp. 189-194.
    2.

  1. Lalèyè, P. A. 2006. Length-weight and length-length relationships of fish from the Ouémé River in Bénin (West Africa). J. Appl. Ichthyol. 22: 502-510.
    2.
  2. Froese, R., Pauly, D. 2012. FishBase World Wide Web electronic publication http://www.fishbase.org; (26, 05.2012).
    3.
  3. Winemiller, K.O. and Rose, A. K. 1992. Patterns of life-history diversification in North American fishes: Implications for population regulation. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49: 2196–2217.
    4.
  4. Cheung,W., Pitcher,T., and Pauly, D., 2005. A fuzzy logic expert system to estimate intrinsic extinction vulnerabilities of marine fishes to fishing. Biological conservation 124(97-111).
    5.
  5. Zar, J. H., 1996. Biostatistical analysis. 3rd edition. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey,USA. 662P.
    6.
  6. Yıldırım, A., Erdoğan, O. and Turkmen, M. 2002. On the age, growth and reproduction of the Barbel, Barbusplebejus (Steindachner, 1897) in the Oltu Stream of Coruh River (Artvin-Turkey).Turk. J. Zool. 25: 163-168.
    7.

 

 

 

_||_

  1. Turan, C., Erguden, D. and Turan, F., 2004. Genetic and morphological structure of liza abu (Heckel, 1843) population from the Rivers Orontes, Euphrates and Tigris. Journal of Veterinary Animal Science. pp. 729-734.
    2.

  1. Coad, B. W. 2006. Endemicity in the freshwater fishes of Iran. Iranian Journal of Animal Biosystematics, 1(1) (2005):1-13.
    2.
  2. Sattari, M,. Shahsavani, D. and Shafii,. Sh. 2005. Ichthyology 2 (systematic). Press HaqShenas.: 246 -245.
    3.
  3. Abdoli, A. 2000. Iranian freshwater fish, The Museum of Nature and Wildlife Iran, page 377.
    4.
  4. Khalfe nilsaz,. M. 2012. Comprehensive monitoring Shadegan  wetland. Aquaculture Research Center south of the country. 172 pages.
    5.
  5. Dezfolnejad, M,. Jamili, Sh,. Sharifpor,. A. and Abbasi,. F. 2007. Studying the process of sexual maturation Liza abu material (Liza abu) in waters province, Research and development in cattle breeding.
    6.
  6. Cheraghi, M., Porkhabaz, H. and Javanmardi,. S. 2013. Mercury concentration in fish feed Liza abu (Liza abu) Karun River, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, during the twenty-Issue.
    7.
  7. Ghaflemarzi, J. 1996. Fisheries and Fish Resources Valuation Comprehensive Studies Hoor Shadegan, Fishery Research Center of Khuzestan Province, 257 p. (In Persian).
    8.
  8. Ansari, H. and  Mohamadi, GH. 1999. Comparison of fishing and fishing status in Shadegan wetland, Southern Water Resources Research Center, 60 p. (In Persian).
    9.
  9. Lotfi, A. Ghafari, H. Behroozirad, B. Savari, A. and Kavoosi, K. 2002. Human activities and their effects on Shadegan wetland ecosystems, Shadegan wetland environmental management project, Report No. 2, Pandam Consulting Engineers, 74 p. (In Persian).
    10.
  10. Hashemi, S. A. R. 2010b. Study of some biology characteristics of fish main species in the Shadegan wetland. National Wildlife Conference, Azad University, Ahvaz, March 2010. 13 pp. (In Persian).
    11.
  11. Doğu, Z., Sahinoz, E., Aral, F., sevik, R. 2013. The growth characteristics of LizaabuHeckel, 1843) in Atatürk Dam Lake, African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(34):4434-4440.
    12.
  12. Sparre, P. and Venema, S. C. 1998. Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment, FAO Fisheries technical paper, Roma, 450 pp.
    13.
  13. Hashemi, S. A. R. 2010a. Survey growth parameters of fish species in the Shadegan wetland. National Wildlife Conference, Azad University, Ahvaz, March 2010. 14 pp. (In Persian).
    14.
  14. Bartulovic, V., Glamuzina, B., Conides, A., Dulcic, J., Lucic, D., Njire, J. and Kozul, V., 2004. Age, Growth, Mortality and Sex Ratio of Sand Smelt, Atherinaboyeri, Risso, 1810 (Pisces: Atherinidae) in the Estuary of the Mala Neretva River (Middle-Eastern Adriatic, Croatia), J. Appl. Ichthyol., 20: 427-430.
    15.

