تحلیل و اولویت‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر تولید گندم با تأکید بر پایداری محیط‌زیست

محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت محیط زیست

علی سردارشهرکی ¹ , ندا علی احمدی ² , مهدی صفدری ³

1 - استادیار اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان. *(مسوول مکاتبات)
2 - دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان.
3 - دانشیار اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان

تاریخ دریافت : 1397/10/10 تاریخ پذیرش : 1398/05/16 تاریخ انتشار : 1399/10/01

کلید واژه: روش FAHP و DEMTEL, گندم, محیط‌زیست, اولویت‌بندی, پایداری,

چکیده مقاله :

زمینه و هدف: دانش و اطلاعات زیست محیطی نقش اساسی در فعالیت های افراد جامعه دارد. این آگاهی ها راه را برای توسعه جوامع بشری هموار می سازد و مسائل و مشکلات زیست محیطی را کاهش می دهد. امروزه تهدید های زیست محیطی از جانب بشر مورد توجه قرار گرفته و افکار عمومی را به خود معطوف کرده است. دلیل این تهدید ها آن است که مشکلات عمده ای را در زمینه پایداری محیط زیست بوجود آورده است و از طرفی توجه بسیار زیادی به مقوله پایداری و سلامت زیست محیطی در بخش تولیدات کشاورزی به علت اثرات زیانبار آن شده است. بنابراین هدف پژوهش حاضر، ارزیابی و اولویت بندی عوامل مؤثر بر تولید محصول گندم با تأکید پایداری زیست محیطی است. روش بررسی: در تحقیق حاضر با استفاده از تکنیک های AHP فازی و DEMATEL جهتتحلیل و اولویت بندی عوامل مؤثر بر تولید گندم با تأکید بر پایداری محیط زیست استفاده گردیده است. جامعه آماری شامل 50 نفر از خبرگان و کارشناسان جهاد کشاورزی منطقه سیستان و در سال 98-1397 گردآوری شده است. یافته ها: نتایج حاصل از AHP فازی، نشان دهنده در اولویت بودن بعد آموزشی- ترویجی با وزن تهایی (45/0) و پس از آن مدیریتی (31/0)، فنی (12/0) و اقتصادی (10/0) می باشد. همچنین نتایج با استفاده از روش DEMATEL، نشان می دهد که بعد آموزشی ترویجی در اولویت نخست، و پس از آن ابعاد مدیریتی، فنی و اقتصادی با مقدار 44/34، 17/32 و 33/31 را بر تولید گندم در منطقه سیستان دارا می باشد. بحث و نتیجه گیری: بنابراین توصیه به برگزاری برنامه های آموزشی ترویجی توسط مروجان جهاد کشاورزی منطقه سیستان برای کشاورزان گندم کار با توجه به نیازمندی کشاورزان و شرایط روستایی منطقه می گردد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Background and Objective: Knowledge and information on the environment play a major role in the activities of the community. These information’s pave the way for the development of human societies and reduce environmental problems. Today, environmental threats have been taken into consideration by human beings and focused on public opinion. The reason for these threats is that it has created major problems in terms of environmental sustainability and, on the other hand, much attention has been paid to the issue of sustainability and environmental health in agricultural production due to its harmful effects. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate and prioritize factors affecting wheat production with an emphasis on environmental sustainability. Method: the statistical population includes 50 experts and experts in agriculture Jihad in Sistan region, using fuzzy hierarchical analysis and demetal analysis techniques. Findings: The results of the fuzzy AHP indicate that the educational-promotional dimension is the highest (0.45) and then management (0.31), technical (0.12) and economic (0.10) respectively. Also, the results are shown using the DEMATEL method The first educational extension followed by the administrative, technical and economic dimensions of 34.44%, 32.17%, and 33.31% on wheat production in Sistan region. Discussion and Conclusion: Therefore, it is recommended that educational programs be promoted by the farmers of Sistan Agricultural Jihad for wheat farmers, taking into account the farmers' needs and the rural conditions of the region.  

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Carbasioun, M., 2007. Towards a Competency profile for the of Instruction of AgricurcuIturaI Extension professionals in Esfahan. PhD-thesis, SociaI Sciences Group, chair group of Education and Competence Studies, Wageningen University and Reseaerch Centrer.


2. Soleimani, A. and Mirkzadeh, A.A., 2014. Analyzing and Prioritizing the Factors Affecting the Production of Corn Grain Application of the AHP Method: Emphasizing Environmental Sustainability, Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 55- 43. (In Persian)


3. Haji, L; Chizari, M and Bochchian, Sh., 2017. Structural Analysis of Effective Components on Sustainable Development of Agricultural Production Cooperatives in Rural Areas of Naghadeh, Rural Studies, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp. 216-195. (In Persian)


4. FAO, 2002, The State of Food and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, No 34, PP. 1-227.


5. Karim, M. H., 2015. Analysis of Factors Affecting the Performance of Agronomic Units with Emphasis on Farmers' Behavior in Sistan, Rural Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 704-691. (In Persian)


6. Edwards, E., 2010. Sustainable Agriculture, Translation by Reza Minoki, Mohammad Hosseini and Abolhasan Hashemi-Dazvoli, Seventh Edition, Jahad University Press.


