ارائه الگوی ریسک‌های HSE در خطوط انتقال شرکت گاز با ترکیب روش‌های فراترکیب و دیمتل فازی

محورهای موضوعی : تحلیل ریسک زیست محیطی

سهیلا فتح اللهی چالشتری ¹ , میثم بابایی فارسانی ² , فرهاد فرهادی ³

1 - دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت، موسسه آموزش عالی نورهدایت شهرکرد، شهرکرد، ایران.
2 - دکتری مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت، موسسه آموزش عالی نور هدایت شهرکرد، شهرکرد، ایران.
3 - استادیار، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، موسسه آموزش عالی نور هدایت شهرکرد، شهرکرد، ایران. *(مسوول مکاتبات)

تاریخ دریافت : 1400/10/01 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/10/21 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/02/01

کلید واژه: شاخص‌های HSE, دیمتل فازی, ریسک‌های HSE, فراترکیب,

چکیده مقاله :

زمینه و هدف: امروزه مسائل مربوط به بهداشت، ایمنی، محیط زیست به جزئی جدایی ناپذیر در هر تجارت و سازمانی تبدیل شده است. بنابراین هدف پژوهش، شناسایی و اولویت بندی ریسک های HSEدر خطوط انتقال شرکت گاز استان چهارمحال و بختیاری با ترکیب روش های فراترکیب و دیمتل فازی بوده است.روش بررسی: در بخش کیفی با استفاده از روش هفت مرحله‌ای بارسو و ساندلوسکی فراترکیب، داده ها جمع آوری شد. جامعه آماری کیفی شامل مقاله ها و پژوهش‌هایی در حیطه موضوع پژوهش بین سال‌های 2000 تا 2021 بود، در نهایت 26 پژوهش مرتبط با استفاده از نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شد. این پژوهش در سال 1401 پژوهش انجام گرفت.یافته‌ها: پس از بررسی اسنادی این مطالعات، 627 کد باز در قالب سه معیار اصلی و یازده زیرمعیار مورد شناسایی قرار گرفت که شامل: معیار ایمنی (عملکرد و فقدان تجهیزات، نشتی ها و سرریز شدن ها، سقوط ها و ریزش ها، کیفیت حرفه ای عوامل انسانی، فاکتورهای محیطی، سطوح و مواد آسیب زا و عوامل محترقه و شوک ها)، بهداشت (صدمات فیزیکی و انسانی و چالش های محیط کار) و محیط زیست (آلودگی هوا، آلودگی خاک و آلودگی آب) می باشد و کیفیت پژوهش نیز از طریق روش های روایی لاوشه با مقدار 81/0و شاخص تکرارپذیری با مقدار81/0 مورد سنجش قرار گرفت و نهایتاً مدل تحقیق با استفاده از نرم افزار مکس کیو دی ای طراحی گردید.بحث و نتیجه گیری: نتایج نشان داد، کیفیت حرفه ای عوامل انسانی، صدمات فیزیکی و انسانی و عملکرد و فقدان تجهیزات به ترتیب بیشترین اولویت را داشتند و همچنین کیفیت حرفه ای از عوامل انسانی بیشترین تاثیر گذاری(علت) و صدمات فیزیکی و انسانی بیشترین تاثیر پذیری (معلول) را دارا بودند.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Background and Objective: Today, issues related to health, safety, and the environment have become an integral part of every business and organization. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify and prioritize HSE risks in the transmission lines of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province Gas Company by Meta-Synthesis and fuzzy dimethyl methods. Material and Methodology: In the qualitative section, data were collected using the seven-step "Barso and Sandlowski" meta-Synthesis method. The qualitative statistical population included articles and researches in the field of research between 2000 and 2021. Finally, 26 researches related to purposive sampling were selected. This research was conducted in 2023. Findings: After documenting these studies, 627 open source codes were identified in the form of three main criteria and eleven sub-criteria, including: safety criteria (performance and lack of equipment, leaks and overflows, falls and falls, Professional quality of human factors, environmental factors, levels and harmful substances and incendiary agents and shocks), health (physical and human injuries and workplace challenges) and environment (air pollution, pollution Soil and water pollution) and The quality of the research was measured by Laosheh methods with a value of 0.81 and the reproducibility index with a value of 0.81 and finally the research model was designed using MAXDA software. Discussion and Conclusion: The results showed that the professional quality of human factors, physical and human injuries, and performance and lack of equipment had the highest priority, respectively and Also, the professional quality of human factors was the most influential) Cause (and physical and human injuries were the most influential (Effect).

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Rahimi, Masoumeh. Provide HSE risk management evaluation model in petrochemical industry (Maroon Petrochemical). Master Thesis, Ivanovki University, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2019. (In Persian)


2. Hajipour, V., Amouzegar, H., Gharaei, A., Gholami Abarghoei, M.S, & Ghajari, S. An integrated process-based HSE management system: A case study, Safety Science, 133 (2021).