  1. Hashemi, S., Ghorbani, R., Kymaram, F., Hossini S. A., Eskandari, G., Hedayati, A., 2015.  Fish Species Composition, Distribution and Abundance in Shadegan Wetland. Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal. 6: 128. doi:10.4172/2150-3508.1000128.
    2.
  2. Mitsch, W.J and Gosselink., J. G. 2000. The value of wetlands: Importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecological Economics, 35(1):25-35.
    3.
  3. Ramsar Convention 1971. http://www.ramsar.org/ Wetlands International Ramsar.http://www.ramsar.org/key_sitelist.htm sites database. 2014.
    4.

  1. Pillia, P., Pillia, N., Muthian, C., Yohannan, T., Mohamad kasiam, H. and Gopakumar, G., 2000. Stock assessment of castal tuna in the Indian sea. In. Pillai, N.G.K., Menon, N.G., Pillai, P.P. and Ganga, U. (Eds.) Management Scombroids Fisheries, Central Marine Fishery Research Institute, Kochin. Pp. 125-130.
    2.

  1. Van den Eelaart, A., 1954. Report to the Government of Iraq on the
    Development of Inland Fisheries. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Report of the Expanded Technical Assistance Program, 270:42 p.
    2.
  2. Szypula, J., P. Epler, R. Bartel and J. Szczerbowksi, 2001. Age and growth of fish in lakes Tharthar, Razzazah and Habbaniya. Arch. Pol. Fish. 9 (Suppl. 1):185-197.
    3.
  3. Ünlü, E., K. Balci and N. Meriç, 2000. Aspects of the biology of Liza abu (Mugilidae) in the Tigris River (Turkey). Cybium 24(1):27-43.
    4.

  1. Vain, D. 2003.  Principles and methods of Biostatistics .Press AmirKabir, Mohammad Taghi ayatollah translation, page 611.
    2.

  1. Froese, R. and Binohlan, C. 2000. Empirical relationships to estimate asymptotic length, length at first maturity and length at maximum yield per recruit in fishes, with a simple method to evaluate length frequency data. J. Fish Biol. 56:758-773.
    2.
  2.  Gayanilo, F.C. Jr., P. Sparre and Pauly. D. 2003. FAO-ICLARM Stock Assessment Tools(FiSAT) user’s Guide. FAO Computerised Information Series (Fisheries). No. 8. Rome, FAO, 266p.
    3.
  3. Jenning, S. Kasier, M. and Reynold, J. 2000. Marine Fisheries Ecology.Black well Science.391pp.
    4.

  1. King, M. G. 2007.  Fisheries biology assessment and management. Second edition published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd., ISBN. 978-1-4051-5831-2, pp. 189-194.
    2.

  1. Lalèyè, P. A. 2006. Length-weight and length-length relationships of fish from the Ouémé River in Bénin (West Africa). J. Appl. Ichthyol. 22: 502-510.
    2.
  2. Froese, R., Pauly, D. 2012. FishBase World Wide Web electronic publication http://www.fishbase.org; (26, 05.2012).
    3.
  3. Winemiller, K.O. and Rose, A. K. 1992. Patterns of life-history diversification in North American fishes: Implications for population regulation. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49: 2196–2217.
    4.
  4. Cheung,W., Pitcher,T., and Pauly, D., 2005. A fuzzy logic expert system to estimate intrinsic extinction vulnerabilities of marine fishes to fishing. Biological conservation 124(97-111).
    5.
  5. Zar, J. H., 1996. Biostatistical analysis. 3rd edition. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey,USA. 662P.
    6.
  6. Yıldırım, A., Erdoğan, O. and Turkmen, M. 2002. On the age, growth and reproduction of the Barbel, Barbusplebejus (Steindachner, 1897) in the Oltu Stream of Coruh River (Artvin-Turkey).Turk. J. Zool. 25: 163-168.
    7.

 

 

 

مقالات مرتبط

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]