7. Minaee, A.H., Sabouri, M.S., 2010, Organization Psychology, Journal of Modern Industrial Vol.1, Issue3, 57-63, Summer.


8. Afrakhte, H., 2012. The Economics of Rural Space and Development (Case: Shaft Region), Rural Economics and Development Quarterly, Year 1, No. 1, Successive 1, p. 54-39. )In Persian (


9. Hariri Akbari, M. 2006. Management and development of civil society institution. Journal Social Sciences, 1(2), pp. 41-45. ) In Persian (


10. Naghdi, A and Sadeghi, R. 2006. Marginalization and challenge for sustainable urban development. Journal Social Welfare, 20(2), pp. 213- 233. ) In Persian)


11. United Nation. 1992. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development [Online].


12. Soltanipur, F, and Damari, B., 2017. Status of Sustainable Development in Iran. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 14-1. (In Persian)


13. Zahedi Mmzandarani M. C., 1999. Development and Social Inequality, Ph.D. Sociology of Sociology University of Tehran. (Persian)


14. Akbari, A .; Moradi, A. and Akrami-Mohajeri, M., 2018. Sustainability of Pistachio Production in Rural Areas of Rafsanjan City, Quarterly Journal of Rural Space and Rural Development, Vol. 2, No. 20, pp. 16-1.


15. Karami, E., Mansoorabadi, A., 2008, Sustainable agricultural attitudes and behaviors: a gender analysis of Iranian farmers, Journal of Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol. 10, pp 883-898.


16. Thinh, N.X.; Arlt, G.; Heber, B.; Hennersdorf, J. & Lehmann, I. 2002, Evaluation of urban land-use structures with a view to sustainable development” , Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 22,No.5, pp.475-492.


17. Sepahand, R and Arefnejad, M. 2014. Prioritizing Sustainable Urban Development Indicators Using Group Analytic Hierarchy Analysis (A Case Study in Isfahan), Quarterly Journal of Urban Planning, First Year, No. 1, pp. 59- 43.


18. Agricultural Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture, Deputy Planning and Economic, Tehran, Vol. 1, 2017.


19. Francis C.A., Flora C.B., and King L.D. 1990. Sustainable agriculture in temperate zones. United States of America, Wiley and Sons, Inc.


20. Adeli Sardie, M, Hayati, B., Zarifian, Sh, and Hosseini Nasab, D., 2012. Factors Affecting the Sustainability of Agricultural Operations in Jiroft County (Case Study: Onions, Potatoes and Tomatoes), Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development (Agriculture Sciences and Technology), Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 468-459.


21. Pope, J., 2004, Conceptualizing sustainability assessment, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24, PP. 595 - 616.


22. Tukker, A., 2000, Life cycle assessment as a tool in environmental impact assessment, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, PP.435-456.


23. Khosrowypour, B, Froshani, N., 2012. Women's Participation and Sustainable Rural Development, Work and Society, No. 132, pp. 68- 56. (In Persian)


24. Sajasi Ghidari, H. a., and Faal Jalali, A., 2018. Measurement of environmental awareness and behavior of villagers (Case study: Zangalanlou Rural District), Journal of Spatial Planning (Geography), Eighth Year, Number One, Successive 28, p. 50- 29. (Persian)


25. Haji, L; Chizari, M and Chobchian, Sh. 2018. A Factor Analysis of the Perspective of Sustainable Development of Agricultural Production Cooperatives in Naghadeh from the Viewpoint of Cooperative Members, Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Research, Vol. 2- 48, No. 2, p. 309- 299. (In Persian)


26. Mohammadi, F ., 2019. Environmental sustainability and its realization in agriculture (Case study: Pakdasht city), Agricultural Economics and Development, Year 26, No. 101, pp. 267-247. (In Persian)


27. Clark, M and Tilman, D. 2017. Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice, Environmental Research Letters, Volume 12, Number 6, Pages 1- 12.


28. Kanter, D. R., Musumba, M., Wood, S. L. R., Palm, C., Antle, J., Balvanera, P., Dale, V. H., Kline, K. L., Scholes, R. J., Thornton, P., Tittonell, P and Andelman, S. 2018. Evaluating agricultural trade-offs in the age of sustainable development, Agricultural Systems, Volume 163, Pages 73-88.


29. Parajuli, R., Thoma, G and Matlock, M. 2019. Environmental sustainability of fruit and vegetable production supply chains in the face of climate change: A review, Science of The Total Environment, Volume 650, Part 2, Pages 2863-2879.