3. Poursoliman, Mohammad Saeed;Kazemi Moghaddam, Vahid;Derakhshanjazri, Milad.Study of the effect of establishing health, safety and environmental management system on improving the safety performance indicators of Kermanshah hoUrea and Ammonia Petrochemical Company, Occupational Health and Safety Quarterly, Volume 5, Number 3, 2016, 75-85. (In Persian)


4. Amir-Heidari, P., Maknoon, R., Taheri, B., & Bazyari, M. (2016). Identification of strategies to reduce accidents and losses in drilling industry by comprehensive HSE risk assessment—A case study in Iranian drilling industry. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 44, 2016: 405-413.


5. Babaei Farsani, Meysam;Asgharian, Rahmatullah.Identification and Prioritization of Components Affecting HSE Risks Using a Mixed Approach in Dorahan Transmission Line Gas Company, Industrial Management Quarterly, Year 16, No. 55, 2021, 117-137. (In Persian)


6. Hakimi, Razia;Jozi, Seyed Ali.Environmental risk and safety assessment of Maroon 2 desalination unit of start-up oil and gas exploitation company by HAZOP, JHA methods, the first national conference on environmental management and management evaluation in Iran, Hamedan, Hegmataneh Association of Environmental Assessors, Aria Hegmatan Conference Development Center, 2014, 1-16.(In Persian)


7. Baesmat, S., Ghotbi Ravandi, M., & Abbasi, F. Identifying, Assessment and Prioritization of the Existing or Potential Hazards in the Automotive Industry by Combining Three Methods: FMEA, Wiliam Fine and AHP, Health Education and Health Promotion (HEHP), 5 (1). 5, no. 1, 2017.


8. Vazdani Soghari, Sabzeqbaei Gholamreza, Dashti Solmaz, Cheraghi Mitra, Alizadeh Reza, Hemmat Azam. Application of FMEA model to assess environmental, safety and health risks of gas condensate storage tanks of Parsian Gas Refining Company, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences 17 (4), 2018: 345-358. (In Persian)


9. Falakh, F., & Setiani, O. Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment in Water Treatment Plant considering Environmental Health and Safety Practice. E3S Web of Conferences 31, 2018.


10. Jafarnia, Ehsan, Sultanzadeh, Ahmad, Ghiyasi, Samira.Integrated model of health, safety and environmental risk assessment based on the project management guide standard, Journal of Occupational Health Engineering, 4 (4), 2017, 47-58. (In Persian)


11. Rolf, J.B, Asbjørn, L.A, & Jens, O. What we talk about when we talk about HSE and culture – A mapping and analysis of the academic discourses. Safety Science, 2020.


12. Deghati, Adeleh;Yaqubi, NoorMohammad;Kamalian, AminReza;Dehghani, Massoud. Presenting a model of step-by-step development of network governance using a Meta-Synthesis approach, Public Management Quarterly, Volume 11, Number 2, 2019, 203-230. (In Persian)


13. ShamiZanjani, Narges;Kundari, Farzaneh."Identification of structural factors for the realization of knowledge governance by combining Meta-Synthesis method", Quarterly Journal of Iran Information Science and Technology Research Institute (Iran Doc), Volume 34, Number 3, 2018, 1123-1153.(In Persian)


14. Soltani, Farzaneh;Shahin, Arash and ShaimiBozorgi, Ali.Designing a model of talent excellence using a systematic review approach and qualitative Meta-Synthesis in Isfahan Gas Company, Scientific-Research Quarterly of Human Resource Management in the Oil Industry, Year 8, No. 32, 2017, 51-83. (In Persian)


15. Zimmer, Lela. Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts: Journal of Advanced Nurising, 53, no. 3, (2006): 311-317.


16. Behbudi, Meta-Synthesis of Factors Affecting Learning in Joint Venture Collaborations, Master Thesis in Technology Management, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, 2016. (In Persian)


17. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five London: sage publications, 2007.


18. Onwuegbuzie AJ, Collins KMT, Leech NL, Dellinger AB, Jiao QG. A meta framework for conducting mixed research syntheses for stress and coping researchers and beyond. In G. S. Gates, W. H. Gmelch, & M. Wolverton (Series Eds.) & K. M. T. Collins, A. J. Onwuegbuzie, & Q. G. Jiao (Vol. Eds.). Toward a broader understanding of stress and coping: Mixed methods approaches (pp. 169-211). The Research on Stress and Coping in Education Series (Vol. 5). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.


19. Maysam Babaei Farsani*, Rahmatullah Asgharian. 1400. Identifying and prioritizing components affecting HSE risks using a mixed approach (Case Study: Gas Company Durrahan Transmission Lines). Industrial Management 55. 117-136.


20. Pourghadiri, E., Ashrafi, F., & Farhadian Esfahani, M, (2013). "Safety, Health and Environment in Pressure Reducing Stations and Gas Transmission Lines", The First National HSE Conference with the Approach of Upstream Oil and Gas Industries, Abadan. (In Persian)


21. Vazdani, S., Sabzeqbaei, G., Dashti, S., Cheraghi, M., Alizadeh, R., & Hemmati, A. (2018)."Application of FMEA model to assess the environmental, safety and health risks of gas condensate storage tanks of Parsian Gas Refining Company in 2016".Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, 17 (4), 345-358. (In Persian)